Video: Bill Clinton gets red-faced at pro-lifers

To William Jefferson Clinton:

1) You are correct. Abortion should be illegal

2) Once abortion is illegal, abortionists who DO continue to perform abortions should be prosecuted, tried, and sentenced, but not just to jail. Time in jail for first degree murder varies from state to state. The sentence for first degree murder, which abortion would be if-when illegal – intentional, premeditated murder of innocent, defenseless human beings, are either life imprisonment or death. I agree with those sentences 100%, but I prefer the death penalty for abortionists once abortion is illegal, rather than life imprisonment.

Why do I prefer the death penalty for abortionists rather than life imprisonment once abortion is illegal? Because as long as they live, the stand a chance of being released from prison. If they are released they will most likely continue to commit the slaughter or human beings via abortion. They are already serial killers, hence it is not as if they commit one or two and that’s it. They commit hundreds to thousands of abortions.

In order to protect babies inside the womb, and society as a whole, from the bane which is abortion – the wanton killing of innocent, defenseless human beings, it is necessary to remove from society any and all those who would perpetrate such a barbaric practice.

Also, the women who hire the abortionist should also be tried, sentenced, and prosecuted. Before sentence should be handed down, such concerns as mens rea, and scienter must be decided.

3) William the thug-liar-woman abusers-rapist-civil rights violator-perjuror Jefferson Clinton is probably correct in his claim that there would be little to no political-legal support for illegalizing abortion and prosecuting abortionists and women who hire abortionists as assassins-hit men to slaughter their own babies, although all legal and political influence SHOULD agree to illegalizing and prosecute abortionists and the women who hire them as killers of their offspring.

Politicians, etc., tend to be weak willed and will favor their own personal, selfish concerns, and the baby inside the womb of a woman is “out of site; out of mind” and is not afforded or considered seriously deserving of the same rights as a person like themselves. Furthermore, with a skewed, distorted sense of value, euthanasia, “personhood,” abortion, HESCR (Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research), Cloning, etc., are all issues which many self absorbed individuals think favors THEM. They don’t want to admit, and live by, criteria that would see them siding with respect for living human beings, even those inside the womb, when they can benefit from exploiting them and making life more “convenient” for themselves.

4) And this could actually be listed as Number 1: A living human being is killed via abortion, not some nonliving, non-human piece of tissue, or item that just “happens” to be inside mother’s womb. That alone should be something our entire society respects and protects, but our society has distorted ideas and practices which contribute to ignorance and abuses perpetrated on our weak, our small, our handicapped, our injured, our elderly, which results in millions of abortions, euthanasia, exploitation in experiments in the lab, and so on.

5) William Jefferson Clinton has proven himself to be devoid of values, ethics, and concern for respect for human life, hence, although people listen to him, it says more about their own lack of ethics, respect for living human beings, mores, etc., than it says about Clinton’s authenticity as an advocate for abortion of innocent human beings.

William2006 on February 18, 2008 at 10:29 PM

Once a child is conceived, I believe wholeheartedly that regardless of the circumstances of the conception, the child is innocent and has a right to live. It deserves a chance

Wanderlust on February 19, 2008 at 2:58 AM

Yes, but why stop there? I’ve got plenty of sperm which are innocent and have a right to live! Don’t they deserve a chance? So if I go rape someone, well, that’s ok, I’m just giving my unborn children a chance to live!

c6gunner on February 19, 2008 at 6:45 AM

“c6gunner,”

Is that comment supposed to be funny?

Are you equating sperm with a living human organism, which is the human being, the human person, the human embryo and human fetus, which is living and developing inside his or her mother’s womb?

Sperm are not living human organisms. They are human, and they are human sex cells, but they are not an individual human organism.

If you take a sperm cell and place it inside a woman’s uterus, the sperm will deteriorate and be ejected from the womb. They won’t grow into another living human being and not continue to adulthood.

Also, the new human being inside the womb, the embryo – the stage (embryonic stages) which extends from conception-fertilization till the end of the eighth week, Post fertilization (PF), is a blend of the genetic material of the mother and fathers sperm and oocyte after the sperm has penetrated the zona pellucida of the woman’s oocyte and fertilization has taken place.

Human body cells, or Somatic Cells, are diploid cells, normally contain 46 chromosomes, as well as produce only human proteins, human enzymes, etc., (exceptions exists, such as 47 in cases of Downs Syndrome, and 45 in cases such as Turners Syndrome). The sperm, after undergoing gametogenesis, will contain 22 _ X or Y, a total of 23 Chromosomes, which means they are haploid cells, containing 1/2 the total number of chromosomes of the normal human being (46).

The woman’s oocyte, which have existed inside the female fetus as early as 1/2 way through her development inside the womb, at which point there are millions of oocyte, has also been undergoing gametogenesis, via oogenesis, which continues for decades, into adulthood. The oocytes, reduced to a few hundred thousand by the time a woman is able to reproduce, undergoes different stages of meiosis.

At the point that the sperm penetrates the zona pellucida, the protective “jacket” so to speak, on the outside of the oocyte, meiosis 2 is completed and the female’s sex gamete, her oocyte, like the sperm cell, is now a haploid cell as well. That means, the oocyte contains 23 chromosomes, 22 + X (X is the chromosome which produces a female baby, provided the male’s sperm delivers another X chromosome (undamaged). If the male delivers an intact, not damaged Y chromosome, the baby will be a boy).

Of we place the oocyte into the womb, or uterus, by itself, as the sperm, the oocyte will deteriorate and be ejected from the woman’s uterus and not develop into an adult human being.

Under the circumstances of sexual reproduction, which requires sexual intercourse and the fertilization of the female’s oocyte in the woman’s fallopian tube by the males sperm – compared to asexual reproduction, which does not require the sperm and ooctye, or sexual intercourse, as in monozygotic twinning, triplets, etc., in vivo, and artificial asexual reproduction, ex vivo (outside the womb), reproduction takes place, and a new human being’s life begins. From that point onward, this new human being, first referred to, clinically, as a human embryo, contains all the genetic information, material, and instructions and programing she or he requires, to develop into adulthood. No other incident or event is required for him or her to complete her journey throughout the continuum of overlapping developmental changes that take place witting the womb, and which do not end at birth, but which continue into adulthood.

The 23 (22 + X or Y) chromosomes of the male, and the 23 (22 + X) chromosome of the female unite, their genetic material fuses, and the new human being, now comprised of all 46 chromosomes, replete with DNA, RNA, human proteins, human enzymes, instructions, the works, now forms the new human being.

The sperm and the oocyte are not the same as the new human embryo, or the human fetus – the fetal stage extending from the ninth week, PF, till term/birth.

One, the human embryo and fetus, are living human organisms, fully members of the human race, while sperm and oocyte are human, but not living human organisms, not living human beings, not an embryo, not a fetus, not an infant, but human sex cells, or sex gametes, part of a human being.

An organism is a living thing which grows and develops, reacts and responds to stimuli, reproduces its own kind, and dies. The sperm does not do these things; the human being, the embryo, fetus, infant, toddler, child, adult, etc., do these things, and hence, there is a clear, discernible difference between sperm, oocyte, and a living human organism, a living human being.

Bottom line, sperm is not a living person, whereas a human embryo, a human fetus, and human infant, etc., are living human persons, living human beings.

Regarding your rape statement, that is crude, rude, and despicable!

If you rape someone, then you should be arrested, tried, and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, and, if and when found guilty, you should be sentenced with the most severe sentence the law provides!

In case you are going to bring it up, the baby should NOT be aborted. It was YOU who did the crime, not the baby. The baby should not be punished for your violence and abuse You aggressed against the woman, the mother, not the baby. If baby is killed by an abortionist, she becomes the second victim and the mother has extended your violent act upon an innocent victim, compounding your crime of violence and violation and abuse, upon an innocent.

William2006 on February 19, 2008 at 7:46 AM

Why is it that so many conservatives think it’s appropriate to force women to have children they may not be prepared for? I thought conservatives were supposed to believe in individual rights…

Enrique on February 18, 2008 at 3:53 PM

Where are you from that forces conception?

Wade on February 19, 2008 at 9:07 AM

That is an excellent question, “Wade!”

“Forces conception?”

Who does that, and where?

William2006 on February 19, 2008 at 9:12 AM