Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Passportgate: A bipartisan mess

posted at 3:00 pm on March 21, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

The scandal du jour expanded today, in a way that essentially renders it meaningless. After announcing that State Department contractors had inappropriately accessed Barack Obama’s passport file, some leaped to the conclusion that a conspiracy had arisen to find dirt on the presidential candidate. If so, it must be to benefit some third-party candidate, as both Hillary Clinton and John McCain have also had their files accessed without authorization by the same people:

The State Department said Friday that all three presidential candidates’ passport files were breached.

The admission comes after it was revealed Sen. Barack Obama’s files had been viewed three times by contractors. One of the contractors also viewed the files of Republican Sen. John McCain, said State Department spokesman Sean McCormack.

Earlier Friday, Sen. Hillary Clinton’s office said that the State Department had notified it that her file had been breached in 2007.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Friday she had apologized to Obama for the unauthorized viewing of his passport file by State Department contractors.

This will make the initial response from the Obama campaign look a little ridiculous. They claimed that the breach was “an outrageous breach of security and privacy, even from an administration that has shown little regard for either over the last eight years.” However, it wasn’t the administration that accessed the files, but employees of companies contracted to maintain State Department database. It’s a case of some low-level workers getting too curious for their own good, and a failure of the contractor to follow up on the flags that the system produced.

Instead of waiting for a little more information, however, the Obama campaign went into full paranoia mode. Where have we seen that recently?

And for sheer chutzpah, we have the Hillary Clinton campaign demanding answers from the Bush administration over its failure to secure these records. Wasn’t it the Clinton Administration that got caught illegally holding over 900 raw FBI files on political figures during the first term? So far, no one has been held responsible for that truly egregious breach of security, an ironic note given that the man who had them was hired apparently at the behest of Hillary herself.

Michelle is following the story closely. All this shows is general bureaucratic incompetence at State, not a grand conspiracy to torpedo anyone. Be sure to watch her post for more updates during the day.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Are the MSNBC Obamamaniacs as outraged now?

d1carter on March 21, 2008 at 3:02 PM

Richard Nixon would be proud!

LT Nixon on March 21, 2008 at 3:04 PM

From Obama’s spokesman yesterday:

“Our government’s duty is to protect the private information of the American people, not use it for political purposes,” Burton said.”

“Political purposes”?

amerpundit on March 21, 2008 at 3:04 PM

If so, it must be to benefit some third-party candidate, as both Hillary Clinton and John McCain have also had their files accessed without authorization by the same people:

I suspect Ronulans. Or just some (other) general f*cktards.

ReubenJCogburn on March 21, 2008 at 3:05 PM

Who dares watch Uberhanded and see if he does an hour on these developments?

TroubledMonkey on March 21, 2008 at 3:06 PM

Looks like some boneheads at the State Department were playing Pimp My Passport or something equally stupid. Now how much you want to bet, before the weekend is even 1/2 over, there are going to be foaming-at-the-mouth-calls from the B.O. and Shillary camps, not to mention from good ol’ Howie Dean himself, for Rice to resign as Secretary Of State?

pilamaye on March 21, 2008 at 3:13 PM

I predict every time this is discussed on the MSM, you`ll see more footageof Obama and statements about how this will affect him. They`ll try to force this from being bi-partisan to an attack on the Healer of our Souls.

ThePrez on March 21, 2008 at 3:14 PM

Rove…it has to be Rove
*
*
That’s what you get when you hire out contractors for government work.
And why didn’t Bush pick up on these two idiots during the interview process? He did interview them didn’t he? He didn’t? Shows once again how uncaring Bush is, can’t even take the time to interview people handling the Governments most sensitive documents…Bush, how could you be so careless.
*
Are people buying this from Obama’s campaign?…well you can bet his most avid supporters are, but the fence sitters are going to end up in McCain’s lap.
Thanks Obama, you’re handing the election over to McCain, while you are spending over 1 million per day.
That’s why you can’t be president…you don’t get it…

right2bright on March 21, 2008 at 3:15 PM

OH FFS!

Anyone who works in Government institutions KNOW they are going to have their backgrounds looked at. Bank accounts, I.D. checks, verification of Funds… and even where they have been in the world. You know, because passports do not EVER get stolen or copied! This also goes for those going into any branch of military service, FBI, CIA, etc.

Get a grip Obama, heck you don’t see Hillary and McCain freaking out about it!

upinak on March 21, 2008 at 3:16 PM

Obama the Drama Queen.

Anyone know how outraged was he over the leaking of national security info by WaPo and the NYT?

Buy Danish on March 21, 2008 at 3:22 PM

This is what “typical white people” do. It’s BRED into them…ha ha ha This is nothing but a diversion. Why is HotAir going along with this crap??

DfDeportation on March 21, 2008 at 3:25 PM

I still say that the administration should say it was just sloppiness (the excuse the Clintons gave for Sandy Burglar) or a bureaucratic snafu (the excuse the Clintons gave for hundreds of FBI files missing), and all will be forgiven!

ToddonCapeCod on March 21, 2008 at 3:29 PM

Details about the contractors might be very interesting.

For what company do they work? When was the company awarded the contract? When were these individuals hired? Who do they work with and to whom do they report?

Then there are political questions. There are rumors that some State Department apparatchiks, from the Clinton days, actively subvert the policies of the current administration. Are there any connections between these contractors and suspected State Department subversives?

It’s time to look carefully at the culture and inhabitants of the State Department.

Arbalest on March 21, 2008 at 3:30 PM

The scandal du jour expanded today, in a way that essentially renders it meaningless.

Meaningless? And I thought the “conservatives” were the group who cared about constitutional freedoms and rights? Apparently not, especially if it will make Jorge Busho and crew look bad to do so. More reason why I am no longer a Republican or voting for any of these losers.

TOPV on March 21, 2008 at 3:30 PM

Olbermann was all over this last night. All over it like a leg humping dog.

bloviator on March 21, 2008 at 3:31 PM

Since when did passport info become secret? I always thought that with all the databases out there linked to passports that they were practically public anyway. Your info on your whereabouts are always shared with databases whenever you use them. In Europe you have to show your passport just to get a hotel room. Interpol knows exactly where you are every night.

Guardian on March 21, 2008 at 3:31 PM

So a sub contractor who is ‘responsible for maintaining a state department database’ was looking at the data in that database and this is a scandal?

Oh, wait, I know, it was unauthorized. They were supposed to be ‘maintaining’ the data base not ‘looking’ at the data.

Would that be something like someone working at Department of Motor Vehicles actually ‘looking’ at someone’s driving record?

Or someone in the justice department ‘looking’ at someone’s criminal history?

Or someone at the Department of Agriculture ‘looking’ at payments made to farmers, or an auditor ‘looking’ at disbursements?

In other words, someone ‘working’ for the government actually ‘working’ is now a scandal?

I’m so confused.

rockhauler on March 21, 2008 at 3:31 PM

There are rumors that some State Department apparatchiks, from the Clinton days, actively subvert the policies of the current administration.

Well Busho hasn’t exactly been known for his judgment in cleaning house. You leave cancer in your body, it’s bound to eat you up. You leave anyone form a corrupt Clinton administration’s…ANYONE… in positions … that’s you’re own stupidity and your administration gets every subversive problem it deserves.

TOPV on March 21, 2008 at 3:33 PM

McCain should be OUTRAGED!

He should put that person that messed with his passport in a headlock! >:D

Chakra Hammer on March 21, 2008 at 3:33 PM

Anyone know how outraged was he over the leaking of national security info by WaPo and the NYT?

Buy Danish on March 21, 2008 at 3:22 PM

That, my friends, is the question of the day. This feigned outrage is offensive from a group of people who were not outraged over Rev Wright or Shabazz or Rezko…etc.

HawaiiLwyr on March 21, 2008 at 3:37 PM

Another leak no Dems cared a bit about – Schumer’s office prying into Michael Steele’s credit cards.

Buy Danish on March 21, 2008 at 3:40 PM

Meaningless? And I thought the “conservatives” were the group who cared about constitutional freedoms and rights? Apparently not, especially if it will make Jorge Busho and crew look bad to do so. More reason why I am no longer a Republican or voting for any of these losers.

TOPV on March 21, 2008 at 3:30 PM

You might want to consider returning your hat for a larger size- the tinfoil on your current one is apparently just a bit too tight.

A few low-level contractors took a peek at passport records, got caught and were dealt with. Thus far no harm- political or otherwise- resulted in the unauthorized access. Nor is it likely, since the travel schedules of the candidates aren’t exactly state or even personal secrets.

In summary: Yawn.

Hollowpoint on March 21, 2008 at 3:46 PM

I still say, if you check Madonna’s or Spears or any other celeb du jour, you would find their passport info. has been looked at also.
Some lowly, 36 year old. living still living with parents, dateless, government worker doesn’t look at every passport of a famous celeb? C’mon, these are people with minimum skills, working for the ultimate bureaucratic, low bidding government contractor…kind of like the NSA…BTW, do they have weight qualifications for NSA workers?…like no woman under 250 lbs. need apply.

right2bright on March 21, 2008 at 3:49 PM

Oh my God, someone looked up my phone number, oops it’s in the phone book.

d1carter on March 21, 2008 at 3:51 PM

Meaningless? And I thought the “conservatives” were the group who cared about constitutional freedoms and rights? Apparently not, especially if it will make Jorge Busho and crew look bad to do so. More reason why I am no longer a Republican or voting for any of these losers.

Since this is hard for you, I’m going to help you out. From a 2008 presidential campaign perspective, it is now meaningless. Obama’s victim card has been taken away and he will not be able to mug for the cameras and maybe let a tear slip from the corner of his eye when he thinks of his (now compromised) super-secret date of birth. The only reason this story was significant was because Obama had an exclusive. Now the more he plays it, the more he looks like a drama queen. Not something he wants: giving Americans an opportunity to compare and contrast him with another candidate that is behaving like an adult.

But I’m curious. A whole ass-load of information on veterans (many veterans, much information on each of them) was compromised when a laptop was stolen and its contents were exposed to God only knew who. This wasn’t terribly long ago. My information was involved. Now tell me something: did you post your anger and fury unto the message boards when that happened? If not, why not? It was, after all, about a million times as damaging as this and, furthermore, the information of men and women who had sacrificed to serve their country selflessly and well, as opposed to some rich guy whose only accomplishment in life was to attend an ivy league college and become bosom buddies with a racist, hate-mongering, America-hating preacher and a crook from Seria who helped him buy his home.

When you can answer that question to my satisfaction, then I will consider taking your faux outrage seriously, and actually eviserate your argument rather than just ripping a new one into your trollish hide.

Immolate on March 21, 2008 at 3:52 PM

Syria, obviously.

Immolate on March 21, 2008 at 3:54 PM

McCain should be OUTRAGED!

He should put that person that messed with his passport in a headlock! >:D

Chakra Hammer on March 21, 2008 at 3:33 PM

WATERBOARD THEM!!!

DfDeportation on March 21, 2008 at 3:55 PM

This story is already over (thank you), our SS#’s are at every job site we ever applied for work at..I wonder how many evil eyes have taken a look at all of our records, including all the times you had to apply for homeowners ins, car ins, bank accounts etc etc., and its never going to make any kind of news, let alone front page news when people are caught peeking at ours. Only an Obama with a 15 manned army of agents surrounding him, with unbelieveable connections and political power, everyone in the whole world should stop what their doing today and take note and worry about poor Mr&Mrs Obama may be in danger of ID theft..Break open that wallet.,Its called LifeLock costs about 10 bucks a month.

Legions on March 21, 2008 at 4:54 PM

What a f-in huge non-story. What can one really get from passport files anyway?? Oh my..he travelled to… big deal. Now, let’s talk about those 900 FBI files the Clintonistas had. Now THAT’s a breach.

tickleddragon on March 21, 2008 at 5:18 PM

Methinks Obama doth protest too much. Shouldn’t the possible CIC be PROUD of the places they’ve visited and think of them as parts of their bulleted resume list of why they would be a great leader?

Maybe Obama’s passport has the most information so far about his ability to lead the nation. So far he’s just a blank sheet of paper with “hope” and “change” scribbled in crayon.

That this fool’s even being considered to lead the free world is maddening to me. He won’t even put his hand over his heart for the Pledge of Allegiance to OUR country, the US(KKK) of A for God’s sake! He’s not even a freaking American in my opinion. Good luck leading the troops to their possible deaths with an a-hole who hates their country. Total disgust.

NTWR on March 21, 2008 at 5:38 PM

So just what the heck is in one’s passport records anyway? I’ve had a passport for a lot of years and would like to know if I should be concerned. Hah! People look at your records all the time be it bank employees looking at your accounts if they’re curious, utility company employees and other credit grantors looking at your credit reports, etc. Big whooping deal. If you’re done something, there’s likely a record of it somewhere. The moral to the story is to not do anything illegal.

Laddy on March 21, 2008 at 6:02 PM

Well Busho hasn’t exactly been known for his judgment in cleaning house. You leave cancer in your body, it’s bound to eat you up. You leave anyone form a corrupt Clinton administration’s…ANYONE… in positions … that’s you’re own stupidity and your administration gets every subversive problem it deserves.

TOPV on March 21, 2008 at 3:33 PM

Easier said that done-the Clintons put their moles at all levels of the government, and a lot of those are civil service positions that can’t be touched. They knew what they were doing.

Del Dolemonte on March 21, 2008 at 6:18 PM

All this story really proves is that there are some people who work for the government who have way too much time on their hands. It also reinforces my opinion of people in general: people, on average, are stupid.

I work for a large telecommunications company that publishes a quarterly security report. It’s hysterically funny. The stupid things people do is mind boggling. They’ll risk a job that pays them $70,000 a year by using a company credit card to gas up their own private cars. They give credits to friends and relatives and they always get caught.

One of the biggest no no’s is looking up a customers records without a legitimate reason for doing so. Everyone knows the company can tell who looks at what, yet they do it anyway and they usually get caught because they did it to someone famous and then bragged about it, or the person whose records they accessed are their ex-wife, or ex-husband, a former boyfriend, or somebody they’re feuding with who reports them for it.

The stupid things people will do at work, especially in this day and age, are incredible. We just had a manager fired for viewing porn on his work computer. Every key stroke we make is recorded and we all know it. But this moron couldn’t help himself, I guess.

Jaynie59 on March 22, 2008 at 8:15 AM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.