Reid: Filibusters are like stabbings
posted at 7:05 pm on March 6, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | regular view
Pity poor Harry Reid. Was anyone ever as inept with rhetoric forced into a position of national leadership? The same man who called George Bush a “loser” and Alan Greenspan a “hack” — the same man who tried surrendering to al-Qaeda from the Senate floor — has now compared Senate cloture motions to aggravated assaults by stabbing:
Reid and Democrats have pointed to the 72 cloture motions — which cut off debate and require 60 votes — as “filibusters.” Republicans say these are not true filibusters, since many of the motions pass overwhelmingly.
Nonetheless, Reid says Republican contentions that they’ve only forced 65 or so cloture motions proves the point. Here’s the stabbing quote:
“Is it 72; is it 65? It’s like you’re charged with aggravated assault and the complaint says you stabbed somebody 72 times and you say no, it’s 65 times,” Reid said.
Reid liked the analogy so much he used it again on a follow up question. “The picture is clear what the Republicans have done. Whether the stab was 72 times or 65 times — a lot of filibusters,” Reid said. “The American people see what’s going on.”
So does this mean Reid admits to stabbing qualified judicial nominees to the federal bench in the back by forcing cloture votes on confirmations? When the Democrats used filibusters in this area in an unprecedented attack on presidential bench selections, they claimed the use of the filibuster as an honorable way to constrain the majority. Reid didn’t make these kind of analogies when the Democrats were in the minority.
Here’s the video:
Reid’s construction here entirely relies on the notion that a filibuster is bad, when he has often argued exactly the opposite. No one would argue that a stabbing every once in a while helps to keep Senate business on track, for instance. Yet that’s essentially the argument one has to derive from Reid and his history with using filibusters for his own purposes. He’s not opposed to stabbings, just the overuse of them.
Hint: Next time, try donuts.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Hey, Nevada! Thanks alot for giving us this douche! The gifts keep coming and coming.
SouthernGent on March 6, 2008 at 7:11 PM
Let’s get rid of the rules and have real filibusters again. The Mr. Smith goes to Washington type of filibuster and not the “gentlemen’s rules” farce where a filibuster is merely all parties not to go forward without certain agreements in place.
highhopes on March 6, 2008 at 7:13 PM
No, the loserlibs just whined (whine in majority too?) about “Minority Rights!” Harry Reid is like Warren G. Harding (corrupt backstabber) without all that annoying personality thing.
Branch Rickey on March 6, 2008 at 7:16 PM
Revenge is a dish best served cold.
THE CHOSEN ONE on March 6, 2008 at 7:18 PM
Stabbing for me, but not for thee.
fourstringfuror on March 6, 2008 at 7:19 PM
what a monumental loser.
jimmer on March 6, 2008 at 7:22 PM
Does that mean that saying, “Hello,” and adding, “How are you?” is attempted murder?
andycanuck on March 6, 2008 at 7:28 PM
Reid . . . the epitome of a Democrat and a hopeless loser.
rplat on March 6, 2008 at 7:30 PM
Democrats complaining about filibusters?
Who is the filibuster king?
Byrd joined with other Southern and border state Democrats to filibuster the Civil Rights Act of 1964, personally filibustering the bill for 14 hours
Chakra Hammer on March 6, 2008 at 7:34 PM
Payback’s a beeeeeee-otch!!!
CurtZHP on March 6, 2008 at 7:38 PM
Hey, Democrat and Clansman though he may be, at least Byrd put his mouth where his (uhh…) mouth was.
Them was the good ole days: back when a filibuster actually WAS a filibuster.
logis on March 6, 2008 at 7:46 PM
This guy is such an inept moron, I just don’t understand how a person like him is in his position.
WisCon on March 6, 2008 at 8:02 PM
BOYCOTT VEGAS!
Its the casinos keeping him in business…
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Harry_Reid
Doogiesd on March 6, 2008 at 8:08 PM
fixed.
sloopy on March 6, 2008 at 8:12 PM
Does this idiot not realize that (1) the Internet is FOREVER, and (2) YouTube is not your friend?
He’s relying on the media to have a deliberately short memory on his minority leader/majority leader hypocrisy on filibusters.
He’s probably right.
But there’s always Rush. He’s got that tool’s number.
$4.2 million, right?
sulla on March 6, 2008 at 8:23 PM
I know it’s been said before, but it’s the only thing that comes to mind…
what a tool.
Hog Wild on March 6, 2008 at 8:29 PM
He’s been hanging around Schumer too much. Chuck loves the “dagger in the back” analogy.
irishspy on March 6, 2008 at 8:38 PM
I agreed so much I just had to emphasize it!
Vntnrse on March 6, 2008 at 9:00 PM
Harry Reid is an embarrassment to the State of Nevada, and our country.
Zorro on March 6, 2008 at 9:24 PM
Gee, no comparisons yet to the idiot Dubyah? Oh, that’s right
The evil Bush pronounces “nuclear” the same way Nobel Peace Prize winner Jimmuh Carter does…
Del Dolemonte on March 6, 2008 at 9:29 PM
Whoever the next Caesar is, will the Senate cut him down?
Tzetzes on March 6, 2008 at 10:09 PM
He may not get Senator Brutus’s vote.
2Tru2Tru on March 6, 2008 at 10:16 PM
I cannot even get worked up about this. Reid is just such a non-player; so completely irrelevant. It is amazing that he holds the position he currently does. I am glad no-one is calling him at 3am
HawaiiLwyr on March 7, 2008 at 12:08 AM
Can you imagine how the rest of the world must see us when they listen to him?
spike on March 7, 2008 at 12:22 AM
For Stargate watchers, Reid looks like a wraith, the live-dead creatures that suck the life force out of you
Pelosi looks like a female wraith except when she puts on a hijab. Then she just looks like a fool
entagor on March 7, 2008 at 2:25 AM
Draw a little mustache on Harry Weasel in that picture, and he looks looks like Adolf giving one of his nut ball speeches. The picture is complete with Schusalesmen in the back looking like a patrolling goon.
This is what we have representing the most powerful country on earth? What a disgrace.
Hening on March 7, 2008 at 8:02 AM
The thing that will shape and warp this election more than anything else, and could quite possibly make it the most well-informed and honest election in American history will not be the Iraq War, or pork spending, or positions on socialized healthcare, tax reform, etc.
Nope.
It’ll be Youtube. Those who promised to end the war in Iraq will have to face free ads showing their 2006 promises vs their 2008 promises. And it applies to other issues as well or better. This thread is a PERFECT example. Great job
scottm on March 7, 2008 at 8:02 AM
Who elected this douche?
natesnake on March 7, 2008 at 8:13 AM
They why did Dem people design and perfect it?
MSGTAS on March 7, 2008 at 8:18 AM
Correction: Then why did Dem design and perfect it?
MSGTAS on March 7, 2008 at 8:19 AM
I’m sorry, I’m confused here. I don’t understand how bringing cloture votes is a filibuster. Isn’t cloture the way the Senate ends a filibuster? Can anyone out there help me out?
ncc770 on March 7, 2008 at 8:44 AM
Don’t blame the whole state of Nevada for this tool. Just Las Vegas.
mojo on March 7, 2008 at 12:06 PM
He sounds like my 12 year old daughter who claims that wevery time I say no to her, “It is like a stab in my heart.”
Difference is this tool is Senate Majority Leader, not a 12 year old girl.
The Opinionator on March 7, 2008 at 5:00 PM
Tool….tool….tool…tool and a dull one too!
Ehh…Wraith? How true, I like that!
Proudvet on March 7, 2008 at 9:12 PM
Comment pages: