<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mullahs or Mounties: Which do we prefer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:56:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Think_b4_speaking</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1005584</link>
		<dc:creator>Think_b4_speaking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1005584</guid>
		<description>Good luck on getting the oil shale in Utah.  Recall that when billy bob was president, he used an executive order to make a huge chunk of that land a wildlife refuge, forestalling any mining or resource extraction, just to keep us out of the business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck on getting the oil shale in Utah.  Recall that when billy bob was president, he used an executive order to make a huge chunk of that land a wildlife refuge, forestalling any mining or resource extraction, just to keep us out of the business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: labrat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1005544</link>
		<dc:creator>labrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1005544</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Energy Independence and Security Act&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Bwhahahahahahaha!!!  How did we get so stupid???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Energy Independence and Security Act</p></blockquote>
<p>Bwhahahahahahaha!!!  How did we get so stupid???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss_Anthrope</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1005439</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss_Anthrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1005439</guid>
		<description>Seriously, this is just too easy to fix.  All Bush has to do is implement an Executive Order stating that, because of the War on Terror, Executive Priviledge allows him to override the sand tar alternative fuel portion of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007.

In addition, he can also rescind E.O. 12123, which Carter installed a moratoria on the East and West Coasts from offshore drilling by US companies (of course, that hasn&#039;t prevented foreign companies from doing so).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, this is just too easy to fix.  All Bush has to do is implement an Executive Order stating that, because of the War on Terror, Executive Priviledge allows him to override the sand tar alternative fuel portion of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007.</p>
<p>In addition, he can also rescind E.O. 12123, which Carter installed a moratoria on the East and West Coasts from offshore drilling by US companies (of course, that hasn&#8217;t prevented foreign companies from doing so).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss_Anthrope</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1005426</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss_Anthrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1005426</guid>
		<description>From the article above:
&lt;blockquote&gt;However, even though we already have reliable and friendly trade with Canada on oil for commercial purposes from these tar sands, the US military will &lt;strong&gt;be forced by the Dems to&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strike&gt;take a pass and &lt;/strike&gt;stick with the Nigerians, Venezuelans, and Saudis.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There, fixed it for ya.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the article above:</p>
<blockquote><p>However, even though we already have reliable and friendly trade with Canada on oil for commercial purposes from these tar sands, the US military will <strong>be forced by the Dems to</strong> <strike>take a pass and </strike>stick with the Nigerians, Venezuelans, and Saudis.</p></blockquote>
<p>There, fixed it for ya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Western Canadian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1005205</link>
		<dc:creator>Western Canadian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1005205</guid>
		<description>We do have quite a bit of traditional oil removal (pump-jacks) all around the province as well.
 I was explaining this to a guy in New York the other day, in that he should be nice and arrange someone to pick me up at the airport or I&#039;ll pick up the phone and cut off the oil tap (just kidding).
 The reality is the oil will be sold to someone, so it might as well be you guys cuz your kinda like our goofy cousins down there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We do have quite a bit of traditional oil removal (pump-jacks) all around the province as well.<br />
 I was explaining this to a guy in New York the other day, in that he should be nice and arrange someone to pick me up at the airport or I&#8217;ll pick up the phone and cut off the oil tap (just kidding).<br />
 The reality is the oil will be sold to someone, so it might as well be you guys cuz your kinda like our goofy cousins down there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tzetzes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1005078</link>
		<dc:creator>Tzetzes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1005078</guid>
		<description>What is this madness?!  Can the campaign be used to bring this issue up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is this madness?!  Can the campaign be used to bring this issue up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaunilon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1005008</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaunilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 04:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1005008</guid>
		<description>Simultaneously fulfills two goals dear to the Dems&#039; hearts: hampers oil production in North America, and causes problems for the military.  Perfect.

Now if they can obstruct the military from buying metal, kevlar, and gunpowder they&#039;ll really be cookin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simultaneously fulfills two goals dear to the Dems&#8217; hearts: hampers oil production in North America, and causes problems for the military.  Perfect.</p>
<p>Now if they can obstruct the military from buying metal, kevlar, and gunpowder they&#8217;ll really be cookin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdkchem</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1004953</link>
		<dc:creator>jdkchem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1004953</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Kafir on March 11, 2008 at 8:27 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It sounds really cool until you discover how incredibly inefficient the process is.  Contrary to popular myth two probes and an enrgizer/duracell don&#039;t cut it. &lt;a href=&quot;http:www.backwoodshome.com/articles2/yago103.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Are hydrogen-fueled cars pie-in-the-sky?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Kafir on March 11, 2008 at 8:27 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>It sounds really cool until you discover how incredibly inefficient the process is.  Contrary to popular myth two probes and an enrgizer/duracell don&#8217;t cut it. <a href="http:www.backwoodshome.com/articles2/yago103.html" rel="nofollow">Are hydrogen-fueled cars pie-in-the-sky?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdkchem</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1004907</link>
		<dc:creator>jdkchem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1004907</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Kokonut on March 11, 2008 at 5:33 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Water vapor does not remain in the atmosphere long enough, 3-10 days, to have any impact on &quot;global warming&quot;.  So while water is a strong infrared absorber it does not reach the region of the atmosphere where it would contribute to &quot;global warming&quot;.  See &lt;em&gt;Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics&lt;/em&gt; by Seinfeld and Pandis.

As for the Canadian tar-oil, would they take the thrashers, hurricanes, stars, panthers, lightning and/or predators in exchange for a few barrels?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Kokonut on March 11, 2008 at 5:33 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Water vapor does not remain in the atmosphere long enough, 3-10 days, to have any impact on &#8220;global warming&#8221;.  So while water is a strong infrared absorber it does not reach the region of the atmosphere where it would contribute to &#8220;global warming&#8221;.  See <em>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</em> by Seinfeld and Pandis.</p>
<p>As for the Canadian tar-oil, would they take the thrashers, hurricanes, stars, panthers, lightning and/or predators in exchange for a few barrels?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IrishEyes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1004861</link>
		<dc:creator>IrishEyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1004861</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Viscount_Bolingbroke on March 11, 2008 at 7:29 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Beyond the thought of it being a global commodity, I just detest the very idea that any of our petro dollars make it to the hands of those who advocate our destruction and attack our troops. For that reason alone, we should be doing all we can (new refineries, ANWR and Gulf drilling, etc.) to get away from ME and Venezuelan oil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Viscount_Bolingbroke on March 11, 2008 at 7:29 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Beyond the thought of it being a global commodity, I just detest the very idea that any of our petro dollars make it to the hands of those who advocate our destruction and attack our troops. For that reason alone, we should be doing all we can (new refineries, ANWR and Gulf drilling, etc.) to get away from ME and Venezuelan oil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaibones</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1004838</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaibones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1004838</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;WTF does congress think we get our oil from? The Moon?

upinak on March 11, 2008 at 5:14 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Uh...actually, the libs in the Dem caucus want to pretend that if we simply don&#039;t use oil, everything will be sweetness and light.  They don&#039;t want the stinking oil from Canada, or anywhere else.

They want to power the military with windmills and solar power.  They&#039;re morons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>WTF does congress think we get our oil from? The Moon?</p>
<p>upinak on March 11, 2008 at 5:14 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Uh&#8230;actually, the libs in the Dem caucus want to pretend that if we simply don&#8217;t use oil, everything will be sweetness and light.  They don&#8217;t want the stinking oil from Canada, or anywhere else.</p>
<p>They want to power the military with windmills and solar power.  They&#8217;re morons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: njcommuter</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1004758</link>
		<dc:creator>njcommuter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1004758</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;If the U.S. government was really concerned about greenhouse gases, why then are all U.S. military vehicles not required to comply with any emmissions regulations? The U.S military still has diesel engines that are mechanically governed in use. For those not mechanically inclined, if you want a cleaner running engine that engine has to be controlled by a computer, which most military tactical vehicles currently are not.&lt;/em&gt;

Mechanically governed diesels will keep running right through an electromagnetic pulse.  The electronics in a tank can be shielded without adding a lot of weight to the thing, but putting enough shielding on a truck or similar vehicle will put lots of weight just where you don&#039;t want it, and it will be protecting the engine compartment, not the passenger space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>If the U.S. government was really concerned about greenhouse gases, why then are all U.S. military vehicles not required to comply with any emmissions regulations? The U.S military still has diesel engines that are mechanically governed in use. For those not mechanically inclined, if you want a cleaner running engine that engine has to be controlled by a computer, which most military tactical vehicles currently are not.</em></p>
<p>Mechanically governed diesels will keep running right through an electromagnetic pulse.  The electronics in a tank can be shielded without adding a lot of weight to the thing, but putting enough shielding on a truck or similar vehicle will put lots of weight just where you don&#8217;t want it, and it will be protecting the engine compartment, not the passenger space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maquis</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1004695</link>
		<dc:creator>Maquis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1004695</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On the other hand, this could be a blessing in disguise. If the military, banned from using cheap oil substitutes, goes in for hydrogen powered vehicles, their quick maturation of that technology could cause it to trickle down into the general public and we’d all get off oil much faster. Then, the Chinese can have all the ME oil they want. Hmmm, I would what would have happened if bin Laden had flown planes into buildings in Beijing?

Kafir on March 11, 2008 at 8:27 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Kafir, nice thought, but the US Military fuel choices are dictated by our NATO alliance, to ensure interchangability of vehicles and fuel supplies.  Thus are we moving away from gasoline, and are even buying diesel scout motorcycles now.  Diesel/kerosene/jet fuel are fairly interchangable, and very energy dense.  I love the idea of hydrogen, but the military can&#039;t do it, and I don&#039;t want to see our forces suffer to develop it.  

We really need to develop our own resources, and work with our neighbors, which means ditching Pelosi and the other reality-deniers and simply growing up as a nation.  We are making such a mess for ourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On the other hand, this could be a blessing in disguise. If the military, banned from using cheap oil substitutes, goes in for hydrogen powered vehicles, their quick maturation of that technology could cause it to trickle down into the general public and we’d all get off oil much faster. Then, the Chinese can have all the ME oil they want. Hmmm, I would what would have happened if bin Laden had flown planes into buildings in Beijing?</p>
<p>Kafir on March 11, 2008 at 8:27 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Kafir, nice thought, but the US Military fuel choices are dictated by our NATO alliance, to ensure interchangability of vehicles and fuel supplies.  Thus are we moving away from gasoline, and are even buying diesel scout motorcycles now.  Diesel/kerosene/jet fuel are fairly interchangable, and very energy dense.  I love the idea of hydrogen, but the military can&#8217;t do it, and I don&#8217;t want to see our forces suffer to develop it.  </p>
<p>We really need to develop our own resources, and work with our neighbors, which means ditching Pelosi and the other reality-deniers and simply growing up as a nation.  We are making such a mess for ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: traderdfw</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1004612</link>
		<dc:creator>traderdfw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1004612</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Give it some thought. Is this possible?

allrsn on March 11, 2008 at 5:46 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Possible?  It&#039;s the plan! All this is deliberate, and you can expect the assault on us by our so-called leadership to be stepped up after the election.

First the traitors, then the enemy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Give it some thought. Is this possible?</p>
<p>allrsn on March 11, 2008 at 5:46 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Possible?  It&#8217;s the plan! All this is deliberate, and you can expect the assault on us by our so-called leadership to be stepped up after the election.</p>
<p>First the traitors, then the enemy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: traderdfw</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1004566</link>
		<dc:creator>traderdfw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1004566</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m wondering if anyone has stopped to consider that the Democr@ps knew exactly what they were doing? Seems it&#039;s the Democr@ps that have also --in concert with their Green buddies (Commies in disguise)-- tied our hands with regard to producing and using our own petroleum resources.

I think the Democr@ps are long over due for some rough justice.

First the traitors, then the enemy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wondering if anyone has stopped to consider that the Democr@ps knew exactly what they were doing? Seems it&#8217;s the Democr@ps that have also &#8211;in concert with their Green buddies (Commies in disguise)&#8211; tied our hands with regard to producing and using our own petroleum resources.</p>
<p>I think the Democr@ps are long over due for some rough justice.</p>
<p>First the traitors, then the enemy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: txstar</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1004528</link>
		<dc:creator>txstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1004528</guid>
		<description>Oh yes, Jim708,I remember the commercial - &quot;Every woman (likes or wants) a Stetson man&quot;!  But I do not remember it being a hat commercial. Perhaps cologne? Ha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes, Jim708,I remember the commercial &#8211; &#8220;Every woman (likes or wants) a Stetson man&#8221;!  But I do not remember it being a hat commercial. Perhaps cologne? Ha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kafir</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1004463</link>
		<dc:creator>Kafir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1004463</guid>
		<description>On the other hand, this could be a blessing in disguise. If the military, banned from using cheap oil substitutes, goes in for hydrogen powered vehicles, their quick maturation of that technology could cause it to trickle down into the general public and we&#039;d all get off oil much faster. Then, the Chinese can have all the ME oil they want. Hmmm, I would what would have happened if bin Laden had flown planes into buildings in Beijing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other hand, this could be a blessing in disguise. If the military, banned from using cheap oil substitutes, goes in for hydrogen powered vehicles, their quick maturation of that technology could cause it to trickle down into the general public and we&#8217;d all get off oil much faster. Then, the Chinese can have all the ME oil they want. Hmmm, I would what would have happened if bin Laden had flown planes into buildings in Beijing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hog Wild</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1004409</link>
		<dc:creator>Hog Wild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1004409</guid>
		<description>If the U.S. government was really concerned about greenhouse gases, why then are all U.S. military vehicles not required to comply with any emmissions regulations?  The U.S military still has diesel engines that are mechanically governed in use.  For those not mechanically inclined, if you want a cleaner running engine that engine has to be controlled by a computer, which most military tactical vehicles currently are not.

Same old song and dance, someone is getting rich off this farce and someone in government has a job waiting for them as a consultant for which they will not have to consult waiting for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the U.S. government was really concerned about greenhouse gases, why then are all U.S. military vehicles not required to comply with any emmissions regulations?  The U.S military still has diesel engines that are mechanically governed in use.  For those not mechanically inclined, if you want a cleaner running engine that engine has to be controlled by a computer, which most military tactical vehicles currently are not.</p>
<p>Same old song and dance, someone is getting rich off this farce and someone in government has a job waiting for them as a consultant for which they will not have to consult waiting for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim708</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1004351</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim708</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1004351</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; will take the Mounties! I always liked a man in uniform, especially &lt;strong&gt;that Mounty hat they wear &lt;/strong&gt;- wide brim, nicely pressed uniform, tall, handsome………is it getting hot in here?

txstar on March 11, 2008 at 5:58 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

They call it the Stetson ;) The wive&#039;s club (probably long since dead) used to be called the Stetsonettes.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> will take the Mounties! I always liked a man in uniform, especially <strong>that Mounty hat they wear </strong>- wide brim, nicely pressed uniform, tall, handsome………is it getting hot in here?</p>
<p>txstar on March 11, 2008 at 5:58 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>They call it the Stetson ;) The wive&#8217;s club (probably long since dead) used to be called the Stetsonettes&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romeo13</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1004321</link>
		<dc:creator>Romeo13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1004321</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;eeyore on March 11, 2008 at 7:25 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Funny thing... Moab wouldn&#039;t even be there if it was not for Uranium mining...

Nice restraunt there that overlooks the town... was built in the house the Geologist built after he made his millions... got a good bit of history in it... and really good food.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>eeyore on March 11, 2008 at 7:25 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Funny thing&#8230; Moab wouldn&#8217;t even be there if it was not for Uranium mining&#8230;</p>
<p>Nice restraunt there that overlooks the town&#8230; was built in the house the Geologist built after he made his millions&#8230; got a good bit of history in it&#8230; and really good food.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Other Words</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1004295</link>
		<dc:creator>In Other Words</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1004295</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Alternate Energy&#160;Source...&lt;/strong&gt;

There exists an alternate energy source that is relatively economically available to us.  It&#8217;s a source of crude that easily dwarfs the size of the Saudi oil fields, and requires no new technology.  It&#8217;s in Canada and we don&#8217;t want ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Alternate Energy&nbsp;Source&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>There exists an alternate energy source that is relatively economically available to us.  It&#8217;s a source of crude that easily dwarfs the size of the Saudi oil fields, and requires no new technology.  It&#8217;s in Canada and we don&#8217;t want &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim708</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1004289</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim708</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1004289</guid>
		<description>There is always this deposit.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/next-energy-news2.13s.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bakken Formation&lt;/a&gt;

Of course you will need some serious arm twisting to get environmental permission to drill it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is always this deposit.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/next-energy-news2.13s.html" rel="nofollow">Bakken Formation</a></p>
<p>Of course you will need some serious arm twisting to get environmental permission to drill it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viscount_Bolingbroke</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1004282</link>
		<dc:creator>Viscount_Bolingbroke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1004282</guid>
		<description>The thing that I wonder about is what kind of crude can they get as the squeezings? Will it be sweet or sour? How expensive will it be compared with just pumping it out of the ground? 

Also, it is important to realize that oil is a globally traded commodity. Increased supply in Canada will lower the price for everyone, all other things held constant. While being able to pipe it in from adjacent Canada would be more cost effective, we can still benefit by paying less for our oil from Mexico and other nearby sources as the global commodity price for oil goes down due to the increased supply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that I wonder about is what kind of crude can they get as the squeezings? Will it be sweet or sour? How expensive will it be compared with just pumping it out of the ground? </p>
<p>Also, it is important to realize that oil is a globally traded commodity. Increased supply in Canada will lower the price for everyone, all other things held constant. While being able to pipe it in from adjacent Canada would be more cost effective, we can still benefit by paying less for our oil from Mexico and other nearby sources as the global commodity price for oil goes down due to the increased supply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eeyore</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1004274</link>
		<dc:creator>eeyore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1004274</guid>
		<description>sorry...they&#039;ll allow switchgrass</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry&#8230;they&#8217;ll allow switchgrass</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eeyore</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-1004265</link>
		<dc:creator>eeyore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/11/mullahs-or-mounties-which-do-we-prefer/#comment-1004265</guid>
		<description>YOU CAN&#039;T TOUCH THE PRISTINE WILDERNESS AND I&#039;LL USE ALL CAPS TO PROVE I&#039;M RIGHT !!!!!!!
&lt;blockquote&gt;If they can get past the hippies that live in Moab, that is prime for mining.
disco on March 11, 2008 at 5:37 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;Problem is, you&#039;re not going to get past those hippies, because they&#039;re the same hippies that are on K Street from the Sierra Club, Environmental Defense, etc. To them &quot;energy independence&quot; means &lt;strong&gt;only &lt;/strong&gt;solar and wind - and an absolute &lt;strong&gt;end &lt;/strong&gt;to oil, coal, and nukes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOU CAN&#8217;T TOUCH THE PRISTINE WILDERNESS AND I&#8217;LL USE ALL CAPS TO PROVE I&#8217;M RIGHT !!!!!!!</p>
<blockquote><p>If they can get past the hippies that live in Moab, that is prime for mining.<br />
disco on March 11, 2008 at 5:37 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Problem is, you&#8217;re not going to get past those hippies, because they&#8217;re the same hippies that are on K Street from the Sierra Club, Environmental Defense, etc. To them &#8220;energy independence&#8221; means <strong>only </strong>solar and wind &#8211; and an absolute <strong>end </strong>to oil, coal, and nukes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
