DMeNTe on February 19, 2008 at 2:24 PM

If you had listened closer, you would realize that he IDs Morales as the supplier to his unnamed (in this clip) cokehead. Morales is not the user here, but the pusher.

The Race Card on February 19, 2008 at 3:58 PM

DMeNTe, you just got pwn’d in front of an international audience. Tell us, how does that feel? :)

- The Cat

P.S.

Big S on February 19, 2008 at 11:06 AM

Nice detectoring.

Good on Bryan for correcting this, and good on your for being big enough to admit your comments were in error. ‘Tain’t easy, I know.

fourstringfuror on February 19, 2008 at 12:39 PM

Yeah, say what you want about our brachiating, libidinally incontinent hosts, they have that integrity thing down. :)

DMeNTe on February 19, 2008 at 2:24 PM

If you had listened closer, you would realize that he IDs Morales as the supplier to his unnamed (in this clip) cokehead. Morales is not the user here, but the pusher.

Also, aren’t there international laws against transporting narcotics? Chavez essentially implicated himself and Morales in drug trafficking. I wonder how much he gets in each care package? I wonder how much time a visitor to Bolivia would get for trying to transport an equal amount out of the country.

Just say “No!” to Hugo.

But I wonder what Robertson takes for his prophesying about world events.

I retract and apologize for my earlier comment.

Lee on February 19, 2008 at 11:57 AM

I second fourstringfour. Bravo, sir. Thus far only you and Bryan have made corrections. I will give the others the benefit of the doubt and conclude that they have not seen the correction yet.

I can’t believe that bible thumper would keep any employees he knew was using illegal drugs. Then he calls the drug dealer by name! The cartel may be gunning for ol’ Pat.

txsurveyor on February 19, 2008 at 11:04 AM

Lee, I wonder if others will man up and do the same. Good on Bryan for correcting this, and good on your for being big enough to admit your comments were in error. ‘Tain’t easy, I know.

This is the Huffington Post trying to slime Pat Robertson by taking his comments about Hugo Chavez out of context.

Michelle on February 19, 2008 at 11:10 AM

Their second commenter called them on it too, but so far, no correction.

twb (See profile | I’m a fan of twb)
I’m no fan of Pat…but funny thing…I was flipping the channels yesterday and happened to this sequence. He was NOT busting on his producer but rather the comment was in reference to Hugo Chavez. I thought the comments were odd for a completely different reason…that Pat’s producer had some specific knowledge regarding Hugo’s drug usage or that a “Cocoa Paste” was actually cocaine… So…criticize Pat if you must…but do so for the right reasons. He says some nutty things, that’s for sure…but this time, he it was only half nutty…and whoever posted this video should have seen that rather than to get many of the posters here all worked up.

When I listened a second time I caught it. It’s very easy to see that he’s talking about someone else in a video that his producer showed him.

Corrections at Hot Air are swift! Thanks for catching the misinformation thrown out there by the leftist.

Zorro on February 19, 2008 at 11:41 AM

You calling Bryan a leftist? ;)

Check out my 11:06 link. The arm flexing anecdote is a dead giveaway that it’s Chavez.

Big S on February 19, 2008 at 11:15 AM

Wow! That’s amazing…Chavez all coked up playing with Russian missles…Ehhhh

I don’t know what’s worse, Robertson talking about the cocaine use, or that he attributes the guy’s “heretical values” to it. Very strange indeed.

Big S on February 19, 2008 at 10:56 AM

I think he said “erratic behavior”.

I guess, and although it’s not fair in this situation, Robertson’s made himself a pretty big target for derision over the years. How about his sidekick, though? I guess Chavez is “just a man with a very interesting perspective on things.”

So criticize him when he says stupid things.

The sidekick was just being wry.