Oops! Soliah goes back to the joint
posted at 7:40 pm on March 22, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Send to a Friend |
printer-friendly
Kathleen Soliah will go back to prison after California authorities realized they miscalculated her time off for good behavior. Police arrested Soliah as she was about to board a flight to Minnesota, and will send her back to the prison from which they incorrectly released her on Monday. The former SLA terrorist and murderer had planned to return to Minnesota to visit her family:
State corrections officials re-arrested Sara Jane Olson on Saturday - five days after she was released - and announced that they intend to keep her in prison for another year.
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation spokesman Oscar Hidalgo said that officials miscalculated Olson’s sentence and gave her a year’s more time off her term than she deserved. …
Hidalgo said that Olson, the former Symbionese Liberation Army member who was convicted of killing Myrna Opsahl inside the lobby of a Carmichael bank in 1975 and of trying to bomb police cars in Los Angeles, was detained Friday night at Los Angeles International Airport as she was preparing to fly to Minnesota, where her family lives.
It’s hard to know how to feel about this. Soliah deserves a hell of a lot more time behind bars than the six she’s served, and she should have to serve every day of her too-short twelve year sentence. At the same time, it’s hard not to sympathize with Soliah’s children, who must be crushed at this unexpected turn of events.
Essentially, California still doesn’t have its act together. Prosecutors gave her too light of a sentence, and a state pardons and parole board had to extend it to the twelve years she got in the end. Now the prison can’t do math or apparently have someone double-check their work, and so let someone out a full year too early. It sounds like the same geniuses who calculate state budgets and wound up with an $18-billion miscalculation last year moonlight for the parole boards. (via Power Line)
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « 1 [2]
I see a lawsuit here: Cruel and unusual punishment?
Steve McCullough on March 23, 2008 at 8:54 AM
Anyone can try and bring a suit, but in this case, it won’t be successful. She knew her earliest release date based on this 2007 ruling. She had to know walking out that the system had her going home under the wrong court order..
This re-arrest is an inconvenience to her, but lawsuit worthy?
Nope..We are talking about someone that will have spent 7 years in prison for murder and attempted murder. This woman that “proved” she could be an upstanding member of society will have that chance to really prove it next year. You see, for all those years she was hiding, her society never knew they were dealing with a potential cop killer, but a definite bank teller murderer. She didn’t have to go through a reintroduction into society as other rehabilitated prisoners do.
The only successful lawsuit I see her involved in is the wrongful death suit that Myrna Opsahl’s family should bring against her. I can see a Soliah losing that one…as well she should.
Pam on March 23, 2008 at 9:31 AM
no your mother is a murdering terrorist and should have faced the death penility or at least life with out the possiblility .
Mojack420 on March 23, 2008 at 11:10 AM
There was no death penalty on the books when Mrs. Opsahl was murdered because it was declared unconstitutional as then written. I’m not even sure if they had lwop on the books back then.
Blake on March 23, 2008 at 11:45 AM
It’s hard to know how to feel? Ed, you’re way too fair, balanced, and mature.
Feel glad that this idiot gets to go back to jail.
misterpeasea on March 23, 2008 at 1:12 PM
I have no particular problem with Ed Morrissey; he is remarkably prolific, and generally level-headed. I don’t have an ounce of sympathy for Soliah’s moonbat daughter, or her moonbat husband, the one with the blinders on.
Ed does, however seem afflicted by a need to soften his conservatism with a hand-wringing compassion from time to time, as do a significant majority of conservative public writers. I am aware that he is a frequent target of left wing scorn and vitriol, and wonder if it hobbles him.
Jaibones on March 23, 2008 at 1:14 PM
The only thing better would have been for this to happen on April Fool’s Day. Heh.
ConservativeBelle on March 23, 2008 at 1:16 PM
Hey, Ed’s just fine..He went out of his way to help me get on this site….I have been reading Ed for years and tho we don’t always line up exactly together, our differences are usually by small degrees…As far as this woman’s concerned, California let her off way too easy in the first place and in spite of this little set-back, she will walk away from a despicable crime against humanity (that’s us)showing little if any remorse…May heartache, strife, and egregious calamity follow her in all her remaining years, incarcerated or not..
b4lucy on March 23, 2008 at 1:52 PM
If everybody thought a like, there would be nothing to discuss. And if Ed wants to feel sympathy for the Olson kids and others do not, so be it. It hurts no one. However, we can all do without the personal attacks on people who may feel differently than the majority.
Blake on March 23, 2008 at 1:52 PM
Once again: California is required to follow the laws on the books at the time the crimes were committed. The laws have been changed and when it comes to handing out sentences California is extremely tough.
Blake on March 23, 2008 at 1:58 PM
We eat our young. Is that wrong?
Jaibones on March 23, 2008 at 2:07 PM
I have no particular problem with Ed Morrissey; he is remarkably prolific, and generally level-headed.
I agree and well-said. I have had about enough of that headset picture, though.
As far as Soliah goes, the fact that she’s not serving life plus is a legal loophole - anything less than that and she’s lucky.
And of course her kids make excuses for her, what would you do? But they’re just excuses, the woman’s scum, and they’re very unlucky to have her as a mother. Any “psychic pain” they’re experiencing is her fault and no one else’s.
That doesn’t mean California’s administrators are competent, of course, as a rule I assume otherwise. But it’s still her fault, she started it when she decided to pursue politically-motivated crime.
Merovign on March 23, 2008 at 2:12 PM
We get enough fairness and balance and high-mindedness and sympathy for criminals from the drive-by media.
I visit conservative blogs for conservative opinion and conservative views on news. I sure as heck don’t want them to become more like the drive-bys. They’re an antidote, not an adjunct.
misterpeasea on March 23, 2008 at 2:29 PM
Prosecutors don’t sentence people, judges do.
Now, it might be that the prosecutors were too lenient in the sentence they sought, given the crime committed - that’d be reason to criticize their performance.
I suspect it was a combination of both - the lenient sentence occurred in part because the prosecutors weren’t insisting on “book throwing” from the court.
BD57 on March 23, 2008 at 2:32 PM
Hidalgo: The parole board has reviewed your case and decided due to your good behavior and other factors regarding your incarceration to reduce your term. You’re free to pack your belongings, make whatever arrangements are necessary and go. There will be a staff coordinator to assist you in this matter.
Solia: Really?
Hidalgo: Yes.
Solia: Really and truly?
Hidalgo: Yes. Yes.
Solia: *glees* *packs belongings* *makes arrangements* *begins to board aircraft*
State correction officials: “Psyche!”
I love a good practical joke as much as the next guy, but, you know, they could have at least waited until April 1st.
bour3 on March 23, 2008 at 2:55 PM
From the daughter’s mouth it’s hard to feel much sympathy for her…her mother’s action’s in Berzerkley were “normal”? HUH?
IMHO Sara should have been sentenced to death or at least LWP, I heard an interview on the radio with a son of the murder victim, before Sara’s rearrest, he was absolutely surprised and flabbergasted at her release…bet he’s breathing just a little easier today.
Quick word on “rehabilitation” …a theory dreamed up by social relativist. Old school here and it worked for me…punishment is the deterrent…if a criminal doesn’t want to go back to confinement they’ve been rehabilitated. If they don’t mind going back to a cell there is still work to do. Quite simple really.
oldernslower on March 23, 2008 at 3:00 PM
Hahaha. My favourite (Gaelic) football team is Dublin. They haven’t won the Sam Maguire Cup in years but I am from Dublin so I support them. If I grew up in Chicago then yes I would support the Cubs.
aengus on March 23, 2008 at 3:09 PM
They should have put her in a cell next to Manson. They could share stories, come up for parole interviews about the same time and always get denied at those times. Finish.
geminicontender on March 23, 2008 at 3:17 PM
Here’s what I don’t understand; if this is the case, why is it that when the death penalty was first declared unconstitutional, they didn’t go ahead and gas those already on death row? They all got a sentence change to Life, which means that California didn’t follow the law on the books when those people were convicted. So why can’t they do the reverse when someone deserves it?
That said, I’d like to see the victims families sue her into poverty.
TugboatPhil on March 23, 2008 at 4:12 PM
Myrna Opsahl was murdered about a mile from where I live. It is a shame California cannot hang the bitch Soliah.
Those who did not live in these times and meet some of the players have no idea how crazy these people are.
mcgilvra on March 23, 2008 at 5:13 PM
I do understand Ed’s statement the children are usually not responsible for the parents actions but in this case the grown daughter not accepting the fact her mother is a murderer negates any sympathy I might feel for her.
As far as the mixup in releasing her it is not as rare a mistake as we would hope, even more common is releasing a dangerous criminal due to mistaken identity.
Does she deserve a stiffer punishment …yes, but until we as a society understand that prison is for punsihment not rehabilatation that is not likey to happen.
JKotthoff on March 23, 2008 at 5:51 PM
Prison is for punishment and rehabilitation. There is a certain segment of the prison population that will not be rehabilitated as they are being punished, but at the same time, we do have another portion of the prison population that are able to walk out after having been punished for their crime, and they do lead productive lives never to be imprisoned again..
If we stopped letting the inmates run the asylum, we might just be able to accomplish both.
Pam on March 23, 2008 at 9:06 PM
Thank you. It’s a quirk of this discussion that, as sometimes happens, those who are thrilled at her re-incarceration find ourselves in the odd position of having defended California corrections officials. This would not have been my original intention.
I pray for her redemption in the eyes of God, but not here on earth. Here, I would keep her locked in a cage. Atonement is available in the form of working inside the prison to educate and counsel other inmates. None other.
Jaibones on March 23, 2008 at 9:11 PM
Truer words are rarely spoken. But I believe that we can all learn the truth of those days if we study history without the rose-colored glasses, and if we know that truth, we can change the present and the future.
Ignoring that history, or writing it off with moral equivalence rationales, as Soliah’s daughter does, will only lead to a repeat of those times. Right thinking people need to remember, and do all we can do to prevent that madness from returning.
Jaibones on March 23, 2008 at 9:16 PM
Look at the assymetry of her eyes.
She is a nut case.
TheSitRep on March 23, 2008 at 10:07 PM
I can’t care more about that terrorist’s kids, than I can about the people she helped to murder. Osama bin-Laden and Saddam Hussein have kids, too, but I think they are perfect candidates for the death penalty. She is, too.
Virus-X on March 23, 2008 at 11:30 PM
And as we point fingers you have problems with spelling.
Chakra Hammer on March 23, 2008 at 11:47 PM
Are these the New Math chickens coming home to roost in California?
LaMonte on March 24, 2008 at 3:57 AM
Another violent lunatic leftist on the loose.
As if we don’t have enough here at DNC HQ here on K Street.
NoDonkey on March 24, 2008 at 9:15 AM
I still regret not having taken the opportunity to freak that skanky broad out. Turns out she was neighbors of a friend of mine in St. Paul. I had planned to go guzzle some of his beer, and let Soliah see me in one of my old Army BDU jackets during her routine walks. I just happen to share the same last name with Myrna Opsahl. I’m guessing the look one her face as she saw my name, and the look in my eyes, would have been truly priceless.
paragon27x on March 24, 2008 at 9:46 AM
Yep, I suck at a lot of stuff.
But you are great at pointing out the obvious.
TheSitRep on March 24, 2008 at 12:11 PM
She’s got crazy eyes, stupid true believer eyes.
The kind that would believe in leftism and get all emotional about it.
benrand on March 24, 2008 at 4:05 PM
boomerang terrorist
ej_pez on March 24, 2008 at 4:10 PM
Comment pages: « 1 [2]