Video: The Spitzer scandal — according to a three-year-old
posted at 8:16 pm on March 28, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
I think it’s her but I can’t load YouTube right now to make sure so you’ll have to check my math.
Tell me, Magic Eightball, will we perchance be treated to a very huffy Bill O’Reilly screaming at Mary Katharine Ham about this clip during next week’s “Policing the ‘Net” segment? All signs point to yes.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Oh. my.
GoodBoy on March 28, 2008 at 8:20 PM
That made my night thank you for posting it.
Joey1974 on March 28, 2008 at 8:23 PM
This lovely young lady already has better reporting skills than the NYT ad LAT combined!
heldmyw on March 28, 2008 at 8:27 PM
Does the little princess report on whether it was straight sex, round the world, or half and half?
Blake on March 28, 2008 at 8:27 PM
I wonder what nic she uses here on HA.
RushBaby on March 28, 2008 at 8:27 PM
It’s not her. Definitely a parody.
- The Cat
MirCat on March 28, 2008 at 8:31 PM
Could it be that we’re looking at the next Fox News babe?
CyberCipher on March 28, 2008 at 8:33 PM
I still prefer the little girl who curses at Will Ferrell.
Dork B. on March 28, 2008 at 8:35 PM
Those Fox “sexperts” are getting a little young
William Amos on March 28, 2008 at 8:41 PM
No; about the same. She too doesn’t appear to have the faintest idea what political party Spitzer belongs to.
Of course, the little girl has an excuse for her gross incompetence. But I think that if she doesn’t learn anything in the next twenty years and then tries to make another video report, it won’t be quite as cute then.
logis on March 28, 2008 at 8:41 PM
Different kid, but equally cute. This was obviously coached though, while the other one was far more genuine.
Tzetzes on March 28, 2008 at 8:41 PM
Will nobody think of the children???
Rosmerta on March 28, 2008 at 8:43 PM
“robots… garage sale… shiny guy always worries… his little light-up sword… we blowed it up together…
“But don’t talk back to Darth Vader; he’ll get ya!”
Tzetzes on March 28, 2008 at 8:43 PM
Major Dudeage
LimeyGeek on March 28, 2008 at 8:44 PM
“Friend”. Heh.
SouthernGent on March 28, 2008 at 8:45 PM
“Elliot paid $80,000 for his friends.”
And she’s knows about the “Girls Wild.” Parents, stock up on Rolaids.
“Everybody at school is talking about it.” Ha!
Mark V. on March 28, 2008 at 8:46 PM
It’s Super Deluxe (cartoon network if I recall) taking the piss, surely
Reaps on March 28, 2008 at 8:46 PM
unnggg…
to weird..
Chakra Hammer on March 28, 2008 at 8:47 PM
I missed the line at the end earlier. “But his wife had a friend who weren’t her husband; so it all worked out!” Funny.
Mark V. on March 28, 2008 at 8:48 PM
Oh my lord,your killin me.I can just see all the little
groups of grades 1,2,3 all talking about Spitzer.
Slowly walking down the hall past the rooms,teachers
lounge all abuzz about Spitzer,with the one kid who
never heard,from one end of the hallway to the other,
“Hey here about Spitzer”!,”No”,”Really”,”Got to be kidding”
“Wow”!,oh the fun!
canopfor on March 28, 2008 at 8:48 PM
Must…not…troll…HA…commenters…
doubleplusundead on March 28, 2008 at 9:04 PM
“The blind man has lots of friends.”
baldilocks on March 28, 2008 at 9:06 PM
Not the same kid. Not nearly as cute.
Tanya on March 28, 2008 at 9:12 PM
hee hee
RushBaby on March 28, 2008 at 9:13 PM
The future Ann Coulter.
Indy Conservative on March 28, 2008 at 9:23 PM
Why can’t we get that kind of straight forward journalism from our ivy league alum? No nuance, no spin, no ulterior motives or agenda. Just hard facts…and strawberry quick!
Thank you.
ronsfi on March 28, 2008 at 9:28 PM
Where can we read her column?
I hope NOT on O’Reilly’s website.
O’Reilly is so full of himself, he thinks that this kid wants to take over his show.
O’Reilly is so full of himself, he thinks that kids are smart because he created them.
O’Reilly is so full of himself, he thinks that Mary Katharine Ham is so deeply fascinated by his sex appeal, she will beg him for a phone sex rendezvous.
Indy Conservative on March 28, 2008 at 9:30 PM
I second the dude.
ronsfi on March 28, 2008 at 9:31 PM
That’s one of the best euphamisms for prostitute I’ve heard. Makes you rethink the Manbearpig episode of South Park–no one will be Algore’s friend…
darii on March 28, 2008 at 9:33 PM
This is a Super Deluxe video, a very funny comedy website. Check out their “Huckabee Girl” video.
Typhonsentra on March 28, 2008 at 9:33 PM
Your technology frightens and confuses me.
ronsfi on March 28, 2008 at 9:31 PM
ronsfi on March 28, 2008 at 9:34 PM
Gives that song new meaning, doesn’t it?
fogw on March 28, 2008 at 9:42 PM
Yes, that’s it! Elliot paid for “friends”
“so it all worked out”
LOL
anne on March 28, 2008 at 9:44 PM
It was smart of him to quit before they peached him.
EJDolbow on March 28, 2008 at 9:53 PM
ditto on the O’Reilly craziness over these kid internet videos.
even though the dudes a pimp otherwise.
Drunk Report on March 28, 2008 at 9:58 PM
and dude. c’mon… thats SO not the star wars girl. clearly.
Drunk Report on March 28, 2008 at 10:01 PM
Totally inappropriate and, unlike the Star Wars recap, not cute or funny. When do we get to hear a 3 year olds recap of the Lewinsky scandal?
Buy Danish on March 28, 2008 at 10:10 PM
lighten up Danish!!
Your technology frightens and confuses me.
ronsfi on March 28, 2008 at 9:31 PM
ronsfi on March 28, 2008 at 9:34 PM
ROFLMAO!!!!!
jerrytbg on March 28, 2008 at 10:28 PM
Yep, that about sums it up.
paul006 on March 28, 2008 at 10:47 PM
This is one of those very few times where I watched the vid and then had to come back later and watch it again. LOL
allrsn on March 29, 2008 at 12:17 AM
I have to agree. I would never think of putting a 3 year old niece/friends daughter in front of a video camera to talk about such subject matter.
At that age children need to be nurtured and protected, not meant to be paraded on the internet for a couple of laughs.
I suppose I am old school.
F15Mech on March 29, 2008 at 12:24 AM
What if someone had written:
This belongs in the trash.
Seven Percent Solution on March 29, 2008 at 12:27 AM
I’ll object when the kid describes ‘two girls, one cup’..
DaveC on March 29, 2008 at 1:10 AM
Then you are a freak.
if that video is the one you would draw the line at when it comes to showing a three year old.. (just for the record I knew about that video back in 2007)
F15Mech on March 29, 2008 at 2:22 AM
got about 10 seconds into this
and had to flee like a rat.
Mike D. on March 29, 2008 at 2:33 AM
One little girl had shorter dark curly hair, while this one obviously has long blond hair. Both are equally cute. Some people find the videos amusing, others don’t. Skip the threads if you don’t.
Blake on March 29, 2008 at 7:58 AM
Using a very young child to recap a scandal about prostitution is what bothers me, no matter how nuanced the language. If it wasn’t so obviously scripted I might view it differently.
That makes no sense, whatsoever.
Buy Danish on March 29, 2008 at 8:09 AM
She’s more savvy than the bimbo’s Fox is premiering in top spots.
Hening on March 29, 2008 at 9:32 AM
The new GOV had friends too, and his WIFE had friends too. Precious… Got to be a rising star on the horizon.
pueblo1032 on March 29, 2008 at 1:07 PM
Will somebody PLEASE just think about the children! I sense excessive potty shame.
ronsfi on March 29, 2008 at 1:13 PM
ronsfi on March 29, 2008 at 1:15 PM
Kids say the darndest things.
Capitana on March 29, 2008 at 8:46 PM
I’ll have what she’s drinking!
Shy Guy on March 30, 2008 at 6:30 AM
Comment pages: