Oklahoma court: Women in skirts have no reasonable expectation of privacy from peeping toms in public
posted at 7:52 pm on March 12, 2008 by Allahpundit
Special pervert bonus: The victim in the case was 16 years old.
The state Court of Criminal Appeals voted 4-1 in favor of Riccardo Gino Ferrante, who was arrested in 2006 for situating a camera underneath the girl’s skirt at a Target store and taking photographs.
Ferrante, now 34, was charged under a “Peeping Tom” statute that requires the victim to be “in a place where there is a right to a reasonable expectation of privacy.” Testimony indicated he followed the girl, knelt down behind her and placed the camera under her skirt.
In January 2007, Tulsa County District Judge Tom Gillert ordered Ferrante’s felony charge dismissed. That was based upon a determination that “the person photographed was not in a place where she had a reasonable expectation of privacy,” according to the appellate ruling issued last week.
I.e. if you’re anywhere except your own home, any random stranger can lodge a camera in your sphincter and snap away with impunity. I want to connect this story to the photo essay See-Dub links here but I’m at a loss as to how. Help me.