Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Democrats place anonymous hold on Semper Fi Act; Audio: Marines welcome anywhere in the U.S., says Reid

posted at 3:45 pm on February 13, 2008 by Bryan
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

What a disgrace. Some Democrat has placed a sneaky hold on the Semper Fi Act, giving Code Pink at least a temporary victory and giving Berkeley at least a temporary reprieve from the consequences of blocking the Marines from recruiting in Berkeley. According to a statement from Sen. DeMint’s office:

Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina) made the following statement in response to the decision by the City Council of Berkeley, California not to apologize to the Marine Corps and their families and reaffirming their support for radical anti-war protestors to “impede” military recruiters from conducting their work.

Senator DeMint introduced the Semper Fi Act to rescind over $2 million in hidden earmarks for Berkeley, California in the Fiscal Year 2008 Omnibus Appropriations bill, and transfer the funds to the Marine Corps. Until yesterday, Senate Democrat leaders used parliamentary maneuvers to block consideration of the bill. Last night, Republicans asked to pass the Semper Fi Act by unanimous consent after no Republican member opposed its passage, but Democrats have placed an anonymous hold on the bill.

“It’s a national embarrassment that these officials refuse to apologize to our troops and their families and continue to support actions against military recruitment. It’s time for Berkeley to realize that actions have consequences,” said Senator DeMint. “Americans across the nation are outraged at Berkeley’s insult to our troops who have fought and died for their ability to live in freedom. It’s truly heartening to hear the outpouring of support for the Marine Corps in South Carolina and throughout the nation.”

Berkeley City Council members voted to rescind a letter to the Marine Corps recruitment office asking them to leave town, but left in place a provision that encourages “all people to avoid cooperation with the Marine Corps recruiting station, and applaud residents and organizations such as Code Pink” that “impede, passively or actively” the work of military recruiters. Berkeley also voted against a formal apology to the Marine Corps and will still allow Code Pink a special parking space in front of the recruitment office to conduct weekly protests.

“Let’s be clear, it’s not a question of the sincerity of anyone on either side of this issue. However, some of the hateful rhetoric and official actions against the Marine Corps that have come out of Berkeley has had real consequences on our troops, their families, and our recruiting,” said Senator DeMint.

The bill is cosponsored by 10 senators including Republican leaders Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) and John Cornyn (R-Texas). U.S. Congressman John Campbell (R-California) introduced a companion bill in the House of Representatives and now has 71 cosponsors, including Republican leaders John Boehner (R-Ohio), Roy Blunt (R-Missouri), and nine other members of the California delegation.

“In Saddam Hussein’s Iraq or the Taliban’s Afghanistan, such opposition would not be allowed a voice at all. But thankfully we live in a free democracy under the protection of our brave Marines. Protestors have the right to vocally insult our troops but patriotic Americans also have the right to seek a democratic response to discourage activities that actively impede the legitimate functions of our military.”

“I will continue to work with my Senate colleagues to stop the special taxpayer favors Berkeley has received through unnecessary earmarks,” said Senator DeMint.

One Berkeley earmark provides $243,000 in taxpayer dollars for the organization Chez Panisse to create gourmet organic school lunches in the Berkeley School District. Another earmark would spend $975,000 in taxpayer dollars for the University of California, to create a new endowment and cataloging the papers of Congressman Robert Matsui. U.C. Berkeley already has a $3.5 billion endowment.

Will any reporter assigned to either the Clinton or Obama campaign ask what either of those candidates for Commander in Chief think about Berkeley’s shameful actions or DeMint’s reponse? Of course not. This entire episode is disgraceful on the part of Code Pink, the city of Berkeley and the Democrats in Congress. And the media, for failing to cover it.

Update (AP): Hey, it’s the thought that counts, right?

While initially apparently unaware of the Berkeley City Council’s action, when informed, Reid said: “Well if they said that, I am disappointed. The Marine Corps should be welcome in any place in the United States.”

Update (Bryan): Yeah, Reid said that yesterday, before the anonymous hold was put on the bill and after he had tried the adjournment trick to stall it. It’s not what you say but what you do that defines you, Harry.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Cowards.

No.

Collaborators

normsrevenge on February 13, 2008 at 3:48 PM

So how about a repeat of the way the Porkbuster outed Ted Steves? Get a map up, and everybody call their Senators and get them on the record to deny, admit, or no comment.

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 3:48 PM

I wish they would make it a public vote.

tshell on February 13, 2008 at 3:49 PM

Senator McCain? SENATOR MCCAIN? Helllooooooo, Mr. Republican Leader?

RushBaby on February 13, 2008 at 3:49 PM

There’s a Republican Leader?? Dam could a fooled me.

Griz on February 13, 2008 at 3:52 PM

I am not surprised. It is long past time for a cleaning out of washington dc. Things like this just mean that the cleaning is more likely to contain firearm usage than not.

Fantasy aside, there should be NO ANONYMOUS anything when it comes to bills. If you cannot put your name on it, then it should not be allowed. Classified info is one thing, actions taken by PUBLIC servants should be PUBLIC.

Voidseeker on February 13, 2008 at 3:52 PM

One earmark provides $243,000 in taxpayer dollars for the organization Chez Panisse to create gourmet organic school lunches in the Berkeley School District. Chez Panisse is dedicated to “environmental harmony” and their menu features “Comté cheese soufflé with mâche salad,” “Meyer lemon éclairs with huckleberry coulis;” and “Chicory salad with creamy anchovy vinaigrette and olive toast.”

Another earmark would spend $975,000 in taxpayer dollars for the University of California in Berkeley Matsui Center for Politics and Public Service, to create a new endowment and cataloging the papers of Congressman Robert Matsui. UC Berkeley currently already has a $3.5 billion endowment.

The earmarks that “should” be taken out of the Beserkeley City Counsel…. Nice huh and from Congressmam John Campbell

upinak on February 13, 2008 at 3:53 PM

Look, go here, locate your Senators, and call them and ask: Will you deny, for the record, being responsible for the secret hold placed on the Semper Fi act?

Then report back here.

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 3:53 PM

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 3:48 PM

Laura, umm Ted Stevens isn’t “earmarking” organic foods for our Students up here LMFAO HAHAHHAHHAAA.

Besides…. maybe you should see who else (State wise) is just as big a “porkster” then Alaska. Hmmmmmm

upinak on February 13, 2008 at 3:56 PM

Disgraceful. Anonymous holds should be outlawed. Where’s the transparency?

CP on February 13, 2008 at 3:56 PM

Laura, it was Reid and Durbin:

Once a measure is on the calendar, a senator can request the Senate to approve a bill by unanimous consent, or force at least one member to object to its passage.

But on Feb. 6 and Feb. 7, Reid and Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) closed the chamber’s doors by recessing until the next day, a move that, unlike adjourning, does not change the legislative day.

RushBaby on February 13, 2008 at 3:57 PM

There’s a Republican Leader??

Griz on February 13, 2008 at 3:52 PM

From what I can see, that’d be Sen. DeMint.

amerpundit on February 13, 2008 at 3:58 PM

James, at Mary Landrieu’s office, asked me what the Semper Fi Act was. When I said it was the bill that takes away Berkeley’s earmarks, he said, “Oh, for regulating Marine recruiters within city limits?” I said, “no, for telling Marines they are unwelcome intruders, allowing Code Pink a private parking space to enable them to block passage into the Marine recruiting station, and for failing to enforce the law against Code Pink when they block the doorway.”

James referred me to Brian, after a long delay, doubtless when he told Brian to let the call go to voicemail.

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 3:59 PM

RushBaby on February 13, 2008 at 3:57 PM

Reread, it’s not clear that Reid and Durbin did the anonymous hold, which came after the recess tactic. My bad.

RushBaby on February 13, 2008 at 4:00 PM

RushBaby on February 13, 2008 at 3:57 PM

Ah, thanks very much. Could ahve saved myself the phone call to a moonbat.

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 4:00 PM

gourmet organic school lunches in the Berkeley School District.

Can someone please explain why this earmark should be reinstated even if the city council does a complete 180?

James on February 13, 2008 at 4:01 PM

Gotta be Boxer or Feinstein – they were responsible for the earmarks in the first place.

tballard on February 13, 2008 at 4:02 PM

tballard, probably so, but make them admit it.

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 4:03 PM

RushBaby on February 13, 2008 at 3:57 PM

Isn’t that different? An anonymous hold is a different parliamentary move, isn’t it? I agree with Laura – let’s find out who it was. Nothing should be anonymous in Congress! It’s disgraceful! What say our future Commander-in-Chief?

I’m pretty confident that it’s not my senators . . .

TX Mom on February 13, 2008 at 4:03 PM

RushBaby – you caught it yourself while I was typing. Never mind!

TX Mom on February 13, 2008 at 4:04 PM

Ah, thanks very much. Could ahve saved myself the phone call to a moonbat.

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 4:00 PM

You did the right thing. I was wrong, see my 4pm

RushBaby on February 13, 2008 at 4:04 PM

James on February 13, 2008 at 4:01 PM

James, but but but… the children wouldn’t have a healthy ORGANIC food! Shame on you for thinking they would need a apple grown in WA that may have needed some fertilizer (cow poo)!

The HORROR!

/sarc if you couldn’t tell

upinak on February 13, 2008 at 4:05 PM

Reiterating my “rabid dog” comment

franksalterego on February 13, 2008 at 4:05 PM

I doubt it was Landrieu, because she’s a blue dog Dem. Has to be, to keep the office. But if we can out and shame the person doing it, and get this thing to a vote, we should.

Again, here’s the link, pick your state, make your calls.

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 4:07 PM

It will probably turn out to be Boxer.

The “Semper Fi Act” is also known as S. 2596

SEC. 2. RECISSION AND TRANSFER OF FUNDS.

(a) Recission of Certain Earmarks- All of the amounts appropriated by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (Public Law 110-161) and the accompanying report for congressional directed spending items for the City of Berkeley, California, or entities located in such city are hereby rescinded.

(b) Transfer of Funds to Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps- The amounts rescinded under subsection (a) shall be transferred to the `Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps’ account of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2008 to be used for recruiting purposes.

(c) Congressional Directed Spending Item Defined- In this section, the term `congressional directed spending item’ has the meaning given such term in paragraph 5(a) of rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the Senate.
Calendar No. 570

rw on February 13, 2008 at 4:07 PM

Yeah, I’m guessing Feinstein or Boxer put the hold on the Semper Fi Act. They’re just scummy enough to do it, and both have plenty of pals in Berkeley. Probably Pink pals, to boot.

MrScribbler on February 13, 2008 at 4:08 PM

bleh…

tshell on February 13, 2008 at 4:09 PM

I spoke to Ashley at David Vitter’s office – he did not do it. (As expected.)

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 4:09 PM

just goes to show you – they didn’t even have the balls to show themselves as supporting this behavior which they obviously do

Defector01 on February 13, 2008 at 4:09 PM

Does anyone know if O’Reilly is on this?

ninjapirate on February 13, 2008 at 4:09 PM

Called Obama’s office. No idea what I was talking about, looked it up, and insisted the bill is still in the House and has not been referred to the Senate.

amerpundit on February 13, 2008 at 4:09 PM

And so why isn’t the McCain stomping outta the bus, grabbing the first network reporter he sees, and begin to threaten gobsmacking someone? Get it in the headlines, and on the networks nightly world news reports? Or GW for that matter? I blame us as much as I blame the donks.

Limerick on February 13, 2008 at 4:11 PM

WTF’nF’ityF?The “organization” Chez Panisse?

Chez Panisse isn’t an organization; it’s just a celebrity-chef fancy restaurant in Berkeley that uses organic and locally-sourced food. I hear it’s really good, but I CAN’T AFFORD TO EAT THERE so I wouldn’t know.

It’s like getting the federal government to subcontract Berkeley’s school lunch program out to Spago. This is ALMOST as big a scandal as the troop-bashing.

Enjoy those school lunches, kids! I’m treatin’ you to a standard of living I can’t afford for myself! And since it’s Berkeley, don’t forget to pray to Gaia for America’s downfall before you dig in!

see-dubya on February 13, 2008 at 4:12 PM

Byrd (D-WV) : No Statement Issued Yet.
Cantwell (D-WV) : No Statement.

amerpundit on February 13, 2008 at 4:13 PM

Cardin (D-MD): No Idea What it Is, No Position Taken Yet, Needed “Semper Fi” spelled out and repeated.

amerpundit on February 13, 2008 at 4:15 PM

Draft DeMint. Hell, shakle him to the rostra. Sick and tired of my ‘no-blue-pill’ party.

Limerick on February 13, 2008 at 4:15 PM

Cantwell’s office did not know if she had placed the hold(promised to send a response later), but one person that I spoke with knew immediately that S. 2596 was the Semper Fi Act.

rw on February 13, 2008 at 4:16 PM

I would love to see Code Stink do something productive and try to protest a war against chicken McNuggets at McDonalds.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on February 13, 2008 at 4:18 PM

One earmark provides $243,000 in taxpayer dollars for the organization Chez Panisse to create gourmet organic school lunches in the Berkeley School District. Chez Panisse is dedicated to “environmental harmony” and their menu features “Comté cheese soufflé with mâche salad,” “Meyer lemon éclairs with huckleberry coulis;” and “Chicory salad with creamy anchovy vinaigrette and olive toast.”

What’s so environmentally INharmonious about peanut butter and jelly?

CurtZHP on February 13, 2008 at 4:20 PM

Hopefully this bill will die.

Do not despair! I’m sure the controversy will rage long enough that anyone that cares to will be able to grandstand about how outraged you are, what seditious scum they are, blah blah blah.

I’ve got my popcorn.

LimeyGeek on February 13, 2008 at 4:21 PM

Chez Panisse

I’ve got a way to save money.

You know how that Subway diet was good for Jared? Just saying….

And really, just how many kids would eat olive toast? I think if the dive a bit deeper you might find an executive lunch room for the Berkeley Board of Education hidden somewhere.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on February 13, 2008 at 4:22 PM

hairy reed is a lowlife piece of crap…period…

areseaoh on February 13, 2008 at 4:22 PM

I admire the Marines for their courage in the face of the enemy. Not only abroad but right here at home. They’re in their face every day taunting and intimidating and harassing them and the Marines have continued to take the high road.

Code Pink reminds me of rabid dogs.

scalleywag on February 13, 2008 at 4:23 PM

oops, I insulted the rabid dogs!

scalleywag on February 13, 2008 at 4:24 PM

Code Pink reminds me of rabid dogs.

scalleywag on February 13, 2008 at 4:23 PM

Code pink ARE rabid dogs.

CurtZHP on February 13, 2008 at 4:24 PM

Patty Murray’s (D-WA) office said she had no statement on the legislation, so it was unlikely that she placed a hold on it. In comparison, Cantwell’s staff seemed much more professional.

rw on February 13, 2008 at 4:24 PM

Hopefully this bill will die.

Do not despair! I’m sure the controversy will rage long enough that anyone that cares to will be able to grandstand about how outraged you are, what seditious scum they are, blah blah blah.

I’ve got my popcorn.

LimeyGeek on February 13, 2008 at 4:21 PM

What would you call people who actively try to block the recruiting efforts of the U.S. Armed Forces during a time of war?

amerpundit on February 13, 2008 at 4:25 PM

Called Clinton’s office, was put on hold, then got “If you’d like to make a call, please hang up…”. Anyone else get through?

amerpundit on February 13, 2008 at 4:25 PM

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 3:59 PM

The good news is that Mary Landrieu is coming up for reelection.

highhopes on February 13, 2008 at 4:26 PM

It all comes down to what is taken, as compared to what is used. Thats how I have come to choose what system performs.

The left cannot support their lifestyle.

They take far more than they give when you get down to it.

That is why exactly that I feel members other than Lenins friends know that if they succeed in shifting the government over to morbid largesse they will destroy the USofA.

Maybe I can have a gourmet lunch provided to my districts kids at the taxpayers expense.

Its amazing how natural and simple the left claims to endeavor for, yet they are the most expensive game in town.

Sonosam on February 13, 2008 at 4:26 PM

What would you call people who actively try to block the recruiting efforts of the U.S. Armed Forces during a time of war?

amerpundit on February 13, 2008 at 4:25 PM

rabid dogs.

scalleywag on February 13, 2008 at 4:26 PM

The heck with getting mad at the donks. Get mad at the GOP!

Please don’t tell me that 45 senators, standing on the steps of the Capitol, shaking their fists, ISN’T gonna cause a stink and embarrassment for the Donks! Where the hell are OUR politicians? Screw the Queensbury rules. There needs to be some heel grinding. What? They are manning the phones? ‘Oh dear, we are trying!’…..Trying my fat fanny!

If you can’t tell I’m a tad bit POd.

Limerick on February 13, 2008 at 4:26 PM

The good news is that Mary Landrieu is coming up for reelection.

highhopes on February 13, 2008 at 4:26 PM

Yes, and this time it’ll be a lot tougher (especially with Jindal in office) to get out the bio-challenged vote!

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 4:27 PM

The bill is cosponsored by 10 senators including Republican leaders Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) and John Cornyn (R-Texas). U.S. Congressman John Campbell (R-California) introduced a companion bill in the House of Representatives and now has 71 cosponsors, including Republican leaders John Boehner (R-Ohio), Roy Blunt (R-Missouri), and nine other members of the California delegation.

But not Senators McCain, Obama, or Clinton. Fascinating. One of the three of them will be in charge of the military by this time next year and the bastards don’t have an opinon on this? Just proves that McCain is as much of a political coward as the rest of them and doesn’t deserve the honor of being CINC any more than the spouse of a Vietnam-era draft dodger.

highhopes on February 13, 2008 at 4:30 PM

Dodd (D-CT): No Position Issued.
Durbin (D-Ill): Forwarded to Voice Mail
Feingold (D-WI): No Position Issued.

amerpundit on February 13, 2008 at 4:31 PM

Code Pink reminds me of rabid dogs.
scalleywag on February 13, 2008 at 4:23 PM

Quit insulting “rabid dogs”

franksalterego on February 13, 2008 at 4:31 PM

The fact that people are calling is bound to make them nervous. Word’s getting out – the girl at Barbara Boxer’s office seems very uneasy.

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 4:32 PM

Dodd (D-CT): No Position Issued.
Durbin (D-Ill): Forwarded to Voice Mail
Feingold (D-WI): No Position Issued.

This type of answer is going to make it hard to find the holder. What’s up with these Senators? Cowardly.

TX Mom on February 13, 2008 at 4:32 PM

I called Amy Klobuchar’s(D-MN) office…. I was told no one there is aware if she did the anonymous hold or not. I will say, though, that the individual I talked to, felt that Berkeley should be ashamed but he wasn’t speaking for Klobuchump. She willingly signed that letter to Clear Channel regarding Rush and has voted for all liberal leaning immigration issues. What can you expect in MN?

MNDavenotPC on February 13, 2008 at 4:33 PM

Scum, that`s all that I need to say about that.

It’s not what you say but what you do that defines you, Harry.

Parapraising from Batman Begins? :)

ThePrez on February 13, 2008 at 4:34 PM

FYI Guys:

The Senators who co-sponsored this legislation. McCain’s one of those AWOL in supporting our troops so please let’s dispense that he is a better choice to lead our troops. He isn’t when he refuses to stand up for Marines by harassed on American soil by the fifth columnist of the Democrat party.

Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina), Saxby Chambliss (R-Georgia), Tom Coburn, M.D. (R-Oklahoma), John Cornyn (R-Texas), James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma), and David Vitter (R-Louisiana) introduced the Semper Fi Act of 2008. The bill would rescind over $2 million in hidden earmarks for Berkeley, California in the 2008 Omnibus Appropriations bill, and transfer the funds to the Marine Corps. U.S. Congressman John Campbell (R-California) is introducing a companion bill in the House of Representatives.

highhopes on February 13, 2008 at 4:34 PM

Quit insulting “rabid dogs”

franksalterego on February 13, 2008 at 4:31 PM

You’re right…I saw pics of Pinkers online today…sorry to rabid dogs everywhere.

scalleywag on February 13, 2008 at 4:34 PM

The most “Honest” congress in history continues its work.

Thank you Harry and Nancy.

azcop on February 13, 2008 at 4:36 PM

I say we go paint Harry Reid’s office a lovely shade of PINK

scalleywag on February 13, 2008 at 4:36 PM

What would you call people who actively try to block the recruiting efforts of the U.S. Armed Forces during a time of war?

amerpundit on February 13, 2008 at 4:25 PM

I’m pretty sure I’d get banned if I unloaded on these Berkeley people.

LimeyGeek on February 13, 2008 at 4:37 PM

I was just told that Matt, at Barbara Boxer’s office, will have the answer, but he’s not in.

After the last time, I’m sure they learned to delay and obfuscate, but we really can’t let them off the hook for this.

Can’t wait to see them start griping about the calls on the Capitolist

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 4:37 PM

Cowards.

No.

Collaborators

How about a**holes? Doesn’t that sound more like them?

RWLA on February 13, 2008 at 4:39 PM

Laura, I am sure it was Reid, Boxer, Pelosi and a few namesless twits. If there IS a Republican who decided to do this… you know I am just going to have to call.

Look at the Congress and Thomas Site now, and can’t even find it on the “Calendar” when it will be coming back up.

upinak on February 13, 2008 at 4:40 PM

Feinstein (D-CA): Lady knew the bill, said no position has been issued.
Harkin (D-IA): No position issued.

Kennedy’s foreign policy department (don’t ask) says he hasn’t made a decision yet.

Kerry’s office said “No, he’s not signed on as a co-sponsor”. Not sure if that simply means he hasn’t taken a position, but it was at least a variation.

amerpundit on February 13, 2008 at 4:40 PM

I don’t care what their individual qualifications are.

I will never, ever again vote for a Democrat for any elected office.

They are the party of deceit and treachery. They’ve shown me all I need to see.

Like David Limbaugh’s book title:

Bankrupt.

Hawkins1701 on February 13, 2008 at 4:41 PM

highhopes on February 13, 2008 at 4:34 PM

Semper Fi Act S2596 PCS

upinak on February 13, 2008 at 4:42 PM

Laura, I am sure it was Reid, Boxer, Pelosi and a few namesless twits.

upinak, I’m sure too, but outing the person who placed the hold is beneficial for a number of reasons. We can probably shame that person into lifting the hold and letting this proceed, it’s a well-deserved political smack upside the head, and it’s also a good reminder that they work for us, not the other way around.

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 4:43 PM

For those pursuing this, there are 2 bills, one in the house and one in the Senate. But I think they are both mute now because Berkeley isn’t taking action against the Marines.

bnelson44 on February 13, 2008 at 4:44 PM

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 4:43 PM

Laura I am looking, but nothing yet on who did what if anything. Sometimes the Lib of Congress screws up.

I have made a nice little call to my Senators and my Congressman… they (their office) all say they support it … I said get on the bill then.. OR ELSE!

upinak on February 13, 2008 at 4:45 PM

bnelson, does Code Pink still have the parking space and can they block the door with impunity?

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 4:45 PM

OK my ‘Senator’ has been contacted.
….
Dear Senator,

I am writing to try to get the GOP to stop looking at the ground and start staring the DEMs in the eye.

I am aware that you are a sponsor of the Sempre Fi Act. That is wonderful. I salute you on that….

But where is the party? The Dems ‘block’ the legislation and the party moans? The heck with that…there needs to be 45 senators on the steps of the Capitol shaking their fists. The media will IGNORE you unless you do. The public will NOT BE INFORMED of the Dems trickery….UNLESS THE GOP TAKES THE ISSUE DIRECTLY TO THE PUBLIC!

I am completely livid over the Dems actions, but I am even more livid over the INACTION OF THE GOP TO FIGHT BACK!

Please. This isn’t the time to think about the Queensbury rules. It is time to grind some heels!!!!!!

xxxx xxxxx
xxxxx, TX

Limerick on February 13, 2008 at 4:46 PM

bnelson, does Code Pink still have the parking space and can they block the door with impunity?

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 4:45 PM

Don’t know, but what does that have to do with the price of tea in china? I know a bunch of nuts who have parking places that other city councils allow them to have. That is a local issue. We look like fools trying to make a federal case out of parking places.

bnelson44 on February 13, 2008 at 4:47 PM

I just got off the phone with senator klobuchar from MN and talked to her staff people and told them that if it is her to knock it off and if it isn’t her to get in touch with one responsible and knock off the B.S. God, I hate these people.

cjs1943 on February 13, 2008 at 4:48 PM

Leahy (D-VT): No position
McCaskill (D-MO): Hasn’t taken a look yet.
Menendez (D-NJ): Not a sponsor, she can keep me updated.

amerpundit on February 13, 2008 at 4:49 PM

it’s also a good reminder that they work for us, not the other way around

This is always a good thing to remind them of. However, “working for us” does not mean that they are our lackeys. They serve us within the bounds of the constitution – something (I previously have argued) that this DeMint bill strays from.

For what it’s worth, I always look askance at bills with gung-ho names – “Semper Fi Act”, “Patriot Act”, “F’ing Awesome America Act”

LimeyGeek on February 13, 2008 at 4:50 PM

That is a local issue. We look like fools trying to make a federal case out of parking places.

bnelson44 on February 13, 2008 at 4:47 PM

A local issue? They’re trying to block recruiting efforts of the U.S. Armed Forces during a time of war, and officially called U.S. Marines unwelcome invaders.

amerpundit on February 13, 2008 at 4:50 PM

By the way, McCain is against all earmarks and would veto any bill with earmarks which crosses his desk as president.

bnelson44 on February 13, 2008 at 4:51 PM

A local issue? They’re trying to block recruiting efforts of the U.S. Armed Forces during a time of war, and officially called U.S. Marines unwelcome invaders.

amerpundit on February 13, 2008 at 4:50 PM

The Berkeley council isn’t restricting the Marines any more. So that is why the bills are mute. If they were, I would say, go for it.

Earmarks are something we should all be against anyway.

bnelson44 on February 13, 2008 at 4:53 PM

This bill should go forward, full steam ahead, regardless of an apology or not. The cowardcrats will find a way to do an end around if any Republican balks. Reid is the biggest liar of them all and is a disgrace to his office.

oakpack on February 13, 2008 at 4:53 PM

Berkeley doesn’t need the federal funding… take a look at the city’s finacial statement… 360 million in assets! Why should we give anyone money that they already have available?

http://webserver.ci.berkeley.ca.us/uploadedFiles/Finance/Level_3_-_General/CompleteCAFR2006.pdf

I like the part in the intro about following Kyoto.

m1a1usmc on February 13, 2008 at 4:55 PM

Names. I want names!

awake on February 13, 2008 at 4:56 PM

This bill should go forward, full steam ahead, regardless of an apology or not.

oakpack on February 13, 2008 at 4:53 PM

Michelle’s post today pointed out that the city refused to officially apologize, with only a few council members doing so. SFChron:

In a separate vote, the council decided not to issue a public apology for its action last month.

amerpundit on February 13, 2008 at 4:57 PM

MNDavenotPC on February 13, 2008 at 4:33 PM

I don’t expect much.

cjs1943 on February 13, 2008 at 4:57 PM

I don’t care what their individual qualifications are.

I will never, ever again vote for a Democrat for any elected office.

They are the party of deceit and treachery. They’ve shown me all I need to see.

Like David Limbaugh’s book title:

Bankrupt.

Hawkins1701 on February 13, 2008 at 4:41 PM

I gave up on the Dems for good and non-conservative representation after one of my relatives (who had been in a military barracks once in her life) told me (I had served in the Regular Army component for seven years, and in the ARNG component for 3 years) that she “understood” what barracks-life was like, and that things would work themselves out. During the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” furor back in the ’90s, BTW.

And don’t even get me started on Fritz Hollings!

dmh0667 on February 13, 2008 at 5:00 PM

m1a1usmc on February 13, 2008 at 4:55 PM

How about the Border? Did you notice what the guys name was who is sponsering the “No Wall on Border”? And this guy is also in charge of the Peace (Police) and the Schools (Organice lunches!) ….. hmmmm I wonder where the organic food is coming from? Makes me wonder what this guys motive is? Makes me wonder if he is in breach with their “Code of Ethics” they have on their site too!

Ok back to my Cup o’ dehydrated noodles w/MSG! Organic school lunches.. geesh

upinak on February 13, 2008 at 5:01 PM

The Berkeley council isn’t restricting the Marines any more. So that is why the bills are mute. If they were, I would say, go for it.

Earmarks are something we should all be against anyway.

bnelson44 on February 13, 2008 at 4:53 PM

It’s “moot” not “mute”. As long as Code Pink still has a dedicated parking spot and is still permitted to illegally block the entrance, it’s not moot.

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 5:01 PM

will still allow Code Pink a special parking space in front of the recruitment office to conduct weekly protests.

Hmmm… makes me wonder if.. pro-life organizations should be able to get special parking spaces in front of abortion clinics to conduct weekly protests…

Berkeley has always been synonymous with Idiocy but they’ve really taken the plunge this time.

Note to the Marines: you will always be welcome here in Hanford and Lemoore, CA, home of the Lemoore Naval Air Station and the Strike Fight Wing of the U.S. Pacific Fleet.

jasnell on February 13, 2008 at 5:06 PM

It’s “moot” not “mute

”.

Thanks

As long as Code Pink still has a dedicated parking spot and is still permitted to illegally block the entrance, it’s not moot.

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 5:01 PM

A parking place and blocking the entrance are two different issues. If the city gives them a parking place, that is OK, if the city owns the space and the city council decides to do that. However, if the city prevents the Marines or uses agents to prevent the Marines from conducting their business, they are in violation of the law. They can have all kinds of federal allotments rescinded. The question is, is the city doing that?

bnelson44 on February 13, 2008 at 5:08 PM

What a crock…..here is my ‘bot’ response to my distinguished gentleman in the Senate…
……..
Dear XXXX XXXX,

Thank you for contacting my offices. Your correspondence has been received, and
we will respond to you as quickly as possible. A copy of your message is
attached below for your records.

If you need immediate assistance regarding an urgent problem you are
experiencing with the federal government, visit the “Help With Federal Agencies”
section of the website for details on how to proceed so that your difficulties
are brought to my attention as soon as possible.

If you are seeking information or services from my offices that are NOT related
to my Legislative duties, please visit my “Services For Texans” section for more
information.

Warmest Regards,
U.S. Senator John Cornyn
….

I got some warmest regards for you Senator…..they’ll arrive the next time you come up in the ballot box.

Limerick on February 13, 2008 at 5:08 PM

However, if the city prevents the Marines or uses agents to prevent the Marines from conducting their business, they are in violation of the law. They can have all kinds of federal allotments rescinded. The question is, is the city doing that?

bnelson44 on February 13, 2008 at 5:08 PM

I’ve seen video – probably at Pat Dollard’s – that shows Code Pink physically blocking the door while the cops stand by and let them.

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 5:09 PM

Can you place Freedom of Information Act requests over the phone? Or do you have to use a government office (USPS) to place a request to another government office?

- The Cat

MirCat on February 13, 2008 at 5:10 PM

how in the name of transparency can an ANONYMOUS hold be put on a bill?

ctmom on February 13, 2008 at 5:11 PM

Funny, I can’t seem to trackback… but here’s the list of calls from these comments so far.

Please specifically ask if they deny putting the anonymous hold on S. 2596 – don’t leave them an out.

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 5:11 PM

It’s “moot” not “mute”. As long as Code Pink still has a dedicated parking spot and is still permitted to illegally block the entrance, it’s not moot.

Laura on February 13, 2008 at 5:01 PM

I love it when people say mute. In my head, I have a little chuckle every time I pick up the remote. lol

oakpack on February 13, 2008 at 5:12 PM

Comment pages: 1 2


You must be logged in to post a comment.