The Andrew Sullivan Double Standard
posted at 11:31 am on March 15, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
The reaction of Obama supporters to Jeremiah Wright has certainly been instructive, especially those who had plenty to say about Mitt Romney and Mormonism last year. Today’s example is Andrew Sullivan, who wondered whether Romney wore Mormon underwear and posted repeatedly about the polygamy that Romney’s faith repudiated over a century earlier. Today, he’s singing a different tune about Barack Obama, whose minister didn’t make his racially inflammatory statements 100 years ago or even thirty years ago:
All I can say is that very, very few public figures have been so candid about why and how they found the message of Jesus so compelling, or have explained their faith journey so pellucidly (certainly not our spiritually inarticulate current president). The appeal of that church to Obama was not anger or racism or the ugliness in some of Jeremiah Wright’s tub-thumping. What Obama discovered – as a previous atheist – was the spiritual power of Christian hope. …
I don’t know how you can read Obama’s writing or listen to any of his speeches and believe that Wright’s ugliest messages are what Obama believes or has ever believed.
Bear in mind that all of these speeches took place while Obama attended Wright’s church and contributed to his ministry. Here’s Andrew on Mitt Romney’s responsibility for racism that his church publicly repudiated 30 years ago, and against which Romney repeatedly argued. He agrees with Christopher Hitchens’ statement:
Mitt Romney was an adult in 1978. We need to know how he justified this to himself, and we need to hear his self-criticism, if he should chance to have one.
[Andrew] The awful history of the LDS church’s treatment of African-Americans requires an accounting by any leading Mormon …
Let’s make this clear. Romney had a responsibility to explain the racism of the Mormons, which they themselves repudiated in 1978, including “self-criticism” for being a Mormon during that period. However, with Obama belonging to and supporting a church in which his self-described “moral compass” preaches that the US created the HIV virus to commit genocide and calling the nation the “the US of KKK-A”, Obama gets a pass because … he writes so beautifully of the faith he found through Jeremiah Wright?
Uh, sure.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
I think it’s obvious that Andrew Sullivan is Antonio Salieri to Christopher Hitchens’s Mozart. I waiting for Hitchens to drop a verbal nuke on this turd.
Sean68 on March 15, 2008 at 11:36 AM
Andrew Sullivan is a hypocritical fool like most liberals. Why anyone pay attention to a man who can exposed so easily using his own posts just months apart is a complete mystery to me. Perhaps like Barak, he simply thinks we are all fools who want to believe his lies.
TheBigOldDog on March 15, 2008 at 11:37 AM
I’m wondering what Hitchens will say about this as well.
I’m not surprised Obama supporters are shrugging it off. It is a cult after all. Much like RP supporters, reality never seems to matter.
lorien1973 on March 15, 2008 at 11:38 AM
As noted already, bro before ho before mormon boy.
maverick muse on March 15, 2008 at 11:38 AM
Sullivan must drink a lot before he blogs.
Lincoln on March 15, 2008 at 11:38 AM
That Andi went to Oxford or something didn’t he?
Man, he is just smart.
benrand on March 15, 2008 at 11:39 AM
Andrew Sullivan’s blog is hard to read. Too much of unnecessary emotions and too little of dispassionate analysis.
Mormon racism has never been repudiated. Practices have changed but the underlying theology has never been rejected. As I said repeatedly, Romney is clearly not a racist, and any accusations that he is are offensive.
freevillage on March 15, 2008 at 11:42 AM
I still don’t think that this “scandal” is going to affect O’B because Dems and Libs are easily able to overlook the wrongdoings of their own side. They are hypocrits – always have been. Always will be.
Those that were excited about this…will be disappointed.
tickleddragon on March 15, 2008 at 11:44 AM
Oh, and who the hell is Andrew Sullivan anyway? I see his name frequently on this site, but why should I care what this guy thinks or says??
tickleddragon on March 15, 2008 at 11:44 AM
I think this is death in the general election. Obama can’t retroactively undo with charm and likability 20 years of close, personal friendship and spiritual mentoring with an anti-semitic, racist, anti-American demagogue.
Sean68 on March 15, 2008 at 11:48 AM
…and Harvard. There are a lot of smart people who spew all kinds of nonsense they believe. Obama has blinded many, and will continue to disappoint.
Tickled, it doesn’t matter – he can never win with just that handful of ‘believers’ in emptiness. It will have an effect on the independents and center righties, without whom no one will win.
Entelechy on March 15, 2008 at 11:48 AM
A popular conservative blogger.
freevillage on March 15, 2008 at 11:48 AM
Heh. Well put!
petefrt on March 15, 2008 at 11:48 AM
He’s an HIV positive homosexual who sometimes plays the token conservative on TeeVee. He’s an Obama boi.
ninjapirate on March 15, 2008 at 11:50 AM
…who claims to be conservative…and not that much, lately, any more…
Entelechy on March 15, 2008 at 11:52 AM
Also, I guess being a “Christianist” is okay when one is Christianist-ing for radical, left-wing political ideology.
its vintage duh on March 15, 2008 at 11:53 AM
I love how Sullivan slipped that atheist into the mix..
Pam on March 15, 2008 at 11:55 AM
No minds were changed this week in the Obamamessiah camp; there is nothing that can sway the blind lust of the Obama supporter.
I’ll bet a cookie that after a few drinks, Michelle Obama sounds just like Rev. Wright’s Greatest Hits.
rockbend on March 15, 2008 at 11:59 AM
Although reading sites like HuffPo is something I rarely do any more, my curiosity about the leftist reactions to Jeremiah Wright got the best of me this morning, and I surfed some threads over there.
Their support runs along two lines.
Many posters there agree with Jeremiah Wright’s anti-American, race-baiting message. So they must defend Wright to defend themselves.
Most of the remainder may admit Wright’s rhetoric is excessive, but they make excuses for him, granting him a pass on the basis of one version or another of progressive victimology.
petefrt on March 15, 2008 at 12:02 PM
It must be a slow news day when Andrew Sullivan makes the front page of Hot Air.
Weebork on March 15, 2008 at 12:08 PM
The moral equivalency game has already begun.
Anyone who has accepted the endorsement of someone who has said something objectionable is being treated as the moral equivalency of maintaining a close personal relationship (spiritual guide and mentor) and attending an church for 20 years.
Curious logic though I bet it flies.
In fact, this apparent deficiency was actually turned into a positive this AM on MSNBC when an Obama supporter said that his unwillingness to “throw Wright under the bus” was seen as a sign of character and strength.
The crazy season is upon us…..
moxie_neanderthal on March 15, 2008 at 12:10 PM
Jeremiah Wright’s “15 minutes of fame” has made Ward Churchill blush with envy. His malevolence will be repudiated by Christain ministers on Sunday across this nation that will make him an aberration. While Barak Obama supporters claim this is a ploy of the Clinton Machine, (which is total BS), Obama will have to accelerate his distance from his pastor’s screed with more than just “some pretty words” or this damage will leave some lasting scars if this is framed as Obama’s perception of “hope and change”.
Rovin on March 15, 2008 at 12:11 PM
How hard Left does one need to be to consider Andrew Sullivan a conservative I wonder?
TheBigOldDog on March 15, 2008 at 12:14 PM
Ha! Love it!
Tzetzes on March 15, 2008 at 12:15 PM
That’s pretty much been my experience over the last few days with the vast majority (90/10) being those who agree with everything Wright espouses.
TheBigOldDog on March 15, 2008 at 12:17 PM
I was being sarcastic. I know who he is, but I still don’t understand why we give a rat’s butt what this rat’s butt says?
tickleddragon on March 15, 2008 at 12:19 PM
Have a Coke and a smile, Andrew Sullivan.
mymanpotsandpans on March 15, 2008 at 12:20 PM
Sounding like a broken record here, myself, I know…but I sure hope you are right. I think it’s very optimistic to believe that anyone will care that the messiah has a nasty uncle.
tickleddragon on March 15, 2008 at 12:21 PM
As a one time fan of Sully’s blog and point of view, I have long wondered how on earth he could be so “on board” with the Ron Paul and BHO philosophies. Of course, this is the same man who endorsed Kerry and claimed that McCain was the only other “acceptable” Republican candidate.
To his credit, he is also a rabid anti-Clinton blogger, and has done a lot (I think) to help destroy the inevitablility argument made by fans of Her Majesty the Anti-Christ and her sociopathic rapist husband.
But Sully is losing his bona fides with respect to his conservative reputation. His attacks on “Christianism” (whatever the hell that is) are oddly reminiscent of the arguments made by those who try to equate Jihad with conservative Christian prniciples (ie: Rosie and her ilk).
In reality, Sillivan’s (typo, but I’m keeping it) frustration with conservatism stems exclusively from his overt rage over America’s refusal to accept his “marriage” to another man as legitimate. I can understand why he’d be upset, but he seems to be the ONLY one who fails to see that this hostility has clouded his judgement on a host of other conservative positions.
Instead of “agreeing to disagree,” he did the Kos thing and declared WAR on conservatism and the Republican Party.
That no one really cares has made him practically psychotic, which I guess explains his attraction to the Cults of the Nazi-loving Paul and the Marxist Obama.
Gartrip on March 15, 2008 at 12:30 PM
You just don’t understand the mind of the modern liberal. Racism against blacks is a sin for which us whites are forever guilty and must constantly flog ourselves for. Racism against whites is morally acceptable and to be expected because whites are the devil.
p0s3r on March 15, 2008 at 12:48 PM
If Mormons didn’t wear underwear at all, Andrew Sullivan wouldn’t have had a problems with them. :-)
Hummer53 on March 15, 2008 at 12:51 PM
This is not just how the black left thinks, this is how the Left thinks. Most Americans, busy living their lives, have no idea. Most leftists–e.g. Michelle Obama–live in the echo chamber. Not all (the smarter ones know)–but many know what impact this will have in the general election. Americans will see these comments, learn of the relationship of the speaker to Obama, and be horrified. It mocks their pride in their country; and most won’t stand for it. And at this point, there’s really nothing Obama can do about it.
Sean68 on March 15, 2008 at 12:51 PM
You guys need to realize that 1) this will poison the well for many blue collar (and most all Blue Dog) Dems. You know – those Archie Bunker Democrats, those “obsessed” folks in Ohio, and 2) if this spooks enough Supers to give Hill the big mo going forward (how close will PA be now?), there still will be hell to pay come August out in Denver.
rhodeymark on March 15, 2008 at 12:56 PM
As a note, i’m not surprised to see freevillage is anti-mormon.
But Sullivan is, as usual, hypocritical. I wonder if he even sees that he is? At one point he used to be conservative; now he’s a full-fledged liberal.
Vanceone on March 15, 2008 at 12:58 PM
It’s not that Sullivan has double standards; it’s that Andy abandoned standards long ago. “Standards”, “principles” and “logic” can’t be allowed to have any effect on his full-spectrum man-crush on Barry.
Vote Sauron 08 on March 15, 2008 at 12:58 PM
Uh, sure, is right. Wating to hear from “the screaming one” himself, Lawrence O’Donnell.
RMR on March 15, 2008 at 1:02 PM
Andrew Sullivan has one thing on his mind. Sex. He’s angry because orthodox Christian churches won’t give their blessing to his promiscuous gay lifestyle.
Ellen on March 15, 2008 at 1:03 PM
Lived there for a few years. Very hot and dry in the summer. Whole place is kindling. Not much water. Should burn well.
JiangxiDad on March 15, 2008 at 1:03 PM
By leftist definition, only whites are racists.
jukin on March 15, 2008 at 1:04 PM
Actually, Andrew has it backwards. He missed where Obama pellucidly describes that it was not the spiritual message of Jesus but more his own very secular revelation that the black church could be a political, economic and social force and agent of change he could buy into. In fact, he seems up to now to have embraced Rev Wright-ism as the audacity of the greatest hope, where principalities and powers spoken of in the Bible can be challenged and defeated as part of the struggle.
Oh, except one minor detail: Satan, it appears, has audaciously been replaced in this black struggle theology by The Man…the white man.
econavenger on March 15, 2008 at 1:06 PM
That’s the thing. There have got to be people high-up in the Dem Party struggling behind closed doors explaining to the true believers how nominating Obama will result in a John McCain presidency. There has GOT to be a brutal battle taking place behind the scenes on just this point. I can’t even imagine what’s going on but it involves panic and shouting.
Sean68 on March 15, 2008 at 1:07 PM
“America created HIV”
“The U.S.of KKK-A”
Funny, I don’t see this guy packing his bags.
“Like a bat in the church, enjoying it’s environment, while rotting it from the inside with it’s caustic droppings.”
–Orson Scott Card, who is btw, Mormon
franksalterego on March 15, 2008 at 1:21 PM
Can’t think of anyone on the Dem side with any true stature. Who’s an elder of their party, John Kerry? Nancy Peolosi? But Bill could be talking to the supers.
JiangxiDad on March 15, 2008 at 1:22 PM
Oh, and who the hell is Andrew Sullivan anyway?
A popular conservative blogger.
freevillage on March 15, 2008 at 11:48 AM
Wow, I mean Wow… How in the world did you come up with that?
What some people are missing with this story; Michelle Obama spewed some of the very same sentiment is a recent speech made at UCLA.. Connect the dots.. No way Americans are going to put an American hater & a white people hater into the white house. This man is finished!
Keemo on March 15, 2008 at 1:23 PM
He’s explained his stance on various issues.
freevillage on March 15, 2008 at 1:26 PM
Guess my other post was a little too extreme cause it dissapeared into the void.
No matter. Point is Sully either has no problems with the remarks for his own bizarre reason, or he’s living vicariously through Jeremiah Wright railing again “rich white people” or some such nonsense.
But why should we expect Obamassiah to apologize for Rev. Wrongs remarks last week, and every week for the past few decades. This is the United Church of Christ. Anyone who doesn’t chuckle at that dispatate group of counterculture “churches” hasn’t been paying attention.
Oddly enough I do have famly who attend a UCofC. The people there are nice enough, and I didn’t really care they had a gay minister in their parish… until I found out he had a boyfriend (Its the whole inclination vs. actuality cabal). Now I just sort of shrug it off and don’t mention anything because I don’t want to hurt my relative’s feelings, and it’s not a hill I’m willing to die on. It’s not as if they have anyone else to replace him, anyway.
BKennedy on March 15, 2008 at 1:29 PM
- nasty ‘uncle’ (I don’t believe for 1 second that he didn’t know)
- supernasty wife
- not as clean as marketed
- emptiness, inside and all around
- blank record “what have you done, not what do you tell me”
- socialist ideals
By itself, no, you’re right – but it is not insignificant, when paired with all the other nasties.
Entelechy on March 15, 2008 at 1:33 PM
I’d have to agree. Most posters at those sites applaud Wright, as he says what they think. He hates America, and they hate America. He preaches Marxist victimology and class warfare, and that’s their religion too.
petefrt on March 15, 2008 at 1:36 PM
The leftists get their news from the MSM who haven’t touched on Wright and will continue to pretend there is no such thing as the Rev.Wright.
Austin’s all wrapped up in itself with the SXSW Festival. By the time it’s over, MAYBE the networks will acknowledge watz up. But until then, Obama banners fly.
maverick muse on March 15, 2008 at 1:37 PM
It’s Obama 46% Clinton 45% – Rasmussen – Obama down 7% overnight – Tickled, it’s having an effect, not by itself, but coupled with other news about the empty messiah.
Mr. Steyn summed it up the best.
Entelechy on March 15, 2008 at 1:38 PM
AoSHQ quotes from The Audacity of Hope:
And so on.
Karl on March 15, 2008 at 1:50 PM
Yeah, Lowry had that yesterday. I linked it an update to the Obama post last night.
Allahpundit on March 15, 2008 at 1:57 PM
That’s the hope, that Denver will so alienate and disgust Obama’s young supporters and black supporters that they won’t bother to vote for Shrillary in November.
petefrt on March 15, 2008 at 2:01 PM
“I attended, but I didn’t inhale.”
-Ed Morrissey via Instapundit
N. O'Brain on March 15, 2008 at 2:08 PM
Sullivan joined the ranks of the MSM libotards long ago. He along with the likes of Matthews, Olbermann et al. will continue to shill for the Messiah regardless of facts and the truth. Short of witnessing actual horns and a tail sprouting from Obamas body the MSM will continue to spin any damaging issue as just a Momentary Lapse of Judgment. HOPE and CHANGE baby, thats all that matters!
dmann on March 15, 2008 at 2:15 PM
Barak Obama is a black supremist racist.
paulsur on March 15, 2008 at 2:17 PM
The only time I read Sullivan anymore is when someone posts an excerpt on a conservative blog.
PLEASE STOP DOING THAT!!!!!!! ;)
BD57 on March 15, 2008 at 2:18 PM
Newsmax is claiming they have proof Obama was at at least one of the sermons with the racist stuff.
wepeople on March 15, 2008 at 2:19 PM
Anyone thought to ask “Pastor” Wright’s ideas about gay marriage?
Flea on March 15, 2008 at 2:23 PM
I have a feeling that Obama’s tie to the church is that Racist wife of his Michelle. He strikes me as a mild mannered guy, but she is a bigot if I’ve ever seen one. However, you can’t be a political figure much less run for President and surround yourself with “those people”.
THE CHOSEN ONE on March 15, 2008 at 2:24 PM
Hard to argue with that assessment.
Sullivan was one of the handful of Manhattan liberal types who, briefly after 9/11, “got it” when it came to the threat of islamofascism – but who then reverted to type when George Bush wouldn’t support the idea of Sullivan marrying his boyfriend.
Can’t argue with that, either. Sullivan’s problem is that his entire universe orbits around his genitals, and it can’t help but to affect the quality of his reasoning – what little there is left of it.
A request with which I heartily concur.
Spurius Ligustinus on March 15, 2008 at 2:25 PM
What do we expect of the leftist media? I am not surprize at all and these people will continue to defend their candidate no matter what. We just have to be patient and point out the difference. Juxtapose the difference on TV and someone should be asking them questions.
mariloubaker on March 15, 2008 at 2:25 PM
There are certain Icons in America where even hard evidence failed to prove guilt, the same standard has already been applied to the Messiah. Obama’s mantra is fast becoming “the truth, need not be!” All hail the Messiah.
dmann on March 15, 2008 at 2:28 PM
This whole sorry episode is ripping the veil away from the so-called loyal opposition. The entire modern liberal movement is based on hatred for whitey and for ‘Amerikkka’.
Bring it on.
PattyJ on March 15, 2008 at 2:31 PM
Andrew Sullivan–ah, so the disease finally reached his brain.
second digit on March 15, 2008 at 2:32 PM
This is what happens when you surround yourself with racists.
General Election: McCain vs. Obama Rasmussen Tracking McCain 47, Obama 42, Und 11 McCain +5
The beginning of the end.
THE CHOSEN ONE on March 15, 2008 at 2:33 PM
The appeal of that church to Obama was not anger or racism or the ugliness in some of Jeremiah Wright’s tub-thumping.
Steve Sailer has been reading the books Obama wrote, and has a different opinion.
Read the whole thing, as they say.
flenser on March 15, 2008 at 2:36 PM
Andrew Sullivan is a ‘popular conservative blogger’ among liberals. I’ve never met a conservative who had any time for the man.
flenser on March 15, 2008 at 2:40 PM
On the other hand, plenty of Romney supporters (mostly just McCain haters who fell back on the default competitor most likely to beat him) repeatedly declared Romney’s religion to be off limits and refused to discuss the CONTINUED intolerance taught and practiced by Mormons, including Capt Ed.
Not 30 years ago. NOW. In the present, Romney never addressed the hate and slander of Jews, Catholics and other Protestant sects by Mormons, and people like the Capt. enabled him by declaring discussion of Mormon intolerance out of bounds and his minions chimed in by calling anyone who brought it up “anti-Mormon bigots” and McCain haters and nominal Romney supporters shouted down any criticism of Romney’s cult.
Why did Romney get a pass for the despicable teachings of his cult, while you lambaste Obama? And Romney is not just sitting in the congregation “nodding his head” as the Capt. so snarkily puts it: he is a 3rd generation elder in a dynastic family leadership of LDS, with significant influence of the policy of LDS.
this:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0407/3673.html
and this:
http://www.slate.com/id/2178568/
http://carnageandculture.blogspot.com/2008/01/mitt-romney-and-mormon-question.html
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/BOM/int/long.html
Those same people who declared Romney’s religion out of bounds of political discourse are now cherry picking impolitic statements by Obama’s pastor and condemning Obama for them.
Hypocrisy and political expedience, pure and simple. No one who excused Romney’s disgusting, hateful theology have any grounds to rant about Obama’s pastor, including Capt. Ed.
docweasel on March 15, 2008 at 3:08 PM
Obama and Wright, McCain and Hagee…it’s a wash in the general.
okonkolo on March 15, 2008 at 3:29 PM
I take it you were a Huckster supporter?
a capella on March 15, 2008 at 3:36 PM
Not in the same league, Hagee isn’t McCain’s pastor of 20 years, Hagee isn’t even the same denomination as McCain.
Also, Hagee doesn’t have links to Louis Farrakhan, and McCain doesn’t have links to terrorists like Obama does, also McCain’s Wife is proud of America.
Chakra Hammer on March 15, 2008 at 3:40 PM
Give Andy a break. If you had hemorrhoids like him you would be cranky too. Especially if you irritated them the way he does,
aloysiusmiller on March 15, 2008 at 3:42 PM
*blinks* docweasel, I would advise you to put down the crack pipe and back away from the internet before you hurt yourself.
The LDS church has a good relationship with the Jewish community. Sure, there’s been a few flaps here and there, but we have good relations with them.
What intolerance have we, the LDS, preached? Unless you are like Andrew Sullivan and your life revolves around your sexual identity…. well, we don’t support homosexuality.
Still, docweasel, if your intent was to drum up support for the position of how intolerant the LDS faith is, I would suggest you pretty well failed miserably, and are going to acheive the opposite effect.
Vanceone on March 15, 2008 at 3:45 PM
Sullivan doesn’t have a double standard: he has a single standard, which is that anyone who supports gay marriage and the gay lifestyle is A-OK and anyone who doesn’t is an evil, Christianist, fascist, mean-spirited, cannibalistic, blah, blah, blah. He correctly sees Obama as a cultural leftist and has imputed to the Messiah certain views on gay “issues” that Obama may not actually share. Hence the, er, man-crush. Sullivan’s purple prose re Obama reminds me of Niles Crane’s unrequited crush on Daphne Moon.
Travis Bickle on March 15, 2008 at 4:34 PM
Alright, who spilled the beans about HIV? Lets not let N5H1 and HPV out of the bag too, hush on Ebloa while we are at. it.!
gbear on March 15, 2008 at 4:39 PM
Someone tell docweasel that Romney lost…He’ll be happy then…Maybe?
Nozzle on March 15, 2008 at 4:42 PM
Didn’t Jonah Goldberg, or was it Mark Steyn, say that Sullivan would soon contradict what he said at the beginning of a sentence with the end of his sentence?
aikidoka on March 15, 2008 at 5:14 PM
I’m very sorry that Docweasel – who I’ve respected in the past – appears to have gone off the same deep end as Sullivan. I’m Jewish, my wife is Mormon. Note I don’t say we WERE, we ARE. Neither one of us has ever heard one of our in-laws speak an intolerant word. We go to services together, everyone knows who and what we are, and no one has said ANYTHING negative to us (except “so when are you going to have children?” and we get that from both congregations.)
It is my dream that in his last month in office, Bush will give an interview to a gay friendly publication. He would say that just as only Nixon could go to China, only a conservative, Christian Republican could get the country to accept gay marriage – but because the left chose to hammer him on every possible point, he didn’t have the political capital to do it.
Sullivan’s reaction would be enjoyable.
Bombast on March 15, 2008 at 5:49 PM
Someone tell docweasel that Romney lost…He’ll be happy then…Maybe?
Nozzle on March 15, 2008 at 4:42 PM
docweasel won’t be happy; not today, tomorrow, or any time in the near future… Something wrong with that little thing called “human spirit” with this creature.
Keemo on March 15, 2008 at 6:30 PM
It is NOT unusual that the lefties aren’t all that upset at Rev. Wright’s rants. How many times have we seen recent surveys saying something like 45% of Americans (mostly Democrats) believe that the Government/Jews was responsible for 9/11, or the malarkey about AIDS being a gummint plot to kill black people (although it seems to hit gays a lot worse) or most of the other daft ideas? That Barry O’ went to church with this nutjob in the pulpit is worth a shoulder shrug. It is nothing compared to Barry’s vapid message of hope and hope and change and more hope.
GeneSmith on March 15, 2008 at 7:10 PM
bombast:
You respected me in the past? I’m shocked! I’m glad you have seen the light and now disrespect me, that would have been a lot to live up to.
Anyway, thanks for saying you did respect me in the past, I’m flattered! No one has ever said that. Of course, since a couple of writers on our blog use the name “docweasel”, it might not have even have been me you respected.
Still, thanks! Even being respected in the past tense, and even though it might not have been me, that made my day!
That’s just how easy I am and how starved for affection and acceptance.
docweasel on March 15, 2008 at 7:28 PM
Yeah, we could kind of tell the “starving for attention” bit with the hard-hitting “And THIS is why Mormons are evil!” bit.
It was clearly a cry for help.
Your suggested list, from a person who knows essentially nothing about Mormonism:
Joseph Smith is not and was not ever God. It’d be like condemning Christians for eating leavened bread because Moses disallowed it. Moreover, unless Mormonism commands Mormons to slaughter anyone who isn’t Mormon (like say, Islam does,) it doesn’t really matter how strongly worded God’s response was to the existence of other faiths. Every other faith could still be an abomination to God without Mormons being called to take a saber and kill the practitioners of the false faiths.
Nevermind we’re talking about what God supposedly said secondhand from Joseph Smith nearly two centuries ago vs. the hateful rhetoric spewed by Barack’s spiritual advisor last week.
SHOCK! The adherents of a religion might have a religious book about which they might believe is divine? Impossible! Arrest that man, he believes in sacred books!
This is a theological teaching irrelevant to the Presidency. Otherwise its just another “there is good and evil in the world” that is standard fare in all monotheistic religions.
Even taken at the most literal and non-symbolic meaning, it would essentially condemn everyone who isn’t albino for having darker skin than anyone else. No one’s skin isn’t colored, so this passage is eith nonsensical, purely symbolic, or actually is racist and simply not practiced since its not an important article of faith.
In other words the president of the Mormons (not America, and not Mitt Romney since he was never the Mormon president) has sort of pope-like moral authority. There’s a shocking religious development.
I can’t really be bothered with the rest in a point-by-point refutation, but the summary is this:
You hate Mormons. You think they’re a cult. We get that. If you want to impose a religious test in your own mind on your favorite hated cult, you’re welcome to do so. Please don’t poison the rest of us with your nonsensical rantings.
Barack Obama’s preacher is solely responsible for his rhetoric because chances are the United Church of Christ does not endorse anything he says, and none of his vitriolic ramblings can be based in Biblical scriptures. In other word’s he’s a heretic. Barack’s spiritual advisor for 20 years is a hateful heretic, and if Barack were truly concerned about that for his and his family’s salvation he would have left that parish for a different UCofC parish long ago.
But he didn’t. Barack chose his spiritual advisor from one Parish. It isn’t about answering for the various articles of faith Jeremiah Wright espoused, but why Barack actively supported the teachings of a rank heretic in the tens of thousands.
Maybe you are electing a pastor. The rest of us are electing a President. Your hateful, illogical screed says more about you than it does about Mormons. Thanks for enlightening us to your bigotry so we can avoid you in the future.
BKennedy on March 15, 2008 at 7:58 PM
Probably Berry Blue Kool-Aid with a shot of Stoli vodka?
Del Dolemonte on March 15, 2008 at 8:23 PM
I’d recommend malt liquor but I hear from Barack’s pastor that the Jews put sterilizing agents in it.
Sean68 on March 15, 2008 at 10:01 PM
Oh, and I just figured out what Barack can do to win back the American people: Publicly behead, Zaraqawi-style, Rev. Wright.
Sean68 on March 15, 2008 at 10:03 PM
BKennedy: you pointedly omit the points you _can’t_ refute. You didn’t answer ONE of the criticisms in the link I posted here:
http://www.slate.com/id/2178568/
or here:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0407/3673.html
Instead, you do exactly what I predicted and what I’m talking about vis a vis the people criticizing Obama: demonize and castigate anyone who questions Romney’s intolerant, hate-filled cult while at the same time attacking Obama with cherry-picked quotes. You are not only a hypocrite, you are intellectual vapid and dishonest. Your “point by point refutation” is nothing but your opinion, completely devoid of facts. Your opinion is that Obama is a racist hatemonger and Romney is pure as driven snow. It says more about you than it does about Obama. All you have done is show everyone what a hateful racist you are and how you despise black people.
That’s the gist of your criticism of me, reversed. I don’t guess you see how idiotic and rationally retarded your argument is.
The bottom line is, haters like you declared religion off-limits in the case of Romney, but open season in the case of Obama, forcing him to repudiate, disavow, explain or denounce his own pastor and his own religion. That’s bullshit. You’re applying a double standard because the you disagree with the guy politically. I don’t support Obama for president, but I know hypocrisy and demagogery when I see it, and you’re practicing it. Its despicable. There are plenty of valid reasons to criticize Obama on the issues. People like you are dredging up racially loaded crap to make a subtle racist attack on the guy, and whether you’re democrat or republican you should condemn that.
docweasel on March 16, 2008 at 2:36 AM
Andrew Sullivan has become irrelevant quite some time ago, as is his opinion about George W. Bush.
Were it so that Andrew Sullivan could even qualify as worthy to lick the dog pooh off of the sole of George W. Bush’s shoe, then Andrew might be someone of more significance than to be relegated to a mere footnote in the annals of journalistic ephemeral also rans.
May we hear no more of such an over sold bloviator as Andrew Sullivan and his pabulum, and may the sun shine on a new era of journalistic integrity, intelligence, and substance.
William2006 on March 16, 2008 at 3:07 AM
Sorry doc(crap)weasel, no dice. I never called Obama himself a racist hatemonger. As far as Jeremiah Wright, by his own words I hang him as a racist hatemonger. Criticizing Barack’s support of this particualr parish is perfectly legitimate. What, Wright’s is the only United Church of Christ parish in all of Illinois, or even the Chicago area? Yeah, right.
The only one calling anyone a racist hatemongering cultist is you docweasel. You won’t hear anything else and you get turbo-defensive when someone points out your glaring hatred. You want to talk Cherry-picked quotes? Half your list is comprised of the boilerplate theological claims of every single world religion (e.g. good and evil exist, all other religions are incorrect, etc). The remainder does have some fairly bizarre teachings, but none of which seem to manifest themselves in Mormon behavior towards others.
I wonder what the Mormon-on-black crime rate is.
Hey docweasel, I agree Mitt is a heretic. So are McCain, Huckabee, Clinton, and Obama. They all teach things counter to Catholic doctrine, therefore by my Catholic standards they are all heretics.
You take it to the next step and claim they are cultists, and not just regular cultists, racist hate-mongering cultists.
Then you have the audacity (of ignorance) to claim I dispise black people because I haven’t joined you on the funny farm of Mormon hatred.
Fact: Jeremiah Wright is a hateful black preacher who chooses to condemn white people and America as part of his regular sermon themes.
Barack Obama has chosen not only to listen to this preacher for decades, but to personally fund his parish to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars, and that was last year alone. Obama is complicit in Wright’s racism through both his attendance and his charity. His repudiation of that hatred now shows one of three things: he did not attend the sermons often making him a poor role model, he is perfectly fine with Wright’s hateful message making his “post-racial politics” a farce, or he’ll spend money like a drunkard on causes he hasn’t investigated thus making him a fool.
Fact: Whatever vices the Mormon religion may possess now or previously, no one was electing Mitt Romney as head of their church, nor was Romney trying to impose Mormon theology on voters.
The Mormon religion has publically repudiated racism, as has Mitt Romney. George Romney was a friend and aide to civil rights leaders. You at once call him a Mormon dynastic leader and then propose to say he’s violating the Mormon theology by not being sufficiently racist to live up to the supposed “dark skin = unclean” doctrine.
You’re spewing madness and personally insulting others. Get a clue docweasel, it is your screeds proving more and more who is prejudiced, not my responses to your fanatical lunacy. I need expend no effort to demonize you, you’re perfectly effective as doing it to yourself.
BKennedy on March 16, 2008 at 5:34 AM
But people, he writes so beautifully!
;)
Kevin M on March 16, 2008 at 10:59 AM
Comment pages: