Video: McCain clinches, takes it to the Democrats on Iraq
posted at 11:36 pm on March 4, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
If it were anyone else it’d be foolish, but with Maverick doing better on national security among voters than Hillary and Obama combined, the Iraq argument isn’t the automatic loser it might otherwise be.
Sounds like he’s ready. Note the not so veiled reference to politicians who seek power for no reason greater than their own overweening ambition. And then, a few minutes later, a pointed redefinition of the word … “hope.”
Link: sevenload.com
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
woopeee
bob dole part 2
Roger Waters on March 4, 2008 at 11:39 PM
Get ready McCain, the media is gonna bury you in the mud they’re gonna sling if you let them.
doubleplusundead on March 4, 2008 at 11:41 PM
Go McCain!
Thank God, a candidate with stones!
ArmyAunt on March 4, 2008 at 11:44 PM
Yeah hes not ready for mud to get thrown at him. Electrodes to testes, weeks without sleep, starvation etc. is for whimps.
broker1 on March 4, 2008 at 11:45 PM
It was a good speech. The best I’ve heard from McCain.
Then along came Hillary with Santa’s bag of goodies.
This is going to be a cliff hanger.
rockhauler on March 4, 2008 at 11:46 PM
Ah yup…., however, stakes could not be higher.
Kini on March 4, 2008 at 11:46 PM
Whatever his failings on domestic issues (and there are many, which is why I still mourn over my Vets 4 Fred sticker and Fred 08 pin), I would be honored to have John McCain as Commander in Chief, and America would be safer for it.
joewm315 on March 4, 2008 at 11:50 PM
Say what you will, I think John McCain is a class act.
ArmyAunt on March 4, 2008 at 11:52 PM
I don’t think McCain has any intention of letting the media bury him, drive his message….or him. This is McCain’s last chance, and its the chance of a lifetime. Not only that, he knows the stakes for this country.
Besides, what is the media going to do to him that’s worse than he’s already endured?
tgharris on March 4, 2008 at 11:52 PM
He’s not the first guy I wanted, but I suppose I’ll go ahead and vote McCain instead of Libertarian.
The other side of the aisle, regardless of who’s running against McCain, is not an option when one pauses and reflects upon reality…
eanax on March 4, 2008 at 11:55 PM
Obama was just on Fox and was trying to say the same things that Hillary and McCain said in their speeches, and the audience wasn’t buying it!
rockhauler on March 4, 2008 at 11:55 PM
It’s gonna be a long wait till August, then come November, all the rest had peanut butter, except my dear grandmother, and they’re coming to take me away, ha ha he he HA HA HE HE to the funny farm where basket weavers sit and twiddle their thumbs and they’re coming to take me away, ha ha he he HA HA HE HE
IT’S NOT AMNESTY!!!!!
Kini on March 4, 2008 at 11:58 PM
did anyone else notice the use of “uncivil brawl”? As a Dittohead this one caught my attention?!
brotherbell on March 4, 2008 at 11:59 PM
After listening to the shout that America is “…downright mean”, and that Americans shouldn’t be proud of their country unless the Messiah is ordained, and that it’s not patriotic to wear a lapel US flag pin, and that unless working Americans pay much more in taxes to apologetically bestow on American non-workers and illegal aliens and their extended families unearned income, and that we should talk to the world’s dictators, but spit on our defender-soldiers and our national security…..yes I have issues with John McCain, but I will do everything I can to beat the Socialist/Marxist candidates of the Dems.
But that’s just me.
mr-edly on March 4, 2008 at 11:59 PM
he’s really awful at making speeches and suxbigtime with a teleprompter.
and his speech writers suck.
reliapundit on March 4, 2008 at 11:59 PM
Bush 2.0?
Kini on March 5, 2008 at 12:06 AM
“We don’t hide from history. We make history.”
OK. Listen up. I don’t post often. I read every day. I also teach college students. I try to be aware of the gap between the “in-the-know” crowd and the general perception (it’s near conventional wisdom crossed with pop culture.) I do this by reading my student’s essays. I also predicted two weeks ago that Hillary was not dead. (street–uh–blog cred?) I did not support McCain. I do not like McCain. Tonight I say he has one hell of a speech writer. That speech said just he right thing. As long as McCain avoids shooting himself in the foot he can beat any democrat with speeches like this. You people in the know — who are his writers? They will win the election. Remember this always — even if MSM cannot — 80% of the voters are mired in CW – (conventional wisdom — not country/western) — this speech plays well in the middle America 80% conventional wisdom. Against any democrat — as long as he sticks to flat delivery and avoids losing his famed temper — speeches like this win the election like Bush senior beat Dukakis.
DocKen on March 5, 2008 at 12:07 AM
Whatever. For the first time since I have been able to vote, I won’t be voting for President.
I have always voted Republican, even when I’ve had to hold my nose for liberal RINOs like GWB and the Governator. There is no way I’ll ever vote for a dhimmicrat, so I’ll just leave the top slots empty.
And I know I’m not the only one who will be doing this.
Sorry Michelle, the party is not as united as you think.
opusrex on March 5, 2008 at 12:07 AM
any republicans that have been wobbeling on Iraq, the merits of it, etc. and are open to ‘withdrawal’, defeat and capitulation. Maybe the fact that all the GOP candidates(other than the bircher) ran strong on Iraq and said it was the right decision to take Saddam out…and NOW HIllary is even talking tough on National Security. These repubs. will begin to understand the importance of Iraq and the broader war.
jp on March 5, 2008 at 12:08 AM
Big mistake Obama in his speach brings up “a black man comes to this country and married a white woman” It even raised the ears of the panel on FOXNEWS streaming.
KBird on March 5, 2008 at 12:09 AM
I think John McCain is NOT a class act. Ugh! The list is too long to repeat it all over again.
cjs1943 on March 5, 2008 at 12:10 AM
Alone among the politicians on the national stage, McCain actually knows what it’s like to suffer for his country, and not come out jaded and hateful. In stark contrast with Mr. Obama and his wife, who have not suffered one iota for anything, and who nevertheless are spilling over with resentment and hate for a country that has given them every opportunity.
The_Freeze on March 5, 2008 at 12:12 AM
Not terribly stirring.
Here’s hoping he gets to that point.
spmat on March 5, 2008 at 12:12 AM
McCain has some good advisers. It’s clear that they are trying to position McCain as a sort of Reagan-corollary vis a vis Jimmy Carter-style leftist politics.
You can sell yourself as hope for a doomed nation or as hope for a great nation that can get better. It’s clear how both sides have chosen.
amkun on March 5, 2008 at 12:15 AM
amkun, you might be on my wavelength. If he only delivers the speeches — not great but not too stilted — he can win. Lesson for all: Bush 43 said the right things poorly — and won. It is more important to say the things that ring true than to say the wrong things well. How did 43 win? Not by being the great communicator.
DocKen on March 5, 2008 at 12:20 AM
AP, you’ve got the best comic touch of any major blog figure, but you’ve always underperformed on Iraq. The public’s mood, while arguably contemptible and unserious, has never really aligned with the NYT script you seem to have internalized. I’da thunk that a zillion unsuccessful congressional votes to cut off funding would have demonstrated what I’m talking about, or perhaps you would have noticed that the Dems mostly studiously avoided any specific commitments on Iraq in ‘06 (I believe all of the newbies did). More serious surveys, such as focus groups using intelligent questions, have never shown a majority with the immature, sour, rather mindless negative opinion of Iraq that your posts consistently channel.
Iraq is not a loser, per se, in the electoral arena. Will, integrity, leadership, and clarity applied to Iraq – and McCain can probably produce this – will appeal to people in a way apart from the specific temperature re Iraq. Presidential choices involve personal character and strengths over policy positions more than any other voter behavior, in my view.
Iraq was never as bad as most think, it’s not as good as most think now, and while I guess I can’t blame MSM-dependent, busy, hard-working folks for getting discouraged so easily, I think their blogospheric leaders owe them a bit more ….
IceCold on March 5, 2008 at 12:21 AM
I want to vote for him. I REALLY DO! I think I shall only get my news from JOHNNY MAVS speaches. Go
FREDJ MAV! ouch.franklinstein on March 5, 2008 at 12:22 AM
He’s not my guy but he is my guy. He has to win.
Greenhorn on March 5, 2008 at 12:23 AM
I liken McCain to my younger brother.
I can punch him, but I will be damned if I let anyone ELSE do it!
ArmyAunt on March 5, 2008 at 12:27 AM
He’s not my guy but he is my guy. He has to win.
Kini on March 5, 2008 at 12:27 AM
Heheee — only someone with youger brothers can really appreciate that. Gord? You out there?
HeHeee
DocKen on March 5, 2008 at 12:29 AM
Just a small quibble, but Bush 43 wasn’t exactly put up against an Obama-type either time. However, that being said, I agree with you. There’s the kind of emotional high or whatever that Obama can put you on, but that fades and at the end of the day the only thing you are left with is the rotten aftertaste of his words. And then there’s his wife.
OTOH, McCain might not have the preacher’s cadence, but, if today’s speech is any sign, like you said, he will have the right essence on the campaign trail.
amkun on March 5, 2008 at 12:29 AM
No need to quibble. I only mean to point out the value of saying the right thing. You know when the left started to hate 43? When he first said “God bless America” and clearly meant it. His crime was loving America. Right or wrong, 43’s love for America is beyond dispute. McCain needs to say the right things. That is primary. Saying them well is secondary. He has done so since being a front runner. He has someone with talent on his staff. Who is it?
DocKen on March 5, 2008 at 12:36 AM
The way I look at is re Obama is, for instance, last month he raised 50 Million.
If next month he “only” raises 40 million what will the talking heads be saying?
The story will be, has the bubble burst? Are Obama’s faithful abandoning him? Etc. Etc.
When you set yourself up so high, it is very easy to fall far and fall hard.
ArmyAunt on March 5, 2008 at 12:44 AM
I like Bob Dole!
Chakra Hammer on March 5, 2008 at 12:51 AM
Bob Dole says, “quit making fun of Bob Dole, Bob Dole is Da Man! and a great American!”
>:D
Chakra Hammer on March 5, 2008 at 12:56 AM
Sometimes I think McCain’s speeches get a little too “flowery”. However, the right intent is there.
As to his delivery tonight…..IMO, some of it seemed a little stiff. Some of it was outstanding.
tgharris on March 5, 2008 at 12:59 AM
For all the geniuses on the far right, the Republican electorate, in their wisdom, probably nominated the only candidate who could win for them this cycle.
Considering the mood of the electorate and the fired up opposition, I think McCain is the best possible choice.
Not my favorite by a long shot, but the guy who can win and at least hold down the fort while the conservatives get their sh*t together.
mylegsareswollen on March 5, 2008 at 1:06 AM
I’m not talking about whether he can maintain composure and keep it together, I’m asking if he’s politically capable enough to deal with the onslaught of negative media and Democrat machinery. McCain’s time in Hanoi Hilton doesn’t necessarily give him the skills to outmaneuver or override the media or Democrat machinery, particularly given his reliance on that very media to build himself up.
doubleplusundead on March 5, 2008 at 1:13 AM
Hold down the fort? Hold down the fort? Ha ha ha! Next time you get a glance at the place the fort once stood, there will be a casino in its place, complete with gambling on our future and dancing girls on our grave.
RushBaby on March 5, 2008 at 1:17 AM
I hope everyone knows, he’s our guy. Even if we don’t like it or not.
Talk about double negatives.
Kini on March 5, 2008 at 1:21 AM
I guess fort/casino comparisons are being held up as spam?
RushBaby on March 5, 2008 at 1:21 AM
He’s only “your guy” if you still consider yourself a Republican. Not me, I’m a RINO, see. “Pseud”, can you dig it! Pass the Cheetos, I’m ready to watch what happens to the Newly Rebranded Moderately Liberal Republican Appeasaménte Party!
RushBaby on March 5, 2008 at 1:27 AM
You are on point. The Republicans say there is hope for our country because Americans will make America great. The Democrats say there is hope for our country because the government is here to take care of you. One message is based on the faith in the American people to fight for a free society. The other is based on the hopelessness of the American people that needs “taking care of.”
I have faith that, when presented with the two messages, the American people will select the one the builds them up and makes them proud to live in this country. Let the libs spend another four years sucking on bile and gnashing their teeth.
Mallard T. Drake on March 5, 2008 at 1:37 AM
I feel for ya baby. I’m a conservative first. A realist second.
Rancho Huevos?
Kini on March 5, 2008 at 1:40 AM
Say adios to your Huevos Rancheros. Corn tortillas are too dear, these days.
RushBaby on March 5, 2008 at 1:46 AM
Yeah, they’re used to fill up my gas tank.
I believe there will be a return to conservative values.
A pendulum can only swing so far before it reaches it limits.
It’s not hope. It’s faith.
Kini on March 5, 2008 at 1:49 AM
Hey Allah: When do we get to see more of the (hopefully) First Daughter?
Mallard T. Drake on March 5, 2008 at 1:54 AM
Well, for frak’s sake. That speech was almost good enough to make me wish I could more easily forget about all those knives, forks and other sharp implements which have been lodged in our collective backs over the course of the past decade, and exactly whose hand put most of them there.
But, I suppose it’s now too late to wish it was someone else saying these things.
Cylor on March 5, 2008 at 1:55 AM
McCain’s longtime co-writer and alter ego is Mark Salter. See McCain’s autobiography FAITH OF MY FATHERS – great assignment for your students to compare it to Barack’s book DREAMS FROM MY FATHER.
McCain isn’t used to the teleprompter – his longtime habit of using cards didn’t play well at early speeches. Even so, his primary night speeches have been excellent, despite his flawed delivery, and served memorable and useful lines into the political dialogue – the phrase “eloquent but empty” may have been the pin-prick that started the air hissing out of the Obama balloon.
It’s actually kind of a relief, and part of his authenticity, that McCain’s not as polished (and wearisomely contrived) a speaker as BO. (Marshall McLuhan could explain to you exactly why BO won’t wear well on TV – and why McCain’s more conversational style should wear better.) When McCain breaks from the line-readings, looks at the audience, and digs down for his conviction, the few seconds are worth more politically than 45 minutes of Barack Obama doing his hollowed-out MLK/Deval Patrick 2.0 shtick.
CK MacLeod on March 5, 2008 at 2:02 AM
His wife looks like a cyborg. And it’s getting close enough to BSG time that I find that extra-scary.
/me does not welcome our new Cylon overlords.
ErikTheRed on March 5, 2008 at 2:16 AM
I liked McCain’s speech, and as long as he talks up America, he’s golden. The Democrats are running anti-American campaigns. They will have to stay left for weeks, because they will be in a closed Democrat primary in Pennsylvania. This is just gravy on the McCain train for the general.
McCain has already taken on the New York Times and schooled them. He answered 36 questions about their shoot and miss “scandal” and wore the media out. The NYTs is now discredited for the rest of the general election. Any Republican will face a hostile press. McCain has faced them down already, and neutralized them. The NYTs has seen to that already.
Stormy70 on March 5, 2008 at 2:18 AM
Nicely put. I mostly agree and would like to believe it, but a lot of folks seem to like the shtick. Personally, it sets my teeth on edge after I watch Obama for more than a couple of minutes in a speech.
BillINDC on March 5, 2008 at 2:22 AM
WMD = Weapons we dare not let them possess.
Good move. Libs ruined WMD like so many other words and phrases.
- The Cat
MirCat on March 5, 2008 at 2:28 AM
That was the best speech I ever heard from him!!
Keep it up! It got me inspired and I would always hate to hear him talk. Go McCain!
Conservatives R Us on March 5, 2008 at 2:50 AM
Chances of an el Presidente Juan Plantation McCain setting 20,000,000 illegals on the path to legalization in his first term: 99.0
Chances that the Republican party, bar moving even much further to the left, will win future Presidential elections: 01.0
MB4 on March 5, 2008 at 3:21 AM
McCain may be having flashbacks on this. hnn.us/articles/31400.html Will the democrats get away with it again?
John Cunningham on March 5, 2008 at 4:09 AM
Obama has not earned a comparison to Dr. King.
Captain Scarlet on March 5, 2008 at 5:58 AM
I’ll admit… it will be nice to have a GOP nominee who can string a sentence together. (Bush is fine, but I cringe when he talks)
AbaddonsReign on March 5, 2008 at 6:32 AM
Ditto that.
And he’s gonna look really, really old next to the Obama/Clinton (face lift queen) ticket.
Not looking good for us. However, VP choice will be critical this time around. I pray he puts Mitt on the ticket.
stenwin77 on March 5, 2008 at 6:55 AM
John McCain alone in his room….”THERE, TAKE THAT LIMBAUGH!!! I DIDN’T NEED YOU. THIS IS AS CONSERVATIVE AS I AM GONNA GET!!!”
I wonder how he thinks he will win in November w/o all us Conservatives??? hehehe
jimbo2008 on March 5, 2008 at 7:23 AM
I disagree. He is monotone and he’s just stating the obvious. … we all are MAKING history, every day.
McAARP is uninspiring, as a speaker. I think Hillary is shrill (as in fingernails on chalkboard) but, she is enthusiastic. The DEM ticket will be Obama/Clinton and McAARP will be flat lined compared to them.
Did you hear about 3 days ago the two horrible gaffs he made in 2 minutes? It was awkward., very awkward. Senior moments are going to happen and they will be played over and over and over on TV.
stenwin77 on March 5, 2008 at 7:30 AM
I won’t be holding my nose this election to vote for McCain because as a conservative first, he WILL NEVER GET MY VOTE.
He is a POS traitor to his first wife, country, and conservative base of his party. His skin is so thin, he was seriously considering changing parties in 2000 after the SC primary debacle. He has too many scores to settle against conservatives and will be able to lurch the country to the left faster than a Democrat because he will have bipartisan support ala Bush.
Valiant on March 5, 2008 at 7:31 AM
Agreed…100%
JetBoy on March 5, 2008 at 7:41 AM
Talk is easy – and useless. Deeds are hard – and often costly. I don’t care what he says – it’s what he may do that bothers me.
OldEnglish on March 5, 2008 at 7:45 AM
DISAGREE 1000%
stenwin77 on March 5, 2008 at 7:53 AM
He must do 3 things to get my vote:
1. Get rid of JUAN HERNANDEZ
2. Say that he will pardon Ramoz & Compeon -who are still rotting away in jail for injuring a Mexican gang member and drug dealer
3. Put a real conservative on the ticket.
Otherwise, like you, I will not vote for him.
stenwin77 on March 5, 2008 at 7:56 AM
Dang, that was good.
Hening on March 5, 2008 at 7:58 AM
The LOSER of this election has now been chosen…unless Barry Hussein committs hari kari between now and November…
jimbo2008 on March 5, 2008 at 8:06 AM
Yeah, I know. (that made me laugh tho)
Again, and this goes for all the “McCain-deranged”…it’s truly time to quit whining, buck-up, brush the primary dust off our jackets, and support the GOP nominee for POTUS.
Let the Democrats fight amongst themselves…and let’s show America that Republicans have a better sense of unity. Or, y’all can keep pouting.
JetBoy on March 5, 2008 at 8:07 AM
I wonder how he thinks he will win in November w/o all us Conservatives??? hehehe
jimbo2008
Yes, because it’s quite apparent that all the conservatives in the USA will be voting for either Hillary or Obama. That will teach those RINOs!
Let’s hear it for Socialized Medicine and Withdrawl! Huzzah class warfare!
Somehow, I think that the conservatives will vote for McCain.
Krydor on March 5, 2008 at 8:17 AM
His delivery is still a little rough, but I think he believes everything he said, and I believe it too. Can’t say that about any Obama or Clinton speeches.
DreadWolf on March 5, 2008 at 8:37 AM
How’s the GOP Kool-Aid? There needs to be united conservative opposition against McCainite thought, not support for it in the White House. We are in a much better position fighting RINO policies in the ferocious minority than supporting them when your guy is in the Oval Office.
None of those things will happen because Maverick hates conservatives more than the New York Times.
Valiant on March 5, 2008 at 8:44 AM
If McPain is trying to start something with the Democrats, he is just going to have to wait until Shillary and B.O. are finished tearing each other to shreds first.
pilamaye on March 5, 2008 at 8:47 AM
Heh.
funky chicken on March 5, 2008 at 8:51 AM
Valiant is a Ted Sampley devotee. For info on Sampley and his ilk, this website is the best one stop shopping you can find:
http://www.miafacts.org/mccain.htm
Short summary of the types of “conservatives” who have hated and defamed McCain since the 1980s.
Really, why one earth would you want to associate with people like that? Any time you see a McCain hater say he is/was a traitor to the military, this is what they are saying.
The author of that site:
Joe Schlatter, Colonel, U. S. Army, Retired. He retired on 1 April 1995. His involvement in the MIA issue came during two assignments:
February 1986 – July 1990
Feb 86 – Dec 88: Chief, Analysis Branch, Defense Intelligence Agency Special Office for POW-MIA Affairs
Dec 88 – Jul 90: Chief, Defense Intelligence Agency Special Office for POW-MIA Affairs
July 1993 – March 1995: Deputy Director, Defense POW-MIA Office
funky chicken on March 5, 2008 at 9:02 AM
Git’er done, John boy. But (please!!!) don’t even think about picking your co-candidate for VP.
argos on March 5, 2008 at 9:02 AM
Never heard of Ted Sampley, but thanks for the link. Please find me one conservative who loves McCain. Seriously. Have you heard of David Hackworth?
Here is what a war hero thought of McCain.
Valiant on March 5, 2008 at 9:12 AM
David Hackworth endorsed John Kerry in 2004. Not terribly conservative.
funky chicken on March 5, 2008 at 9:35 AM
I’m surprised and pleased that Hillary did so well against the man who would endanger the lives of Americans and Iraqis if he was elected. I think she’ll come out strong now but didn’t think so before. I really thought the Hopinator was going to inspire naives across the nation. THANKS FOR PROVING ME WRONG AMERICA! I guess I have a new found “hope”.
After saying that, it is to bad for Hillary that she can’t use McCain’s greatest weakness against him: amnesty.
But she may indirectly. She’s a smart woman and knows that McCain’s amnesty involvement has angered most Americans. I’m sure that she is also aware of popular conservatives who have suggested to let America go to hell in a handbasket under her administration if elected.
She would be wise to have unofficial supporters fan that fire against him. (The MSM may do that of their own volition.)
I’m already concerned about his amnesty involvment and denial but I would rather contend with McCain in the Whitehouse than with Hillary.
shick on March 5, 2008 at 9:36 AM
Hackworth on Kerry, and on calling vets “traitors” like Valiant is doing to McCain:
funky chicken on March 5, 2008 at 9:44 AM
The Washington Post reports that former occupation head Paul Bremer now says publicly that coalition forces “never had enough troops on the ground” in Iraq, and that the Bush administration spurned his advice on the subject. Plus: David Hackworth says the draft is coming, for both males and females, in ‘05 or ‘06.
Hack praising the POD himself:
http://www.militarycorruption.com/wesleyclark.htm
funky chicken on March 5, 2008 at 9:51 AM
Check me out here blogging on McCain.
http://imustimes.wordpress.com/2008/03/05/matt-taibbiwhen-doves-cry/
Dr Evil on March 5, 2008 at 9:51 AM
The VVAJC is Ted Sampley and his followers. Pure unadulterated garbage. Thanks for proving to everybody what you are selling “Valiant.”
funky chicken on March 5, 2008 at 9:52 AM
oops VVAJMC is Ted Sampley and his followers.
funky chicken on March 5, 2008 at 9:55 AM
I agree with alot of What Hackworth says there but what he leaves out is critical. Kerry used that brief yet honorable service to label himself as the perfect critic against the war effort, our nation and our warriors. And he slandered them mercilessly and his involvement in France is nothing short of traitorous.
It is obvious by his post-service action that he used his service only as a political tool to gain power.
What’s really interesting is that he hasn’t spoken of his immediate post-war involvment for some time now.
Why?
shick on March 5, 2008 at 9:56 AM
Even if you take that as fact for the sake of argument, none of it would make him a traitor to his country as you claim. Such claims are odorous and offensive. The site you link even mentions that the Code of Conduct has been changed.
Unless you’re a disabled war vet yourself, you haven’t done a 100th of what he has for your country.
DreadWolf on March 5, 2008 at 10:05 AM
shick, yes, the problem with Kerry was Winter Soldier and our old historical pal JenJiss Khan or however the douche said it.
funky chicken on March 5, 2008 at 10:11 AM
I don’t doubt that all of the acrimony ABOUT McCain from conservatives will be brought up by the Dems. I was very vocal in my opposition to McCain, but it is what it is, and I will vote for him.
Doug on March 5, 2008 at 11:30 AM
Again, that Wes Clark is no George S. Patton or William T. Sherman — is he?
eanax on March 5, 2008 at 12:03 PM
Did anyone notice . . . this guy runs essentially un opposed in Texas. . . and gets only 51% of the vote.
Labamigo on March 5, 2008 at 12:28 PM
in the end, mC will be made look like an over-the-hill nut case and it will the easy to do. dole2.
jimmer on March 5, 2008 at 12:30 PM
As the baby of my family I can’t quite appreciate that.
OneGyT on March 5, 2008 at 12:40 PM
I really liked the speech up until 3 minutes in the video. He started talking about “listening to the people,” not being “insulting,” and “adhering to principle.”
And flashes of comprehensive immigration zombie-amnesty bills arose in my mind. What a hypocrite.
HYTEAndy on March 5, 2008 at 1:03 PM
Is it just me or does it appear he can’t lift his arms past 90 degrees?
jusstjones on March 5, 2008 at 1:35 PM
So, McCain needs to “say the right things”?
Well, I guess that’s what he’s got left. Since he’s spent years doing the wrong things, maybe “saying” the right things will help him. Not with me, but I’m not an undecided voter.
Defend the First Amendment, and the Constitution… anyone but McCain. I was against McCain during the CFR vote. I was against McCain during his lawsuit against the FEC. I was against McCain during his amicus brief in 2007… and I’m against McCain now.
Things that might help… repealing McCain-Feingold. Picking FEC Commissioners early and have ones known to not support McCain’s push to regulate internet speech. Showing just one iota of acknowledgment that a law that abridges freedom of speech in fact violates the clear text of the First Amendment.
Some sort of respect for the Constitution itself, and acknowledging that the Constitution trumps his political goals.
These would help. Everything else is just frosting on the sh*t sandwich.
gekkobear on March 5, 2008 at 2:07 PM
Every time McCain speaks, I need to turn up the volume. even when he “forcefully denies” something. I’m afraid he’s not going to stand a chance against Obama if he doesn’t learn to speak more inspiringly.
freevillage on March 5, 2008 at 3:59 PM
agreed 1000%! i like him more and more. if he keeps this up, i think he has every chance of winning.
i am really looking forward to seeing him debate whomever the dems nominate. expect a replay of cheney SCHOOLING silky pony back in ‘04. :-)
homesickamerican on March 5, 2008 at 10:47 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »