Good news: Tonight’s debate shaping up to be the dullest yet; Update: Late-breaking schadenfreude bonanza!

posted at 9:47 am on February 26, 2008 by Allahpundit

If the meltdown doesn’t come this evening then it’s next week’s concession speech or bust. I fear the golden schadenfreudean moment may yet elude us, my friends.

Hey, I know. How about a last-ditch attack on Obama with the same crap that hasn’t worked for the past 11 months?

[A]t a fund-raiser Sunday night in Boston, Mrs. Clinton told supporters that in the coming days, she planned to highlight what she called “the experience gap” between her and Mr. Obama.

Indeed, her advisers said Monday that she planned to hit this theme during the candidates’ Tuesday debate, though they said she would try to avoid making harsh personal attacks on Mr. Obama, particularly since Mrs. Clinton drew widespread attention and praise at the debate last week for saying she was “honored” to be on the same stage with him.

She can’t club Bambi now or else she’ll look desperate, but she couldn’t club Bambi last year when she was ahead or else she would have looked mean and … Hillary-ish. This is why I fear Obama so much more than her in the general: There’s never a good time to club Bambi.

Read Stephen Hayes’s op-ed this morning in the Journal about the GOP preparing to repeat her mistakes. The experience contrast will serve McCain better than Her Majesty, but hammering the guy for being a lightweight with a knack for prose won’t work since it makes it that much easier for Obama to prove his heft by showing command of the details. It’s a stupid line of attack anyway: If you want to motivate the base and capitalize on Maverick’s appeal to the middle, you don’t argue that Obama has no ideas, you argue that he has lots of ideas, all of them quite dogmatically liberal. McCain is the real centrist, much to the chagrin of most conservatives.

A parting whiff of schadenfreude in case we don’t get any tonight. There’s an old post somewhere in our archives about how ruthless the Clintons’ people are with the media; I can’t find it now, but Tucker Carlson confirmed it again last night. If you want to know why the worm has turned in terms of coverage, think revenge. To wit:

“I find it interesting that in a room of such esteemed journalists that Mr. Drudge has become your respected assignment editor,” [Clinton advisor Phil] lectured. “I find it to be a reflection of one of the problems that’s gone on with the overall coverage of this campaign.” He went on to chide the journalists for their “woefully inadequate” coverage of Obama, “a point that has been certainly backed up by the ‘Saturday Night Live’ skit that opened the show this past Saturday evening, which I would refer you all to.”

The brief moment explained everything about the bitter relations between Clinton’s campaign and the media: Singer taunting the likes of Broder, who began covering presidential politics two decades before Singer was born, with a comedy sketch that showed debate moderators fawning over Obama.

“That’s your assignment editor?” responded Post columnist Ruth Marcus.

“That’s my assignment editor,” Singer affirmed.

Update: I confess to laughing out loud at this frontpage coverage coup for Team Hillary:

papers.jpg

Photos of Obama in a turban in every newspaper in America. As Ace would say: Well played, Hillary. Very well played.

Update: Politico hits the mother lode:

With a week to go before climactic tests in Texas and Ohio, Hillary Rodham Clinton’s campaign team has slipped into full recriminations mode.

Looking backward, interviews with a cross-section of campaign aides and sympathetic outsiders suggest a team consumed with frustration and finger-pointing about the apparent failure of several recent tactical moves against Barack Obama.

Looking forward, it is clear Clinton’s team has only a faint and highly improvisational strategy about what to do over the next seven days. Simply put, there is no secret weapon…

Some Clintonites are disappointed with the candidate herself. Lines that were meant to be funny or show fighting spirit — “change you can Xerox” or “Shame on you, Barack Obama” — instead came off as peevish…

But mostly the campaign has become a grim slog. Unable to make anything stick, the campaign is throwing out a dizzying array of potential storylines each day.

Read down at the link for whining about — oh, the irony — the “Obama News Network.”

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

It may as well be misinformation, ya know, the element of surprise. Or is it wishful thinking?

Aristotle on February 26, 2008 at 9:51 AM

I don’t get your headline.

ninjapirate on February 26, 2008 at 9:51 AM

Good news: Tonight’s debate shaping up to be the dullest yet

Couldn’t get much more dull. The last Dem debate I tried to watch, I fell asleep.

someguy on February 26, 2008 at 9:55 AM

Unless they plan on opening with that guy whostarts all the boxing matches with ‘LET’S GET READY TO RUMBLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”, I’m figuring this debate will be as exciting as watching grass grow and paint dry at the same time.

pilamaye on February 26, 2008 at 9:59 AM

Maybe the Dems should get Jon Stewart to reprise the Oscar monologue he did on Sunday. It won’t be any funnier now than it was then but it might make Clinton and Obama appear intelligent by comparison.

highhopes on February 26, 2008 at 10:00 AM

Haven’t all of the Democratic debates been dull? Can they get any worse?

Erockk on February 26, 2008 at 10:03 AM

Dem debate or Tina Fey? Which one is more painful?

Conservative Gunman on February 26, 2008 at 10:03 AM

When he grows up Barack Obama wants to be what John McCain has been for twenty years already. That’s the line of attack that’ll win. Barack offers Hope of a less divisive politics, McCain’s been practising it in the minority for 15 years. Barack promises to reach across the aisle if you elect him, but he never has yet in his political career. John McCain has when he was up and when he was down.

John McCain is the embodiement of Obama’s Change/Hope/Promise and has been for a long time. Why chance it with Obama when you’ve already got the Real Deal? Why wonder if Obama can take the pressure when you already know McCain can take more pressure than you’ve ever soiled yourself dreaming about? And he did it for five years with the chance to go home any time he wanted. That’s the line and you repeat it a thousand times and offer another example from McCain’s career every time you do. By November Obama will look like a high school freshman and every one will wonder why the Democrats ever thought he could win.

The Apologist on February 26, 2008 at 10:04 AM

she couldn’t club Bambi last year when she was ahead or else she would have looked mean and … Hillary-ish. This is why I fear Obama so much more than her in the general: There’s never a good time to club Bambi.

McCain should club Bambi early. We already know he’s mean. In fact, it’s his biggest selling point to me as CiC. But you are probably right. Obama’s pure, unadulterated liberalism is his Achilles Heel, and it’s a line of attack on which Hillary couldn’t capitalize. McCain can, and the cracks are already showing in Obama’s poll numbers. As you say, there is only one of these guys who has shown he can “reach across the aisle” and “get things done” with the other side in the Senate, and it ain’t Obama. If that’s what America really wants, then that’s McCain’s selling point.

Dudley Smith on February 26, 2008 at 10:04 AM

I’m figuring this debate will be as exciting as watching grass grow and paint dry at the same time.

pilamaye on February 26, 2008 at 9:59 AM

See, you have to spice it up a bit. Paint the grass, then bet on how long the growing grass takes to crack the dried paint. Or whether the paint covering the grass will kill the grass before it can crack the paint.

But I don’t get the Somali thing…isn’t his heritage (half) Kenyan? Why would he have any reason to play Somali dress up?

James on February 26, 2008 at 10:06 AM

Just hearing Chris Dodd just endorsed Obama…

Meh, I think we’re all in agreement (?) that Clinton is done.

JetBoy on February 26, 2008 at 10:07 AM

I think this is going to be a snarkfest,last time Obama
and Hillary were handcuffed and muzzled,there been alot of crap thrown in Obama’s political yard since then,and the
picture is insult to injury for Obama!

And Hillary knows its now as in tonight,or never as in
Mar,4th to make any kind of in-roads against Obama!

canopfor on February 26, 2008 at 10:09 AM

Hillary needs to use her position on a stand in front of millions of people, live and unable to be nuanced or contexted into meaninglessness by the MSM, and set it to full automatic.

She especially needs to hit from the right on the Weatherman story. The Republicans are already gonna do it, right? (Isn’t that the argument the leftists always make when they bring up Obama’s race?)

amkun on February 26, 2008 at 10:12 AM

WFAA (Dallas/Fort Worth) put out the early voting numbers today in Dallas and Tarrant Counties…….4 to 1 Dem to Rep. That is 100k EARLY voters. Now I know that usually Dems outnumber Reps in the primaries, but the raw number of voters is big red flashing light to this Texan. We don’t get excited about anything here….well….Jessica Simpson maybe. I’m sticking with my 12-15 point win here by Obama.

Limerick on February 26, 2008 at 10:13 AM

My first post here at HotAir, please be gentle.
Can’t say I’m sorry for Hillary, the world moved past the Clinton style of campaigning and they haven’t evolved. They were unable to handle instant fact checking and the common man’s (or woman’s) ability to find the text of everything they ever said. Tough to get away with a blatant lie when everyone can read your prior statements.

Al Gore get the last laugh, this internet thing he invented is the Clinton’s Achilles heal

midwesternperspective on February 26, 2008 at 10:17 AM

Texas Early Voting

Limerick on February 26, 2008 at 10:18 AM

Hillary needs to train a PARROT to say the words: “Barack Obama!” and carry on her shoulder to the debate, trained to speak out whenever Barack utters either the word HOPE or CHANGE.

The poor bird would need a throat tincture ten minutes in.

profitsbeard on February 26, 2008 at 10:19 AM

I see where Hillery is going on a new offense. This one is described as the “kitchen sink” offense by an unknown aide of hers. Day late and dollar short I think.

TooTall on February 26, 2008 at 10:21 AM

Won’t be voting for Obama. A slew of reasons well beyond ethnicity. Contrast his photo in Somali garb with a picture of Rage boy and Obama looks rather docile. Debate snippets on HA will be quite enough to satisfy any curiosity I might have as to substance or content.

captivated_dem on February 26, 2008 at 10:24 AM

Oh, the mix of metaphors that come to mind….

The Hildebeest is on the ropes. If she doesn’t throw some punches, the Messiah gets a KO.

Likewise, in presidential poker, it’s hard to beat a hand that holds the race card. McCain will have to tread very carefully if he is not to be perceived by the MSM and limousine liberals as a nasty racist.

In fact, the Messiah doesn’t even have to say anything directly about McCain. All he needs to do is say “well, Rash Limbaugh said…” and “Ann Coulter said…” and “Michelle Malkin said…” and he’ll be dining on barbecued Maverick.

MrScribbler on February 26, 2008 at 10:27 AM

What happens when one of the only two major political parties nominates a guy who really hasn’t been vetted at all? (Can’t club Bambi, right?) Not saying the sheeple of the US will not decide nothing matters anyway, but sweet mercy, is there ever going to be some “surprises” revealed about Jesus 2.0 in the next 6 months.

Sugar Land on February 26, 2008 at 10:27 AM

Meh, I think we’re all in agreement (?) that Clinton is done.

JetBoy on February 26, 2008 at 10:07 AM

I could be wrong, but I think there are too many Dems who could be implicated in the various Clinton scandals, and they knew they were looking at every single one of them being brought up and re-investigated if Hillary got the nomination. They’d all rather bury that stuff. Obama is their messiah.

Connie on February 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM

That calibration was lost in some news coverage, though. “Another day, another attack from Hillary Clinton,” anchorman Charles Gibson said Monday at the start of ABC’s “World News Tonight.”

[...]

“Oftentimes, when she addresses her opponent, it’s immediately seized upon by the press as negative,” the adviser said. “When he makes personal character attacks, it’s often called ‘sharpening your rhetoric.’”

Well that’s the problem when your past catches up to your present. She has no credibility because she has always used personal attacks in the past. It is her modus operandi, and creates it’s own expectation. Can’t escape the past.

Spirit of 1776 on February 26, 2008 at 10:34 AM

amkun:

Hillary!’s essentially disarmed; attacking Obama from the right would lose her more votes than she’d take away from him.

The Democrats casting these votes are left of their states & the nation as a whole; so are Hillary! and Obama.

Attacking Obama on the Weatherman business will fall flat – Obama won’t even have to say “Are you questioning my patriotism?”, the Democrat voters will say it for him.

The only argument she really has is that Obama’s selling “Rodney King” – “Can’t we all just get along?” & it’s a fairy tale; much as we’d like it to be true, people are going to disagree on policy, etc., and we need a president who can deal with the world that is, not the one Obama imagines.

Problem is, Hillary!’s been peddling the same sort of claptrap forever herself, that if she’s elected, all the ‘evil special interests’, etc. will be thrown out. She has no record of treating those who disagree with her as principled people acting in good faith because they have a different view of what would be best. By demonizing those who disagree, Hillary! sets up the idea that a “Magic Man” can break through the evil which separates us.

Regardless of what state she’s in, the Democrats who will be entering the polling place are left of the state as a whole; Hillary! cannot hope any attack of Obama from the right will

BD57 on February 26, 2008 at 10:37 AM

A minor quibble. The goal posts constantly move left. To call McCain a centrist is relative.

JiangxiDad on February 26, 2008 at 10:38 AM

My first post here at HotAir, please be gentle.
Can’t say I’m sorry for Hillary, the world moved past the Clinton style of campaigning and they haven’t evolved. They were unable to handle instant fact checking and the common man’s (or woman’s) ability to find the text of everything they ever said. Tough to get away with a blatant lie when everyone can read your prior statements.

Al Gore get the last laugh, this internet thing he invented is the Clinton’s Achilles heal

midwesternperspective on February 26, 2008 at 10:17 AM

Nice first post.

I’d also like to add that one of Hillary’s biggest mistakes is that she took it for granted that she would get the nomination. Like it was owed to her…puleeze. For the smartest woman on the planet she sure wasn’t very.

Pulchritudinous Patriot on February 26, 2008 at 10:40 AM

When he grows up Barack Obama wants to be what John McCain has been for twenty years already. That’s the line of attack that’ll win. Barack offers Hope of a less divisive politics, McCain’s been practising it in the minority for 15 years. Barack promises to reach across the aisle if you elect him, but he never has yet in his political career. John McCain has when he was up and when he was down.

John McCain is the embodiement of Obama’s Change/Hope/Promise and has been for a long time. Why chance it with Obama when you’ve already got the Real Deal? Why wonder if Obama can take the pressure when you already know McCain can take more pressure than you’ve ever soiled yourself dreaming about? And he did it for five years with the chance to go home any time he wanted. That’s the line and you repeat it a thousand times and offer another example from McCain’s career every time you do. By November Obama will look like a high school freshman and every one will wonder why the Democrats ever thought he could win.

The Apologist on February 26, 2008 at 10:04 AM

Good post. All McCain has to do is say over and over “I’ve been doing the reach across party lines thing for years; all Barack does is talk about it. He’s failed in every single chance he’s had to reach out. When he reaches out, it’s always farther left.”

And regarding Stephen Hayes, as I said on another post here, he’s got one thing very wrong: Reagan’s eloquent words of hope were about the greatness of this country. They made people proud to be Americans. Obama’s schtick is about making people feel ashamed of being Americans, and only he can save them from their shame. It’s a very, very different message, and one I think that is ripe with risk for Obama, particularly as he goes up against a war hero.

Rational Thought on February 26, 2008 at 10:40 AM

I think the sarcasm she used the other day featuring the “magic wand”, was perfect. She should stick to light hearted sarcasm.

With your headlines you are not helping conservatives. I actually want her now to cream him. I wish everyone, even conservaties would stop writing about him, giving him credibility with all this foolish talk about “charisma”, it is so played out, he’s not all that, so why are conservatives even repeating it? You guys aren’t helping. I want him shot down off his pedestal and exposed for all that he is and all that he lacks.

Conservatives R Us on February 26, 2008 at 10:40 AM

Here in NE Ohio we’re having a pretty good snowstorm. Most of the schools are closed, but…well, it is Cleveland in February. I think:
the wear and tear of the campaign trail
+
the wear and tear from the harsh weather that makes even walking just that much more difficult
+
the absolute do-or-die scenario
+
the fact that this is on NBC
+
the msm recognition that Obamamania is about to have run its course (see also SNL)

…well, I think we have a good chance at seeing the Hillary Clinton we all remember. If we do, it’s gonna get interesting fast.

I know I’ve got the popcorn ready, and my two favorite moonbat friends are coming over to watch (I alllllllllmost got tickets through one of them!)

scottm on February 26, 2008 at 10:40 AM

They were unable to handle instant fact checking and the common man’s (or woman’s) ability to find the text of everything they ever said. Tough to get away with a blatant lie when everyone can read your prior statements.

For those who care to look, anyway. Certainly the Messiah’s thin resume hasn’t harmed him. Also, unpleasant prior statements have a nasty way of disappearing down the memory hole.

JiangxiDad on February 26, 2008 at 10:43 AM

‘Bambi’ Obama pretty well sums it up. How do you to challenge wide-eyed innocence and ‘hope’?

michaelo on February 26, 2008 at 10:47 AM

You have to admit we never ever have had a candidate that was
A. Educated and raised in a foriegn country

B. Constantly mentioning his mixed heritage(why? Color means nothing to me)

C. House hunting and fund raising openly with a mobster

D. Married to a future 1st Lady whose thesis was “whats wrong with America”

E. Wearing a muslim garb, recently (oh yeah “African”)

F. Painstakingly explaining why he won’t wear a Flag pin

We DID think this day would never come

Well at least me

EricPWJohnson on February 26, 2008 at 10:50 AM

…well, I think we have a good chance at seeing the Hillary Clinton we all remember. If we do, it’s gonna get interesting fast.

I know I’ve got the popcorn ready, and my two favorite moonbat friends are coming over to watch (I alllllllllmost got tickets through one of them!)

scottm on February 26, 2008 at 10:40 AM

So Clinton pulls ahead at the last moment and asks Obama to save her by being her running mate?

Connie on February 26, 2008 at 10:50 AM

scottm on February 26, 2008 at 10:40 AM

now that sounds like a good evening.

i expect to see her go hard on his meet with ahmedinejad stuff. i expect her to call him soft on defence and terror in harsh language.

zane on February 26, 2008 at 10:51 AM

I think there are too many Dems who could be implicated in the various Clinton scandals, and they knew they were looking at every single one of them being brought up and re-investigated if Hillary got the nomination.

Connie on February 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM

True. But then, it was the Dem’s, with a lot of help from the media, that allowed Bill Clinton to basically “skate away” with his many, many scandals.

What made the Republicans “look bad” was the way they tried to go after Bill C…And I would think Hillary would have learned something from all that. Now she’s the one going after Obama. And, as with the GOP in the ’90s, she’s “looking bad”.

JetBoy on February 26, 2008 at 10:53 AM

Hillary was doomed all along. She couldn’t criticize Obama’s leftist policies, because they were too much like her own. She couldn’t criticize him for shady dealings with people like Tony Rezko without reminding voters of all the shady dealings with similar people in her own past. She couldn’t criticize Obama (effectively) for his lack of executive experience, because she also lacks meaningful experience (most people discount her “I spent 8 years watching Bill govern” claim of experience). That left Hillary with nothing to offer voters but her gender identity (first female US president!), which many voters rejected in favor of Obama’s racial identity (first black president!).

If Hillary had a personality that people liked — if she was funny or charming — it could have been a very close race, and one she might have won. But in a personality contest between Hillary and just about anybody else, Hillary is going to lose.

AZCoyote on February 26, 2008 at 10:54 AM

Can’t say I’m sorry for Hillary, the world moved past the Clinton style of campaigning and they haven’t evolved…. Al Gore get the last laugh, this internet thing he invented is the Clinton’s Achilles heal

midwesternperspective on February 26, 2008 at 10:17 AM

What gets me too is, that Howard Dean was probably the first candidate to truly use the internet both as a “message getter-outer” and as and effective way to raise funds, back when Dean was running for the Office.

But now, Dean’s head of the DNC, and remember, he’s no “friend” with the Clintons. So perhaps he declined his input to help Hillary…

You’re right tho…Hillary DID try to use the ‘net early on…but really has shied away from it, to run a campaign she’s more comfortable with.

JetBoy on February 26, 2008 at 10:59 AM

Rational Thought on February 26, 2008 at 10:40 AM

Very insightful commentary re: Obama’s message. However, I’d tweak it just a bit. It seems to me only people who are already ashamed of America are hooked by his rhetoric. Really, he’s just parroting what they already think, but eloquently, making them feel good about themselves for thinking such things in the process.

He is, in fact, the change they seek. A change from a president who loves and fights for America on the world stage to one who loves only the America he wants to create and will “rebalance” the political and military power in the world.

amkun on February 26, 2008 at 10:59 AM

Hillary “supporters” were standing outside the convention center this morning with their signs, and Saturday I passed a couple of young black kids holding up Hillary signs alongside one of our busier roads. Seeing as they were kids I went with the “thumbs down” rather than “the finger.”

Which is weird, ’cause whenever I see a Hillary sign here, there’s a live and really miserable-looking person holding it, with that sad “I’m getting paid how much to stand here?” look. So maybe they’re not being paid, but if they are, I hope they’re getting comprehensive health insurance too.

saint kansas on February 26, 2008 at 11:01 AM

Smartest Woman in the World

Smarmiest Woman in the World

fogw on February 26, 2008 at 11:03 AM

“Oftentimes, when she addresses her opponent, it’s immediately seized upon by the press as negative,” the adviser said. “When he makes personal character attacks, it’s often called ‘sharpening your rhetoric.’”

Treated like a Republican in other words. Cry me a river, Hillary.

Blacksheep on February 26, 2008 at 11:06 AM

So maybe if she tries the experience BS Obama can reply Hillary, judging from the way you have run your campaign you were so not ready from Day one.

skatz51 on February 26, 2008 at 11:08 AM

Having caused the demise of many a Bambi, I know well that the “spray and pray” method of shooting doesn’t work very well. That seems to be what Hillary’s campaign is doing.

It’s too late for anyone to help her now, but she needs a smoking gun type of scandal- hard to believe that the Clinton Machine couldn’t find one and make it stick.

Hell, I’d not even heard about the shady land deal in Capt. Ed’s post above until I read about it there. No one escapes Chicago politics without coming out a bit dirty.

Hollowpoint on February 26, 2008 at 11:10 AM

It seems to me only people who are already ashamed of America are hooked by his rhetoric. Really, he’s just parroting what they already think, but eloquently, making them feel good about themselves for thinking such things in the process.

He is, in fact, the change they seek. A change from a president who loves and fights for America on the world stage to one who loves only the America he wants to create and will “rebalance” the political and military power in the world.

amkun on February 26, 2008 at 10:59 AM

Maybe so, but I think people instinctively want to feel some national pride. Seriously, anyone with the thinnest ability to reason knows this is not a nation to be ashamed of. The blame-America-first routine is strictly a democrat strategy, and they’re mostly mad at America for electing Republicans. It does not work with moderates and Republicans, which is why I think it’s risky for Obama. He’s gonna have to show some national pride sooner or later, or the electorate is going to wonder just why in the hell he wants to be prez of this God-awful country.

Rational Thought on February 26, 2008 at 11:12 AM

But mostly the campaign has become a grim slog. Unable to make anything stick, the campaign is throwing out a dizzying array of potential storylines each day.

And that’s been the problem. Clinton and Obama agree more than they disagree on the issues. Clinton can’t set herself up as being the national security hawk to Obama’s dove or the fiscally responsible candidate to Obama’s big government approach. The branding of these two candidates is virtually identical- like comparing toothpaste from two different manufacturers.

Clinton’s primary strategy is to hype the “experience” angle instead of focusing on the details where her position differs from Obama’s. She would have been far more successful to stick to a few key and predictable issues (e.g. healthcare, Iraq, social security) than this throwing all sorts of stuff out there and find out that the only thing that has any traction is odd stuff like charges of plagerism.

highhopes on February 26, 2008 at 11:37 AM

That outfit Obama has makes him look like an inept chef that put his apron on backwards

Kini on February 26, 2008 at 11:57 AM

For once, she didn’t throw anything about MO’s “first time really proud”. That could be helpful with Indepedents and Republicans, and it would stick if she made a big deal out of it like it had when McCain took a ride on it.

It would be scary enough to assume she actually agrees with MO, but even if she does – nothing has prevented the Clintonizers from being hypocrites before. Very confusing.

Aristotle on February 26, 2008 at 12:00 PM

He looks like Shaq’s mini-me from the movie “Kazaam”.

Chuck Schick on February 26, 2008 at 12:02 PM


“Sixteen months into this,” he said, “I’m just angry.”

Schadenfreude……….. indeed!

Seven Percent Solution on February 26, 2008 at 12:13 PM

There’s never a good time to club Bambi

True, but I think it’s OK for Hillary (or Maverick) to ask this question: “As much as you love Bambi, do you want him to be president?”

infidel65 on February 26, 2008 at 12:16 PM

Why haven’t we seen tons of pics of Barack smoking cigarettes?

boko fittleworth on February 26, 2008 at 12:24 PM

“McCain is the real centrist, much to the chagrin of most conservatives.” He’s only a centrist when he’s pretending not to be a liberal.
“There’s never a good time to club Bambi.” That’s why McPain needs to focus on his experience rather than Obama’s empty words. Oh and picking Romney as his VP will help alot.

Christine on February 26, 2008 at 1:18 PM

Funniest thing on the New York Post pictures is the caption

Bum Wrap – key word, wrap.

Entelechy on February 26, 2008 at 2:22 PM

Obama, in those pictures, looks like a Muslim kid in cooking school.

Entelechy on February 26, 2008 at 2:23 PM

Like it was owed to her…puleeze. For the smartest woman on the planet she sure wasn’t very.

Pulchritudinous Patriot on February 26, 2008 at 10:40 AM

And remember Hillary’s recent encounter with CBS News anchor Katie Couric? Asked how she would feel if she didn’t become the Democratic nominee, Hillary acidly shot back, “Well, it will be me.”

Entelechy on February 26, 2008 at 2:41 PM

F. Painstakingly explaining why he won’t wear a Flag pin

We DID think this day would never come

Well at least me

EricPWJohnson on February 26, 2008 at 10:50 AM

G. Wife, who’s 44, and hasn’t been proud of her country in the last 26 years, ever since she’s been 18, that is…

Entelechy on February 26, 2008 at 2:42 PM