Is time on Clinton’s side?

posted at 9:45 am on March 12, 2008 by Ed Morrissey

Even after a big loss in Mississippi yesterday, the Clinton team feels more sanguine about their chances for the nomination. They have the next few weeks to continue pressuring Barack Obama and pushing him into the kind of negative campaigning that will diminish his New Politics standing. And as the primaries move out of the South and into the industrial North, the demographics will start turning in Hillary’s favor:

Mississippi marks the last primary or caucus for a six-week stretch — by far the longest pause in this year’s nomination fight.

That gives Clinton a chance to battle Obama without time pressures that magnify every moment on the trail, allowing her to make a deliberate and methodical case in favor of her candidacy — and against Obama’s. …

But Clinton’s campaign has proved more adept at seizing control of the race when no one is voting. Just in the past few weeks, Clinton has kept pressure on Obama with a stinging TV ad suggesting he’s unprepared to serve as commander in chief; left him on the defensive over NAFTA and controversial comments made by a high-level foreign-policy adviser; and made headlines by suggesting publicly that Obama could be considering as her running mate.

Could the lull help Hillary? Possibly. She did manage to turn the two weeks between Wisconsin and the March 4th mini-Super Tuesday into an offensive that dinged Obama’s momentum. In doing so, she went explicitly negative for the first time in the race, and the shock of the tactical change worked to her advantage, especially as it appeared to wrong-foot Obama into a couple of avoidable mistakes.

She no longer has the advantage of surprise, however. Hillary and her surrogates can continue to hit the same themes, but they will lose most of their impact. Unless the Clinton team can find new ways to suggest that Obama is unsuited to lead the nation in a time of crisis, that 3 AM ad will get very old by the time Pennsylvania rolls around — and it may have more people asking how Hillary qualifies on the issue as well.

What the lull does for Hillary is to give her time to bolster her support among working-class white voters in Indiana, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. With the South out of the way, the demographics in these regions work to her advantage. Like Ohio, Hillary expects to win significant victories in these states and make an argument for momentum in Denver.

The 24-point blowout in Mississippi will get explained in the same way as South Carolina, allowing for a more subtle argument at the convention. Team Hillary will note that the racial division in Mississippi threatens the Democrats with marginalization in the general election. Obama, they will argue, lost the white vote halfway through the primaries and won’t get it back for a general election. Winning the industrial states coming next will provide them ammunition for that argument to the superdelegates. It promises to make Denver a powderkeg, and the Clintons will spend the next six weeks rolling out the fuse.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Tiiiiiiiiime is on her side
Yes it is!

Unless the Clinton team can find new ways to suggest that Obama is unsuited to lead the nation in a time of crisis

I’ve got about an Obajillion, and that’s just off the top of my head. If Hilary Clinton can’t find ways to suggest (or, better, flat-out prove) that Obama is unsuited to lead the nation in a time of crisis (or any other time, for that matter), she doesn’t deserve the nomination. It’s too easy.

emailnuevo on March 12, 2008 at 9:50 AM

Popping some corn and settling in for hot Summer full of fireworks!

Ordinary1 on March 12, 2008 at 9:51 AM

If Clinton “steals” the nomination from Obama who earned it, then the Democrats may loose more than just the General election. At least it’s the best case scenario for McCain and the Republican party. One can dream!

Ordinary1 on March 12, 2008 at 9:54 AM

I’m thinking of sending her a donation (takes mental shower).

jukin on March 12, 2008 at 9:54 AM

Does anyone else find it interesting that Obama’s campaign doesn’t seem to be able to get their quick response teams out there like they did before? Prior to this it seemed like Barack would have a plausible comeback to any criticism within minutes of it being made, now it seems like things are lagging and the usual political cycle is taking hold.

NeoconNews.com on March 12, 2008 at 9:56 AM

Does anyone else find it interesting that Obama’s campaign doesn’t seem to be able to get their quick response teams out there like they did before?

NeoconNews.com on March 12, 2008 at 9:56 AM

Their last quick response was…’monstrous.’

James on March 12, 2008 at 10:02 AM

Spitzer changes everything. Now time is on Barak’s side. Spitzer reminds us of everything voters of all political persuasions disliked about the Clintons. Greed, self-serving, vain. Spitzers fall will mark Hillary’s fall.

Angry Dumbo on March 12, 2008 at 10:02 AM

This may end up coming down to which side ends up with the scandal de jour in their lap when the music stops come convention time. Hillary has the stronger campaign in-fighters, so the Obama campaign has to know that the Clintons are going to be pushing the Rezko dealings hard, and right now the media is truly divided between the Clinton camp and the Obama camp (the Clinton supporters having been aided by the SNL skits that brought them back into revelence), so both sides have the ability to get their message out to at least a few big media outlets.

Nobody expects anything dignified from the Clintons, so it’s easier for them to sling mud, but the Obama people will have to make sure they have something come primary time in April and in the run-up to the convention that will remind people in the party of Hillary’s negatives with independent voters and the general population as a whole (they can hope that Elliot Spitzer’s court hearings get scheduled, or Anthony Pellicano trial gets extended into late August).

jon1979 on March 12, 2008 at 10:05 AM

I wonder if Hillary will resort to emphasizing Obama’s race? :~)

JiangxiDad on March 12, 2008 at 10:06 AM

Obama v Hillary
Obama v SNL
MSNBC v Hillary
Rezko v Spitzer
Black v White
Messiah v Queen
Rookie v Rookie
Dreamer v Schemer

And we’ve all got a front row seat.


Priceless.

fogw on March 12, 2008 at 10:24 AM

Politically, she like an over ripe onion. You have to get rid of it but won’t for fear of the smell on your hands.

pc on March 12, 2008 at 10:25 AM

This is like when Hamas and Fatah started killing one another.

Send lawyers, guns and money to the DNC for equal distribution to both camps.

Who wins when Democrats ruthlessly damage one another? The American people.

NoDonkey on March 12, 2008 at 10:29 AM

Even after a big loss in Mississippi yesterday, the Clinton team feels more sanguine about their chances for the nomination.

Who comes off a trouncing like Clinton got yesterday thinking like this??? Is it the spin that results in the denial or the denial that results in the spin?

Yes, there is a lull in the action. The GOP’s failed candidate might even poke his head out of the ground, sees his shadow, and announces there are five months before the convention (McCain’s an idiot for not getting out there and starting campaigning for November). Nevertheless, the situation hasn’t changed all that much. Obama was expected to win big last night. Clinton is expected to win big in Pennsylvania. What has changed in the dynamics to make the Clinton people feel optimistic?

The odds are still 58% against her being able to secure the popular vote. Personally, I’m looking forward to the fireworks if she somehow gets enough superdelegates to negate the popular vote. That being said, I suspect that whomever goes into the convention with the most popularly elected delegates will win. Which is why it is fun to see the Democrats trying to unravel the mess they made in Michigan and Florida!!!

highhopes on March 12, 2008 at 10:39 AM

Oh gee whiz, this Summer’s blockbusters won’t come from Hollywood (except for cameo spots by various ‘celebrities’).

King Eliot’s little ‘oopsie with a high priced floozie’ must be seen as ‘Heaven sent’ by Obama’s group. It takes the focus off the Primaries (for a short time) and distracts Herself! from the game at hand.

Anyone want to guess how long it will take Herself! to declare for Governor from the (late) Great State of New York? That would be a nice parting gift, give her some ‘Executive’ experience and, wonders of wonders, the seat would be open in short order.

Of course, one wonders just how the FBI got tipped.

SeniorD on March 12, 2008 at 10:45 AM

Anyone want to guess how long it will take Herself! to declare for Governor from the (late) Great State of New York?

I’m betting on Bloomberg to declare his desire to expand the “socialism on parade” tour statewide. Why be a benevolent despot over a city when you can buy the entire state?

highhopes on March 12, 2008 at 10:54 AM

my money is on HRC somehow tying Obamarama to Spitzer. im just saying, weirder things have happened.

custer on March 12, 2008 at 10:55 AM

Tiiiiiiiiime is on her side
Yes it is!

‘Cause you all just said, that you would be VP,
-But
You’ll come running back, You’ll come running back
You’ just keep popping up on the TV -EE-EE

Hening on March 12, 2008 at 10:59 AM

I think it’s pretty smart for McCain to be quiet right now. The less he says, the less likely it is he will say the wrong thing and re-focus the Dems’ energies back on him instead of each other.

Sekhmet on March 12, 2008 at 11:16 AM

I find it interesting that the Democratic primary is much more about race than the general election will be.

Interesting, but not surprising.

lodestonejames on March 12, 2008 at 11:30 AM

Everything is on Hillary’s side. Except the majority of voters. But I’m sure she will figure something out.

Lawrence on March 12, 2008 at 11:31 AM

The less he [McCain] says, the less likely it is he will say the wrong thing…

Sekhmet on March 12, 2008 at 11:16 AM

True. Sadly.

Lawrence on March 12, 2008 at 11:32 AM

jukin

Don’t send Hillary a donation. Go on one of the lefty sites & praise Hillary while dissing Obama (emphasis on dissing Obama).

jgapinoy on March 12, 2008 at 11:48 AM

Spitzer changes everything. Now time is on Barak’s side.

Angry Dumbo on March 12, 2008 at 10:02 AM

No, Spitzer reminds everyone just how far the Democrats are mired in sleaze, from hookers to fraud to slum landlords. Obama’s close ties with Rezko, Clinton’s connections to Hsu, Spitzer’s gluttony for hookers – this all paints a very sorry picture of the Democratic party.

We need to hammer this home until November – return the GOP to Congress and the White House! Keep the Democratic sleazeballs out!

Pax americana on March 12, 2008 at 12:05 PM

Point of clarification. I disagree with Ed, time is on Barak’s side in his battle with Hillary. For now, only bloggers care about Rezko. Keep Obama in the game, for now, then drop the Rezko bomb in the general.

Angry Dumbo on March 12, 2008 at 12:16 PM

Has Geraldine Ferraro created an ‘Emperor has no clothes’ moment?

Hope P. Muntz on March 12, 2008 at 12:36 PM

Only if someone puts a muzzle on Geraldine Ferraro (D).

In her old age, she’s slipping, and revealing an ugly truth that many of us have known about white liberals all along.

All we ask is that democrats be themselves. That’s how we win.

jeff_from_mpls on March 12, 2008 at 12:37 PM

Cap’n Ed, you need to have a caption contest for that photo. My suggestion
“I command you to vote for me”
The force is weak with that one

rbj on March 12, 2008 at 12:47 PM

Who wins when Democrats ruthlessly damage one another? The American people.

NoDonkey on March 12, 2008 at 10:29 AM

I like your analogy.

cjs1943 on March 12, 2008 at 12:53 PM

Hello Captain,

I wonder if you noticed the sudden eruption of sympathy for
fired Admiral Fallon on lefty sites today. They were
conferring hero status on the guy, you know – that rare
American who speaks truth to power – that sort of thing.
But why put this comment on a Hillary thread?
Probably nothing but I caught the smell of a VP candidate
in the making – for either Dem Presidential nominee.
Military hero – offsets weak military experience of the
CIC – but best of all, reluctant, nay very reluctant to
use military power. He singlehandedly stopped “The Bush
Administration” in it’s tracks when it tried to build up
naval forces opposite Iran. Maybe I’m just being paranoid.
But you know that saying, just because you’re paranoid
doesn’t mean yu don’t have real enemies. A military
commander the Left could sort of … like.

davem on March 12, 2008 at 1:20 PM

Sadly I don’t think negative campaigning wouldn’t hurt Obama too much. People will assume that he is just telling the truth granted to him from the heavens, and it is his responsibility to enlighten us with it.

Also, I love the picture of Emperor Hillary about to lightning blast someone with the dark side of the force.

Grafted on March 12, 2008 at 1:32 PM

err..I mean: I don’t think negative campaigning would hurt Obama too much

Grafted on March 12, 2008 at 1:33 PM

Obama is like the late 90′s stock market. He’s built entirely on air and has a long way to fall.

The longer he’s in the spotlight the greater the chance his bubble will burst.

Hillary doesn’t have to worry about people discovering that she isn’t who they think she is. People have had almost two decades to make up their minds about her and all of her dirty laundry has already been aired.

29Victor on March 12, 2008 at 1:34 PM

I have said it many times over these last four years—it’s Hillary’s nomination to lose despite her trailing in the popular and delegate counts. If she’s close the machine will produce/steal the nomination. As to the supposed outrage it would produce they could care less. With their top notch spinmeisters the rank and file will forgive and vote in unison. It is the Dem party way. She will offer the VP to Obama as consolation. If he doesn’t accept, so be it. She will spin it as having been generous.

For the Clinton’s the only thing that counts is the nomination–without it she has no chance of being president and Bill’s legacy will never be rewritten. He’ll be stuck with the blue dress one hundred years from now.

They will deal with the aftermath when the time comes. Remember these are the folks that gave clemency to terrorists and Marc Rich while stealing White House flatware, all for a few shekels…..

patrick neid on March 12, 2008 at 1:36 PM

Um, don’t these senators have jobs to do in Washington during this six weeks’ lull? Or don’t they want to be on record for what they truly stand for?

onlineanalyst on March 12, 2008 at 1:41 PM

…and all of her dirty laundry has already been aired.

This is going to be the biggest shock to the Conventional Wisdom, if she does get the nomination.

All of the dirt about the Clintons before about 1998 is out in the open. After that, no one really cared to dig too hard.

How much do we know about the miraculous rate at which the Clintons accumulated a massive fortune, paying off their legal debts and buying a $10 million home in NY within weeks of leaving the White House?

How much do we know about Clinton’s pardons?

How much do we know about the massive amounts of money the Clintons have acquired in the last eight years, shilling for despotic regimes and getting uranium mining contracts in Kazakhstan?

We don’t even know how many millions they’ve made — they haven’t released their tax returns.

If I were in the Obama campaign, I’d be working hard to get the Clinton tax returns out before Pennsylvania.

You think Obama’s Rezko problem is bad? You ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

ClintACK on March 12, 2008 at 1:46 PM

Obama, the guy who, during his campaign for U.S. Senate, repeatedly promised the voters of Illinois that he would definitely not run for President in 2008, has been far too busy campaigning for President to bother with his Senate duties.

AZCoyote on March 12, 2008 at 1:47 PM

With six weeks until the next primary (PA), and media attention distracted by Eliot Hearts Kristen More Than NY, there will probably be less interest in the Presidential race outside of PA. Obama has had a better “ground game” than Clinton in many states, but this lull might give Clinton a chance to get her act together not only for a big win in PA, but for IN on 5/6 and WV on 5/13 (assuming Obama wins NC on the black vote). There’s always the chance that a bombshell might come out of the Rezko trial over the next six weeks, while the Clintons’ own baggage is old news from 8+ years ago.

As for McCain, he can lie low for awhile, while doing lots of fund-raising, but also lots of planning. He will need to build up campaign teams in all the swing states, and seriously think about a VP nominee, probably one against Hillary and one against Obama. He will also need to crunch some numbers and put together with his advisors a well-thought-out campaign platform, especially on economic policies, health care without socialized medicine, and judges, which could be winning issues for him. He will need to publicly criticize Obama, who has a more enthusiastic following, but is more prone to rookie mistakes, especially when Obama proposes a government program that would require huge tax increases, or if Obama makes a foreign-policy blunder.

McCain can let Hillary slide for the time being, knowing that she would carry a lot more baggage than Obama in the fall, but Obama cannot be allowed to build up huge leads based on empty promises of “hope and change”. Obama has many voters believing that he’s whatever they want him to be, but McCain should force Obama to fill in some nitty-gritty details that might turn voters off, like high taxes and a return to Carteromics. Maybe a few ads featuring horrible headlines from the late 1970′s, and comparing Obama’s plans to Carter’s might give voters too young to remember the 1970′s an education in what Jimmuh Hussein Obama would do to America.

McCain should also take note of any attack ads between Obama and Hillary, and plan to use the more effective ones against the winner this fall.

Steve Z on March 12, 2008 at 2:41 PM

Also, I love the picture of Emperor Hillary about to lightning blast someone with the dark side of the force.

Grafted on March 12, 2008 at 1:32 PM

When I read the headline, I actally say dark side.

- The Cat

MirCat on March 12, 2008 at 2:51 PM

Everything is on Hillary’s side. Except the majority of voters. But I’m sure she will figure something out.

Lawrence on March 12, 2008 at 11:31 AM

Having watched these two people for the past 25 years, she will waste no time in bringing out every dirty trick, using every person with a recognizable name within her campaign, to keep afloat.

Witness, bringing out Geraldine Ferraro to slight Senator Obams’s race, rather than Bubba, in order to save playing his card too soon, saving it for the brokered convention instead!

localmalcontent on March 12, 2008 at 4:00 PM

All BHO has to do is do nothing until the convention. No comments and no comebacks. He has nothing to lose by staying silent. Satan’s head will eventually explode.

JAW on March 12, 2008 at 5:55 PM