<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WaPo editor: We didn&#8217;t cover the Wright story sooner because, um, it wasn&#8217;t &#8220;new&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:23:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Low Earth Orbit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1041111</link>
		<dc:creator>Low Earth Orbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 04:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1041111</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Can I expect this for the next OJ Simpson style story?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Via Hot Air, we have this report about how the Washington Post didn&#8217;t initially cover the Obama / Wright controversy......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Can I expect this for the next OJ Simpson style story?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Via Hot Air, we have this report about how the Washington Post didn&#8217;t initially cover the Obama / Wright controversy&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneGyT</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1030575</link>
		<dc:creator>OneGyT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1030575</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In fairness, he talked about it frequently. So frequently then when story blew up, my first thought was, “Sean was right.” Why Fox never thought to buy the DVDs is a mystery.

TheBigOldDog on March 25, 2008 at 12:37 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

My first thought was &quot;Hasn&#039;t this been covered?&quot; But I guess that&#039;s because I&#039;m one of those bigoted uninformed talk radio listeners who live in a hole away from the &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In fairness, he talked about it frequently. So frequently then when story blew up, my first thought was, “Sean was right.” Why Fox never thought to buy the DVDs is a mystery.</p>
<p>TheBigOldDog on March 25, 2008 at 12:37 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>My first thought was &#8220;Hasn&#8217;t this been covered?&#8221; But I guess that&#8217;s because I&#8217;m one of those bigoted uninformed talk radio listeners who live in a hole away from the <em>real</em> media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fineagle</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1030567</link>
		<dc:creator>Fineagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1030567</guid>
		<description>This just confirms the fact that those who want hot, breaking, true, and straightforward news don&#039;t rely on MSM outlets like WaPo, NYT, CNN, MSNBC, etc., and the editors at WaPo know it. So why bother printing anything that even closely resembles current news? People probablt already got it from other more reliable sources. So might as well wait until it is really nice and stale...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just confirms the fact that those who want hot, breaking, true, and straightforward news don&#8217;t rely on MSM outlets like WaPo, NYT, CNN, MSNBC, etc., and the editors at WaPo know it. So why bother printing anything that even closely resembles current news? People probablt already got it from other more reliable sources. So might as well wait until it is really nice and stale&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace of Spades HQ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1030566</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace of Spades HQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1030566</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rev. Wright: Israel Was Closest to South Africa&#039;s White Supremacists; Both Workded on &quot;Ethnic Bomb&quot; Bomb That Would Kill Only Blacks, Arabs  (Blacks, Arabs Hardest Hit)...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nuance! The new pastor: It&#039;s a lynching! But of course it is, darling. Whitewash/blackout!......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rev. Wright: Israel Was Closest to South Africa&#8217;s White Supremacists; Both Workded on &#8220;Ethnic Bomb&#8221; Bomb That Would Kill Only Blacks, Arabs  (Blacks, Arabs Hardest Hit)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nuance! The new pastor: It&#8217;s a lynching! But of course it is, darling. Whitewash/blackout!&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnEasyRider</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1030536</link>
		<dc:creator>UnEasyRider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1030536</guid>
		<description>Saiga if these millions of blacks don&#039;t like these socalled leaders to represent them they should speak up.  Until they do, these race hustlers will represent them. 

As far as the MSM, the nightly news is crumbling and newspapers are going broke and they all wonder why.  Why watch biased news or buy a biased newspaper?  When we start getting just the news, unfiltered through their ignorant liberal heads perhaps we will return to t.v. and newspapers.  Or, we might just sit on the Internet where you can find anything and everything in a nanosecond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saiga if these millions of blacks don&#8217;t like these socalled leaders to represent them they should speak up.  Until they do, these race hustlers will represent them. </p>
<p>As far as the MSM, the nightly news is crumbling and newspapers are going broke and they all wonder why.  Why watch biased news or buy a biased newspaper?  When we start getting just the news, unfiltered through their ignorant liberal heads perhaps we will return to t.v. and newspapers.  Or, we might just sit on the Internet where you can find anything and everything in a nanosecond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lockstein13</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1030321</link>
		<dc:creator>Lockstein13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1030321</guid>
		<description>Maybe the &lt;em&gt;Washington Post &lt;/em&gt;was trying to explain that, as &lt;em&gt;the premier national political journal&lt;/em&gt;, they are &lt;em&gt;in-the-know &lt;/em&gt;about &lt;strong&gt;so many &lt;/strong&gt;presidential candidates who have had tin-foil-hat-crazed, racist, anti-American religious mentors for 20 years that &lt;strong&gt;that&#039;s what&#039;s old news &lt;/strong&gt;to them.

Yah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the <em>Washington Post </em>was trying to explain that, as <em>the premier national political journal</em>, they are <em>in-the-know </em>about <strong>so many </strong>presidential candidates who have had tin-foil-hat-crazed, racist, anti-American religious mentors for 20 years that <strong>that&#8217;s what&#8217;s old news </strong>to them.</p>
<p>Yah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: docdave</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1030188</link>
		<dc:creator>docdave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1030188</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Alright, you people, don’t you understand. America is a racist country,already. &lt;/blockquote&gt;That&#039;s such an overused expression that it has lost any relavent meaning.  Besides the Wright issue has little or nothing to do with race as it stands by itself as being blatantly anti-American.  Anyone white, black or purple would draw an equal amount of justified criticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Alright, you people, don’t you understand. America is a racist country,already. </p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s such an overused expression that it has lost any relavent meaning.  Besides the Wright issue has little or nothing to do with race as it stands by itself as being blatantly anti-American.  Anyone white, black or purple would draw an equal amount of justified criticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franksalterego</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1030178</link>
		<dc:creator>franksalterego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1030178</guid>
		<description>This can all be summed up, in one term...

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fourth Estate&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;

It&#039;s undeniable...It&#039;s irrefutable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This can all be summed up, in one term&#8230;</p>
<p><em><strong>Fourth Estate</strong></em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s undeniable&#8230;It&#8217;s irrefutable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1030153</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1030153</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Sins of &lt;strike&gt;omission&lt;/strike&gt; collusion.

Connie on March 25, 2008 at 12:43 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Sins of <strike>omission</strike> collusion.</p>
<p>Connie on March 25, 2008 at 12:43 PM</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saiga</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1030109</link>
		<dc:creator>saiga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1030109</guid>
		<description>Well, stupid is what stupid does.  And, the race baiters like Jackson and Sharpton are intellectually handicaped at best.  They can&#039;t even speak proper English much less figure out reality. 

They suffer from the bigotry of very low expectation, and I&#039;m guilty.  Think how embarrassed millions of blacks are to have these morons called &quot;Black Leaders&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, stupid is what stupid does.  And, the race baiters like Jackson and Sharpton are intellectually handicaped at best.  They can&#8217;t even speak proper English much less figure out reality. </p>
<p>They suffer from the bigotry of very low expectation, and I&#8217;m guilty.  Think how embarrassed millions of blacks are to have these morons called &#8220;Black Leaders&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftnomore</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1030091</link>
		<dc:creator>leftnomore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1030091</guid>
		<description>AND WHEN IS WRIGHT GETTING INTERVIEWED ON CNN?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AND WHEN IS WRIGHT GETTING INTERVIEWED ON CNN?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kini</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1030063</link>
		<dc:creator>Kini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1030063</guid>
		<description>People like the Rev. Wright are so invested in promoting racism in their congregation.  Like race-baiting mongers Sharpton, Jackson and Farrakhan, they all have a need to promote the worst in America.  

People like Bill Cosby try and identify the problems within the black community by pointing out the destruction of the family structure and get ostracized for it.

What Christian belief does the Rev. Wright preach from?  What is he propagating to the youth of his congregation?  What has Barack Hussein Obama learned in 20 years of Rev. Wright&#039;s lessons?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People like the Rev. Wright are so invested in promoting racism in their congregation.  Like race-baiting mongers Sharpton, Jackson and Farrakhan, they all have a need to promote the worst in America.  </p>
<p>People like Bill Cosby try and identify the problems within the black community by pointing out the destruction of the family structure and get ostracized for it.</p>
<p>What Christian belief does the Rev. Wright preach from?  What is he propagating to the youth of his congregation?  What has Barack Hussein Obama learned in 20 years of Rev. Wright&#8217;s lessons?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HawaiiLwyr</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1030048</link>
		<dc:creator>HawaiiLwyr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1030048</guid>
		<description>I get all my news from HA.  Kidding of course.  But I do get more information from various sites on the internet and very very rarely actually even bother to read a newspaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get all my news from HA.  Kidding of course.  But I do get more information from various sites on the internet and very very rarely actually even bother to read a newspaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saiga</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1030013</link>
		<dc:creator>saiga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1030013</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Alright, you people, don’t you understand. America is a racist country,already. Got that. Now to our next headline.

Johan Klaus on March 25, 2008 at 1:20 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

America pulls for the underdog too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Alright, you people, don’t you understand. America is a racist country,already. Got that. Now to our next headline.</p>
<p>Johan Klaus on March 25, 2008 at 1:20 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>America pulls for the underdog too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan Klaus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1029989</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan Klaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1029989</guid>
		<description>Alright, you people, don&#039;t you understand. America is a racist country,already. Got that. Now to our next headline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, you people, don&#8217;t you understand. America is a racist country,already. Got that. Now to our next headline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flipflop</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1029985</link>
		<dc:creator>flipflop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1029985</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it&#039;s old news.  Hot Air&#039;s own Bryan Preston covered it &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/02/obamas-pastor-problem/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;last May&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s old news.  Hot Air&#8217;s own Bryan Preston covered it <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/02/obamas-pastor-problem/" rel="nofollow">last May</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saiga</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1029976</link>
		<dc:creator>saiga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1029976</guid>
		<description>The reason they didn’t cover it is because it boils down to racial tension.  Racial tension is such an ugly, unfair, cruel subject that I doubt we will ever have a frank, stark airing of the root issues.  Until all the racial talking heads grow a tough layer alligator skin, the truth is too hurtful to discuss even though everyone black and white knows the ugly taboo.  

Once we come to grips with the fact that everyone has their strengths and weaknesses, and they are not all the same, we will be in this round robin.   Making general statements about ethnic groups made up of unique individuals is not acceptable.  Many black leaders love to play the victim card, but thinking people realize that can only account for so much, not everything.  

We can’t handle the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason they didn’t cover it is because it boils down to racial tension.  Racial tension is such an ugly, unfair, cruel subject that I doubt we will ever have a frank, stark airing of the root issues.  Until all the racial talking heads grow a tough layer alligator skin, the truth is too hurtful to discuss even though everyone black and white knows the ugly taboo.  </p>
<p>Once we come to grips with the fact that everyone has their strengths and weaknesses, and they are not all the same, we will be in this round robin.   Making general statements about ethnic groups made up of unique individuals is not acceptable.  Many black leaders love to play the victim card, but thinking people realize that can only account for so much, not everything.  </p>
<p>We can’t handle the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kini</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1029969</link>
		<dc:creator>Kini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1029969</guid>
		<description>Apparently, we cannot expect anything from the MSM but selective reporting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, we cannot expect anything from the MSM but selective reporting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pedestrian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1029967</link>
		<dc:creator>pedestrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1029967</guid>
		<description>The sooner the public comes realize that the best stories are covered first on the blogs the better. Reading the newspaper online is like going on a nostalgia trip to remind yourself of the amusing stories that have been discussed over the past week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sooner the public comes realize that the best stories are covered first on the blogs the better. Reading the newspaper online is like going on a nostalgia trip to remind yourself of the amusing stories that have been discussed over the past week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dash</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1029965</link>
		<dc:creator>Dash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1029965</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s like not covering the fall of the Berlin wall because the existence of Germany isn&#039;t &quot;new&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s like not covering the fall of the Berlin wall because the existence of Germany isn&#8217;t &#8220;new&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1029963</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1029963</guid>
		<description>Poo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon1979</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1029959</link>
		<dc:creator>jon1979</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1029959</guid>
		<description>One of the things about being a reporter -- at least in the way it&#039;s supposed to work -- is there are certain stories you get that you are excited about covering and are completely motivated to go after. And then there are the stories that are either too boring, too complicated or don&#039;t conform to your pre-set beliefs and you might not be excited about them, or you might even dread covering them, but you still have to cover them. That&#039;s where you&#039;re supposed to make your paycheck on most days, in covering the stories that are the narrative version of spinach and not ice cream. If you only cover the things you want to cover in the world of politics, that makes you the Village Voice, The Nation or (on the right) The Weekly Standard or The American Spectator, which have no qualms about picking and choosing their stories, because they don&#039;t hide who they are ideologically.

But apparently, the Washington Post has decided that if anyone else on the planet has covered a story they don&#039;t want to cover, that justifies them not having to cover it at all. It&#039;s not only a lazy cop-out on their part, but it calls into question the whole point of even subscribing to the Washington Post for news, as opposed to signing up simply to have your own belief structure validated, if you&#039;re a liberal Democrat. If you want to be a full-service newspaper (or a TV news network), you have to report on stories that both validate and go against your personal beliefs, especially when the internet makes it so easy to show that stories are being left uncovered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things about being a reporter &#8212; at least in the way it&#8217;s supposed to work &#8212; is there are certain stories you get that you are excited about covering and are completely motivated to go after. And then there are the stories that are either too boring, too complicated or don&#8217;t conform to your pre-set beliefs and you might not be excited about them, or you might even dread covering them, but you still have to cover them. That&#8217;s where you&#8217;re supposed to make your paycheck on most days, in covering the stories that are the narrative version of spinach and not ice cream. If you only cover the things you want to cover in the world of politics, that makes you the Village Voice, The Nation or (on the right) The Weekly Standard or The American Spectator, which have no qualms about picking and choosing their stories, because they don&#8217;t hide who they are ideologically.</p>
<p>But apparently, the Washington Post has decided that if anyone else on the planet has covered a story they don&#8217;t want to cover, that justifies them not having to cover it at all. It&#8217;s not only a lazy cop-out on their part, but it calls into question the whole point of even subscribing to the Washington Post for news, as opposed to signing up simply to have your own belief structure validated, if you&#8217;re a liberal Democrat. If you want to be a full-service newspaper (or a TV news network), you have to report on stories that both validate and go against your personal beliefs, especially when the internet makes it so easy to show that stories are being left uncovered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redshirt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1029958</link>
		<dc:creator>redshirt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1029958</guid>
		<description>This is old news, therefore not newsworthy.
I am waiting, however, for WaPo and NYT to do the big expose on all the hellraising McCain did while at the Naval Academy. 
You know it&#039;s coming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is old news, therefore not newsworthy.<br />
I am waiting, however, for WaPo and NYT to do the big expose on all the hellraising McCain did while at the Naval Academy.<br />
You know it&#8217;s coming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moonsbreath</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1029956</link>
		<dc:creator>moonsbreath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1029956</guid>
		<description>As one who isn&#039;t finished with this story yet, I would like to know just &lt;em&gt;when&lt;/em&gt; has Obama attended this church?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As one who isn&#8217;t finished with this story yet, I would like to know just <em>when</em> has Obama attended this church?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snaggletoothie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-1029954</link>
		<dc:creator>snaggletoothie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/25/wapo-editor-we-didnt-cover-the-wright-story-sooner-because-um-it-wasnt-new/#comment-1029954</guid>
		<description>At times I have complained about journalists being unethical.  I now realize that I was off base.  Journalism is not a profession and so lacks the rigor for ethical standards.  Journalism is a trade.  Some journalists are fair minded and have intellectual rigor but most just follow their prejudices and run around in packs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At times I have complained about journalists being unethical.  I now realize that I was off base.  Journalism is not a profession and so lacks the rigor for ethical standards.  Journalism is a trade.  Some journalists are fair minded and have intellectual rigor but most just follow their prejudices and run around in packs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
