<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Green shock: CFLs more dangerous than first thought</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:48:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Government forcing us to switch from regular light bulbs to fluorescents because they are better for the environment. Really? &#171; Are you Freaking Stupid?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-2802499</link>
		<dc:creator>Government forcing us to switch from regular light bulbs to fluorescents because they are better for the environment. Really? &#171; Are you Freaking Stupid?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-2802499</guid>
		<description>[...] But the biggest problem with CFLs is not the noticeably poorer quality of the light, but the clean-up they require when they break, as I wrote a year and a half ago:  What happens when an incandescent bulb hits the floor? Simple: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But the biggest problem with CFLs is not the noticeably poorer quality of the light, but the clean-up they require when they break, as I wrote a year and a half ago:  What happens when an incandescent bulb hits the floor? Simple: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: The light bulb goes &#8230; off</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-2802051</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: The light bulb goes &#8230; off</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-2802051</guid>
		<description>[...] But the biggest problem with CFLs is not the noticeably poorer quality of the light, but the clean-up they require when they break, as I wrote a year and a half ago: What happens when an incandescent bulb hits the floor? Simple: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But the biggest problem with CFLs is not the noticeably poorer quality of the light, but the clean-up they require when they break, as I wrote a year and a half ago: What happens when an incandescent bulb hits the floor? Simple: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BOHICA &#187; Cold Fury</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-2435771</link>
		<dc:creator>BOHICA &#187; Cold Fury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-2435771</guid>
		<description>[...] contrived conventional wisdom. It shouldn&#8217;t be mandating what kind of toilets we must buy, or what kind of lightbulbs we must use in our homes. It shouldn&#8217;t be using a compliant media establishment to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] contrived conventional wisdom. It shouldn&#8217;t be mandating what kind of toilets we must buy, or what kind of lightbulbs we must use in our homes. It shouldn&#8217;t be using a compliant media establishment to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The DNC&#8217;s &#8220;Director of Greening&#8221; and &#8220;Carbon Advisor&#8221; &#171;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-2242124</link>
		<dc:creator>The DNC&#8217;s &#8220;Director of Greening&#8221; and &#8220;Carbon Advisor&#8221; &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 12:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-2242124</guid>
		<description>[...] CFLs More Dangerous Than First Thought [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CFLs More Dangerous Than First Thought [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecotyrants.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stopping Global Warming by poisoning our water</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1898684</link>
		<dc:creator>ecotyrants.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stopping Global Warming by poisoning our water</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1898684</guid>
		<description>[...] Edison&#8217;s standard incandescents these bulbs are made with a unhealthy amount of mercury. Via Hot Air: Compact fluorescent light bulbs, long touted by environmentalists as a more efficient and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Edison&#8217;s standard incandescents these bulbs are made with a unhealthy amount of mercury. Via Hot Air: Compact fluorescent light bulbs, long touted by environmentalists as a more efficient and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A bright idea? &#171; The Green Scene</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1715002</link>
		<dc:creator>A bright idea? &#171; The Green Scene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1715002</guid>
		<description>[...] contributer Ed Morissey : (catch the full post here) &#8220;Even a single CFL could provide toxic levels of exposure for mercury. One contains five [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] contributer Ed Morissey : (catch the full post here) &#8220;Even a single CFL could provide toxic levels of exposure for mercury. One contains five [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Towards a (Re)Definition of Sustainability: Justin Van Kleeck and Caroline Savery. 2-Caroline : Sustainablog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1281112</link>
		<dc:creator>Towards a (Re)Definition of Sustainability: Justin Van Kleeck and Caroline Savery. 2-Caroline : Sustainablog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 18:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1281112</guid>
		<description>[...] priceless natural arrangement.  Besides, what are the benefits of using more electricity versus not putting more and more mercury into our landfills and environments due to CFLs?  I&#8217;d like to see those numbers, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] priceless natural arrangement.  Besides, what are the benefits of using more electricity versus not putting more and more mercury into our landfills and environments due to CFLs?  I&#8217;d like to see those numbers, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blatant Reality &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Barack Obama's Love/Hate Relationship with Toxic Mercury</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1273942</link>
		<dc:creator>Blatant Reality &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Barack Obama's Love/Hate Relationship with Toxic Mercury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1273942</guid>
		<description>[...] about in the above paragraph. This means that upon breaking a CFL, one has to basically follow a hazardous waste procedure to remove the broken pieces from your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about in the above paragraph. This means that upon breaking a CFL, one has to basically follow a hazardous waste procedure to remove the broken pieces from your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enquête casino on net</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1161316</link>
		<dc:creator>enquête casino on net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 18:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1161316</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;jeu du casino gratuit...&lt;/strong&gt;

Denken scaricare casino gratis vente de jeu de poker liste jeux casino strip poker a telecharger jeu world poker...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>jeu du casino gratuit&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Denken scaricare casino gratis vente de jeu de poker liste jeux casino strip poker a telecharger jeu world poker&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeux poker</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1153410</link>
		<dc:creator>jeux poker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 05:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1153410</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;jeux de poker online...&lt;/strong&gt;

A lot poker 770 telecharger jeux poker texas regle du jeu texas holdem jeux poker omaha en ligne jouer au poker on line...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>jeux de poker online&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A lot poker 770 telecharger jeux poker texas regle du jeu texas holdem jeux poker omaha en ligne jouer au poker on line&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baseball Crank</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1062265</link>
		<dc:creator>Baseball Crank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1062265</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;POLITICS/SCIENCE:  Toxic Bulbs...&lt;/strong&gt;

I&#039;ve thought from the very beginning that the move to outlaw Edison&#039;s great invention, the incandescent light bulb, was basically foolhardy and possibly just a ploy to force consumers to buy $7 lightbulbs that (in my experience, at least) don&#039;t......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>POLITICS/SCIENCE:  Toxic Bulbs&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve thought from the very beginning that the move to outlaw Edison&#8217;s great invention, the incandescent light bulb, was basically foolhardy and possibly just a ploy to force consumers to buy $7 lightbulbs that (in my experience, at least) don&#8217;t&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aceinstall</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1025353</link>
		<dc:creator>aceinstall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1025353</guid>
		<description>For some real energy savings insulate your house with
 cellulose instead of fiber glass. cellulose is made with 80% recycled paper/ 20% borax, and uses very little energy
 to make. Energy savings of up to 50% (heating + cooling)
 have been proven. This would have a bigger impact on the enviroment and be the best posable use for many newspapers
 that are out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some real energy savings insulate your house with<br />
 cellulose instead of fiber glass. cellulose is made with 80% recycled paper/ 20% borax, and uses very little energy<br />
 to make. Energy savings of up to 50% (heating + cooling)<br />
 have been proven. This would have a bigger impact on the enviroment and be the best posable use for many newspapers<br />
 that are out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Califemme</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1025208</link>
		<dc:creator>Califemme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1025208</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Want to know if these bulbs are dangerous? Take the ultimate test– &lt;strong&gt;TRY TO TAKE ONE ON AN AIRPLANE&lt;/strong&gt;.

Bicyea on March 21, 2008 at 10:49 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Heeheheehee!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Want to know if these bulbs are dangerous? Take the ultimate test– <strong>TRY TO TAKE ONE ON AN AIRPLANE</strong>.</p>
<p>Bicyea on March 21, 2008 at 10:49 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Heeheheehee!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomLawler</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1024877</link>
		<dc:creator>TomLawler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1024877</guid>
		<description>this thread is intersting.  i do not know about you folks but i checked my electric bills.  my average electric bill over the last 19 months is 64.79.  

if i could save $50 a month by switching to cfl then it whould mean i could operate:

air conditioner
refridgarator
televisions
dish washer
clothes washer
computer and printer
stereo
clothes dryer even though its gas it still uses electricty
furnuce though gas still uses electricty
phones
vaccumm cleaner
garage opener
my wood working shop(hobby)
weed eater blower trimmer
sump pump
and others i have not listed

for 14.79 a month.  I DO NOT THINK SO.

i truly do not know af any one spend $50 a month on lighting.  

if you do please post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this thread is intersting.  i do not know about you folks but i checked my electric bills.  my average electric bill over the last 19 months is 64.79.  </p>
<p>if i could save $50 a month by switching to cfl then it whould mean i could operate:</p>
<p>air conditioner<br />
refridgarator<br />
televisions<br />
dish washer<br />
clothes washer<br />
computer and printer<br />
stereo<br />
clothes dryer even though its gas it still uses electricty<br />
furnuce though gas still uses electricty<br />
phones<br />
vaccumm cleaner<br />
garage opener<br />
my wood working shop(hobby)<br />
weed eater blower trimmer<br />
sump pump<br />
and others i have not listed</p>
<p>for 14.79 a month.  I DO NOT THINK SO.</p>
<p>i truly do not know af any one spend $50 a month on lighting.  </p>
<p>if you do please post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pro Cynic</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1024690</link>
		<dc:creator>Pro Cynic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1024690</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;How environmentalists are bad for the environment...&lt;/strong&gt;

Exhibit 1: compact fluorescent light bulbs....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>How environmentalists are bad for the environment&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Exhibit 1: compact fluorescent light bulbs&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MSGTAS</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1024251</link>
		<dc:creator>MSGTAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1024251</guid>
		<description>There is the same amount of mercury in these bulbs as in a rectal thermometer.  Let&#039;s just stick them in our #$^^ and when it glows we have a fever.

Trying to dispose of them in the regulated manner is tooooooo costly that their value as an energy saver is well below the economic realities to make the claim they are cheaper over the long term.

Let me think.  Before electric light there was gas/coal fired fixtures.  Let&#039;s take a step back and use gas/coal fired fixtures or candles to light up our lives. 

No can do.  That would increase our carbon foot print and it takes up oxygen to stay lit and we need to breath to stay alive.

Another foolish factor that has not been considered, is the fact that when we exhale (and we must or die) we are emitting Carbon Dioxide (green house gas and necessary for the plants to absorb in their process of emitting oxygen that we must inhale).

Life is a vicious circle of choices.  But, I sense we can make the right choice on our own, and do not need the help of environmentalists that do not understand physics to tell us how to survive in the world today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is the same amount of mercury in these bulbs as in a rectal thermometer.  Let&#8217;s just stick them in our #$^^ and when it glows we have a fever.</p>
<p>Trying to dispose of them in the regulated manner is tooooooo costly that their value as an energy saver is well below the economic realities to make the claim they are cheaper over the long term.</p>
<p>Let me think.  Before electric light there was gas/coal fired fixtures.  Let&#8217;s take a step back and use gas/coal fired fixtures or candles to light up our lives. </p>
<p>No can do.  That would increase our carbon foot print and it takes up oxygen to stay lit and we need to breath to stay alive.</p>
<p>Another foolish factor that has not been considered, is the fact that when we exhale (and we must or die) we are emitting Carbon Dioxide (green house gas and necessary for the plants to absorb in their process of emitting oxygen that we must inhale).</p>
<p>Life is a vicious circle of choices.  But, I sense we can make the right choice on our own, and do not need the help of environmentalists that do not understand physics to tell us how to survive in the world today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bicyea</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1024248</link>
		<dc:creator>Bicyea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1024248</guid>
		<description>Want to know if these bulbs are dangerous? Take the ultimate test-- TRY TO TAKE ONE ON AN AIRPLANE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to know if these bulbs are dangerous? Take the ultimate test&#8211; TRY TO TAKE ONE ON AN AIRPLANE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outlander</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1024094</link>
		<dc:creator>Outlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1024094</guid>
		<description>Where can you buy LED light bulbs?  I thought they were hugely expensive, very bulky, and cast very little light.  Is that true?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where can you buy LED light bulbs?  I thought they were hugely expensive, very bulky, and cast very little light.  Is that true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kafir</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1024032</link>
		<dc:creator>Kafir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1024032</guid>
		<description>It comes as no shock to me that a left-wing &quot;solution&quot; only causes more problems downstream. Isn&#039;t that the way with all their ideas? Got poor people? Easy, just start writing them checks every month. You say that will torpedo their family and sap their desire to move up and they&#039;ll become dependent on those checks? You heartless fascist, you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It comes as no shock to me that a left-wing &#8220;solution&#8221; only causes more problems downstream. Isn&#8217;t that the way with all their ideas? Got poor people? Easy, just start writing them checks every month. You say that will torpedo their family and sap their desire to move up and they&#8217;ll become dependent on those checks? You heartless fascist, you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: electric-rascal</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1023963</link>
		<dc:creator>electric-rascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1023963</guid>
		<description>When incandescent bulbs are outlawed, only the outlaws will have incandescent bulbs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When incandescent bulbs are outlawed, only the outlaws will have incandescent bulbs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gekkobear</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1023828</link>
		<dc:creator>gekkobear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1023828</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Wearyman’s use of Cape Cod refers to a type of house. The place Cape Cod is in Massachusetts&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I wondered, but honestly I have no clue.  Either about North-East USA geography or about home buying/styles.  I rent, and I&#039;ve never been closer to NY than Chicago.

And the extra research did show that apparently I live in a below average cost area... My electric bill January (I don&#039;t save them, but that one missed the trash) was $39.58 for electricity (2 bedroom condo, total 450 KWh for 33 days).  I know I can&#039;t save $50/month.

And switching over for $5/month?  Hell, when I first looked into it, each bulb was around $5.

Sorry, I didn&#039;t realize the extent of the cost of living sticker shock when I wrote that first post.  Remind me not to move to New York without getting paid a hell of a lot more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Wearyman’s use of Cape Cod refers to a type of house. The place Cape Cod is in Massachusetts</p></blockquote>
<p>I wondered, but honestly I have no clue.  Either about North-East USA geography or about home buying/styles.  I rent, and I&#8217;ve never been closer to NY than Chicago.</p>
<p>And the extra research did show that apparently I live in a below average cost area&#8230; My electric bill January (I don&#8217;t save them, but that one missed the trash) was $39.58 for electricity (2 bedroom condo, total 450 KWh for 33 days).  I know I can&#8217;t save $50/month.</p>
<p>And switching over for $5/month?  Hell, when I first looked into it, each bulb was around $5.</p>
<p>Sorry, I didn&#8217;t realize the extent of the cost of living sticker shock when I wrote that first post.  Remind me not to move to New York without getting paid a hell of a lot more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: opusrex</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1023779</link>
		<dc:creator>opusrex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 02:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1023779</guid>
		<description>And all my eco-nut &quot;friends&quot; thought I was nuts to replace all my bulbs with LED bulbs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And all my eco-nut &#8220;friends&#8221; thought I was nuts to replace all my bulbs with LED bulbs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dentalque</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1023505</link>
		<dc:creator>dentalque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1023505</guid>
		<description>FYI
&lt;blockquote&gt;gekkobear on March 20, 2008 at 7:51 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Wearyman&#039;s use of Cape Cod refers to a type of house.  The place Cape Cod is in Massachusetts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI</p>
<blockquote><p>gekkobear on March 20, 2008 at 7:51 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Wearyman&#8217;s use of Cape Cod refers to a type of house.  The place Cape Cod is in Massachusetts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gekkobear</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1023445</link>
		<dc:creator>gekkobear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1023445</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If you are wondering how I noticed, I have a large filing system where I file all my paid bills and other important paperwork. It was easy as pie to go back a year or two and check and compare on a month-to-month basis.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m not saying your wrong, and the NE seaboard has a much higher KWh than the rest of the country.  Looking over a 2003 chart (again, what I could find) at &quot;http://michaelbluejay.com/electricity/cost.html&quot; NY looks awful.

I live in Colorado, used to Live in Kansas (8.14 and 7.71 cents/KWh, looks to be median numbers for that year).  The Chart shows NY as 14.31 for the state.  Beyond that, Cape Cod may very well be pricier than most of NY (so above average there), and I was in a lower cost area of Kansas I think...

I&#039;d be curious to know what your KWh usage is (if that&#039;s on the bills) but no biggie.  Your location helps explain the discrepancies.

Where I live, I&#039;ve lived by myself in apartments where my electric bill didn&#039;t hit $50, and I had 3 roommates once in Kansas in a 4 bedroom duplex and I don&#039;t think we ever cleared $150 for the electric bill (but expenses in Lawrence Kansas don&#039;t exactly relate 1:1 to Cape Cod). :)  And I think Lawrence is off Wolf Creek Power Plant from KCP&amp;L, which is one of the few Nuclear plants running, so that could affect the cost too.

So a $50 savings (when mine now is $60-80, live alone, 2 bedroom condo) sounded iffy.  But when you&#039;re paying double or more for electricity, that changes things (both the usage calculation, and the savings).

I&#039;d be curious to know what you pay per KWh today (which may be on your current bill).  That would help give an idea of how that $50 savings would correlate elsewhere.

Again, though, no pressure.  Knowing you&#039;re in one of the worst areas for electric costs (California and NY seem to fight for the top of that list) answers the questions I had about your statement.

I&#039;ll try to remember there are places where the simple cost of living is more than twice what I&#039;ve known, and therefore people stating savings aren&#039;t talking in &quot;my dollars&quot;... and I&#039;ll avoid moving to Hawaii.

But yes, as lighting is generally 1/6th of electric usage, your bill must be staggering (to those of us in cheap electricity land).

Oh, HA, March 18th news story quote &quot;The average cost of electricity is higher on Cape Cod than it is in any state in the continental United States. &quot;

http://www.capecodonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080318/NEWS/803180325

So yeah, you&#039;re in the worst of the worst.

And, looking for another story (from Dec. last year)... &quot;Climate and customer ownership of Colorado Springs Utilities combine to rank the typical Springs residential energy bill as fifth-lowest in
the nation, according to a recent study of 300 cities.&quot;.

Sorry, the simple comparison I did in my head here wasn&#039;t really comparable, worse than any state VS one of the low 5 cities nationwide.  Yeah, that&#039;s not going to relate well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If you are wondering how I noticed, I have a large filing system where I file all my paid bills and other important paperwork. It was easy as pie to go back a year or two and check and compare on a month-to-month basis.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying your wrong, and the NE seaboard has a much higher KWh than the rest of the country.  Looking over a 2003 chart (again, what I could find) at &#8220;http://michaelbluejay.com/electricity/cost.html&#8221; NY looks awful.</p>
<p>I live in Colorado, used to Live in Kansas (8.14 and 7.71 cents/KWh, looks to be median numbers for that year).  The Chart shows NY as 14.31 for the state.  Beyond that, Cape Cod may very well be pricier than most of NY (so above average there), and I was in a lower cost area of Kansas I think&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be curious to know what your KWh usage is (if that&#8217;s on the bills) but no biggie.  Your location helps explain the discrepancies.</p>
<p>Where I live, I&#8217;ve lived by myself in apartments where my electric bill didn&#8217;t hit $50, and I had 3 roommates once in Kansas in a 4 bedroom duplex and I don&#8217;t think we ever cleared $150 for the electric bill (but expenses in Lawrence Kansas don&#8217;t exactly relate 1:1 to Cape Cod). :)  And I think Lawrence is off Wolf Creek Power Plant from KCP&amp;L, which is one of the few Nuclear plants running, so that could affect the cost too.</p>
<p>So a $50 savings (when mine now is $60-80, live alone, 2 bedroom condo) sounded iffy.  But when you&#8217;re paying double or more for electricity, that changes things (both the usage calculation, and the savings).</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be curious to know what you pay per KWh today (which may be on your current bill).  That would help give an idea of how that $50 savings would correlate elsewhere.</p>
<p>Again, though, no pressure.  Knowing you&#8217;re in one of the worst areas for electric costs (California and NY seem to fight for the top of that list) answers the questions I had about your statement.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try to remember there are places where the simple cost of living is more than twice what I&#8217;ve known, and therefore people stating savings aren&#8217;t talking in &#8220;my dollars&#8221;&#8230; and I&#8217;ll avoid moving to Hawaii.</p>
<p>But yes, as lighting is generally 1/6th of electric usage, your bill must be staggering (to those of us in cheap electricity land).</p>
<p>Oh, HA, March 18th news story quote &#8220;The average cost of electricity is higher on Cape Cod than it is in any state in the continental United States. &#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.capecodonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080318/NEWS/803180325" rel="nofollow">http://www.capecodonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080318/NEWS/803180325</a></p>
<p>So yeah, you&#8217;re in the worst of the worst.</p>
<p>And, looking for another story (from Dec. last year)&#8230; &#8220;Climate and customer ownership of Colorado Springs Utilities combine to rank the typical Springs residential energy bill as fifth-lowest in<br />
the nation, according to a recent study of 300 cities.&#8221;.</p>
<p>Sorry, the simple comparison I did in my head here wasn&#8217;t really comparable, worse than any state VS one of the low 5 cities nationwide.  Yeah, that&#8217;s not going to relate well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sekhmet</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/comment-page-3/#comment-1023408</link>
		<dc:creator>Sekhmet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/19/green-shock-cfls-more-dangerous-than-first-thought/#comment-1023408</guid>
		<description>The problem is that the non-compact fluorescent bulbs were big and long, and could not be tossed so easily into the garbage, leaving the garbagemen able to see and reject the burned-out bulbs, forcing people to dispose of them properly, more or less.

CFLs are no bigger than a standard bulb, and there&#039;s no way anybody&#039;s diving through garbage looking for them. One million times &quot;Oh, it&#039;s just one bulb, it&#039;s too big a bother to dispose of it properly&quot; equals one million improperly-disposed-of fluorescent bulbs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that the non-compact fluorescent bulbs were big and long, and could not be tossed so easily into the garbage, leaving the garbagemen able to see and reject the burned-out bulbs, forcing people to dispose of them properly, more or less.</p>
<p>CFLs are no bigger than a standard bulb, and there&#8217;s no way anybody&#8217;s diving through garbage looking for them. One million times &#8220;Oh, it&#8217;s just one bulb, it&#8217;s too big a bother to dispose of it properly&#8221; equals one million improperly-disposed-of fluorescent bulbs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
