<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Obama on Farrakhan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 02:47:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bagadeez04</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977822</link>
		<dc:creator>bagadeez04</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977822</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Tim, you betray me with a question? You know not what you do. Thankfully, the Vatican is investigating the latest in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://exurbanleague.com/2008/02/27/unconfirmed-obamiracle-227.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;series of Obamiracles&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;


&lt;/blockquote&gt;Haha now that is some funny stuff...and I thoght all the Obamessiah stuff was just schtick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Tim, you betray me with a question? You know not what you do. Thankfully, the Vatican is investigating the latest in a <a href="http://exurbanleague.com/2008/02/27/unconfirmed-obamiracle-227.aspx" rel="nofollow">series of Obamiracles</a> </p></blockquote>
<blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>Haha now that is some funny stuff&#8230;and I thoght all the Obamessiah stuff was just schtick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bagadeez04</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977794</link>
		<dc:creator>bagadeez04</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977794</guid>
		<description>Damn hate to admit it but the guy can think on his feet. He just made Hillary look like a fool at the end there with the &quot;reject and denounce&quot;. He&#039;ll be without words though when McCain calls him &quot;my friend&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn hate to admit it but the guy can think on his feet. He just made Hillary look like a fool at the end there with the &#8220;reject and denounce&#8221;. He&#8217;ll be without words though when McCain calls him &#8220;my friend&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy Danish</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977727</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy Danish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977727</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s problems run far deeper than Loony Louis Farrakhan. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/30/us/politics/30obama.html?pagewanted=all&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&#039;s the New York Times&lt;/a&gt; on his mentor and minister, Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. 

This is not a church he was raised in, this is a church that Obama &lt;strong&gt;chose&lt;/strong&gt; to join as an adult. How can he argue that he was inspired by Wright&#039;s &quot;Audacity of Hope&quot; message, but not inspired by Wright&#039;s afro-centrist, anti-semitic, anti-American, anti-middle class message?

Indeed, there are plenty of Socialist-themed churches which preach social justice and other leftist crapola which Obama could have chosen, if that was truly his concern. 

These criticisms have nothing to do with religion BTW, but have everything to do with ideology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s problems run far deeper than Loony Louis Farrakhan. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/30/us/politics/30obama.html?pagewanted=all" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s the New York Times</a> on his mentor and minister, Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. </p>
<p>This is not a church he was raised in, this is a church that Obama <strong>chose</strong> to join as an adult. How can he argue that he was inspired by Wright&#8217;s &#8220;Audacity of Hope&#8221; message, but not inspired by Wright&#8217;s afro-centrist, anti-semitic, anti-American, anti-middle class message?</p>
<p>Indeed, there are plenty of Socialist-themed churches which preach social justice and other leftist crapola which Obama could have chosen, if that was truly his concern. </p>
<p>These criticisms have nothing to do with religion BTW, but have everything to do with ideology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackCapitalist</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977690</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackCapitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977690</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

Obama denounces AND rejects Farrakhan’s antisemitic comments, but what about his HATE-WHITEY comments? Farrakhan has said on many occassions that the BIGGEST PROBLEM the black man faces is WHITEY.
I want to hear a repudiation of those comments too Mr. Barack Hussein Obama.

jimbo2008 on February 27, 2008 at 2:36 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why does Obama have to apologize for everything Farrakan says?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>Obama denounces AND rejects Farrakhan’s antisemitic comments, but what about his HATE-WHITEY comments? Farrakhan has said on many occassions that the BIGGEST PROBLEM the black man faces is WHITEY.<br />
I want to hear a repudiation of those comments too Mr. Barack Hussein Obama.</p>
<p>jimbo2008 on February 27, 2008 at 2:36 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Why does Obama have to apologize for everything Farrakan says?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie Schlussel</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977679</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Schlussel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977679</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/02/hillarys_mistak.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hillary screwed up on this&lt;/a&gt;.  She should have demanded that Obama fire &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/01/obamas_nation_o.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;his Nation of Islam employees&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; and promise not to have any in his White House.  This word-parsing was stupid and petty and it came off that way.  She really would have hung him on the issue of &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/01/obamas_nation_o.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;his key NOI employees, which I exclusively wrote about&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.  The Hillary people told me they are aware of the story and have pitched it to the MSM, but none will pursue it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/02/hillarys_mistak.html" rel="nofollow">Hillary screwed up on this</a>.  She should have demanded that Obama fire <strong><a href="http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/01/obamas_nation_o.html" rel="nofollow">his Nation of Islam employees</a></strong> and promise not to have any in his White House.  This word-parsing was stupid and petty and it came off that way.  She really would have hung him on the issue of <strong><a href="http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/01/obamas_nation_o.html" rel="nofollow">his key NOI employees, which I exclusively wrote about</a></strong>.  The Hillary people told me they are aware of the story and have pitched it to the MSM, but none will pursue it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservatives R Us</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977508</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservatives R Us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977508</guid>
		<description>Give me a personal break here! If Obama truely rejected or denounced Farrakhan&#039;s endorsement or beliefs, Obama would reject his pastor and would still not be attending his church.

Both Barack and Michelle seem to me as racists period.

His inability to even see that the war in Iraq is serious and what we are facing are grounds to denounce him as presidential material. How Americans, black and white can&#039;t see this is astoundingly absurd to me.

McCain made a great comment back to Obama&#039;s unintelligent statement last night &quot;he would take action as president if al-Qaida is forming a base in Iraq.&quot; McCain said &quot;I have some news. Al-Qaida is in Iraq. It&#039;s called `al-Qaida in Iraq.&quot;

And Obama want&#039;s to be our President. America wake up!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give me a personal break here! If Obama truely rejected or denounced Farrakhan&#8217;s endorsement or beliefs, Obama would reject his pastor and would still not be attending his church.</p>
<p>Both Barack and Michelle seem to me as racists period.</p>
<p>His inability to even see that the war in Iraq is serious and what we are facing are grounds to denounce him as presidential material. How Americans, black and white can&#8217;t see this is astoundingly absurd to me.</p>
<p>McCain made a great comment back to Obama&#8217;s unintelligent statement last night &#8220;he would take action as president if al-Qaida is forming a base in Iraq.&#8221; McCain said &#8220;I have some news. Al-Qaida is in Iraq. It&#8217;s called `al-Qaida in Iraq.&#8221;</p>
<p>And Obama want&#8217;s to be our President. America wake up!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbo2008</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977470</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbo2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977470</guid>
		<description>Obama denounces AND rejects Farrakhan’s antisemitic comments, but what about his HATE-WHITEY comments? Farrakhan has said on many occassions that the BIGGEST PROBLEM the black man faces is WHITEY.
I want to hear a repudiation of those comments too Mr. Barack Hussein Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama denounces AND rejects Farrakhan’s antisemitic comments, but what about his HATE-WHITEY comments? Farrakhan has said on many occassions that the BIGGEST PROBLEM the black man faces is WHITEY.<br />
I want to hear a repudiation of those comments too Mr. Barack Hussein Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benrand</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977436</link>
		<dc:creator>benrand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977436</guid>
		<description>I talked to someone at work who is not normally really political but he and his wife watched the debate and they just couldn&#039;t believe either of those two could become President.

But then, he also thinks Barry will be &quot;Ron Browned&quot; if he wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I talked to someone at work who is not normally really political but he and his wife watched the debate and they just couldn&#8217;t believe either of those two could become President.</p>
<p>But then, he also thinks Barry will be &#8220;Ron Browned&#8221; if he wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977413</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977413</guid>
		<description>These are interesting times. In 2000, the president was decided in Florida. In 2008, it may all be decided in Texas/Ohio.
Both Dem candidates look worse under scrutiny.
McCain may actually have a chance.
&quot;OBAMA: Tim, I have some of the strongest support from the Jewish community in my hometown of Chicago and in this presidential campaign. And the reason is because I have been a stalwart friend of Israel’s.&quot;
I doubt every word he says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are interesting times. In 2000, the president was decided in Florida. In 2008, it may all be decided in Texas/Ohio.<br />
Both Dem candidates look worse under scrutiny.<br />
McCain may actually have a chance.<br />
&#8220;OBAMA: Tim, I have some of the strongest support from the Jewish community in my hometown of Chicago and in this presidential campaign. And the reason is because I have been a stalwart friend of Israel’s.&#8221;<br />
I doubt every word he says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benrand</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977401</link>
		<dc:creator>benrand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977401</guid>
		<description>But I have no doubt, as president, even though technically the meetings may be with the man who is labeled as president, the decisions will be made by Putin.

RUSSERT: Who will it be? Do you know his name?

CLINTON: Medvedev -- whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I have no doubt, as president, even though technically the meetings may be with the man who is labeled as president, the decisions will be made by Putin.</p>
<p>RUSSERT: Who will it be? Do you know his name?</p>
<p>CLINTON: Medvedev &#8212; whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977373</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977373</guid>
		<description>With the MSM on your side, anything is possible. It&#039;s an American Idol audience out there and they all love Obama.. Pretty scary to say the least...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the MSM on your side, anything is possible. It&#8217;s an American Idol audience out there and they all love Obama.. Pretty scary to say the least&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronsfi</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977333</link>
		<dc:creator>ronsfi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977333</guid>
		<description>Poor Hillary, she&#039;s just plain outmatched.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Hillary, she&#8217;s just plain outmatched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funky chicken</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977322</link>
		<dc:creator>funky chicken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977322</guid>
		<description>whoa  video--Obama on how he&#039;s going to slash the military

http://therealrevo.com/blog/?p=483</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whoa  video&#8211;Obama on how he&#8217;s going to slash the military</p>
<p><a href="http://therealrevo.com/blog/?p=483" rel="nofollow">http://therealrevo.com/blog/?p=483</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highhopes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977309</link>
		<dc:creator>highhopes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977309</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;THIS is the moment Hillary lost the nomination.

faraway on February 27, 2008 at 12:49 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s been over for some time.  The telling thing, as related on Rush&#039;s show today, was that Russert was treating Clinton like a Republican last night instead of his usual &quot;Larry King like&quot; softballs.  

I&#039;m with Novak in pondering, who tells Hillary it&#039;s time to hang the bumblebee suit up and go back to the Senate and her dull pants suits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>THIS is the moment Hillary lost the nomination.</p>
<p>faraway on February 27, 2008 at 12:49 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s been over for some time.  The telling thing, as related on Rush&#8217;s show today, was that Russert was treating Clinton like a Republican last night instead of his usual &#8220;Larry King like&#8221; softballs.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m with Novak in pondering, who tells Hillary it&#8217;s time to hang the bumblebee suit up and go back to the Senate and her dull pants suits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PattyJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977307</link>
		<dc:creator>PattyJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977307</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;(By the way, why is it somehow only a question for Jewish Americans that Farrakhan is a fascist hate-monger? It’s a question for all Americans.) &lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is the same ploy of the newspapers, who make it a point to only publish critical letters to the editor regarding &quot;Palestine&quot; penned by people with Jewish-sounding names.  Shame on Russertt and Hillary for pulling the punch.  The American people however caught it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>(By the way, why is it somehow only a question for Jewish Americans that Farrakhan is a fascist hate-monger? It’s a question for all Americans.) </p></blockquote>
<p>This is the same ploy of the newspapers, who make it a point to only publish critical letters to the editor regarding &#8220;Palestine&#8221; penned by people with Jewish-sounding names.  Shame on Russertt and Hillary for pulling the punch.  The American people however caught it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mallard T. Drake</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977302</link>
		<dc:creator>Mallard T. Drake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977302</guid>
		<description>Oh how I wish Fred! was able to debate Barry O and call him on his bull$hit. His answer was weak; he danced around the issue without stating unequivocally that he rejected/denounced Farrakan and his support. Shrillary started down the right path but chickened out and fumbled the opportunity. Fred! would have laid it out there for Barry O: do you reject Farrakan? and forced him to either answer yes or dance. I hope McCain has the nads to stand up to the empty suit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh how I wish Fred! was able to debate Barry O and call him on his bull$hit. His answer was weak; he danced around the issue without stating unequivocally that he rejected/denounced Farrakan and his support. Shrillary started down the right path but chickened out and fumbled the opportunity. Fred! would have laid it out there for Barry O: do you reject Farrakan? and forced him to either answer yes or dance. I hope McCain has the nads to stand up to the empty suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rational Thought</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977300</link>
		<dc:creator>Rational Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977300</guid>
		<description>Have watched and rewatched the clip. There&#039;s no way to interpret it but that Obama was &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; uncomfortable criticizing Farrakhan.  He probably knew the follow-up was going to be about his own pastor and his close ties to Farrakhan. This should be a deal-breaker for any reasonable Obama supporter. If you can&#039;t vigorously reject — yes, &lt;em&gt;reject&lt;/em&gt; — Louis Farrakhan, and say you want him to have nothing to do with your campaign and you&#039;d really appreciate it if he would never utter your name again, you have no business applying for the job of POTUS. Can you imagine if Bush was endorsed by the likes of David Duke and he said &quot;Golly, gee, I can&#039;t help it if a feller likes me and all…&quot;  Ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have watched and rewatched the clip. There&#8217;s no way to interpret it but that Obama was <em>very</em> uncomfortable criticizing Farrakhan.  He probably knew the follow-up was going to be about his own pastor and his close ties to Farrakhan. This should be a deal-breaker for any reasonable Obama supporter. If you can&#8217;t vigorously reject — yes, <em>reject</em> — Louis Farrakhan, and say you want him to have nothing to do with your campaign and you&#8217;d really appreciate it if he would never utter your name again, you have no business applying for the job of POTUS. Can you imagine if Bush was endorsed by the likes of David Duke and he said &#8220;Golly, gee, I can&#8217;t help it if a feller likes me and all…&#8221;  Ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larraby</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977291</link>
		<dc:creator>Larraby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977291</guid>
		<description>Obama could have knocked this one out of the ballpark. He should have said: &quot;Unlike Hillary Clinton, I would not have remained silent when Suha Arafat said the Israelis were poisoning Palestinian children deliberately. I would not have kissed Suha Arafat on both cheeks after Suha made those shameful remarks as did Hillary. I would not have waited a week until I was safely back in Washington before condemin those remarks. And I would have condemned those remarks publicly, not via a statement released by the White House press office&quot;. Had Obama done this, Hillary would have been toast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama could have knocked this one out of the ballpark. He should have said: &#8220;Unlike Hillary Clinton, I would not have remained silent when Suha Arafat said the Israelis were poisoning Palestinian children deliberately. I would not have kissed Suha Arafat on both cheeks after Suha made those shameful remarks as did Hillary. I would not have waited a week until I was safely back in Washington before condemin those remarks. And I would have condemned those remarks publicly, not via a statement released by the White House press office&#8221;. Had Obama done this, Hillary would have been toast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pedestrian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977290</link>
		<dc:creator>pedestrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977290</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Does Obama understand that saying he has consistently denounced him is not the same as simply saying, “I denounce him”? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Silly words games. Obama is just trying to demonstrate he is being diplomatic. The president needs sometimes to work with people or groups that are offensive in some way, that&#039;s just the real world. At the end he did finally say, &quot;I reject and denounce him.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Does Obama understand that saying he has consistently denounced him is not the same as simply saying, “I denounce him”? </p></blockquote>
<p>Silly words games. Obama is just trying to demonstrate he is being diplomatic. The president needs sometimes to work with people or groups that are offensive in some way, that&#8217;s just the real world. At the end he did finally say, &#8220;I reject and denounce him.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hening</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977288</link>
		<dc:creator>Hening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977288</guid>
		<description>The best part is that everybody is treating this guy with kid gloves.  I&#039;ve watched my president, and a great vice-president get savaged for almost eight years from cartoon shows, sitcoms, and rhetoric supporting our enemies at the expense of a cheap shot at these two men.  Every nut not locked-up has come out against the administration with a mic shoved in their face by the MSM.

This clown is treated like he&#039;s above criticism.  Weak, and dangerous tactics during an election not to mention sickening.  At least if he wins, some camps can pat themselves on the back for fighting fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best part is that everybody is treating this guy with kid gloves.  I&#8217;ve watched my president, and a great vice-president get savaged for almost eight years from cartoon shows, sitcoms, and rhetoric supporting our enemies at the expense of a cheap shot at these two men.  Every nut not locked-up has come out against the administration with a mic shoved in their face by the MSM.</p>
<p>This clown is treated like he&#8217;s above criticism.  Weak, and dangerous tactics during an election not to mention sickening.  At least if he wins, some camps can pat themselves on the back for fighting fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaintOlaf</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977282</link>
		<dc:creator>SaintOlaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977282</guid>
		<description>OhEssYouCowboys on February 27, 2008 at 1:23 PM




You&#039;re 100% right!    

England has already fell..just not everyone is aware of that yet. The fact is 2/3rd&#039;s of U.K. is atheist now(AP ponders moving) and the bishops are promoting sharia law!

Bye Bye England.

The question now is who will stand after America falls?
(islamic caliphate?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OhEssYouCowboys on February 27, 2008 at 1:23 PM</p>
<p>You&#8217;re 100% right!    </p>
<p>England has already fell..just not everyone is aware of that yet. The fact is 2/3rd&#8217;s of U.K. is atheist now(AP ponders moving) and the bishops are promoting sharia law!</p>
<p>Bye Bye England.</p>
<p>The question now is who will stand after America falls?<br />
(islamic caliphate?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funky chicken</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977269</link>
		<dc:creator>funky chicken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977269</guid>
		<description>al, I hope that column is correct!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>al, I hope that column is correct!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nottakingsides</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977267</link>
		<dc:creator>nottakingsides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977267</guid>
		<description>A principled Hussein could have stood up and harshly rejected Farrakhan (and all like him) and his support, demanded his apologies, and demanded him to step down from any association with him and his church (and denounced his church leadership while he was at it). 

Of course he can&#039;t because Hussein is &quot;open&quot; to the likes of Farrakhan and it wouldn&#039;t agree with his future openness to sharia creep, Sharpton/Jackson/Nagan race-baiters, having &quot;talks&quot; with Ahmadinejad, and other such disgraceful behavior the US will be subjected to during his term.

Hussein will have to stay on course and &quot;not reject&quot; Nazi ideology, KKK, and the like to have any credibility. This will be very sad to see all the future double-talk and hypocrisy of this unprincipled loser and his race-baiting 1st lady.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A principled Hussein could have stood up and harshly rejected Farrakhan (and all like him) and his support, demanded his apologies, and demanded him to step down from any association with him and his church (and denounced his church leadership while he was at it). </p>
<p>Of course he can&#8217;t because Hussein is &#8220;open&#8221; to the likes of Farrakhan and it wouldn&#8217;t agree with his future openness to sharia creep, Sharpton/Jackson/Nagan race-baiters, having &#8220;talks&#8221; with Ahmadinejad, and other such disgraceful behavior the US will be subjected to during his term.</p>
<p>Hussein will have to stay on course and &#8220;not reject&#8221; Nazi ideology, KKK, and the like to have any credibility. This will be very sad to see all the future double-talk and hypocrisy of this unprincipled loser and his race-baiting 1st lady.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveS</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977264</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977264</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused... why did Russert ask the question about  Farrakhan in the way that he asked it?  I&#039;ve been reliably informed by Aristotle and others on Hotair that the appropriate way to ask such a relevant and thoughtful question was to repeatedly refer to Barack as &quot;Barack Hussein Obama&quot; at the most awkward and innappropriate times without explicitly asking a question, in the style of a 3rd grader taunting another on the playground!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused&#8230; why did Russert ask the question about  Farrakhan in the way that he asked it?  I&#8217;ve been reliably informed by Aristotle and others on Hotair that the appropriate way to ask such a relevant and thoughtful question was to repeatedly refer to Barack as &#8220;Barack Hussein Obama&#8221; at the most awkward and innappropriate times without explicitly asking a question, in the style of a 3rd grader taunting another on the playground!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OhEssYouCowboys</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/comment-page-1/#comment-977256</link>
		<dc:creator>OhEssYouCowboys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/video-obama-on-farrakhan/#comment-977256</guid>
		<description>Presidential candidates quake at the prospect of rejecting and denouncing the leader of the Nation of Islam. Fear of alienating Black voters and Muslims.

As England falls to the Muslims, so, too, will America. Political correctness, or, more specifically, &lt;em&gt;thoughtcrime&lt;/em&gt;, will cause the Balkanization [huge sectors of non-English speaking, illegals from Mexico and Muslims who reject &lt;em&gt;in toto &lt;/em&gt; our system of jurisprudence] and destruction of our country. 

Matthew 12:25 - ..., &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

When our politicians are muzzled, when the People are muzzled - we are lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Presidential candidates quake at the prospect of rejecting and denouncing the leader of the Nation of Islam. Fear of alienating Black voters and Muslims.</p>
<p>As England falls to the Muslims, so, too, will America. Political correctness, or, more specifically, <em>thoughtcrime</em>, will cause the Balkanization [huge sectors of non-English speaking, illegals from Mexico and Muslims who reject <em>in toto </em> our system of jurisprudence] and destruction of our country. </p>
<p>Matthew 12:25 &#8211; &#8230;, <strong><em>Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand:</em></strong></p>
<p>When our politicians are muzzled, when the People are muzzled &#8211; we are lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
