Dan Abrams: Hey, how about prosecuting Rush Limbaugh for Operation Chaos? Flashback: “Let’s have some fun in Michigan,” says Kos
posted at 3:52 pm on March 25, 2008 by Allahpundit
Send to a Friend |
printer-friendly
In which the son of one of America’s most prominent First Amendment lawyers drools over the thought of Republicans being sent to the pen for ignoring a state-mandated loyalty oath. If his pal Olby urged Countdown’s nutroots viewers to defy an unconstitutional GOP oath, they’d be running promos at MSNBC about the “noble tradition of civil disobedience.” As it is, he and Jeralyn Merritt are happy to sit there and game out ways of getting Limbaugh frog-marched away. It’s of a piece with the left’s interminable whining about Hillary and the superdelegates: Instead of recognizing that the rule is stupid and should be changed, they fault their opponent for using that rule to his/her advantage. The obvious solution would be to close all primaries and require voters to change their registration three or six months in advance, before the race shaped up and strategic voting angles became evident. But why do that when you can whine about people being “un-American”?
In any case, Chaos isn’t illegal in Pennsylvania — and people are taking full advantage. Keep hope alive, Hillary! Click the image to watch.
Update: I’d forgotten all about this but commenter SoulGlo didn’t. Here’s Kos on January 10, urging his readers to skip the meaningless Democratic primary and cross over to vote for Romney for precisely the same reason Limbaugh has vis-a-vis Hillary: “[W]e want Romney in, because the more Republican candidates we have fighting it out, trashing each other with negative ads and spending tons of money, the better it is for us. We want Mitt to stay in the race, and to do that, we need him to win in Michigan.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: [1] 2 »
Who is this fey looking milktoast Dan Abrams guy?
BJ* on March 25, 2008 at 3:53 PM
What if somebody broadcast a show nobody watched? Would that mean it never happened?
TheBigOldDog on March 25, 2008 at 3:54 PM
Bwaa-ha ha ha ha ha! I hope Rush makes these fools take it all the way to the Supreme Court.
xardoz on March 25, 2008 at 3:55 PM
So the Dems want another “thought” crime, whereby they attempt to peer into your mind and ascribe certain motives for your actions? Very chilling.
rbj on March 25, 2008 at 3:55 PM
The Ohio Secretary of State said that Democrats had crossedover in the GOP primary for the gubernatorial race. That was wrong too, right? It was “un-American” when Libs crossedover in the Michigan primary as well, correct?
Or is that only applicable when Republicans strategically vote, Dan?
amerpundit on March 25, 2008 at 3:56 PM
BTW AP you may want to get your TIVO ready for O’Reilly. He was at Tusla for Hillary’s visit and he’s angry at about her lie which he calls an insult to US Army…. He plans on letting Lanny Davis have it tonight on O’Reilly.
TheBigOldDog on March 25, 2008 at 3:57 PM
Dan…Dan…Dan…Rush was sleep deprived, he misspoke.
kiakjones on March 25, 2008 at 3:57 PM
Cold David Hunt was there… not O’Reilly…..
TheBigOldDog on March 25, 2008 at 3:57 PM
So they want to persecute people for voting ? Im sure that will go over real well.
AS long as you dont vote more than once there is nothing illegal there. Its not voter fraud to cast a vote during a primary.
William Amos on March 25, 2008 at 3:57 PM
They should ask Harry Reid whether screwin’ with El Rushbo is a prudent course of action.
innominatus on March 25, 2008 at 3:58 PM
Chaos always wins, because it’s better organized.
- Murphy
MB4 on March 25, 2008 at 3:59 PM
Does anybody watch MSNBC? Last time I looked they were showing a movie. Don Imus radio was there biggest time slot. Which means that watching somebody doing a radio show was the best thing they had on a television channel.
Hening on March 25, 2008 at 4:00 PM
Just think how royally papa oscar’ed Dan Abrams would be if Rush started drawing cartoons.
MB4 on March 25, 2008 at 4:02 PM
MSNBC has a very loyal viewership base. Both of them watch every night.
amerpundit on March 25, 2008 at 4:02 PM
I don’t even watch MSNBC.
I don’t even know on what channel it is.
What am I doing here?
Sorry, wrong topic.
Gotta go.
Indy Conservative on March 25, 2008 at 4:05 PM
Dan Abrams: Keith Olbermann and Pee Wee Herman’s Love Child.
heldmyw on March 25, 2008 at 4:05 PM
Rush said today if they put him in the slammer, he will do his show, 30 min. or so from there. He would do it just to make a point. It’s not nice to mess with someone like Rush. He has the bucks to get things done.
L
letget on March 25, 2008 at 4:05 PM
Please keep this story alive. It’s entertaining, silly, and highlights the irredeemable stupidity of Abrams and Herr Olbermann.
Vote Sauron 08 on March 25, 2008 at 4:05 PM
I think it’s great. I also think the Ohio law is unconstitutional. You cannot enforce voters to vote the way the party wants. As the prof. points out, the dems are guilty of that practice also! Which has Dan almost pissing himself with shouts of “Breaking the Law”! Oh Judas Priest.
It’s free speech, it’s private, and you cannot prove it. But irregardless, it’s not illegal! Ohio can change it’s voter registration law to fix that, but what a bunch of cry babies.
Kini on March 25, 2008 at 4:06 PM
What can you expect from a bunch of marxists? These people would be very happy with the Soviet system. Next, they’ll want to make it illegal to be a Republican.
jdawg on March 25, 2008 at 4:06 PM
Ok, so what is it?
Rush is irrelevant one month, the next he is the most persuasive villain in the US.
How do the moonbats keep their heads from exploding?
PappaMac on March 25, 2008 at 4:09 PM
Dan Abrams is a typidal white
womanperson.Akzed on March 25, 2008 at 4:12 PM
You must sign allegiance to the party
Does anyone, especially Dan, realize how illegal and unconstitutional that is. November cannot come sooner.
Kini on March 25, 2008 at 4:13 PM
It’s interesting to me to see the young guys choosing the wrong team. It’s understandable why the J. Jacksons or Ted Kennedys or Diane Feinsteins of the world stick with the Dems. They’re old and have made money off of the radical left. But young ones like Abrams? Few people watch that channel. I never saw him. Why wouldn’t a young guy hitch his wagon to a fast horse like Fox?
JiangxiDad on March 25, 2008 at 4:13 PM
Yup, MSNBC has sure taken it up a notch since Danny boy took over. How’s the ratings Daniel?
Sugar Land on March 25, 2008 at 4:13 PM
Thanks for laugh!
TheBigOldDog on March 25, 2008 at 4:13 PM
This is America… we have a secret ballot. They cannot prosecute voters for voting a certain way. That would be well… facist?
AbaddonsReign on March 25, 2008 at 4:15 PM
I thought Merritt was a Clinton supporter? Why would she care if people cross over and voted for Clinton?
Blake on March 25, 2008 at 4:15 PM
whatever happened to the 1st amendment rights the loony left are always holding up? If it doesn’t allow the killing of babies, lifting up the Koran and Islam, or protecting extramarital affairs, I suppose that freedom of speech thing just loses it’s luster for them….
charlie36r on March 25, 2008 at 4:15 PM
Chelsea was advocating Operation CHAOS just last night in Bloomington, IN. Watch the video on MM’s site.
paratrooper on March 25, 2008 at 4:15 PM
I’d sue GE for their last nickel if their employees pulled this sort of harassment against me.
Buddahpundit on March 25, 2008 at 4:16 PM
It was all orchestrated by Karl Rove, that magnificent ba$tard! Oh oh, something shiny over there … gotta go.
trs on March 25, 2008 at 4:17 PM
It’s official: Hot Air is now keeping MSNBC afloat.
emailnuevo on March 25, 2008 at 4:18 PM
Just like Bush is an idiot monkey one second and an EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEVIL GENIUS the next. Who can keep track?
crazy_legs on March 25, 2008 at 4:18 PM
Thanks for all the free publicity Dan
GogglesPisano on March 25, 2008 at 4:18 PM
Let’s see, we cannot have voter ID laws, because having to produce an ID to vote (like you have to in order to buy a drink, buy cigarettes, cash a check, get many jobs, etc.) is unconstitutional.
However, if you vote in a Dem primary when you are actually a living, breathing Republican, you can be liable for prosecution?!!??
Wow. That takes one pretzelly mind to wrap around these legal principles.
cs89 on March 25, 2008 at 4:19 PM
Heh, good one MB4!
Liberty or Death on March 25, 2008 at 4:19 PM
I guess dissent isn’t patriotic when it’s aimed at something as sacred as a primary where voters can choose between one absolutely worthless, corrupt and incompetent Democrat or the other.
Whereas when it’s aimed at gleefully encouraging terrorists to kill American troops in support of the DNC’s elector strategy, by all means, go right ahead. What could possibly be more noble?
People like Abrams aren’t just born brainless, they work very hard at exceeding every known limit of human stupidity.
NoDonkey on March 25, 2008 at 4:19 PM
Who cares what the wormy little puke Abrams thinks. He can take that left wing network he works for and stick it in his ear . . . or the orifice of his choice.
rplat on March 25, 2008 at 4:20 PM
Buddahpundit
Allahpundit
You guys are related?
Indy Conservative on March 25, 2008 at 4:23 PM
Yep, I wish the left-tards would make up their minds, however this issue has all the earmarks of a Rovian plot (the real EEEEEEEEVIL GENIUS) to sucker the left into taking Rush to task so he can biatch-slap them silly!!
Liberty or Death on March 25, 2008 at 4:23 PM
Floyd Abrams “My son’s not as smart as I thought. Sad”.
Rush Limbaugh “Damn, I love these liberals. Business is good, and only getting better”.
Entelechy on March 25, 2008 at 4:24 PM
Prosecute Limbaugh for violating a state law when Limbaugh wasn’t even in the state? Did Abrams ever hear of a little something called “jurisdiction”? I thought he claimed to be a lawyer.
johnny dollar on March 25, 2008 at 4:24 PM
Yes, they’re both pundits :)
Entelechy on March 25, 2008 at 4:25 PM
Damn, you said it first. LOL gotta love these guys thinking they should prosecute people for “violating” BS pledges of allegiance to political parties.
funky chicken on March 25, 2008 at 4:25 PM
Rush mentioned this on his show today. He laughed at DNCTV, and basically told them, bring it on!
They’d be opening up a biiiiiiiiiig can of worms on that one.
rightside on March 25, 2008 at 4:28 PM
Hey guys, liberals heads don’t explode. They just spin around and around.
TimothyJ on March 25, 2008 at 4:28 PM
I think Rush’s “Operation Chaos” is hilarious, but I wasn’t too keen on the crossing over to vote for Hilary part - until now. Democrats are like the bratty kid who is getting beat on the playground, quits and takes his ball with him.
Ballistic on March 25, 2008 at 4:32 PM
Obama lieing about his relationship with Wright.
Hillary lieing about flying into Bosnia under fire.
Signing a loyalty oath to the Democratic party and then getting prosecuted for lieing…
PappaMac on March 25, 2008 at 4:35 PM
Aaaaah the Pundit Family.
I hope they don’t have connections to the Italian Mafia.
Indy Conservative on March 25, 2008 at 4:36 PM
I can’t wait to meet the Pundit family’s Jewish cousin, Challahpundit. I hear he’s a little stale though…
doubleplusundead on March 25, 2008 at 4:40 PM
Ya know, I think Cindy Sheehan might’ve said the Pledge of Allegiance a time or two when she was in school. Does that mean we can prosecute her (and all the other pink-o commies moonbats out there) for fraud or perjury or something?
Just askin’
srhoades on March 25, 2008 at 4:41 PM
Where do I contribute to Rush’s defense fund?
Techie on March 25, 2008 at 4:42 PM
Hill-ary-eous.
saltydogg14 on March 25, 2008 at 4:43 PM
Abrams is the little puke that was standing on the Supreme Court steps and flipped through the decision to say breathlessly into the mic “Bush has been declared the winner”.
That was the highlight of his career!
flytier on March 25, 2008 at 4:45 PM
I don’t remember Dan Abrams calling out Daily Kos for getting their people to vote for Mitt Romney in Michigan in order to hurt John McCain.
SoulGlo on March 25, 2008 at 4:46 PM
I loved it when he whipped out “Two wrongs don’t make a right”, inadvertently admitting on air that the Dems have done this more times than we can count.
I think he feigns more outrage than Bathtub Boy. What a slimeball, and that giggling ditz of an ambulance chaser was nearly as stomach-churning as she railed with emotion and no actual facts.
MadisonConservative on March 25, 2008 at 4:47 PM
Heh.
And I thought Olby was teevee’s greatest brain-dead, kool-aid huffing, bend-over for the Dems, shameless Marxist Moron. He suddenly has some competition!
Gartrip on March 25, 2008 at 4:47 PM
If you pledge allegiance to the Dem party they give you a button with the word Comrade on it.
BrianA on March 25, 2008 at 4:51 PM
“Und evleesink izt - gedzunheit!!!”
“Sieg: Heilery!”
“Sieg: Heilery!”
“Sieg: Heilery!”
Akzed on March 25, 2008 at 4:55 PM
Hopefully Fox doesn’t want him!
He used to be on Court TV so basically he went from bad to worse.
Domino on March 25, 2008 at 4:55 PM
Abrams has problems trying to make an outrage.
Chakra Hammer on March 25, 2008 at 4:56 PM
Abrams would like to see Rush prosecuted and I’d LOVE to see his puky little network go off the air due to lack of ratings.
Oink on March 25, 2008 at 4:56 PM
*snort*
spmat on March 25, 2008 at 4:57 PM
Dan Abrams reminds me of Islamic Rage Boy.
He’s making a big deal out of the guy that wrote “For one day only.” I’m not a lawyer, but seems like the guy changed the contract and it was accepted.
It’ll be interesting if the Dems try to charge someone with a felony.
tgillian on March 25, 2008 at 5:00 PM
WRONG, Not in MOST cases, just one county.
Chakra Hammer on March 25, 2008 at 5:02 PM
Rush will put these crappy libs in their place. This is a country where people can vote for who they want for whatever reason. What jerks these leftists are!
jencab on March 25, 2008 at 5:03 PM
Not when Maxwell Smart is on the case!
Random Numbers (Brian Epps) on March 25, 2008 at 5:05 PM
On the “UPDATE”: Good job finding that, SoulGlo. I remembered something like that happening, and I was sure it was DU that was behind it when I first saw this post. I’m still sure DU had something to do with something about a year ago…But you got it, it was DKos.
JetBoy on March 25, 2008 at 5:06 PM
“Prosecute [Rush] Limbaugh for violating a state law when Limbaugh wasn’t even in the state?
Hey Johnny dee…How about…prosecute El Rushbo where and when he lives in the state?
NO way baby…beee!
1] Has maid and driver purchase thousands of prescription pain killers for his painful Pilonial backside cyst and doctor shopping— no problem in Florida.
2] Customs detains him when his private plane lands in Florida with four of his best male “buds” after a little Caribbean holiday with no prescription for the “little blue pill” — no problem in Florida.
3] Prosecute [Rush] Limbaugh for violating a state law when Limbaugh wasn’t even in the state?
Oh…OOoo! This ain’t Florida. It’s Ohio…!
DAMN! AND DOUBLE DAMN…!
Oh…! And Dittoheads…and by your very fine religious measure?
Isn’t El Rushbo a serial womanizer? Married three or four times now? Perhaps he should have considered that excursion to the Caribbean isles at some earlier period when he was legally, seriously diddling…? earlier in his career?
You get my drift…?
The Lord will forgive those who are meek!
J_Gocht on March 25, 2008 at 5:16 PM
Rush made an EXCELLENT point: these are the people who are so terrified of George Bush’s phone-tapping library book surveillance gub’ment and WHAT are they advocating? Tracking down people who “gloat on the internet message boards” and prosecuting them!
I’m Marcus, and you are ALL reported!
Marcus on March 25, 2008 at 5:26 PM
How exactly does a presumably reasonably intelligent attorney (assuming Abrams is actually licensed) go on television and actually advocate something that:
1) Any first year law student could tell you makes no logical, legal, or constitutional sense;
2) Obviously runs contrary to the most basic precepts of constitutional law;
3) Would criminalize identical behavior committed by the other side of the political aisle (yet is never mentioned); and
4) Is almost breath-taking in the scope of its unvarnished, proudly hailed hypocrisy?
No. Really. I don’t get it. Is this proof that the pundits are just reading off a prompter without thinking for half a second about what they’re saying?
Because this is just stoopid. And Abrams must have known it was stupid. Unless he’s actually able to read that prompter without digesting the content of what he’s reading.
That’s gotta be it.
Professor Blather on March 25, 2008 at 5:40 PM
pMSNBC has to use up air time somehow. What better way then to make a non-story a story. And a real fairy tale as well.
Kini on March 25, 2008 at 5:44 PM
Heh. Allah’s all they got besides teary little Danny Abrams. I swear, I thought he was going to start crying.
Jaibones on March 25, 2008 at 5:46 PM
Swear loyalty to a party that has no loyalty
so it shouldn’t matter if you break that loyalty..
DaveC on March 25, 2008 at 5:47 PM
I’ve never tried them. [little blue pills]
At my age; I probably should consider alternatives! Doesn’t jump up greetin’ me in the morning anymore?
Perhaps Rush liked “diddling” more than “dipping”?
Only his multiple wives would know. How much alimony [hush “Rush” money] would you guess the “rotund one” is paying?
Hot damn payroll, sister. It’s the end of the month
J_Gocht on March 25, 2008 at 5:47 PM
Operation Chaos is beautiful. And it’s even better
when Jerks like Abrams try to trip up Rush.
Rush I’ll have him for lunch. This is great.
Texyank on March 25, 2008 at 5:50 PM
Other than disliking Rush Limbaugh, do you have a point?
Oldnuke on March 25, 2008 at 5:58 PM
Heh, excellent…I can see Max on the phone with agent 99 rallying the troops…!
Liberty or Death on March 25, 2008 at 6:03 PM
The Democrat loyalty pledge has been questioned before.
Oldnuke on March 25, 2008 at 6:04 PM
If he wasn’t a multi-millionaire his sorry asse would be in jail.
Fair for you, fair for me, not the filthy rich guy behind the tree!
Next question.
J_Gocht on March 25, 2008 at 6:06 PM
You could have just said “No.”
Oldnuke on March 25, 2008 at 6:09 PM
I live in North Carolina, and after wrestling with the decision for a couple weeks, I went over to the county Board of Elections today and signed up for Operation Chaos. I had wondered whether I would be asked to sign any loyalty oaths, but I wasn’t. Not that it would have deterred me. (Come to think of it, I wasn’t even asked to show any photo ID. Just like on voting day. Grrrrr…)
I wanted to ask if a lot of people had been doing this, but I figured it was best not to stir anything up…
Lee on March 25, 2008 at 6:22 PM
I think it would also be appropriate to remind ourselves Mary Katharine Ham engaged in the same endavour:
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/12/coveted-mary-katharine-ham-vote-goes-to-hillary-clinton/
I don’t know if I agree with the un-american insult. I also think the oath is way overboard.
On the other hand, all the people that always want to enforce the black letter of the law need to be advocating for 1- a retroactive change in the law or 2- prosecution. I don’t see what other alternatives there are.
Also, I think it’s really bad when your only intent is to subvert the process. If you are voting for Hillary because you think Democrats will win in November and would prefer to see Hillary, it’s one thing. But if your goal is simply to wreck the other side, and cause chaos, I think that is really really bad.
And before anyone tells me “what about Kos?”, I already said that what he was advocating was not ethical. Tempting, but not ethical.
mycowardice on March 25, 2008 at 6:23 PM
I find Abrams outrage laughable. He is upset about the letter of the law not being followed, but didn’t both he and Merrit defend Bill Clinton during the Paula Jones trial. Also isn’t Abrams the head of MSNBC? Where he allows a slanderous Keith Olberman to spout off.
PoketheBear on March 25, 2008 at 6:30 PM
…and I could have avoided service in Vietnam due to no cartilage in my left knee.
…and I could have avoided service in Vietnam due to a very painful Pilonial cyst on my backside.
…and I could have avoided service in Vietnam by joining the Texas [goddamn] Air National Guard.
…and I could have avoided service in Vietnam by getting five deferments, like VP “big dick” Cheney!
J_Gocht on March 25, 2008 at 6:34 PM
I’m of two minds about this and it depends somewhat on what state you live in and what the laws are. In some cases it can’t possibly subvert the process. It is the process. In states like Virginia we don’t register by party. Anyone can vote in either primary but only one. The reason you vote for a candidate has no relevance. Since McCain was already certain why should voters of whatever bent not vote in the only primary still open to persuasion, the Democratic. Look at it this way should McCain happen to lose the general is it not Ok to vote for the alternative that you dislike least.
Oldnuke on March 25, 2008 at 6:34 PM
What I thought, I just lost interest in anything you have to say. Buh-bye.
Oldnuke on March 25, 2008 at 6:35 PM
We can all emphatically state that the democrat party has the market cornered re: voter fraud.
These people are a laugh riot. You really can’t make this stuff up!
SouthernGent on March 25, 2008 at 6:37 PM
Just more evidence as to how intimidated and fearful the left is of not Rush, but any truth that challanges their fantasies. The go after Rush because he is the big boy.
Remember also: Fairness doctrine, Reids fiasco, dode pink, Forrest lake schools in Mn, and many more examples of the socialists attempts to kill free speech!
allrsn on March 25, 2008 at 6:38 PM
Maybe I missed something, Is Rush running for office? They’ll do anything to silence talk radio.
Buttercup on March 25, 2008 at 6:38 PM
There are approximately 25 million registered voters in America that would donate at least a “ten spot” immediately to fund the legal defense for Rush Limbaugh. 250M could and would be raised in a mere matter of days if the Dems running things in Ohio (or any other state) decide to go after El Rushbo.
That is exactly why Rush Limbaugh is so hated by Liberals; they have no answer for Rush; they don’t have the connection with the people of America that Rush has; they despise the fact that Rush has made a fortune by removing the mask of socialism from their faces. Most of all, they hate Rush Limbaugh for having the courage to confront the media bias in America, for exposing the most powerful tool in the DNC tool chest.
You Liberals are all talk and no walk. Your threats against Rush Limbaugh and those who have already crossed over to vote in the Dem primaries, are nothing other than an attempt to use threats and fear tactics to prevent any further crossover voting in the remaining states. Back up your threats here Liberals; bring on this law suit. It’s high time you Liberal weenies find out just what lengths we are willing to go to when it comes to defending one of our true leaders. Bring it on…
Keemo on March 25, 2008 at 6:43 PM
Dan sounds like a lawyerly moron. He’s all gung-ho until Blackwell is brought. Then he can’t shut people up fast enough. No, we’re not talking about that, we’re talking about this.
Lesson for Liberals: Liberals always say how Republicans who cheat on their wives prove Republicans are hypocritical. NO! It makes them human and sinners. While we’re still within the season, that’s why there is a commandment about it. That’s what confession, contrition, repentence, and grace are all about because man/woman are sinners. Again, doesn’t make them hypocrits, it makes them human. BUT, what Dan Abrams is saying here, now that… that’s hypocritical.
Sultry Beauty on March 25, 2008 at 6:44 PM
No way AllahP’s Italian.
Kini on March 25, 2008 at 6:44 PM
The loyalty oath thingy -
1) Yes I signed zee papers.
2) Yes I am loyal to the DNC.
3) Did you write the e-mail saying you changed parties for Operation Chaos?
4) No I did not write that e-mail. Rick Ellensburg did. Or maybe Ellers, or maybe even Gleen did it. Anyway - someone in my house used my computer to write that e-mail.
5) Case dismissed. (See Gleen/s is good for something!)
Enlightened on March 25, 2008 at 6:49 PM
I like to think that generally, the process is to pick a candidate for a party. I am not talking about the technical aspects. I am really talking about people with similar ideas coming together and deciding who should represent them.
It’s easy to circumvent any technical limitations. Plus, intent is really hard to prove. I just think it doesn’t reflect well on Rush, Kos, MKH or anyone to start doing something I see as unethical.
Obviously at the end of the day the only two people in the room might be you and your conscience. I personnaly hope people make an ethical decision and resist the calls by anyone to simply go and try to screw up the other side.
mycowardice on March 25, 2008 at 6:50 PM
And before anyone tells me “what about Kos?”, I already said that what he was advocating was not ethical. Tempting, but not ethical.
mycowardice on March 25, 2008 at 6:23 PM
Lessons need to be taught & learned. Democrats-Liberals chose John McCain for Republicans. What have you to say about that? If we have no fight in us, we deserve to lose.
Operation Chaos rocks….
Keemo on March 25, 2008 at 6:50 PM
So many idiots like you and so few sharks to jump…
newton on March 25, 2008 at 6:51 PM
Oh, BTW: you don’t wanna mess with the wrong guy. Ask Harry Reid. He can’t seem to get his head out of the hole, after Rush made him look like an incompetent idiot before the rest of the word.
Are Reid and you related?
newton on March 25, 2008 at 6:55 PM
Good catch re: DailyKos, Soulglo. I added a new post sure to piss the libs off even more — Dan Abrams: Markos Moulitsas Is UnAmerican.
Cuffy Meigs on March 25, 2008 at 6:57 PM
Comment pages: [1] 2 »