Conservative republicans aren’t going to roll over for stupid liberal proposals from any POTUS, GOP or democrat
funky chicken on February 14, 2008 at 11:17 AM

Do not confuse conservatives with Republicans. McCain has established there is a difference

The conservative republicans feel more affection for Bush than for McCain, correct? …
funky chicken on February 14, 2008 at 11:28 AM

Not correct

It’s all academic and cute and funny if you don’t have a loved one in the sandbox, but for those of us who do, the idea that the American people would betray them by placing Obama in command is sickening.

They go off to war to protect us from external enemies. It’s our job as citizens to protect them from internal enemies, like the socialist comrades of Senator Obama.

funky chicken on February 14, 2008 at 10:06 AM

‘It’ ?

The greatest internal enemy of America are the persons who have opened the borders to mass infiltration.

The second greatest internal enemies of America are those who seek to limit free speech, especially at election time

Last I checked, asking if someone is Oprah or Donahue doesn’t fall under disagreement. It falls under trolling. If you don’t see that, then I’ll be sure to avoid responding to you as well.

MadisonConservative on February 14, 2008 at 11:51 AM

Madison I agree the game is tedious. It makes me remember a great mil blog gnat attacked by persona describing mil strategem learned ‘in the sandbox’. When they started a routine about how we don’t realize that guns can kill I had to save my neurons from underload

I miss the free ranging discussions on HotAir between conservatives, but understand, it is important to the buzzards to take down this chat which has had a lot of influence in working out conservative issues

Since the conservative viewpoint is an impediment to their goals the buzzing will continue

Or, they left the cage unlocked at Kos

John McCain’s involvement with George Soros….

Good God – she is a nut, pure and simple.

AprilOrit on February 14, 2008 at 9:16 PM

The Soros involvement is documented by Michelled Malkin as true, not false. Michelle is a great American

Coulter is a debater who slings humor coated facts, not, thank God, a nut pure and simple.

I thank God for the persons of intelligence and integrity willing to enter this dirty debate. Coulter will take a lot of abuse right up to election day because they need some scapegoats to take the heat off of McCain

I am surprised they sent in the sandbox warriors so early. Cornering a primary with vote leeches does not mean you control the conservative electorate. It is too soon to assume the enemy is dead.

Meanwhile Madison, keep posting. People can read between the lines.

Really? Anne is the standard bearer for the Conservative movement? Good lord, if that is the case then I think I better find a movement that isn’t being led by and absolute loon.

Her comments don’t hurt the cause of conservatism in the least. If you think so, then you don’t know what “conservatism” is.

Depends on what kind of conservative you are, I suppose. Seems to me she’s more of a capitalist and not so much a conservative.

Take a minute and rethink who you are attacking and why.

RobertCSampson

People are attacking a shrill woman that makes incredibly stupid statements at the least opportune times. It wouldn’t be such a big deal if she wasn’t considered some kind of conservative standard bearer.

Mikey Moore? Anne Coulter! Anne Coulter? Mikey Moore. Now that you two have met, why don’t you go exploit some people? You have so much in common.

Dork B. on February 14, 2008 at 9:53 AM

Dork B. may have nailed it.

Remember Coulter’s idiotic “McCain and Obama are the same” crap next time she starts screaming about how pro-life she is too.

McCain gets a 0.0 score from Planned Parenthood. Obama gets a straight A.

Yeah, no difference at all, right?

funky chicken on February 14, 2008 at 10:02 AM

I don’t think she really believes what she’s saying. She seems to be driven by emotion rather than logic. Oddly, that’s a liberal tendency.

Having said that, I think Ann often offers much more substantive and telling points than Sharpton’s demagoguery. She does get us talking and makes us think. Despite her recent comments, however, I seriously doubt she would ever vote for Hillary. She is just trying to make sure we keep McCain’s feet to the fire. ———Arrgh! I can’t get spaces between my paragraphs no matter what I try.

…think about the troops in the field.

… the idea that the American people would betray them by placing Obama in command is sickening.

funky chicken on February 14, 2008 at 10:06 AM

I was reading up on WWI political history. Germany was looking for ways to insight riots and revolutions in enemy nations. One such person the Germans assisted in such a task was helping Lenin foment the Bolshevik revolution. This is just one example of many similar situations throughout history.

So, no, it is not beyond comprehension that a nation would turn its back on its armies in the field.

Now… Lenin got Russia out of WWI. Okay, cool. But then what happened? The power vacuum left the Communists in power leading to the tyranny of Stalin, the most despicable leader in the history of the Russian peoples.

Here is what scares me:
- Lenin was a socialist.
- Obama is a socialist.
- Clinton is a socialist/Marxist.
- McCain’s policies are not that much different from Hillary’s.

Obama and Clinton are both saying today almost exactly what Lenin telling the Russians during WWI with regard to getting us our of war, which is that winning a protracted war is worse that losing in the short term.

Only one difference between Lenin and Obama/Clinton. The Germans fighting Russia wanted to stop also, and when the fighting ended the Germans redeployed to their Eastern front. The Islamofascists fighting us have no intention of quitting, regardless if we fight them or not.

The only one of these people offering an inkling of real national defense rhetoric is McCain.

On H & C, calling Mike Huckabee Huckleberry,

Could you possibly cry any more for the most liberal candidates in the election? Christ…

John McCain’s involvement with George Soros….

Good God – she is a nut, pure and simple.

AprilOrit on February 14, 2008 at 9:16 PM

Oh, you mean the one covered on this site?

Guess you’re at a site full of nuts, hosted by nuts. Maybe you’d be better off where they’re nice to people like B. Hussein Obama…OOPS…I mean a site where they don’t mention what his middle name is because saying a person’s name is a smear attack.

Good God – she is a nut, pure and simple.

Sorry, I have to throw a flag on using “Swiftboat” as a verb to imply a dishonest smear attack. The charges made by the Swiftboat veterans were not dishonest, were never discredited, and the real smear attacks were launched against them, not by them.

When you use “swiftboat” like this, you validate John Kerry’s delusions that the election was somehow “stolen” from him by dirty politics. And that’s just dead wrong.

theregoestheneighborhood on February 14, 2008 at 8:27 PM

Ok then – if you want TO SMEAR someone – find a more formible topic, or at least an honest one, please.

. If you want to Swiftboat someone find a more formible topic, or at least an honest one, please.
…..
AprilOrit on February 13, 2008 at 11:21 PM

Sorry, I have to throw a flag on using “Swiftboat” as a verb to imply a dishonest smear attack. The charges made by the Swiftboat veterans were not dishonest, were never discredited, and the real smear attacks were launched against them, not by them.

When you use “swiftboat” like this, you validate John Kerry’s delusions that the election was somehow “stolen” from him by dirty politics. And that’s just dead wrong.

Its all a crock. I love Ann. She realizes that conservatism is fighting for its life and she stands on the front lines locked and loaded. Her comments don’t hurt the cause of conservatism in the least. If you think so, then you don’t know what “conservatism” is.

Take a minute and rethink who you are attacking and why.

But she is wrong about McCain… I actually believe he would bomb Mecca…which is, of course, exactly the right thing to do… and as soon as possible and preferrably when the Saudi royal family it there.

georgealbert on February 14, 2008 at 2:02 PM

Long live Jonny Mac!

MadisonConservative on February 14, 2008 at 4:22 PM

That’s the best compliment I’ve gotten this fine Valentine’s Day! Mine are prettier than Hillary’s and Ann’s too!

Sultry Beauty on February 14, 2008 at 3:56 PM

Oh, and I do beg your pardon…

Happy Valentine’s to you as well!

I think 150,000,000 corpses would beg to differ.

Lehosh on February 14, 2008 at 9:45 AM

They did that to their own. We won the Cold War. This outcome doesn’t look to good.

Sultry Beauty on February 14, 2008 at 3:56 PM

You do me too much honor, m’lady. ‘Tis more than evident, though, that you have more balls than many here.

Sultry Beauty on February 14, 2008 at 3:56 PM

Hey there, Gorgeous

Limp-wristed unprincipaled conservatives who would vote for someone they disagree with idealogically more than 70% of the time; will sing his praises and vote for him willingly, while he pens liberal legislation they hate and would eagerly sign these same laws as a GOP president thus condemning the GOP to be accused of being the “cause” of this horrible legislation that destroys are economy and takes away many freedoms, saying that Ann Coulter is a Shrew is really rich. If only these same men would stand up and speak as vehemently about Democrats who say such things as “Bush lied people died”, et al as they do their own politicans when they have enough balls and courage to stand up where they will not, things would be a lot simpler in the world.

I’m SO glad El Rushbo isn’t limp-wristed. At least there’s a man out there worthy of my ear. Except of course, MadCon…

OldEnglish on February 14, 2008 at 9:24 AM

I stand corrected.

OMG a HUSSIEN in the white house
pueblo1032 on February 14, 2008 at 1:20 PM

Only if invited by President McCain. Of course, Mac will probably get bashed for inviting any democrat to the WhiteHouse, but IMO, you should take that up with the Illinois voters that put Obama in the Senate in the first place.