Name an urban Republican political machine existing since 1945, moron

It’s totally unsurprising that voter fraud would go on in the primaries as well as the general election.

Certainly, the reaction among the Democrat party doesn’t even rise to phony shock. It appears they were expecting fraud.

Here in Georgia, simply being asked to show a legal form of ID when voting is considered racist.

Dorvillian on February 17, 2008 at 1:38 PM

Being required to show a photo ID before voting is also “un-Christian and un-American,” according to former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee.

Makes me wonder just how many votes candidate Huckabee received in Arkansas from all those Tyson chicken employees “doing the jobs Americans won’t do.”

Voting fraud: it’s not just for Democrats.

ruh oh

windansea on February 16, 2008 at 9:11 PM

Like Zoiks!

Dorvillian on February 17, 2008 at 1:38 PM

It’s not racist at all!!!!

This year, the opening keynote was instead delivered by President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan, who argued that Muslims in Afghanistan and Bosnia were right to expect and accept American military intervention to relieve their suffering, and America was just in coming to their aid.
After his speech, former U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, Turkish Foreign Minister Ali Babacan, and U.S. Ambassador to the UN Zalmay Khalilzad seemed to echo Karzai’s themes: common interests between Muslims and the West in fighting terrorism, improving regional stability, and building the foundations for prosperity and freedom. Karzai pointed to the global contributions to Afghanistan’s reconstruction as a symbol of Western-Islamic world cooperation; Babacan proudly referred to the Turkish accession talks with the European Union as evidence that the values of the Union are not essentially Western but rather universal in their appeal.

Quite honestly, though, I don’t think the relative love-fest at this year’s meeting is all ascribable either to regional shifts or to the conference organizers’ choice of speakers. The most powerful explanation for the change is evident in the overwhelming fact that all anyone at this conference really wants to talk about is Barack Obama.

A friend from the Gulf tells me her young relative was so excited about the Democratic candidate that he tried to donate money over the Internet, as he’d heard so many young Americans were doing. Then he found out he had to be a U.S. citizen to do so. Another young woman, visiting from next-door Saudi Arabia, said that all her friends in Riyadh are “for Obama.” The symbolism of a major American presidential candidate with the middle name of Hussein, who went to elementary school in Indonesia, certainly speaks to Muslims abroad.

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/mesh/2008/02/arabs_for_obama/

In the Harlem district, for instance, where the primary night returns suggested a 141 to 0 sweep by Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, the vote now stands at 261 to 136. In an even more heavily black district in Brooklyn — where the vote on primary night was recorded as 118 to 0 for Mrs. Clinton — she now barely leads, 118 to 116.

There is no way this can be explained away by the elderly unable to competently push a stick through a perferated hole on a ballot. In the second example, that means that Obama didn’t have a single vote recorded primary night and Clinton hasn’t had a single vote recorded since. Improbable is the tamest word I can think of to describe this anamoly. There isn’t any way that this kind of shift is simple procedural error by elections officials. Something stinks in New York City and it isn’t just the East River!

Where’s the outrage? Where are the protests? Where is the invocation of the Voting Rights Act? Where is the threat of boycotts, lawsuits, marches and race riots?

29Victor on February 17, 2008 at 12:19 PM

Outstanding point. Seems like there is at least the possibility that voting rights were compromised among the Harlem vote. My guess is that Obama is such a threat to the race industry that Sharpton/Jackson/Fahrakan are keeping their machine in idle. After all, how can Sharpton be screaming about a lack of opportunity for blacks once one is elected President?

29Victor on February 17, 2008 at 12:19 PM

Excellent point.

Here in Georgia, simply being asked to show a legal form of ID when voting is considered racist.

Oh, wait, it’s Dhimmicrats.

FOXNEWS lies!!!

Ahh, its good to live without facts, reason and logic.

This is exactly the kind of anti-black electoral trickery that took place in the South “back in the day” that the NAACP and other groups claim to exist to defy. Where are they now?

If the majority of Blacks in America can’t see that they have spent the last several decades serving as the “useful idiots” of the Democrat party, then I have little hope for them.

where we delivered the margin of victory for John F. Kennedy at 4 in the morning.”

Heh. You gotta love this. The sleaze just keeps on rising to the surface. Before it is over, the Dems will finally show their true colors by changing rules, counting or not counting votes, filing lawsuits and running smear campaigns. All against fellow Dems.

Now, if the GOP just has the good sense to stay the hell out of the way.

By theway, none of this vote shenanigans in new York have yet to find it’s way into the mainstream press.

paulsur on February 17, 2008 at 9:51 AM

Unless, of course, you include the NYT as a member of the MSM.

The NYT story is kinda funny because they use most of the story explaining over and over again that there is NO fraud…just human error.

I’m sure if I was a poll worker in Harlem and found that Obama got zero votes, I wouldn’t even bat an eye.

The Clinton’s can no longer be called smart, or dangerous for that matter. Their days of murder and mayhem are over.

Ridiculous Old Coots.

If you ask me he ran just to impress his trophy wife, and in this regard he probably suceeded.

paulsur on February 17, 2008 at 9:50 AM

I may be a bit short sighted here, but, just from observation, the rewards may have been worth it. I don’t blame him a bit. Simple pleasures are the best kind.