A curious case of plagiarism
posted at 9:16 am on March 1, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Tin Goeglein has resigned his position at the White House after a blogger caught him plagiarizing the work of others in his occasional newspaper column that ran in a local Fort Wayne, Indiana newspaper. Goeglein acted as a liaison to the social and religious conservatives in the Republican Party and assisted in the formulation of policy to act in those interests, the New York Times reports, but he has done that so quietly that most people have probably never heard his name, until now (via Memeorandum):
A longtime aide to President Bush who wrote occasional guest columns for his hometown newspaper resigned on Friday evening after admitting that he had repeatedly plagiarized from other writers.
The White House called his actions unacceptable.
The aide, Tim Goeglein, had worked for Mr. Bush since 2001, as a liaison to social and religious conservatives, an important component of the president’s political base. Mr. Goeglein was influential in decisions on a range of questions important to that constituency, including stem cell research, abortion and faith-based initiatives. …
Mr. Goeglein, 44, is little known outside Washington. He is a familiar figure to conservatives and evangelical Christians, who knew him as a spokesman for Gary L. Bauer, the conservative who ran for president in 2000.
When Mr. Bauer dropped out of the race, Mr. Goeglein signed on with Mr. Bush, eventually becoming a top aide to Karl Rove, the chief political strategist. He was the eyes and ears of the White House in the world of religious conservatives and an emissary to that world for Mr. Rove and the president.
Blogger Nancy Nall discovered one instance of plagiarism, and others were later found as well. He apparently had eclectic tastes in source material; he copied from the Dartmouth Review, the New York Sun, and the Washington Post. In all, the News-Sentinel found that he had plagiarized material in 19 of his 38 columns, an impressive record of theft.
Let’s be blunt: plagiarism is theft. It’s stealing someone else’s words and thoughts and taking credit for them as your own. It’s a sign of intellectual poverty, and in most cases, completely unnecessary. People can use outside material to make an original point, as long as they cite their references. In fact, given the wide range of references from which Goeglein stole, it might have made him a more impressive columnist if he had just been honest.
Most people who plagiarize do so under time constraints — they have deadlines to meet and start looking for short cuts. However, Goeglein didn’t have deadlines. His column was occasional, not scheduled, as 38 appearances in eight years indicates. So why steal at all? Why risk career and reputation by plagiarizing for a local newspaper column?
We will never know the answer to that question. However, his departure was entirely necessary. Unlike the Armstrong Williams case, though, this doesn’t reflect on the administration. This is one man’s curious and unnecessary compulsion to undo himself — for what appears to be no reason at all.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
When I taught high school, it was very difficult to teach kids not to plagerize. The internet had made it so easy for them to cut and paste from all kinds of sources, and their parents and the administrators didn’t like for the penalty for plagerizing to be stiff. I always pointed stories like this out to them so that they would see that this was a real world issue that truly mattered, not some prediliction of their goofy teacher. It was becoming a huge problem for teachers when I left the profession and last I heard it was becoming very uncommon to assign papers that were to be written outside of class because plagerism was so hard to control.
TX Mom on March 1, 2008 at 9:29 AM
If a Repulican does it, it’s called plagiarism.
If a Democrat does it, it’s called sharing. So that makes it all okie dokie.
Hog Wild on March 1, 2008 at 9:30 AM
…Not exactly a good example for the cause. I imagine the The View nitwits will discuss this in detail.
a capella on March 1, 2008 at 9:31 AM
It always amazes me how, when a repub is caught with his hand in the cookie jar, he will then do the honorable thing. The dem will always grab more cookies and then tell you to shove it.
Up-Chuck on March 1, 2008 at 9:33 AM
Republicans ALWAYS resign and slink off, while democrats who do bad things are feted by the party establishment and eventually named Time Man of the Year.
Rational Thought on March 1, 2008 at 9:40 AM
The most suprising thing about this is that the article is NYT, and [I checked] it’s NOT on the site’s front page. Have they gone VRWC?
eeyore on March 1, 2008 at 9:51 AM
Larry Craig? Ted Stevens? Bob Ney?
a capella on March 1, 2008 at 9:52 AM
Good. He was nailed for his own choice. I have no vindictive feelings for him, but I’m not going to give him a pass because he is an ‘R’.
Limerick on March 1, 2008 at 9:56 AM
TX Mom, I see your point about plagiarism in the schools being harder to police since the Internet makes it so easy for students to cut and paste. The flip side, however, is that the Internet also makes it easier to catch people doing this! Note that in the link to Nancy Nall’s blog above, that’s exactly how she caught him, googleing an uncommon name and taking it from there.
radjah shelduck on March 1, 2008 at 10:09 AM
Maybe he can get a job with Joe Biden.
irishspy on March 1, 2008 at 10:30 AM
It always amazes me that these idiots think their plagiarism won’t be noticed.
Lehuster on March 1, 2008 at 11:19 AM
Let’s be blunt: plagiarism is theft. It’s stealing someone else’s words and thoughts and taking credit for them as your own. It’s a sign of intellectual poverty, and in most cases, completely unnecessary. People can use outside material to make an original point, as long as they cite their references. In fact, given the wide range of references from which Goeglein stole, it might have made him a more impressive columnist if he had just been honest.
Most people who plagiarize do so under time constraints — they have deadlines to meet and start looking for short cuts. However, Goeglein didn’t have deadlines. His column was occasional, not scheduled, as 38 appearances in eight years indicates. So why steal at all? Why risk career and reputation by plagiarizing for a local newspaper column?
We will never know the answer to that question. However, his departure was entirely necessary. Unlike the Armstrong Williams case, though, this doesn’t reflect on the administration. This is one man’s curious and unnecessary compulsion to undo himself — for what appears to be no reason at all.
IMO anyway.
Kevin M on March 1, 2008 at 12:28 PM
Yes, this is true. I frequently used Google to catch plagerism in my students’ papers, but it would take me hours of extra time. In-class essays that I watched them write took much less time to grade because I didn’t have to check every odd phrase, and there weren’t really any odd phrases. One of the reasons that I quit teaching when I had children of my own is because I didn’t think I could devote the time required to adequately prepare lessons and grade papers. Hours to check for plagerism is one of the things that I would no longer have, and since every case of plagerism that I found also required intense defense of my position to both the parents and my bosses – well, many teachers felt it wasn’t worth it. I was too stubborn to let it go.
TX Mom on March 1, 2008 at 12:29 PM
Maybe he can
writeplagiarizeborrow some speeches for Obama.SouthernGent on March 1, 2008 at 12:35 PM
Most people who plagiarize do so under time constraints — they have deadlines to meet and start looking for short cuts. However, Goeglein didn’t have deadlines. His column was occasional, not scheduled, as 38 appearances in eight years indicates. So why steal at all? Why risk career and reputation by plagiarizing for a local newspaper column?
Sorry, I ripped that off. I can’t remember from where.
Sugar Land on March 1, 2008 at 12:40 PM
I don’t understand plagiarism when a simple attribute to the original author demonstrates how “well read” and “worldly” one may be, a position more lofty than mere intellect…..in some circles.
b4lucy on March 1, 2008 at 12:46 PM
So, a story about some dink nobody’s ever heard of, writing for a hometown paper of no consequence makes it to the front page of HA. I thought the whole purpose of the headlines was for stories like this. Meanwhile, I have yet to see even a headline or main story about the illegal alien who killed 4 children on a school bus who had been busted at least once and possible twice before for driving related violations. Happy to see we have our priorities straight.
TheBigOldDog on March 1, 2008 at 12:58 PM
I guess most people still don’t get it: Conservative Republican plagiarism = BAD, Liberal Democrat plagiarism = ethical, moral and the standard.
jimbo2008 on March 1, 2008 at 1:05 PM
Actually, there is now a tool on the internet where students have to upload their papers and it checks other papers ever turned in and other works and determines if it’s been plagiarized. I just saw a demo of it. I know that some schools are already using it. It’s awesome!!
ihasurnominashun on March 1, 2008 at 2:02 PM
I guess crediting someone depends on how much of his material you quote. If you go to far, its the other persons article not yours.
KW64 on March 1, 2008 at 2:11 PM
Michelle wrote about it on 2/21 (initial report) 2/22(re: Memorial Fund) and 2/27 (followup) at michellemalkin.com
Domino on March 1, 2008 at 2:36 PM
Part of the problem with evaluating plagiarism is that we don’t create what we write out of nothing. We don’t make up words on the fly. All the letters, all the words, all the turns of phrase and idioms….all were created by someone else and are used freely.
At some level, however, the aggregated chunks of all these common pieces get to be too much. Instead of authorship that shares a common language, the writer — not author — is engaged in misappropriation of another’s work. At what point is the line to be drawn? I don’t know of any hard and fast rules — instead, it’s “we’ll know it when we see it.” And that makes it a difficult subject to teach.
And if the subject is avoided because it’s difficult to distinguish the subtle cases, then there are no impediments to developing egregious ones. I would guess that nobody ever said, “hey, Tim — gettin’ pretty close to plagiarism there, aren’t you?” when Mr. Goeglein was in school.
This same difficulty, with defining an absolute border, also means that plagiarism becomes one of those subjects — like porn, torture, and promiscuity — that will be doomed to oscillate between lax and fervent prosecution. Further, there will be those who wish to “amp up” these oscillations for reasons unrelated to the actual transgression. Many of the commenters here are noting partisan differences relating to views on plagiarism — but this is true for many issues where “you know it when you see it.”
And, again, it’s not because the horrible cases aren’t horrible. It’s that each of the subjects begins with something good — plagiarism begins with using a common language; porn begins with representational art; torture begins with the control of prisoners; promiscuity begins with courtship. If you begin with something good, and confuse and politicize the border, then the things that go bad can be very bad indeed.
cthulhu on March 1, 2008 at 4:21 PM
TX Mom: The English teachers at my school use Turnitin.com to make sure we aren’t plagiarizing. They catch a couple of people each year, I hear. See if your school will get a subscription (assuming that’s how it works).
Math_Mage on March 2, 2008 at 12:46 AM
TheBigOldDog – yeah, like isolated incidents and anecdotes prove anything. Bring back statistics that say illegal immigrants are more likely to break other laws, or stop complaining about Hot Air not writing what Malkin already wrote.
Math_Mage on March 2, 2008 at 12:49 AM
TX Mom: Teaching the sciences makes life a little easier: quizzes and tests and more quizzes; math on the fly. I like the idea of composition in class though; makes them sweat and teaches them to think and compose on their feet as well as brevity.
Bubba Redneck on March 2, 2008 at 1:57 AM
Obama will fix it all!!! After all every word his Messiahship utters is as pure as the wind driven snow.
Hypocrites thy name is Democrats! [paraphrased, not plagiarized]
Bubba Redneck on March 2, 2008 at 2:01 AM
Comment pages: