obama sucks as far as the economy goes.
obama says that he will redistribute the wealth?
the real numbers are not 1/4 million. but closer to 200,000.
so it will boil down that a SINGLE PERSON WHO MAKES 100 TO 125 K WILL PAY MORE TAXES.

health care?
obama plan = canada.
if anyone can explain to me that the fact that 19 doctors educated in canada practice medicine in the u.s. when only one amerecan educated doctor goes to canada? why is it that people who live in canada come to the u.s. for medical treament. the answer should be obvious. SOCIALIZE HEALTH DOES NOT WORK!

when it comes to national security obama is dumber than a rock. i will talk to anyone.? even hllary said that is not a good thought. biden even says that mccain is better on national security.

energy?

when the u.s. is caught in a need for more energy and national security obama says i think about off shore drilling. no nukes unless? unless we can guarantee something that even the french (70+percent nuclear) can not do! so what do we end up with? no oil ,no coal,no natural gas, and no nuclear!

back to the economy.

every left pundit say its the bush economy. how is it that with bush the economy grew for six years and as soon as the pelosi reid frank dodd economy takes over everthing goes in the tank!

0a7cfd73e6986d84b3ae…

Does this guy think the all Americans are this stupid? Really?

acleaver on March 28, 2008 at 1:08 PM

No, he’s counting on it.

Just keep talking Obama. Please.

a capella on March 28, 2008 at 5:22 PM

I’ve read them and find them not to be objectionable.

crr6 on March 28, 2008 at 5:42 PM

East is East and West is West and never the twain shall meet then, right? Surely, that must be true if you don’t find this objectionable:

If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him.

Whites were racists, are racists and will be always racists.”

Indy Conservative

Of course! We, the whiteys, are against Hussein because he is half-black. We really would vote for his white half, because we really want a socialist-racist as president. Unfortunately, the black half of Hussein gets in the way. Too bad. Hussein would have made a great socialist-racist-presidente.

saved on March 28, 2008 at 2:36 PM

This election just proved how the American people, especially those Whites on the Left are Fake, Hypocrites, Politically Correct and Liars.

Do you really think the Whites on the Left are voting for Hussein because his “qualifications?”

Do you really think the Blacks on the Left are voting for Hussein because his “qualifications?”

Both groups are voting for Hussein because he’s BLACK.

The Blacks are voting for him because he’s one of them.

The Lefty Whites are voting for him because they want to send a message that they are not racists.

This is the Truth.

But unfortunately nobody can say it in public, on TV, on the Radio or in the papers because we are a nation of Hypocrites, of Liars, of Fakes, of Cowards, of Politically Correct idiots.

Ah, but you are asking us to rely on what he says in public instead of his actions.

This is laughable. You’re asking us to rely on what other people he knows have said. As a politician then, give me one piece of legislation or one cause he has advocated that is in line with Wright’s selected statements (i.e. U.S. deserved 9/11, the government engineered AIDS etc). Give me these actions you speak of.

Read the Trinity UCC introductory statements. If one belongs to that church, one must agree with those principles. Or not??

a capella on March 28, 2008 at 5:22 PM

I’ve read them and find them not to be objectionable. Would you see a Jewish temple which advocated the “Jewish” community and praised the “Jewish work ethic” as racist or Jewish supremacist? Replace black with Irish, Italian, Greek Orthodox etc. Also I disagree (as would many) that in order to belong to an organization you need to agree with every single principle. I’m a Catholic but I don’t agree with everything the Catholic church puts out there.

what extreme racial beliefs do you believe Obama has then, and please provide some quotes (from Obama) to substantiate your position. He’s a prominent politician, it shouldn’t be too hard to find some quotes or writings by him if he truly is somehow akin to Malcolm X. Wait you can’t? So your whole smearing of Obama is based on things someone else said (which he has himself has condemned)?

crr6 on March 28, 2008 at 5:11 PM

Read the Trinity UCC introductory statements. If one belongs to that church, one must agree with those principles. Or not??

give me on quote by Obama which is in line with what Wright said, or explicitly endorses what Wright says. If anything he’s openly said he strongly disagrees with Wright’s statements. Obama has been in the public eye for several years now, he has said nothing which would suggest he agrees with Wright. The fact that he was close to him does not mean they agree. Similar political beliefs are not a pre-requisite for friendship.

crr6 on March 28, 2008 at 4:22 PM

Ah, but you are asking us to rely on what he says in public instead of his actions. We already know the urgent need for a discussion on race just happened to coincide with the public’s realization that Obama was financially supporting a black power based church and exposing his children to that message. Wouldn’t that be evidence of something? So, why don’t we look more closely at what he does and put less emphasis on what he says for public consumption.

Untrue? How’s that? He chose a church based on Black Liberation Theology, which was developed by Dr. Cone, who was a student of Malcolm X. Cone was about to leave the Christian church until he figured out that he could take Malcolm X’s Black Power message, add a dash of Christianity, and go from there.

How can Obama exempt himself from the core message of his church?

Buy Danish on March 28, 2008 at 4:41 PM

what extreme racial beliefs do you believe Obama has then, and please provide some quotes (from Obama) to substantiate your position. He’s a prominent politician, it shouldn’t be too hard to find some quotes or writings by him if he truly is somehow akin to Malcolm X. Wait you can’t? So your whole smearing of Obama is based on things someone else said (which he has himself has condemned)?

I really believe that if Obama were white he would have wrapped up the nomination by now, the only way to effectively smear him is by painting him as some sort of black power candidate, which any clear-thinking person can see is untrue.

crr6 on March 28, 2008 at 2:56 PM

Untrue? How’s that? He chose a church based on Black Liberation Theology, which was developed by Dr. Cone, who was a student of Malcolm X. Cone was about to leave the Christian church until he figured out that he could take Malcolm X’s Black Power message, add a dash of Christianity, and go from there.

How can Obama exempt himself from the core message of his church?

Using the phrase tapdance when speaking about a lying African American pol will, invariably, be construed as racially charged…by rich white liberals.

Sure, like spending 20 years as a clear devotee of this man who spews hate and racism, donating to his ministry, exposing his children to this hate, and otherwise helping to advance the message by supporting the church.

How, exactly, do you deny this evidence of Obama’s endorsement of Wright?

give me on quote by Obama which is in line with what Wright said, or explicitly endorses what Wright says. If anything he’s openly said he strongly disagrees with Wright’s statements. Obama has been in the public eye for several years now, he has said nothing which would suggest he agrees with Wright. The fact that he was close to him does not mean they agree. Similar political beliefs are not a pre-requisite for friendship.

If Obama subscribed to Wright’s line of thinking, don’t you think at least one statement by him would have risen by now? Maybe a studen from his years as a professor…anything? I really believe that if Obama were white he would have wrapped up the nomination by now, the only way to effectively smear him is by painting him as some sort of black power candidate, which any clear-thinking person can see is untrue.

crr6 on March 28, 2008 at 2:56 PM

“If Obama subscribed to Wright’s line of thinking, don’t you think at least one …” example of this would be evident? Sure, like spending 20 years as a clear devotee of this man who spews hate and racism, donating to his ministry, exposing his children to this hate, and otherwise helping to advance the message by supporting the church.

How, exactly, do you deny this evidence of Obama’s endorsement of Wright?

Things have not gone great for Obama this month, although the press is doing their best to push the narrative that his speech has healed all wounds,
In his appearance on The View today he again addressed the Wright affair, falsely claiming Wright…

Black Americans were a founding population,” she said. “Africans and Europeans came here and founded this country together — Europeans by choice and Africans in chains. That’s not a very pretty reality of our founding.”

As a result, Miss Rice told editors and reporters at The Washington Times, “descendants of slaves did not get much of a head start, and I think you continue to see some of the effects of that.”

“That particular birth defect makes it hard for us to confront it, hard for us to talk about it, and hard for us to realize that it has continuing relevance for who we are today,” she said.

What head start?
She should hear my families history, not every white person is born into wealth. Sheesh.

PAIN!

PAIN!!!!

She and Obama agree about the “suffering and humiliation” that the Israelis cause the “oppressed” palestinians too.

I think the palis and our criminal underclass race haters share much in common, and seem also to share the same enablers.

It seems the Secretary of State should not be in this type of dialogue given it is in the middle of a divisive campaign. She seems to add fuel to Obama’s justification for feeling antipathy towards “typical white people.”

If Obama subscribed to Wright’s line of thinking, don’t you think at least one statement by him would have risen by now? Maybe a studen from his years as a professor…anything? I really believe that if Obama were white he would have wrapped up the nomination by now, the only way to effectively smear him is by painting him as some sort of black power candidate, which any clear-thinking person can see is untrue.

crr6 on March 28, 2008 at 2:56 PM

Uhhh… John Edwards(White), Had more experience than Obama…

Kucinich is white and was AGAINST the war from the beginning and actually voted against it..(Is White, Has more experience and like I said was actually there to vote against the war)

None of these things were done too Obama … he did all of these things to himself …

Nobody has to paint Obama as anything, he bathes himself in these ideas an expects us to not notice …