Porky past or bright future? Senate GOP’s decision point
posted at 3:45 pm on March 1, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
John McCain may interrupt his campaigning to return to Washington in an effort to pass a one-year moratorium on earmarking. The Hill reports that McCain’s return puts the rest of the Senate GOP caucus in a tough position. Do they show unanimity with the party’s nominee, or do they protect their ability to protect their incumbencies?
Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) may return to Capitol Hill this month to support an amendment imposing a one-year ban on earmarks, a move that could set up a divisive clash within the GOP caucus.
McCain, the likely Republican presidential nominee, has long broken with most of Congress, including the Senate Republican leadership, in seeking an end to the practice of inserting line items in spending bills for parochial projects.
His return could set up a clash with many Senate Republicans who argue that it is the prerogative of Congress to set spending priorities, and earmarks are acceptable so long as the process is transparent. Earmarks take on added importance in an election year because lawmakers often point to the projects to tout their effectiveness in Congress.
McCain has tried to convince his colleagues to eschew earmarks for years, and now he may have them exactly where he wants them. As the party’s nominee, he has the power of the media spotlight, and he has not hesitated to use that leverage in the past to twist arms. He also has the high road on this issue; it’s a lot easier to say that pork is corrupting Congress than it is to explain how earmarking somehow retains accountability over procurement.
Senate Republicans now face the same choice that House Republicans blew at their annual retreat. They have an opportunity to send a clear message on clean government. A one-year moratorium on earmarking would show voters a commitment to changing the environment and the processes in the Beltway that has brought sclerosis to the electoral process. It would reject the Treasury raids for incumbency protection — and any pushback by the Democrats would enhance the GOP brand for 2008.
McCain can’t lose in any sense. If he and DeMint can’t budge the Senate, he will enhance his general-election image as a maverick, a man who can challenge his party. If the amendment passes, McCain will enhance his argument that he and not Barack Obama is the real agent of change. The only question will be whether the Republicans choose to be winners or losers.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
This issue is truely the one where Republicans show they learned from the 2006 election defeat.
William Amos on March 1, 2008 at 3:48 PM
The architects of the bridge to nowhere have already made this decision incorrectly a few times in recent history.
lorien1973 on March 1, 2008 at 3:48 PM
Now we’ll be able to see what America really wants: skin-based superficial change or results-based actual change.
amkun on March 1, 2008 at 3:49 PM
You have to ask?
Do you think, Ed, that not getting this supported by fellow Republicans would show McCain as being too weak to get things done in his own party, much less both?
Christoph on March 1, 2008 at 3:50 PM
For republicans though its a win/win issue because the democratic congress will never pass it. Republicans can push the bill knowing the dems will defeat it.
William Amos on March 1, 2008 at 3:52 PM
It’s a winning issue either way. Literate Americans want an end to this spending. We want the government out of wallets.
Point out where the earmarks have been going. Such as:
1) Chucky Rangel’s “Monument to Me” at CUNY
2) Murtha’s earmarks to cronies and alleged “companies” in PA
3) Earmark for gourmet, organic food for SF public schools
Make as many commercials using as many examples as possible and run them in vulnerable, colostomy bag Democrat districts. Why colostomy bag? Because their full of sh!t.
Hell, I wish I could get an earmark for a new dental school in Indiana. Something that would benefit the entire population. I’m not a dentist, but I’ve seen the place (the only place, actually) where dentists and hygienists are trained. If there was ever a place that needed an earmark, here it is.
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on March 1, 2008 at 4:07 PM
As much heartburn as Maverick has caused me on other issues (free speech, borders, taxes), this is one issue where he is the Mac Daddy. I actually hope some of our dimmer Repubs throw hissy fits. It will show us who the real weasels are. But either way, Mav looks good here. Now… watch how the MSM tries to either ignore it or make it look like an empty, election-year stunt.
Sugar Land on March 1, 2008 at 4:10 PM
It seems the pork loving Republicans have their backs against the wall. What is Stevens (R-AK) going to do? He has Palin on his heels, big fat smelly pork in his past, a nominee that stands vociferously against pork and a very agitated RINO hunting grassroots monement brewing. It’d be suicide to vote against it.
McCain should have kept his intentions secret. Now Bambi will show up at the 11th hour to bandwagon.
Theworldisnotenough on March 1, 2008 at 4:11 PM
I hope he resigns from the Senate while he’s at it. After all, his buddy, Bob Dole, was man enough to do it.
Zorro on March 1, 2008 at 4:12 PM
Is it me or does McCain relish putting his fellow Republicans on the spot?
normsrevenge on March 1, 2008 at 4:15 PM
.. or is it just an election year ploy?
normsrevenge on March 1, 2008 at 4:16 PM
they should all have to resign. were paying them for a job that they do on their own leisure while campaining for 18 months. wish i could come and go as i pleased and still recieve a check.
palefaced on March 1, 2008 at 4:21 PM
Let me take this one, Ed?
Nah. That’s inside the Beltway stuff, for activists and staffers. I’d wager 95% of the voters have never even used the phrase “too weak to get things done in his own party”.
Personally, I love it. Obambi will try to pile on, as someone noted, but his $Trillions economic and social nannyism proposals will expose him as a liar and a socialist, for anyone too stupid not to know it already. And the thought of McCain being able to call out the GOP big spenders in the Senate might actually help revive the brand.
Either way, it’s good public policy.
Jaibones on March 1, 2008 at 4:29 PM
McCain plans to cripple the economy with his global warming hoax and poverty labor importation. Cutting pork is the shiny toy he uses to distract you.
I’m still waiting for the McCain fans to convince me that this global warming business is worth destroying the economy over. Anyone?
Buddahpundit on March 1, 2008 at 4:30 PM
Rhetoric, that bill won’t pass or it will be so watered down it wont have any effect. Schwarzenegger did the same thing in California, passing a popular, but worthless bill. So much so a staffer from the state resigned because the bill wasn’t doing “enough” to fight global warming.
It gives McCain cred for his “centrism” while not doing anything to hurt the economy. Hopefully McCain can get some nuke plants up and running.
The funny thing is the closer we get to the next president the more the media is revealing ethanol as a hoax. Global Warming is on the ropes and the media can’t hide that forever either. We may get real conservative solutions to our energy needs.
I’m a “Fredhead” by the way.
Theworldisnotenough on March 1, 2008 at 4:37 PM
Weak is voting for the earmarks. The idea of rich white men doing what the hell they want to do without accountability is coming to an end. Now it will be women and minorities supported by white male eunuchs who will take what they want without accountability. Either way, the middle class is going to get screwed with an orgasm no where in the future.
volsense on March 1, 2008 at 4:47 PM
I don’t think there are any McCain fans here.
shibumiglass on March 1, 2008 at 4:51 PM
This is an opportunity to increase his Conservative following without alienating his blue dog voters.
Speakup on March 1, 2008 at 4:53 PM
This should generate a lot of political hay for us, even if the Dems defeat the moratorium. Good move, I think.
petefrt on March 1, 2008 at 5:00 PM
Obama Over $90 Million in Pork-Barrel Earmarks
McCain $0 In Earmarks
Chakra Hammer on March 1, 2008 at 5:53 PM
The dems will never go for this, infact they’ll go kicking and screaming. again. The guy is old but he didn’t just fall off the turnip truck.
THE CHOSEN ONE on March 1, 2008 at 5:58 PM
He’s been pretty effective at that with the anti-Muslim-baiting. So far hes doing a pretty good job of sorting out the undesirable elements… let’s hope he keeps it up.
DaveS on March 1, 2008 at 6:14 PM
Ummmm…..me.
I just cannot stomach Obama getting in office and removing the troops just as we are winning over there.
I will not allow him to spit on my nephew’s grave.
Hope this is ok to post:
Support John McCain!
http://armyaunt.johnmccain.com/
ArmyAunt on March 1, 2008 at 6:22 PM
Well, if he can pull this off I might start to forgive him a few of his past sins. I’ll take any comfort available, at this point.
a capella on March 1, 2008 at 6:31 PM
Great strategic campaign move. Compare Obamas trillions in state socialism with zero bucks for McCain earmarks.
The only thing this election will be about is security. The MSM is trying to move the goalposts but will not succeed.
Been a McCain supporter since 2000.
Colonel_prop on March 1, 2008 at 6:31 PM
Win Win for John – big win for us taxpayers if this passes.
Frank Tait on March 1, 2008 at 6:32 PM
Here’s a silly question — if it’s “unconstitutional” for the president to have line item veto power, then shouldn’t it be the same regarding the insertion of line items in a bill?
whtabtbill on March 1, 2008 at 6:40 PM
No sudden dash to do something right can make up for McCain’s history of doing so much wrong. Earmarks vs. an attack on the 1st amendment? I’ll take earmarks any day. If only he had this same zeal for standing up for other conservative values.
Mormon Doc on March 1, 2008 at 6:55 PM
This could work for McCain. It could also give conservatives a bit of schadenfreude toward big-spender Repubs who were responsible for the ’06 loss. Regardless of their lists of massive and expensive government programs, both Hillary and Obama are going to use the economy as the top issue (are we in a recession or not?). If the Republicans want to win in November, they should go along with McCain on this and use it to their advantage.
Connie on March 1, 2008 at 7:16 PM
Good point that makes too much sense. McCain crossed the aisle so much, he forgot what page he was on. He has to use verbal cues like sheriff, bridge to nowhere, and pork barrel to find his way home. McCain’s core is McCain. Everyone and everything else can just lump it. McCain has no ethical standing to berate others when his policies are as asinine. We’re not all drinking what you’re pushing McCain.
Cold Steel on March 1, 2008 at 7:17 PM
Pure politics. No effect on spending.
.
They load up a bill with earmarks and make this moratorium effective the day after that bill is signed. Then operate the Federal government on continuing resolutions until the one year moratorium is expired, meanwhile, preparing the next bill loaded with earmarks.
News2Use on March 1, 2008 at 7:34 PM
So even Juan McAmnesty gets it right once in a while? Big freakin deal!
DannoJyd on March 1, 2008 at 7:35 PM
1) McCain has been in office too long: he has incumbentitis.
2) McCain took too many shots to the head while being tortured in Hanoi for 6 years.
3) McCain’s temperment and lack of humility are a bit too much for me to accept in a President.
4) McCain has been on the WRONG side of too many issues recently due to all of the above.
5) McCain’s ego is just too much to take…..ad infinitum & nauseum.
God Bless him, but I can’t vote for him.
jimbo2008 on March 1, 2008 at 7:58 PM
jimbo2008 on March 1, 2008 at 7:58 PM
What’s wrong Jimbo, Chosen and Chakra haven’t convinced you otherwise? Chosen’s sole requirement is that Mr. Cranky did not “fall off the turnip truck.” Chosen likes to remind us of that in just about every thread. I’m thick so I forget quickly.
Cold Steel on March 1, 2008 at 8:04 PM
What Triceratops can’t get one of his really really liberal Democrat friends to help him out here? There is no McCain-Kennedy bill against earmarks in the making? What happened to all that bipartisanship that is part of the reason why we are supposed to vote for the man who repeatedly tells social conservatives to f**k off?
Seems to me this is a perfect way for Triceratops to do something meaningful to convince the GOP rank-and-file he isn’t the effing liberal he really is.
highhopes on March 1, 2008 at 8:40 PM
I’m a Republican. I know my party: they’ll blow it again.
irishspy on March 1, 2008 at 8:46 PM
highhopes on March 1, 2008 at 8:40 PM
I’ve seen you use Triceratops lately, and it is funny. OCB is totally a Triceratops. That explains his hatred for global warming. I mean you know his people/monster/dinosaur friends were killed off by global warming a jillion years ago. This global warming fixation is fused in his DNA. As a corollary, the dinosaur media’s fixation runs in the same vein. What you say rings true my friend.
Cold Steel on March 1, 2008 at 8:48 PM
The Republicans have almost always managed to find themselves defeated by insurmountable opportunities such as this one.
I’m reminded of Ben Franklin’s caution: We must all hang together, or we shall most assuredly hang separately. Congressional Republicans have, by and large, preferred to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory rather than take the high road.
Paul_in_NJ on March 1, 2008 at 10:10 PM
“McCain should have kept his intentions secret. Now Bambi will show up at the 11th hour to bandwagon.
Theworldisnotenough on March 1, 2008 at 4:11 PM”
AHHH but even then O”Change”Bama will look even more foolish. McCain has been an anti-pork crusader for years, he has never once asked for an earmark. Obama has manages to get himself up to his rasins in pork in just 3 years in the Senate. Mac will still coming out looking like the champ he has always been on this issue.
Squid Shark on March 1, 2008 at 10:46 PM
“I don’t think there are any McCain fans here.
shibumiglass on March 1, 2008 at 4:51 PM”
Hi! Over here, McCain man since 2000!
Squid Shark on March 1, 2008 at 10:51 PM
Paul_in_NJ on March 1, 2008 at 10:10 PM
Patience Paul. It’s still a long road to November.
Saltysam on March 1, 2008 at 11:52 PM
Hey, those pigs may be useful in the future. For dipping our bullets in.
Tzetzes on March 2, 2008 at 12:14 AM
Smart move for McCain. Difficult decision for Republicans in close races. They can probably count on the Democrats to do everything possible to protect the earmarks, looking at how previous votes on the subject have gone.
Mister Mets on March 2, 2008 at 1:32 AM
Mister Mets on March 2, 2008 at 1:32 AM
Smartest guy in the room.
THE CHOSEN ONE on March 2, 2008 at 1:48 AM
Like I’ve been saying–disagree with him or not, you can’t say McCain has no principles.
He’s using his influence to do good–even if it alienates his fellow Senators.
jgapinoy on March 2, 2008 at 9:56 AM
Barnstorming Obama plans to pick Republicans for cabinet
“…Obama is hoping to appoint cross-party figures to his cabinet such as Chuck Hagel, the Republican senator for Nebraska and an opponent of the Iraq war, and Richard Lugar, leader of the Republicans on the Senate foreign relations committee.
Senior advisers confirmed that Hagel, a highly decorated Vietnam war veteran and one of McCain’s closest friends in the Senate, was considered an ideal candidate for defence secretary. Some regard the outspoken Republican as a possible vice-presidential nominee although that might be regarded as a “stretch”…
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3466823.ece
J_Gocht on March 2, 2008 at 2:29 PM