Comments on: Don’t blame the critics for focus on Bill & Hillary relationship

By: tony the tiger

tony the tiger — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:30:22 +0000

Wow – two good ones here:

Ellen on March 10, 2008 at 1:15 PM
What will Bill do if Herself is elected? Will he try to take up the reins of power? Will he carve out an area of responsibility?

I like it… I’ve been pondering the HRC/BO thing from this perspective “What if (and I’m not wishing for this to happen) it happened, and HRC became incapacitated… would Bill claim more experience and try to usurp BO’s rightful ascent to the Presidency?” Scary thought…

AND

jerseyman on March 10, 2008 at 2:23 PM
The Democrats do NOT care about elections or the will of the people. Elections are only a means to achieve power. That is why they ignore winning ballot referendums and seek to govern through the courts.

‘Zactly right!

By: EJDolbow

EJDolbow — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:13:34 +0000

Take away her husband and she is nothing.

We would never have heard her name.

By: jerseyman

jerseyman — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:23:39 +0000

Perhaps the clinton campaign is using the same racist view that they showed earlier: White America will not vote for a black president, thereby gaining black votes for Hillary by assuring Obama a spot as VP. (Early on black voters turned to Obama when they realized he actually had a shot at winning.) The Clinton surrogates are justifying the Super Delegate selection of the presidential candidate (Hillary) on the basis that the party knows better how to pick a viable candidate where the chump voters are too ignorant to make their own decision. Remember, they tried to ’select’ Al Gore in 2000, why not Hillary in 2008? The Democrats do NOT care about elections or the will of the people. Elections are only a means to achieve power. That is why they ignore winning ballot referendums and seek to govern through the courts.

By: mattyj86

mattyj86 — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:16:38 +0000

She is ridiculous. It’s not like Bill just cheated once. This was SEVERAL times with SEVERAL women. At the same time, I do feel bad that their dirty laundry was aired in front of the entire country and had to play out like that. But they just made it ten times worse by lying and blaming the rumors on a “right wing conspiracy”. The two of them are the most DRAMATIC couple I’ve ever seen. Everything they do is tied up in storylines even soap opera writers would be shocked at. They are just a couple of shameless, power-hungry leftists who will utilize whatever shady tactics they must use to steamroll over opponents both outside and within the Democratic Party. Why do we need another Clinton presidency? Just watch Passions….same deal.

By: Starlink

Starlink — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:58:02 +0000

twist any rule, tell any lie to gain power.

He is a buffon. She is dangerous.

davidk on March 10, 2008 at 1:25 PM

Your comment made me wonder about her pitch of HRC/BO. Is this a perverse way of bluffing saying, “……since I was willing to put you on mine, you will have to put me on yours or else…..?” It would seem to be a ploy to the “superwimps” to split the baby and ensure she is in power and save face even if he gets it….or she’ll rip the party apart?

Or perhaps that is nuts and she thinks she has it in the bag and she would never consider being second, but now I wonder. “Tell any lie to gain power” makes one question her every motive, and she has intentionally floated this……

After more thought, I think it is a play to the supers to split the baby and pressure him to take her for the ’sake of the party’ …..(or she’ll drag this out longer and rip us up – if, and only if, it looks like she will lose!)

Of course he would have to be mental to do so…..

By: rbj

rbj — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:53:59 +0000

I’m confused. Didn’t liberals used to like the Bill & Hillary show?

By: perroviejo

perroviejo — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:33:21 +0000

“She wants her impossible husband to be always an asset but never a liability.” BC took credit for all things good while taking the blame for nothing. Republicans were/are to be blamed for all things bad. That’s the memory that Mrs. Clinton brings us – total contempt for ~~Republicans~~ Conservatives.

By: davidk

davidk — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:25:00 +0000

There is nothing redeeming about these two. They are … in the pursuit of raw power.

Starlink on March 10, 2008 at 12:58 PM

They-especially her–are Marxists who will, like true Marxists, use any means (including violence and murder), twist any rule, tell any lie to gain power.

He is a buffon. She is dangerous.

By: TooTall

TooTall — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:23:33 +0000

She has little experience of her own to produce: just an undistinguished seven years in the Senate.

Seven years that she wouldn’t have if she hadn’t been married to Bill.

By: pilamaye

pilamaye — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:15:45 +0000

Frankly, if I were a married working woman, the last person I would use as a role model would be Shillary. Here is a lady who has to know beyond a shadow of a doubt that her husband is a cheating cad who has dropped his pants at the slightest glance of a short skirt and a hot pair of legs so many times, he has to have worn out the zipper by this time, and yet she sticks with him and puts up this unbelievable front that she has the Ideal Marriage, because she knows his popularity (or what is left of it) in the Democratic Party may be the key factor into getting her into the Oval Office.

Problem is she seems to have forgotton about his pompous blowhard ways and his incredible ability to open his mouth at the wrong time and say something incredibly stupid, to the point that she has got to have him bound in gagged in some underground bunker somewhere right now, or she’ll wind up losing Pennsylvania and the nomination as a whole.

But for anyone to use her as some sort of an ideal of what a real working woman should be, she would be better used as a role model for what Lady MacBeth may have really been like.

By: Ellen

Ellen — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:15:43 +0000

What will Bill do if Herself is elected? Will he try to take up the reins of power? Will he carve out an area of responsibility? Will he cut a swathe through a new group of interns? Will he behave himself a la Dennis Thatcher? (as if). I really would like to know and I don’t hear the press asking the questions. And NO I do NOT want a co-presidency, but I’ll bet if She Who Must Be Obeyed is elected, we will get one.

By: srhoades

srhoades — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:59:16 +0000

How dare you confuse poor Lisa with the facts, Ed!

By: Starlink

Starlink — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:58:12 +0000

There is nothing redeeming about these two. They are dysfuntional, running from one planned strategy to another, all in the pursuit of raw power. Any pretense of a relationship here is simply pretense.