The winning entries in the Watcher’s Council vote for this week are Black Liberation Theology by Joshuapundit, and 5 Years, 1 year by Acute Politics.  Here are the full results of the vote:VotesCouncil linkVotesCouncil link2  1/3Black Libera…

And now…  the winning entries in the Watcher’s Council vote for this week are Black Liberation Theology by Joshuapundit, and 5 Years, 1 year by Acute Politics.  Here are the full tallies of all votes cast:VotesCouncil linkVotesCouncil link…

First off…  any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,  and here.  Die spambots, die!  And now…  the winning entries in the Watcher’s Council vote for this week are Black Liberation Theology by Joshu…

First off…  any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,  and here.  Die spambots, die!  And now…  here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher’s Council for this week’s vote. Council li…

We pay our enemies to bash us and our allies. One more example of the up=downism of the Left.

misterpeasea on March 28, 2008 at 5:17 PM

Agreed!

I spit on your “prophet” and all his followers. Ban that.

Now why would AP think this is a disgrace?

Because nobody has any right to wage violence on anyone over a movie? What other trivial concepts do you have trouble with? We’d be happy to help you out.

Can we simply abolish the whole organization now, and deport all its staff from the US, and allow the headquarters to become a crack house, brothel, or overgrown vacant lot — something of greater social utility than the UN itself?……

We’re just keeping the devil in our bossom, rather than move it to, say Caracas, or Berne.

Entelechy on March 28, 2008 at 3:44 PM

Surely we can keep an eye on the jackasses without funding them to the tune of $2 billion+ a year. All they do is issue press releases condemning us and Israel.

And I wonder if that $2 billion+ includes Turtle(’s Head) Bay.

Juan McCain’s foreign policy speech sounded like John Kerry’s global test, but I’d be willing to start a UNRG (United Nations with Representative Governments) as long as we use the funds we’re currently wasting on the UN to do it.

We pay our enemies to bash us and our allies. One more example of the up=downism of the Left.

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

The right to free speech isn’t an issue, so shut up. Thus saith the UN. What a joke.

Nah, I’m not holding my breath either.

It’s only bad when it “insults” Islam.

Barack Obama is currently sponsoring a bill in the Senate to give the U.N. .7 of the United States’ GNP (estimated to be nearly $1 Trillion over the next 15 years), in order to combat “global poverty.”

I guess Obama sees this as part of the pay-back from Evil and Greedy White America for all the years we’ve been forcing Third World black & brown nations to live in “grinding poverty” — if Obama actually believes that crap that “Reverend” Wright has been peddling from his pulpit, which of course, he doesn’t.

All that stuff brings me closer to puking than laughing.

misterpeasea on March 28, 2008 at 2:54 PM

We’re just keeping the devil in our bossom, rather than move it to, say Caracas, or Berne.

The fun part is that Fitna neither expresses hatred toward muslims nor incites others to violence against muslims. Unless asking muslims to renounce violence is now classified as hate speech. Which it clearly is.

I’m also relieved to see that the referenced AQ linked website is only hoping that Wilders suffers a massive stroke. That seems like some sort of progress.

The United Nations has repeatedly been used by Islamic organizations and countries to silence critics of Islam. The UN Human Rights Council is one of the main areas in which this has occurred. Today, the UN Human Rights Council passed a resolutio ……..

Although the text refers frequently to protecting all religions, the only religion specified as being attacked is Islam, to which eight paragraphs refer.

……

And why are our amusing little friends from South of the Border voting with the muslims?

thuja on March 28, 2008 at 2:40 PM

Any little thing that pokes a stick in our eye is my guess.

Furthermore, do the backers of this idea realize they are giving up their right to criticize other religions? If they are truly serious in their concerns over the wide-spread criticism of religions perhaps they can prove it to the rest of the world by first banning any criticism of any religion in their own countries.

Sooooo…..

Depicting the subjects of the movie engaging in hate speech and inciting violence constitutes such?

Orwellian…