Ani-war protesters attack Catholic parishioners in Chicago Update: Bail set a little … high

posted at 7:39 am on March 24, 2008 by Ed Morrissey

A group of anti-war protesters interrupted an Easter Mass in Chicago yesterday, stunning parishioners with their shouts during Cardinal Francis George’s homily. They then squirted stage blood on the congregation, leading to their arrest and an angry confrontation in the gathering space outside the hall. As it turns out, the protesters not only were mostly incoherent, but also very, very late (via Memeorandum):

Six people were arrested at Holy Name parish’s auditorium Sunday after disrupting an Easter mass to protest the Iraq war.

The group—whose female and male members identified themselves as Catholic Schoolgirls Against the War—stood up at the beginning of Cardinal Francis George‘s homily and shouted their opposition to the conflict, which marked its fifth anniversary last week. As security guards and ushers tried to remove them from the service, the demonstrators squirted fake blood on themselves and parishioners dressed in their Easter finery.

The red substance, which one protester later described as “stage blood,” initially drew gasps and a few terrified yelps from the 600 worshipers at the mass. The shock, however, quickly transformed into anger as people booed the six while they were escorted from the parish auditorium.

Why did they target the Chicago cathedral? Almost three months ago, Cardinal George met with President Bush. The protesters explained (much later) that the Cardinal should have challenged Bush to end the war during that private meeting. They failed to explain (a) how they know that Cardinal George didn’t do that, and (b) why it took them ten weeks to protest the meeting.

I warned people three weeks ago that the anti-war movement was going to start getting violent. Alan Colmes scoffed at the notion, but assaulting people sitting in church demonstrates that the fringe of the movement has no sense of boundaries, and their frustration at losing in the political process keeps growing. Instead of peacefully protesting outside the cathedral, which is their right to do, they insisted on breaking the law and conspiring to commit multiple acts of battery. This time, they used fake blood. How long before that won’t be enough, and they start trying to draw real blood instead?

Jim Hoft has a roundup of links relating to the story. It turns out that one of the apparent sponsors of this attack is the International Solidarity Movement, a pro-Palestinian organization. Why is a sponsor of the Palestinian cause sponsoring or at least offering apologetics for an attack on a Catholic Mass? One might expect the news media to ask that question, and to ask whether this is just an anti-war attack or whether it is an anti-Catholic, anti-Christian hate crime.

If that’s not clear enough, let me ask readers what kind of coverage this would have provoked had it been conducted against the worshipers at a mosque. If a group of anti-terrorist protesters had broken into Friday prayers at a Chicago mosque to spray stage blood all over Muslims in protest of al-Qaeda and the Taliban — a little stronger connection than that between the Catholic Church and the war in Iraq — the newspapers would have trumpeted it as a hate crime against American Muslims, followed by weeks of human-interest, anecdotal accounts of how terrible America is to its Muslim citizens.

Update: Via Jim and Carl in Jerusalem, here’s the video:

Notice the little bit of performance art in the middle of this protest, when they fall down shrieking. I’m assuming that’s when they threw stage blood on the parishioners. I’m heartened that they have been charged with a felony in connection to this protest, although I doubt that Chicago will actually follow through on prosecuting it.

Update II: Via Jim again, the bail for these “Holy Word 6″ got set a little higher than they expected:

A judge set bond at $25,000 to $30,000 today for six anti-war protestors following an Easter service disruption at Holy Name Cathedral in the Loop Sunday morning. …

Bond was set at $35,000 for Donte D. Smith, 21 and $25,000 for the five others including: Ephran Ramirez, Jr., 22, and Ryane J. Ziemba, 25, Mercedes Phinaih, 18, Regan Maher, 25, and Angela Haban, 20. Smith has served time in a federal prison in Texas for trespassing on a Native American reservation.

All six protestors were charged with two counts of felony criminal damage to property and two counts of simple battery.

They may have to stay in jail for a while, or some of their lunatic-fringe friends will have to find about $20,000 to spring all of them. Either sounds good to me. The judge is treating this seriously instead of winking over the assault on religious practice that this represented — at least for now.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

If only my time machine were working, I’d send the little panty-wastes back to the late 70s and subject them to a little brand of catholic justice I like to call: Sr. Rose Carmel, Sr. Rita Rafferty, Sr. Peter Maria and Sr. Thomas Gertrude…

D2Boston on March 25, 2008 at 12:09 AM

Shipley,

You are nothing but an anti-semitic troll.

Go back to your God-hating kook friends at Kos.

Troll.

Dave R. on March 25, 2008 at 12:39 AM

18 years of Catholic school…

I’ve never missed Mass in my life…

more importantly, I try my best to apply Jesus’ teachings in my everyday life…

Now, all that said, let’s be clear: Easter is the most solemn, holy, sacred (whatever you want to call it) day in the Church calendar.

You can make the argument that to commit such a gross display of mental retardation as these morons did on Good Friday could actually appear to be even more abhorrent simply because of it being such a solemn and sad recollection of a key moment in Salvation History… but holiest day of the year? No.

D2Boston on March 25, 2008 at 12:52 AM

Catholic Schoolgirls Against the War

C-SAW…liberal logic in a nutshell.

labrat on March 25, 2008 at 4:00 AM

I’m not a Catholic, but I did go to Catholic school as a kid.

I was also born and raised in Chicago before I moved to AZ in 95′ and I know that, were he alive today, Mayor Daley (the Sr.) would’ve had the CPD take billy-clubs to the heads of these ****ing punks the minute they were clear of the Holy Name.

I miss Mayor Daley.

Or at least that part of his SOP anyway. lol

Teddy on March 25, 2008 at 5:16 AM

I’m heartened that they have been charged with a felony in connection to this protest, although I doubt that Chicago will actually follow through on prosecuting it.

I would be more surprised if they didn’t prosecute them. Chicago has a large Catholic community and Daley is Irish Catholic himself, they don’t normally take very kindly to this sort of thing.

Teddy on March 25, 2008 at 5:16 AM

ahh the ‘magic’ of the CPD. :)

MannyT-vA on March 25, 2008 at 6:19 AM

Sweet. I wonder if any of them found god, or at least shrieked out his name, last night around shower time.

manfriend on March 25, 2008 at 8:22 AM

Up close and personal, but no coverage by MSM.

What a shocker for all of the once-a-year faithful who assume that what they had as kids will always be waiting for them when convenient to pick up as adults.

Disgusting to hear of it. Those were cowards. If they had something to say, they should have protested outside of the White House and taken their licks with pride. As it is, they just wet the appetite of the worst agitators for more.

Parishoners had better band together to organize themselves present during the judicial procedings and stand witness during all of the court procedures. Even if they present themselves in silence, they’d better not sweep the “peaceful” (no permanent bodily injury) ruin of their worship under the rug under the “forgiveness” wrap. There is reason for ceremony, and ruining the ceremony is not acceptable unless the unacceptable is acceptable. Daly or no Daly, the parishoners had better protect themselves at church.

maverick muse on March 25, 2008 at 8:24 AM

While we’re on the subject of scumbag anti-war tactics; let’s not forget just how this group of scumbags have abused their privileges…

If It’s Intentional, Is It Malpractice?

Patterico does an excellent job of deconstructing a front-page Los Angeles Times hit piece on John McCain. The Times article includes this howler:

But McCain openly disputed Bush administration claims that Hussein appeared linked to the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. “I doubt seriously if there’s this close relationship between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein,” he told CBS News in September 2002.

We know that op-ed columns sometimes appear in print without ever being read by an editor, but I assume that front-page news stories are reviewed by at least one person other than the reporter who writes them. It is hard to believe that there are both a reporter and an editor at the L.A. Times who don’t know that this statement about “Bush administration claims” is false.

Over the last five years, we have witnessed something remarkable: our principal news media outlets have fabricated an alternative reality around the Iraq war by simply misreporting the facts. They have done this in order to advance their own political agenda. It is really quite extraordinary; someone should write a book about it. (powerline)

Keemo on March 25, 2008 at 8:25 AM

I know the Judge they will be appearing in front of for their preliminary hearing, before they will be sent to the main criminal court for random assignment to a trial room. This isn’t going to laughed off.

Shouldn’t the penalty be at least the same for running on the field of a Cub’s game? That gets a felony trespass charge, same as here. Should they be let off the hook because they are “protesting” something? If I ran onto the field at Wrigley in order to protest the continued TV blackout of Blackhawks games, I would still be charged the same. Frankly, because of the blood, they should also be charged with Battery as well. Maybe even Agg. Battery. I have a guy doing 6 months for that right now, and that was a gift from the Judge.

If they haven’t been bailed out, I can GUARANTEE that they are not having fun in custody of the Illinois Dept. of Corrections.

Mark E. on March 25, 2008 at 8:55 AM

Are bleacher seats available for this year’s DEMO Convention? This is one show I’m not going to want to miss. It’s going to like sitting ringside in the Roman Coliseum.

Dread Pirate Roberts VI on March 25, 2008 at 9:07 AM

Shouldn’t the penalty be at least the same for running on the field of a Cub’s game?

Well, legally speaking, I don’t think it’s the same. I think penalties have been strengthened for running out on to baseball diamonds in the wake of two incidents at Comiskey where fans ran out on the field and assaulted people.

Anyone is allowed into Holy Name Cathedral.

Tom_Shipley on March 25, 2008 at 9:10 AM

Good for the judge!

But, I think these idiots are just that, and won’t easily learn any lessons here.

bridgetown on March 25, 2008 at 9:13 AM

We’ve seen laws executed when clergy defame their orders.

So what laws are on our books protecting everyone during time at church? Does posting “all are welcome” or “visitors welcome” deplete a church of its right and obligation to protect the sheep of its fold when the wolf or lion come to feed on easy victims?

maverick muse on March 25, 2008 at 9:20 AM

So what laws are on our books protecting everyone during time at church?

I imagine the same as any other private institution that has an open-door policy, like say a Starbucks.

Tom_Shipley on March 25, 2008 at 9:42 AM

Chicago? Hmmm…how many of Obama’s brethren were participating?

jgapinoy on March 25, 2008 at 9:47 AM

These people shouldn’t try this at New Line Church in Colorado Springs. The church lost two beautiful teenagers to an anti-Christian killer and they would have lost many more if Jeanne Assam hadn’t shot him. The protesters are lucky they didn’t get shot as soon as they pulled out their blood squirters.

Eventually, enough leftists are going to resort to violence that they won’t get the kind escort out of the building that these folks got. A lot of leftists are going to get killed if they keep this up.

bonnie_ on March 25, 2008 at 10:22 AM

A lot of leftists are going to get killed if they keep this up.

bonnie_ on March 25, 2008 at 10:22 AM

Yikes. Probably true, but still…

Oh, dumbest name ever: Catholic Schoolgirls Against the War. Filthy hippies.

blankminde on March 25, 2008 at 10:41 AM

Nothing better than hippies in jail.

ArtLindsey on March 25, 2008 at 10:53 AM

As much as I hate the idea of a “hate crime” I wonder why they haven’t been charged under those statures? Seems to me they picked a group because of their religious beliefs. Do hate crimes only apply when they’re against the darlings of the left.

TooTall on March 25, 2008 at 11:24 AM

Wow. I wonder how many people who were at the mass that might have been sympathetic towards the anti-war crowd have now been totally turned off towards them.

RobertInAustin on March 25, 2008 at 12:23 PM

So what laws are on our books protecting everyone during time at church?

What law protects you from anything?

LimeyGeek on March 25, 2008 at 1:22 PM

“Well, legally speaking, I don’t think it’s the same. I think penalties have been strengthened for running out on to baseball diamonds in the wake of two incidents at Comiskey where fans ran out on the field and assaulted people.

Anyone is allowed into Holy Name Cathedral.”

Legally speaking, I would argue that it is precisely the same. Public event, some restricted area for the event or ceremonies everyone is coming to see, a possible assault risk to the attendees and the officiators, and public interest in preventing precisely this type of demonstration disruptive to others. The tickets are not an element of the crime in a Baseball circumstance, because crimes are not contractual; it is the trespass to unauthorized areas that make the crime, and not the license of the ticket. (Or so I would argue.)

“…in the wake of two incidents at Comiskey where fans ran out on the field and assaulted people.”

You mean like the present case of being splashed with fake blood by a trespassing protester? Or are only fists a Battery? Law school question….

It seems that you want to minimize this, but the fact is that people go down for these same or similar actions all the time, and are charged with felonies. Given the blood throwing, they absolutely warrant the charges they are facing, and probably more.

Mark E. on March 25, 2008 at 1:24 PM

Boil ‘em in oil, off with there heads, put them in a jail in Mexico.

Johan Klaus on March 25, 2008 at 1:25 PM

Average age = 22.

No surprise.

budorob on March 25, 2008 at 2:56 PM

If someone present there would have cracked the skull of one of these pro-Jihadi “protestors”, today they would be a national hero.

Of course they would be portrayed as a helpless, heroic victim by what’s laughingly referred to by our hopelessly biased and completely unethical “news” “media” (i.e. propaganda arm of the Democrat Party), but real Americans, the people who have had it up to here and beyond with these people, would have understood.

The same people who are going to hand a humiliating defeat to B. Hussein O. in Pennsylvania.

NoDonkey on March 25, 2008 at 2:56 PM

It seems that you want to minimize this

No, I was just responding to the question you posed:

Shouldn’t the penalty be at least the same for running on the field of a Cub’s game? That gets a felony trespass charge, same as here.

It’s not the same thing. The act itself of running on to the field and Wrigley Field and walking into Holy Name Cathedral are not the same, in the eyes of the law. It’s against the law for people who do not have permission to be on the field (players, coaches, press, grounds crew, etc…) to enter the field of play at Wrigley.

Anyone can walk into Holy Name Cathedral when it is open. Those protesters were not unauthorized to walk into the service.

The charges that were filed on Sunday were because of the fake blood that was splattered. If, on Monday, someone jumps onto the field and sprays fake blood on Prince Fielder to protest the war, not only will be probably get his ass kicked, but he’ll be charged with trespassing and assault.

The protesters were charged with two counts of felony criminal damage to property and two counts of simple battery… not entering Holy Name. There is no felony trespass charge for entering Holy Name Cathedral.

Given the blood throwing, they absolutely warrant the charges they are facing, and probably more.

I never said they don’t warrant the charges they are facing.

Tom_Shipley on March 25, 2008 at 3:56 PM

Just putting this out there, but a trespass conviction doesn’t hinge on whether the property is open to the public. What it tends to hinge upon is if the owner/authorized representative told the trespasser to leave and he does not.

From the video the battery and property damage charges are defensible. The DA will likely review the findings of the investigation and can add a trespass charge if warranted. Just because there isn’t a charge *now* doesn’t mean one won’t be added later, or for that matter that trespass didn’t occur. Charges are brought based on the ability of the prosecutor to prove them, not whether he believed it happened or not.

JohnTant on March 25, 2008 at 9:56 PM

I wonder if they will also served with a restraining order as a condition of there bail . either way i hope they enjoy playing pick up the soap during shower time in the cook county lock up .

Mojack420 on March 26, 2008 at 1:46 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3