HonestConservative on March 5, 2008 at 9:03 PM

Yes, and that is known as the spatial theory of politics. It’s only a theory which bears little relevance to things political, as it is not very helpful to make distinctions between right and left when you can find elements on each side of the spectrum.

For example, Hitler was grand leftist, just like Stalin and Mussolini. To proclaim GWB and Juanita as on the “right” is intellectually dishonest. They should just be referred to as “anti-citizen” when they want to import a new constituency to replace the current one.

“but history will prove Bush to be a very good President.”

BWAAHAHA! That’s the funniest thing I have heard in a long time.

What has 8 years brought us? A failed war in Iraq that will wind up costing 7 trillion dollars. Big government and record defecit spending. Millions of illegals traipsing across our borders, killing our countrymen and colonizing our country. More racist affirmative action, and contempt for the American worker (see Elaine Chao). Border agents prosecuted and incarcerated at the request of the mexican government. The Skull Chertoff ignoring the invasion from the south, and an even more pronouced ignorance of the rule of law in this country. Mass exodus of the manufacturing sector to China. The dollar worth next to nothing thanks to record inflation. The decimation of the middle class. The list goes on and on and on.

This is the kiss of death, as McCain is also an “invade the world-invite the world” kind of guy taking us down this path of national suicide.

I can’t wait until the currency changes to the “Amero” and we all speak spanish. How long will it be before McCain gets in bed with Ted Kennedy for more treasonous antics?

Hard to believe carpetbagger McCain replaced Barry Goldwater, who is now rolling in his grave. You failed to support conservatives like Hunter, Tancredo and Paul, so you all deserve the Hildebeest or Obama “X” as your next president, you republican apparatchiks.

I am staying home this election.

Such an interesting observation. I remember way back about 30 years ago, I guy named Mort Sahl did a stand up bit where he stood in front of a black board and did a graph of the political spectrum.

He started with the far left and then went across through the center and through the far right and brought it back linking it almost identically to the far left. If I can find it, I’ll try to let you know.

It was perfect and it got a standing O.

“I Just don’t know how to quit you, John”.

Is it possible to swing so far right that you in effect become a crypto-leftist?
Tark on March 5, 2008 at 4:44 PM

Now there is something McLaim doesn’t need to fear.

Stutter, stutter, stammmer, stammer, – how embarrasing.

Loved all the code words for “AMNESTY” -(i.e., “big hear”, “compassionate”, “Those less fortunate…)

Looking at the two side-by-side, I can’t tell the difference. McSame is correct.

jaime on March 5, 2008 at 4:05 PM

We can only hope.

Reagan wasn’t much of a factor for Bush on the trail in 1988 as far as I remember.

Was this intended as sarcasm? Bush Sr. coasted into office, with conservatives greasing the skids for him, SOLELY because of Ronald Reagan’s legacy.

Now, those same conservatives have spent three terms propping up Bushes, and getting spat on in return. Now, we’re being asked to do it again – only a lot more so this time. Is it really any wonder the resentment has reached a boiling point?

The Democrats and the media spent the last 2 years beating a lame duck President for a REASON. Those McCain=Bush commercials are going to be very effective – with both sides.

Is it possible to swing so far right that you in effect become a crypto-leftist? Interesting question to think on. Elections are first and foremost about the future. While I don’t like everything about McCain, I will be sending him money, like I did Guiliani, like I did Romney after Rudy folded.

Look at it this way — if you have to take a sack, it’s better to take it on the 20 yard line rather than run the ball back into your own end zone to fall in protest.

Tark on March 5, 2008 at 4:44 PM

If you donated to Rudy you’re one of the good guys, in my book. :)

He may not be perfect, but I’d vote him again…

Even after he accused you the collective you) of being racist not once (Dubai Ports deal) but twice (Shamnesty)? I think its a good thing he saved that sh** for his second term.

Look at it this way — if you have to take a sack, it’s better to take it on the 20 yard line rather than run the ball back into your own end zone to fall in protest.

I will miss him too much, especially when he has so much fun with the stupid people.

AverageJoe on March 5, 2008 at 4:03 PM

Surrendering to the Mullahs, bleeding the taxpayer dry, bankrupting the country morally and financially, and the installation of a mosque just off the Oval Office

So what is going to be the “Obama Doctrine”?

Don’t know.

Then again, I don’t know, if I WANT to know.

*Shudder*

So what is going to be the “Obama Doctrine”?

ColtsFan on March 5, 2008 at 3:37 PM”
.
Not likely. Texans know the dems are pushing amnesty even harder than the ‘moderates’. Texas is deep red for quite a while, yet.

3 words for Hillary.

Peter F. Paul

As the HotAir.com resident right of center type guy. I say this:

As I said here, It is kind of hard to read the right, at this point.

It seems the further you get to the Right, the worse it looks for McCain. I mean, The WorldNetDaily.Com and the NewsWithViews.com crowds, they HATE Bush and McCain with a passion. Some of the stuff that I have read over there, that’s been said about Bush, made me think I was reading the Hoffington Post or The Nation. It was amazing.

I think among the Bush supporters, this will be a good shot in the arm for McCain. But among those who are not too happy with Bush, This will be a paperweight. The same can be said about Independents. (like me!)

Now before someone here screams “Liberal!”, Hold your fire, please. I’m just as displeased with the Democrats and their candidates. Obama is pure fluff, Hillary? Well, let’s just say there’s a laundry list for that women!

1. Her and Her Hubby disgraced the White House (Monica)
2. Waco Stand off
3. Ruby Ridge
4. Her failed Healthcare policy.

and the list goes on an on….. So, Who’s the best person for the White House?

None of them, really.

the MSM would start hurling feces

Right. And since everyone watches the MSM… or, wait… since nobody watches the MSM and everybody watches FoxNews and listens to Russ Limbaugh… uhmmm…

Help?