Spitzer Awaits Next Shoe Drop
posted at 12:45 pm on March 12, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | regular view
Eliot Spitzer cited “personal failings” as the reason for his departure, but the very public scandal doesn’t promise to disappear with his resignation as Governor of New York. With his wife Silda by his side, Spitzer apologized to her, his family, his supporters, and everyone in the state for his patronage of high-priced hookers during his term as governor and as Attorney General. It appears that the feds will drop the other shoe on Spitzer:
Gov. Eliot Spitzer, reeling from revelations that he had been a client of a prostitution ring, announced his resignation today, becoming the first governor of New York to be forced from office in nearly a century.
Mr. Spitzer, appearing somber and with his wife at his side, said his resignation is to be effective Monday, and that Lt. Gov. David A. Paterson would be sworn in to replace him.
“I am deeply sorry that I did not live up to what was expected of me,” he said. “To every New Yorker, and to all those who believed in what I tried to stand for, I sincerely apologize.”
“Over the course of my public life, I have insisted — I believe correctly — that people regardless of their position or power take responsibility for their conduct,” he added. “I can and will ask no less of myself. For this reason, I am resigning from the office of governor.”
I predicted yesterday that Spitzer might try a Larry Craig strategy and just outlast the outrage. According to the New York Times, he considered that as a possibility. Spitzer found out just how few supporters he has left in Albany. As AP notes in his post, that certainly makes Spizter’s claim that he couldn’t put his beloved state through any more pain look less than honest or noble.
Spitzer avoids the ignominy of impeachment, but that’s hardly the last mine in the field. Judging from the appearance of Ted Wells at the resignation statement, Spitzer expects serious legal trouble ahead. Wells has represented clients such as Scooter Libby, Robert “Torch” Torricelli, and Michael Espy, whom Wells successfully defended against corruption charges during the Clinton administration. It hints that Spitzer hasn’t gotten a pass from federal prosecutors for violations related to his financial transactions hiding the payment to the prostitution service and could wind up in a high-profile felony trial.
Perhaps that’s why Spitzer kept emphasizing the supposedly “private” nature of his failings. He wants people to forget that he himself hardly treated prostitution as a private matter as Attorney General. He chose to not only prosecute them relentlessly, but used that to build his credentials as a law-and-order liberal. He even endorsed prosecution of johns as a means to fight prostitution, which belies all pretense of privacy claims at this late date. And an AG certainly knows that money-laundering is hardly a private affair.
He wants to make this about the sex. Doesn’t that sound familiar? Spitzer’s departure consists of a depressingly predictable combination of humiliation and arrogance.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
My prediction when I first saw all this the other day:
Spitzer is toast.
Vatican Watcher on March 12, 2008 at 12:50 PM
He wanted licenses for illegals, and a personal license for illegal behavior.
Adios.
bucktowndusty on March 12, 2008 at 12:51 PM
Morrissey –
How come when I search this page for the word “Democrat” or “(D)” I get nothing? You haven’t gone to the dark side have you?
rbb on March 12, 2008 at 12:54 PM
Eliot phone home.
Branch Rickey on March 12, 2008 at 12:56 PM
Nutroots heads explode.
Seriously though, after trashing him for months the left will reinstate Well’s hero cred any minute now.
Topsecretk9 on March 12, 2008 at 12:57 PM
Ed–
As you noted yourself, ol’ Spitz was all about the personal responsibility when he wanted to start taxing the crack trade for revenue.
see-dubya on March 12, 2008 at 1:00 PM
It’s about him being the Chief Executive of New York, responsible for the ENFORCEMENT of the law. When he chose to violate the law, he lost all credibility as an ENFORCER of the law.
He’s just another in a long line of hypocrites, who “serve the People.” He didn’t “serve” … he just got “serviced.”
OhEssYouCowboys on March 12, 2008 at 1:00 PM
So where is the “Culture of Corruption” eh Democrats? Hypocrites of the decade.
RushBaby on March 12, 2008 at 1:00 PM
My suspicious nature has me wondering whether he purposely got caught on the prostitution charge to avoid being in office when a more serious charge hits. I’m not sure what it is, perhaps Trooper-gate, perhaps something we don’t even know about yet. He had to know the bank was going to report his transactions especially after he, as I heard reported today, called and asked them to remove his name from overseas transfers. Getting caught on a “private matter” may have been more palatable to him… Time will tell.
TheBigOldDog on March 12, 2008 at 1:01 PM
He acted like all he did was steal a few cookies out of the cookie jar.
And I can’t believe his wife stood there by his side again like a Stepford wife.
fogw on March 12, 2008 at 1:05 PM
Ouch! It has to hurt when you find out that you are no longer on the movers and shakers speed dial!
He He He!!!!!! Sorry, just something about a vindictive self-righteous prick getting some of his own back at him does my black heart good. Ted Wells doesn’t come cheap (Libby ended up spending over $1M because of Richard Armitage and Colin Powell’s treason).
highhopes on March 12, 2008 at 1:06 PM
I just feel so bad for his three teenage daughters. Teenagers are not known for their sympathetic nature, they now have to go to school every day and face the barbs from young boneheads that will certainly make fun of them.
Spitzer is a slug of the lowest order.
cannonball on March 12, 2008 at 1:07 PM
I hear him and silky are forming a law partnership
/sorry that is a joke but irony runs strong in the democratic party
William Amos on March 12, 2008 at 1:09 PM
I can’t believe Spitzer had her there. The tasteful thing to do would have for him to get up there alone, tell the world that he is resigning because he’s a pig and ask the forgiveness of his family.
That being said, were I Silda Spitzer, I wouldn’t be in the same time zone and maybe not even on the same continent with the pig.
highhopes on March 12, 2008 at 1:09 PM
Haven’t I read all of this before?
Seven Percent Solution on March 12, 2008 at 1:10 PM
Private matter?
He did this for over ten years, and if that’s the case, then IT HAD to have leaked into his public life at some point, which it seems to me he desired a whole heaping fill of public life. And if he was frequenting hookers as AG, how in the hell is that NOT interfering with his “public” life.
What a prick. There aren’t enough swear words to explain what this tool has done.
Frickin liberals.
benrand on March 12, 2008 at 1:12 PM
Don’t go insulting slugs like that!
Seriously though, I obviously don’t know the dynamics of the Spitzer family but I’m hard pressed how you get beyond something like this. Not just the infidelity and possiblity that “dad” is going to be going to jail; but also the very public way this has all gone down. When all this broke, Spitzer should have gotten his family to a secluded place away from the glare of spotlights and speculation.
There, I suppose, is also the question of whether the Spitzers will divorce. I can only imagine the legal proceedings when two opportunistic Harvard educated lawyers divorce!
highhopes on March 12, 2008 at 1:15 PM
I don’t know who the bigger idiot is here. Spitwadzer, for remaining the consummate unrepentant arrogant SOB schmuck he always has been, despite the fact he was literally caught with his pants down and may soon be facing federal charges, or his wife, for doing her “Stand By Your Man” routine despite the fact she most likely is now carrying who knows whatever he happened to bring back with him from one of his recent merry trysts. Everytime I see her standing with him, she looks like she is ready to haul off , sock him in the face and rip his lungs out. I wish she actually would, just for the entertainment value alone
pilamaye on March 12, 2008 at 1:27 PM
Don’t assume his wife didn’t know. A smart wife knows when her hubby’s stepping out for 10 years. That may be why she didn’t want him to quit. That may be why she stood next to him. If she’s pissed maybe she’s pissed he was sloppy enough to get caught and humiliate her.
TheBigOldDog on March 12, 2008 at 1:38 PM
Spitzer (D-NY). The D is for Duplicity.
kirkill on March 12, 2008 at 1:43 PM
my take on it
Guardian on March 12, 2008 at 1:46 PM
There is blood in the water on this one,and there will be more blood spilt before it is over with.
Spitzer made a lot of enemies and apparently prosecuted a lot of them while he was breaking the law himself.
He filtered money to his political campaigns illegally.
He used Troopers to get dirt on his political adversaries.
He abused his power by pushing many indictments that ended
up with acquittals to make himself look like a “crusader
of justice.”
He engaged in the trafficking of women for prostitution ,
illegal money transfers,dipping the duckie while on
the taxpayers dime,and while he was prosecuting people for
doing the exact same thing he was doing.
Spitzer was a narcissistic a$$hole that didn’t care how
many lives he ruined with his political ambition.
Karma’s a B!tch ain’t it.
Kind of like watching the democrats do everything they can
to tear down the American Soldier and push for America’s
surrender in the war they voted for in Iraq just to gain Senate seats and the White House.
Baxter Greene on March 12, 2008 at 1:49 PM
I just couldn’t get over how he tried to be JFK while poorly attempting to apologise with the tired line “To whom much is given..”.
The news people were making such a big deal about the dinner dynamic in the Spitzer household was when Eliot was a child. My parents did the same thing..so what? What does that have to do with client # 9?
As for Silda, I wonder how much her father in law had to cough up to get her to stay with #9.
Pam on March 12, 2008 at 1:51 PM
Well at least he went out with a BANG!
mhexel on March 12, 2008 at 2:06 PM
Has his Oprah appearance been booked yet?
PattyJ on March 12, 2008 at 2:15 PM
Whom does this dork think he is ? ? ? William Jefferson Clinton. Not even close to the low level WJC earned.
Texyank on March 12, 2008 at 2:16 PM
No DEALS! Live by the brief die by the brief steamroller.
What’s really disgusting is that his wife was urging him to fight on. She KNEW.
And we all know that the press has known about this and hushed it up, because Spitzy was doing Gaia’s work taking down
innocentevil capitalists.Iblis on March 12, 2008 at 2:20 PM
QAT Consulting = Questionable Accounting Transactions. Does someone have a sense of humor or what?
meci on March 12, 2008 at 2:33 PM
I think Spitzer is getting a bad rap. I know a lot of people are calling him a hypocrite. I do not think he is a hypocrite. To be a hypocrite you need to have morals that you go against. Do you know what they call someone who cynically goes after prostitution rings purely for political gains while using the same services himself. A douche bag. Spitzer is douche bag but not a hypocrite. So back off.
Shtetl G on March 12, 2008 at 2:43 PM
That would be just the first installment. Think of it as a pitcher warming up in the bullpen, although, despite the speculation she knew all about it, she appeared to me to have a stunned, disoriented appearance.
a capella on March 12, 2008 at 2:58 PM
I hereby offer my shoulder for Silda to cry on. She is good looking and intelligent too. Eliot, you’re a dumba$$.
txsurveyor on March 12, 2008 at 3:24 PM
Some media clown on CNBC (yeah, it was on in front of the elliptical, I had to watch it), opined that the feds agreed not to prosecute ol’ Spitzy if he agreed to resign.
What a dope. Elected office is not the possession of the office holder, it belongs to the people. Prosecutors better not be bargaining this way or they need to be prosecuted.
If I were caught doing what Spitzy got caught doing, do you think the prosecutors would give a hoot whether or not I resigned my non-government job?
Obviously not. And it’s definitely not up to prosecutors to suggest that an elected official should or should not resign.
Just another example of what dopes many of these people are who offer opinions on cable news channels.
NoDonkey on March 12, 2008 at 3:45 PM
Oh, I dunno. I think she’s thinking just wait till you’re in prison cooling your heels and making license plates and I’m out and about spending your…err…my money.
I R A Darth Aggie on March 12, 2008 at 3:50 PM
I agree. I think she is waiting for the dust to settle while making appts with divorce lawyers.
Blake on March 12, 2008 at 3:56 PM
She did have a stunned look, but in those circles, that look is because he was caught and embarrassed the family. She may well have known that he got some on the side, but as long as it never came home with him, she could turn the other cheek. He got caught and humiliated her..JMO, obviously.
I have nothing but rumors to base this question on, but I would love to know:
Who was it harder to break the news to: Your wife or your father?
I would bet it was harder for him to go to his dad…after all, everything he did, he did to show his dad how smart and accomplished he was..or so I hear..
Pam on March 12, 2008 at 4:12 PM
Does the term “crack trade” include the business model of the Emperor’s Club?
mikeyboss on March 12, 2008 at 4:20 PM
His family has the dough and I bet the wagons are circled tight against the indians. Betch Silda saw that she’s better inside the wagon circle.
Not that I want to give the pig a pass, but Silda ain’t no virgin in her deal to marry him. I’m guessing she sniffed out the possibility of infidelity and looked the other way.
JAW on March 12, 2008 at 5:49 PM
Judge Nap: Elliot Spitzer Could Face Decades in Prison!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=w5a7k_xm5M0
Afterimage on March 12, 2008 at 6:25 PM
Comment pages: