Musharraf on his way out?
posted at 1:08 pm on February 19, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
In which your fearless correspondent pretends to know something about Pakistani politics. Our man in Islamabad lost big yesterday — not quite so big as to give Bhutto’s and Nawaz Sharif’s parties the two-thirds majority in parliament they’d need to impeach him but big enough that that might be do-able if they can bring in just 30 or so MPs from the smaller factions. Time to warm up the helicopter for a Nixonian denouement?
Two politicians close to Mr. Musharraf have said in the past week that the president was well aware of the drift in the country against him and they suggested that he would not remain in office if the new government was in direct opposition to him. “He does not have the fire in the belly for another fight,” said one member of his party. He added that Mr. Musharraf was building a house for himself in Islamabad and would be ready soon to move.
A Pakistan expert at CFR thinks it’s a matter of time. His one hope lies in the fact that Bhutto’s and Sharif’s parties traditionally have hated each other, but given the anti-Musharraf sentiment evident in the results — his own party was nearly wiped out — maybe they’re going to put the old differences aside. A deal in the works?
Mr. Sharif has been reported to agree to the Peoples Party [i.e., Bhutto's party] assuming the post of prime minister in exchange for three things: impeachment proceedings against Mr. Musharraf; the reinstatement of the dismissed Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and other judges; and the appointment of a top lawyer, Aitzaz Ahsan, as prime minister.
Ahsan led the movement to have Pakistan’s chief justice reinstated after Musharraf fired him last year; he got a spell under house arrest for his trouble. That would take care of the premiership, but what about a replacement for Musharraf as president? Anyone else under house arrest available to step up and take control of the Pakistani nuclear arsenal? Why, yes:
Sharif has even said he’s considered naming as president rogue nuclear scientist A.Q. Khan, seen as a hero in Pakistan for developing a nuclear bomb and in Washington as a villain for selling nuclear secrets to North Korea and other countries. Monday’s contest — which Musharraf had called “the mother of all elections” — is supposed to nudge Pakistan toward full-fledged democracy, nearly nine years after former army chief Musharraf took power.
If you think the country’s unstable now, install the world’s foremost nuclear black marketeer as commander in chief and see how the U.S. reacts.
Any good news from all of this? Indeed — the Islamists were routed worse than Musharraf was, including in the tribal areas. Superficially that means yesterday was a victory for “moderate” and pro-democratic forces, but the posture of Bhutto and Sharif especially towards jihadis, as I understand it, has always been more opportunistic than principled, so don’t be surprised if the new boss is the same as the old boss when it comes to taking the fight to the Afghan border. That means more unilateral strikes by the United States against jihadi targets without the Pakistani government’s permission — a policy which, it turns out, has already been put into practice, with glowing results. Exit question: How much are we going to miss Musharraf? Exit answer: Not as much as you think.
“The United States has gotten into a pattern where it sends a high-level delegation over to beat Musharraf up, and then you find that within a week or two a high-value target has been identified. Then he ignores us for a while until we send over another high-level delegation,” Clarke said.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
“Would you like a tactical nuclear warhead with that slurpee?”
pseudonominus on February 19, 2008 at 1:12 PM
A.Q.Khan? really? Can’t make this stuff up.
TexasDan on February 19, 2008 at 1:13 PM
A.Q. Khan!!!
My strongest recommendation for a book. It’s also downloadable at iTunes.
RushBaby on February 19, 2008 at 1:19 PM
Hillary, is that you?
geckomon on February 19, 2008 at 1:19 PM
President Khan?! Que William Shatner: Khaa-aa-aan!!
Pakistan run by a corrupt mob of embezzlers and nuclear salesmen. Kosovo run by a corrupt mob of smugglers and vandals and Islamist sympathizers. Russia run by ex-KGB thugs, seething at Western ‘arrogance’. Turkey run by increasingly confident Islamists (headscarves and all). Iranian theocrats using improved centrifuges to enrich uranium. This is the perfect time to elect a 46-year old ex-social worker, memoirist, and naive political novice with no military or foreign experience. Perfect! Just freakin’ perfect. Here you go Barry. Good luck with the ChangeHopeUnity crap.
Vote Sauron 08 on February 19, 2008 at 1:24 PM
Why is everyone picking on Fred Thompson?! /maverick muse.
In the meantime, Pakistan remains a nuclear ticking time bomb ready to take out civilization as we know it.
BKennedy on February 19, 2008 at 1:28 PM
But Obama will talk to all of them and convince them they wrong with his words.
/sarc off
terryannonline on February 19, 2008 at 1:31 PM
We must engage them in dialog. They’ll be nice to us if we’ll just be nice to them. Kumbayaaaa.
petefrt on February 19, 2008 at 1:31 PM
If Sharif names AQ Khan as President, that photo with Kerry, Biden, and Hagel will come in quite handy.
danking70 on February 19, 2008 at 1:36 PM
No, no, my friend. You meant to say a Dunkin’ Donut.
“Would you like a tactical nuclear warhead with your donut (not bagel; those are for the Zionist pig dogs)?”
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on February 19, 2008 at 1:40 PM
Well, you remember the Messiah was early on in favor of invading Pakistan without official permission, which we are apparently doing now. Maybe he’s been right on this all along. At least he could play it that way in the campaign. I’d say his bragging credentials on Pakistan are going to hinge a lot on how things go down over there between now and November, plus whether NATO continues to drag it’s feet in Afghanistan. Much of this stuff is entirely out of our control.
a capella on February 19, 2008 at 1:41 PM
No. Obama’s stance is that we invade Pakistan to ferret out the Taliban. Remember? No war for poppy.
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on February 19, 2008 at 1:42 PM
A.Q. Khan!?!
Let’s let that one sink in for a moment. I’m thinking that would be one of the worst decisions ever made in Pakistan. That would not be acceptable and could seriously lead to war.
CP on February 19, 2008 at 1:45 PM
The question is…..where is the Indian Navy?
Limerick on February 19, 2008 at 2:04 PM
“Thank you; come again”
No! Thank you, Mr. Musharraf!
pseudonominus on February 19, 2008 at 3:13 PM
Insert Kenny Rogers
” know when to hold ‘em.. know when to fold ‘em.. ”
normsrevenge on February 19, 2008 at 3:36 PM
That “Bye” under Musharraf`s picture……….Is that bye to him or to US?
ThePrez on February 19, 2008 at 4:18 PM
In all the hub bub I’ll bet Mush will forget to put the rest of that aid money in the bank before he exits.
Everyone does know that Pakistan has always been most stable under a military dictatorship right? It is chaos with the politicians in charge.
At least Khan can cut the middle man(tech info) out and sell the nukes direct now.
BL@KBIRD on February 19, 2008 at 10:29 PM
Comment pages: