Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Quote of the day

posted at 10:57 pm on February 12, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

“And, my friends, I promise you, I am fired up and ready to go.”


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Let’s hope

Lance Murdock on February 12, 2008 at 11:01 PM

Wonder if Hillary feels… marginalized…

elgeneralisimo on February 12, 2008 at 11:01 PM

Do you hear that Barry Hussein? We ain’t ready to surrender yet.

Pax americana on February 12, 2008 at 11:03 PM

democrat voters far outnumbered republican voters again tonight (way more than 2-to-1). it’s not looking good for november.

romney ‘12

darkegop on February 12, 2008 at 11:03 PM

I say again…after hearing Barry tonight…I am on the verge on eating my words about not voting for McCain. IT.IS.ON.

SouthernGent on February 12, 2008 at 11:04 PM

I wish McCain would answer Obama on Iraq this way

“Back in the 1960 and 1970s I layed in a Prison cell in Veitnam only wanting my Freedom back. The Government of the United States didnt abandon me because the war weny bad they stood until they got me out.

As President I wont abandon our troops who risked it all because some dont like this war. We cant abandon our principles for empty promises of change that cause things to go from bad to worse.

Our Cou8ntry needs leadership not slogans. The ability to lead us to better things not empty promises and empty slogans that say nothing and acheive nothing. I didnt survive in Veitnam by listening to political promises I survived because our leadership never gave up on me or anyone else

That my freinds is why we need a leader not an orator”

William Amos on February 12, 2008 at 11:05 PM

McCain is an open borders madman. Believe me. This liar intends to stab all of America in the back.

pat on February 12, 2008 at 11:09 PM

they will BOTH stab us in the back

darkegop on February 12, 2008 at 11:11 PM

I’m right behind ya, Mav.

Let’s roll!

JetBoy on February 12, 2008 at 11:12 PM

btw….what kind of message are ya trying to send with that screencap? Hmmm….

JetBoy on February 12, 2008 at 11:13 PM

William Amos on February 12, 2008 at 11:05 PM

McCain could also point out that he has two sons on active duty. One who has served in Iraq and the other may go. He could say that he understands sacrifice more then Obama ever could. He also understands the threat we face, with his years of experience he knows how to win wars and how to lose them.

Complete7 on February 12, 2008 at 11:14 PM

All talk and no action. When he talks to MEXICO like that, let me know. Until then….YAWN!!!

TOPV on February 12, 2008 at 11:14 PM

Romney still has more delegates than Huck. GO ROMN Screw it, go johnny mac. yeah.

franklinstein on February 12, 2008 at 11:14 PM

McCain could also point out that he has two sons on active duty. One who has served in Iraq and the other may go. He could say that he understands sacrifice more then Obama ever could. He also understands the threat we face, with his years of experience he knows how to win wars and how to lose them.

Complete7 on February 12, 2008 at 11:14 PM

Mc Cain’s new slogan..

Tough on Iraq, selling the country away under you nose.

I’m telling you, the Iraq war talk is getting old when he could care less about the citizens here. Kind of hard to secure them when you have no country to secure.

I’m waiting for his real straign talk when the general comes…

Hey Obama, I can bend over for Mexico faster than you will.

TOPV on February 12, 2008 at 11:17 PM

democrat voters far outnumbered republican voters again tonight (way more than 2-to-1). it’s not looking good for november.

romney ‘12

darkegop on February 12, 2008 at 11:03 PM

Don’t worry to much about turnout at this time, democrats are simply more excited about getting into power. High primary turnout usually does not translate into turnout in the general election. Freddoso explains.

Complete7 on February 12, 2008 at 11:18 PM

Or is it yea. Come on people, we need to figure this out.

franklinstein on February 12, 2008 at 11:22 PM

Don’t worry to much about turnout at this time, democrats are simply more excited about getting into power. High primary turnout usually does not translate into turnout in the general election. Freddoso explains.

Complete7 on February 12, 2008 at 11:18 PM

One problem with that — this is NOT a traditional election season. There is no one running for president from the current administration (a V.P.) — and the race is wide open. In addition, the country’s current mood, especially with Independent voters, is one of cleaning house … if you catch my drift.

eanax on February 12, 2008 at 11:23 PM

BTW here is the rollcall on the Survellance bill before Congress earlier today

AP News

Arizona
Kyl (R) Yes; McCain (R) Yes.
Illinois
Durbin (D) No; Obama (D) Not Voting.
Massachusetts
Kennedy (D) No; Kerry (D) No.
New York
Clinton (D) Not Voting; Schumer (D) No.

Barak Obama “we can change america by not participating !”

William Amos on February 12, 2008 at 11:25 PM

Yeah…..McCain’s war record, however grand, is going land on the public’s ears like Dole’s war record…equally as grand. The public has tuned it out…and the troops know it.
Hard pill to swallow, but the truth. Painful to try to wrap our heads around, but the truth.

When the people close the curtain in the booth they won’t be thinking of war records…they will be thinking ‘what can I get outta this’.

Limerick on February 12, 2008 at 11:26 PM

There is no one running for president from the current administration (a V.P.) — and the race is wide open. In addition, the country’s current mood, especially with Independent voters, is one of cleaning house … if you catch my drift.

Lat time this happened ? 1952

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1952

Incumbent President Harry S. Truman decided not to run, so the Democratic Party instead nominated Governor Adlai Stevenson II of Illinois; Stevenson had gained a reputation in Illinois as an intellectual and eloquent orator. The Republican Party countered with popular war hero General Dwight D. Eisenhower and won in a landslide, ending twenty consecutive years of Democratic control of the White House.

William Amos on February 12, 2008 at 11:27 PM

Help Us, Obi-Won McCaini, you’re our only hope.

Always Right on February 12, 2008 at 11:29 PM

Yeah…..McCain’s war record, however grand, is going land on the public’s ears like Dole’s war record…equally as grand. The public has tuned it out…and the troops know it.
Hard pill to swallow, but the truth. Painful to try to wrap our heads around, but the truth.

When the people close the curtain in the booth they won’t be thinking of war records…they will be thinking ‘what can I get outta this’.

Limerick on February 12, 2008 at 11:26 PM

Bingo again! You get even more bonus points.

eanax on February 12, 2008 at 11:29 PM

BTW americans love divided government McCain should run hard against the democratic congress arguing that we should give the democrats full power but maintain the checks and balances to prevent things from going even further south.

William Amos on February 12, 2008 at 11:30 PM

democrat voters far outnumbered republican voters again tonight (way more than 2-to-1). it’s not looking good for november.

romney ‘12

darkegop on February 12, 2008 at 11:03 PM

Well, I don’t think tonight’s really a great bellwether, though I won’t deny it’ll be a problem. McCain is perceived as the Republican nominee, so I wouldn’t be surprised if many people didn’t turn out because they figured he’s already got it.

I’m telling you, the Iraq war talk is getting old when he could care less about the citizens here. Kind of hard to secure them when you have no country to secure.

I’m waiting for his real straign talk when the general comes…

Hey Obama, I can bend over for Mexico faster than you will.

TOPV on February 12, 2008 at 11:17 PM

We’ve had a pro-amnesty president for 8 years. We fought a pro-amnesty Congress and President, defeated them, and got the bulk of the American people on our side.

I’m no McCainiac, but I’d rather fight McCain’s amnesty a couple of times, with conservatives to counter him in Congress, than have Obama fail to protect out nation with us being helpless.

amerpundit on February 12, 2008 at 11:31 PM

Ugh, screwed the quote up. TOPV’s full quote was:

I’m telling you, the Iraq war talk is getting old when he could care less about the citizens here. Kind of hard to secure them when you have no country to secure.

I’m waiting for his real straign talk when the general comes…

Hey Obama, I can bend over for Mexico faster than you will.

TOPV on February 12, 2008 at 11:17 PM

amerpundit on February 12, 2008 at 11:32 PM

When the people close the curtain in the booth they won’t be thinking of war records…they will be thinking ‘what can I get outta this’.

Limerick on February 12, 2008 at 11:26 PM

I agree with you but I do think that McCain has one good weapon in his arsenal. It is the one factor in his favor that wins my vote. Sorry to repeat myself, but as much as I violently disagree with the man on nearly everything else he comes up with, he does and has made his case on this issue very effectively.

Whether right or wrong (wrong IMHO) the nanny class has managed to make a fetish of Universal Health Care as a way of dealing with the high costs of medical treatment. The peepul are crying out for health-care reform and baby wants that bottle NOW!

If an Obillary becomes president, he/she/it along with a friendly congress will be highly motivated to make CHANGE like you wouldn’t believe and as fast as possible.

The plans being proposed by Obama and Clinton are virtually indistinguishable and will push the public/private ratio of health care funding past its tipping-point*. This will kill private healthcare as an option for most people and will prove to be a one way ticket to Socialized Medicine a la the U.K.

McCain’s proposal is attractive, workable, and free-market based (weirdly enough, given his proclivities) and may be the only way to counter the peepul voting themselves a massive and irreversible expansion of the nanny state.

*I reccomend the Review of Presidential Candidate’s Proposals for Health Reform published by PricewaterhouseCooper’s Health Research Institute in Nov. 2007 (I would link to it but it is a PDF that you need to register for and download.)

Deety on February 12, 2008 at 11:38 PM

When the people close the curtain in the booth they won’t be thinking of war records…they will be thinking ‘what can I get outta this’.

Limerick on February 12, 2008 at 11:26 PM

It’s up to McCain to remind them that when the current adminstration took over, Al Qaeda made its second attack on WTC using coordinated hijackings of American jets. Since then there have been no significant terror attacks here and in Iraq they are reduced to strapping bombs onto women with Down’s Syndrome.

pedestrian on February 12, 2008 at 11:44 PM

eanax on February 12, 2008 at 11:23 PM

Exactly. The way I see it, Dems are excited because they want in. Repubs aren’t excited because they see no way out.

To all the party faithful…be careful of what you wish for……it may be exactly what you get.

I WILL NOT vote for McCain.

Talon on February 12, 2008 at 11:48 PM

When McCain says: “Profits are good and the goal of any responsible corporation or individual”, and,
“America is a sovereign nation who’s borders must remain secure and who’s laws must be enforced”, then and ONLY then will I give him a second look.

And he better convince me that his actions will match his words.

And the next pundit who counsels me to vote party line instead of my beliefs will: 1) get a nasty letter, 2) will never have another of their columns read by me. I already chucked Linda Chavez columns to the side after she called me a racist for being against the Shamnest bill.

I don’t mind finding out what “conservative” columnist/pundits are nothing more than party shills and setting them to /ignore.

Montana on February 12, 2008 at 11:50 PM

The MSM got McCain to where he is now. They can vote for this open borders freak. The choice between a simpleton, Obama, and an angry whore for big business, McCain, is a hard one. So I defer.

pat on February 12, 2008 at 11:56 PM

The GOP elite have shoved McCain down our throats for one issue alone…illegal immigration.

And the GOP elite will get Obillary for it.

Simple as that.

What boggles the mind is why the Bill Crystals/Fred Barnes types can’t figure it out.

Saltysam on February 12, 2008 at 11:59 PM

pedestrian on February 12, 2008 at 11:44 PM

I’d love to live in that world, but I don’t. In 04 the neighbors asked every day how the boy was. In 06 it started tapering off. In 07 it all but disappeared. In 08 I haven’t had a single one of them, when I meet them at the mail boxes, ask how it goes for the soldier. They ask if I’ve seen the electric bill, or the gas. They ask if I have any better insurance quotes then they have. They don’t say a word about AQ, or PAK. They don’t mention Dingy Harry, or his thrall from San Francisco. It is all about their mailbox.

I’m all for this free enterprise, make your own way world. The problem is in our euphoria to build the biggest golden parachute, the $1k stock, and the ’service’ industry, we forgot that most people still go to the mailbox. They don’t have ‘people’ to do it for them. We let the future entrepeneurs wither and die. We set out to make everyone their own man, only we delt away their opportunity to be that. We are to blame for this mess. In our efforts to maximize the profits, we destroyed the source of the income.
Now we get the rewards. Horray for us.

Limerick on February 13, 2008 at 12:03 AM

It McCain’s to lose

Kini on February 13, 2008 at 12:03 AM

Man, if McCain doesn’t engender some sort of enthusiasm, Obama is going to mop the floor with him. If the Right doesn’t get behind McCain solidly and allow him to seriously court the middle, we’ve got 4 years of Obama in our future. 4 years of Obama won’t be like 4 years of Hillary. Hillary could be held in check. Obama probably can’t be. Yikes…

TheBigOldDog on February 13, 2008 at 12:07 AM

BTW americans love divided government McCain should run hard against the democratic congress arguing that we should give the democrats full power but maintain the checks and balances to prevent things from going even further south.

William Amos on February 12, 2008 at 11:30 PM

Soooooo….where would the division be? McCain/Kennedy? McCain/Feingold? Campaign Finance Reform? Waterboarding as torture?

DfDeportation on February 13, 2008 at 12:10 AM

The only significant vote many have left is their “non-vote”. The GOP elite/hierarchy have become so totally blinded and deluded by their own arrogance. Several today (even Newt) have put forth the numbers comparing the # of dem’s who’ve voted and the numbers who’ve voted gop so far in the primaries. The gop voter numbers are significantly and alarmingly low compared to the dem numbers. Which says one thing: the former gop base is voting by “not voting”. They’re staying at home. Just like they did on 11/7/06 only more so. I don’t say I agree w/them but I can sypathize and understand why. DD

Darvin Dowdy on February 13, 2008 at 12:10 AM

There sure was a lot of I will, I will , I will in there…but everything is what McShamnesty will do, but not one word that implied he was goint to do the will fo the people who voted him in…just what HE wants…and HE WILL try to persuade you…
Forget the WoT, forget IRaq, for national security…hello Mexiamerica (and you will have voted for it)…

TOPV on February 13, 2008 at 12:11 AM

What boggles the mind is why the Bill Crystals/Fred Barnes types can’t figure it out.

Saltysam on February 12, 2008 at 11:59 PM

It’s because they just know that they are wiser and better informed than the childish hoi-polloi like you and I and that after they chide us for throwing a temper-tantrum we will become biddable again and defer to their vastly more sophisticated world view.

Deety on February 13, 2008 at 12:12 AM

Just think of what Obama’s cabinet would look like and his Supreme Court picks; that should motivate you.

michaelo on February 13, 2008 at 12:12 AM

Watch the person in front of you and when he drops off the cliff you’ll know that you’re a lemming heading for the big fall. You’ve nominated the person the Democrats chose for you and made sure that Hillary or Obama are inevitable. Remember the John McCain that had his lips firmly attached to Teddy Kennedy’s backside a few months ago? That’s exactly who you’re nominating and exactly why the GOP isn’t going to control Congress or the White House for a long long time. Everytime you have to press 2 for Spanish remember this post.

Buzzy on February 13, 2008 at 12:13 AM

Help Us, Obi-Won McCaini, you’re our only hope.

Always Right on February 12, 2008 at 11:29 PM

You have no idea how depressing that is to me.

jwp1964 on February 13, 2008 at 12:16 AM

McCain needs to counter with something like:

“Let us remember, and remember it well, that it was a Republican Administration which prevented ANY further terrorist attacks after the Islamists’ cowardly strike on 9/11. There have been NONE. Think about that for a second. This does not happen by accident. It is the sign of a steadfast and clear-sighted response to a deadly and devious enemy. And, if you elect me, I vow to continue this strong record, and to keep taking the fight to the jihadists so they will not be able to bring it back to us.

“My opponents would have had us running scared for the past 7 years, throwing in every towel they get their paws on, coddling our enemies, and undermining our fine military’s ability to continue to win against this brutal and ruthless enemy.

Change is an attractive abstraction, but America needs something more substantial than such a tissue of “hope”. We need the sinews of strength, leadership, courage, and experience. And, most of all, the will to win.

“I will bring that spirit to the Oval Office. Because now is not the time to gamble on pleasant-sounding wishes but to face the reality of the world as it is. And show it America’s greatness once again.”

Obama’s campaign balloons have more substance than Barack.
Let him chew on something like this in reply to his vacuous platitudes.

profitsbeard on February 13, 2008 at 12:17 AM

I wish McCain would answer Obama on Iraq this way

“Back in the 1960 and 1970s I layed in a Prison cell in Veitnam only wanting my Freedom back. The Government of the United States didnt abandon me because the war weny bad they stood until they got me out.

As President I wont abandon our troops who risked it all because some dont like this war. We cant abandon our principles for empty promises of change that cause things to go from bad to worse.

Our Cou8ntry needs leadership not slogans. The ability to lead us to better things not empty promises and empty slogans that say nothing and acheive nothing. I didnt survive in Veitnam by listening to political promises I survived because our leadership never gave up on me or anyone else

That my freinds is why we need a leader not an orator”

William Amos on February 12, 2008 at 11:05 PM

Fantastic

KBird on February 13, 2008 at 12:22 AM

No Republicans in any numbers in my State will vote for McCain. I have yet to meet a single McCain supporter. Obama, Hillary supporters are a dime a dozen. Giuliani, Romney. Easy to find.
I DON’T KNOW A SINGLE PERSON WHO IS IN FAVOR OF THIS OPEN BORDER LOON.
I don’t get it.

pat on February 13, 2008 at 12:23 AM

I can’t believe some of you are crazy enough to think this bitter old man still has a chance. They should change the name of the GOP to the Gray Old Prune party! You think that they couldn’t come up with someone who is younger, smarter, a better speaker, and….oh, A REPUBLICAN!?! This crap about the Gray Old Prunes constantly nominating the next person in line to the throne has got to stop. How are we ever going to run a younger, sharper, less corrupt person until it stops?

McCain is taking George Soros money, who I don’t think anyone would argue with would destroy this country in a second if he could, and he still has Juan Hernandez on his team who is trying to get the US to annex the southwest to Mexico. It appears he is willing to make that trade if it gets him the oval office.

Bikerken on February 13, 2008 at 12:26 AM

It’s because they just know that they are wiser and better informed than the childish hoi-polloi like you and I and that after they chide us for throwing a temper-tantrum we will become biddable again and defer to their vastly more sophisticated world view.

Deety on February 13, 2008 at 12:12 AM

Yes.

But, what I mean is:

If McCain’s strategy is to court the squishy middle, then take a strong stance on illegal immigration.

The brain dead political center doesn’t have the attention span to understand McCain-Feingold, Harriet Myers, The Gang of 14 Debacle etc…

But, they can sure as hell wrap their brain around the problems created by an illegal labor pool.

Crystal and Barnes? Clueless.

Saltysam on February 13, 2008 at 12:50 AM

But, they can sure as hell wrap their brain around the problems created by an illegal labor pool.

Crystal and Barnes? Clueless.

Saltysam on February 13, 2008 at 12:50 AM

Yeah….the Curia looks great from the steps….but from the rostra in the Comita it looks like hell.

Limerick on February 13, 2008 at 12:53 AM

I think the graphic says it all.

RESCUE

We’re gonna need it.

Kini on February 13, 2008 at 12:56 AM

Limerick on February 13, 2008 at 12:53 AM

And that reminds me…

This election seems more like a coordinated Senatorial power grab for executive authority. Beware the ides of March…

Saltysam on February 13, 2008 at 1:23 AM

I don’t know which would be worse, four years of HildaBeast’s cackle or four years of Juan Plantaion McForkedTouque’s, “My friends”.

Aaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrggggggggg !!!

MB4 on February 13, 2008 at 2:00 AM

I wish McCain would answer Obama on Iraq this way

“Back in the 1960 and 1970s I layed in a Prison cell in Veitnam only wanting my Freedom back. The Government of the United States didnt abandon me because the war weny bad they stood until they got me out.

As President I wont abandon our troops who risked it all because some dont like this war. We cant abandon our principles for empty promises of change that cause things to go from bad to worse.

Our Cou8ntry needs leadership not slogans. The ability to lead us to better things not empty promises and empty slogans that say nothing and acheive nothing. I didnt survive in Veitnam by listening to political promises I survived because our leadership never gave up on me or anyone else

That my freinds is why we need a leader not an orator”

William Amos on February 12, 2008 at 11:05 PM

That was wonderful!! I totally agree and would love to use it and of course give you credit.
McCain could use Tom Petty’s song with it, “I won’t back down”.

Conservatives R Us on February 13, 2008 at 3:06 AM

McCain is an open borders madman. Believe me. This liar intends to stab all of America in the back.

pat on February 12, 2008 at 11:09 PM

they will BOTH stab us in the back

darkegop on February 12, 2008 at 11:11 PM

McCain would stab you in the back.

Obama would stab you in the heart, looking you straight in the eye. I remind you that Obama (and Hillary) voted against the confirmation of both Roberts and Alito.

McCain/Obama would stab you in:
Amnesty
Judicial Nominations
etc., etc.

The candiatate who will stand strong on these issues and not stab conservatives in the back?
Mike Huckabee.

Huckabee/Thompson defeats Obama/Edwards in November

ITookTheRedPill on February 13, 2008 at 3:35 AM

Obama would stab you in the heart, looking you straight in the eye

with a smile on his face, saying, “I HOPE you like this CHANGE!”

I remind you that Obama (and Hillary) voted against the confirmation of both Roberts and Alito.

And that McCain said Alito is “too conservative“.

Huckabee/Thompson defeats Obama/Edwards this November

ITookTheRedPill on February 13, 2008 at 3:40 AM

I’ve seen “conservatives” here say they voted for Hillary Rodham Clinton yesterday, and HebrewToYou said he will vote for Obama even though he says he wants a conservative candidate who will

nominate conservative judges. I don’t ask for much

That’s a CINO talking right there. A Conservative In Name Only, who will vote for a Democrat Senator who voted against Roberts and Alito.

And for those of you who voted for Hillary, check her vote on both of those nominations.

ITookTheRedPill on February 13, 2008 at 5:00 AM

At least Huck signed Sen Jeff Sessions immigration pledge, McCain refused.
stenwin77 on February 12, 2008 at 6:41 PM

He signed statements when his past failed to fall in line with his current position. He originally said opposition to McCain’s amnesty was partially driven by racism.
amerpundit on February 12, 2008 at 6:43 PM

Huck said it because it’s true. It is a true statement that at least some of the people against Amnesty actually are racist and don’t like Hispanics. Not a majority, just some. So to say that opposition to McCain’s amnesty was partially driven by racism is an absolutely true statement.

ITookTheRedPill on February 13, 2008 at 5:07 AM

CINOs who vote for Democrats, whether it be for Hillary in a primary or for Obama in the general, have Taken The Blue Pill.

Y’all are the ones on drugs!

ITookTheRedPill on February 13, 2008 at 5:10 AM

this election comes down to this:

If you have to shoot yourself in the foot, what do you choose to do it with, a Daisy air rifle (BB Gun) or a sawed off shotgun.

The air rifle will sting for a little while but at least you won’t blow your toes off.

Pcoop on February 13, 2008 at 7:43 AM

Huckabee has said a lot of things about illegal immigration. Many of them make no sense. How about his comment that it’s payback for slavery? (I’d love to hear his explanation for that ludicrous statement). Or how about how his “soul” wouldn’t let him enforce anti-illegal immigration laws in Arkansas? Or how about how he enticed the Mexican government to set up a consulate in Little Rock by offering them a $1 a year lease? Or his decision to give in-state tuition rates and gov’t-funded scholarships to illegal aliens? Or his statement that a law requiring voters to show photo identification before voting was “un-American and un-Christian”?

Huckabee talks tough on illegal immigration now, but his record as Arkansas governor tells a very different story. His current stance on illegal immigration is nothing more than a political strategy to try and position himself as a “real conservative”; it’s not based on any principled beliefs. I’m inclined to judge Huckabee more on what he’s actually done in office, rather than on what he now says he’ll do. Promises — especially campaign promises — are easily broken.

AZCoyote on February 13, 2008 at 7:50 AM

Hard to believe that vile dinosaur is fired up about anything except sticking it to the conservatives in his own party. Frankly I don’t know what is worse four years of being called “friend” by a clear enemy of my values or Hillary Clinton’s cackle. I simply can’t stand to listen to even five minutes of McCains lies and he expects me to vote for him in November?

Bottom line, McCain won last night but also proved his weakness. Conservatives are not buying his utter load of crap and McCain has yet to figure out a way to “fire up” his base. Granted the anti-Christian crowd is thrilled to have one of their own in the limelight but that isn’t how the GOP gets mobilized to beat back Clinton or Obama.

Sean Hannity probably said it best. Why is it a man who is so proud of “reaching across” the aisle to work with (Obama supporter) Kennedy and (impeachment activist) Feingold so loathe to reach across his own party and work with conservatives. Perhaps one of you that keeps telling everybody to shut up support this rat bastard traitor could answer that one- “friend.”

highhopes on February 13, 2008 at 8:21 AM

I think there are going to be a lot of Clinton supporters on the other side that would rather see McCain elected than Obama. My wife has already said that she was either going to vote Clinton or whoever gets the Republican nom. She considers Obama too inexperienced.

Also think about the Hispanic vote. Cuban Che flags might go over well with the Rage Against The Machine crowd, but not much else.

BohicaTwentyTwo on February 13, 2008 at 8:26 AM

The dems almost doubled the primary turn out in 1988 too. Remember President Dukakis?

TOPV is an Obama fellator, so it’s on ignore.

funky chicken on February 13, 2008 at 8:33 AM

Is this what more than 300 millions people have to offer?

Is America bankrupt?

Can’t we find an honest, experienced with a record of successes, ready to lead, conservative or even a liberal?!?!

Can’t we have on elections-year a candidate who don’t change positions just to be elected?

Out of 300 millions, none?

These people who are running on both parties, are they the best of what America has to offer?

Who is to blame?

I blame the stupid, uninformed, “feel good,” racists, bigots, “regular” voters who make up their mind without researching and analyzing each candidate, but rather vote according to the “look,” the “feel good about him/her,” the “he’s/she’s one of us,” the “I like him/her.”

As I wrote previously, only the American people will destroy America, not the Islamic terrorism, not China, not Iran, not Russia.

It is so depressing.

I hate to see America going down the drain by the hands of her own people, something the Founding Fathers would’ve never imagined it could happen.

Here’s a look at one of McCain’s liberal voting record, just to stick to the subject of that topic:

When Obama, Clinton and McCain Decisively Agreed

By Terence P. Jeffrey

CNSNews.com Editor in Chief

February 13, 2008

One thing Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and John McCain all have in common is that they voted to give retroactive Social Security benefits to illegal aliens who committed document fraud.

Indeed, McCain voted for it before he was against it.

On May 18, 2006, when the immigration reform proposal advocated by McCain was on the Senate floor, Sen. John Ensign of Nevada offered an amendment.

As written, the bill immunized illegal aliens from being prosecuted for document fraud, including using a stolen, or a fake, Social Security number. Additionally, the bill did not stop the current practice of allowing aliens who are eventually granted permanent legal residency to go back and claim credit with the Social Security Administration for work they did as an illegal.

Thus, the immigration reform proposal advocated by McCain in 2006 would not only have added millions of illegal aliens to Social Security rolls, it would have protected these aliens from being prosecuted for fraudulently using other people’s Social Security numbers.

Ensign sought to buffer the blow of this double-barreled attack on fiscal responsibility and the rule of law. His amendment let stand the provision granting illegal aliens immunity from prosecution for document fraud, but it denied them the ability to claim Social Security benefits based on work they did while fraudulently using someone else’s-or a fabricated-Social Security number.

When Ensign’s amendment came up, McCain tried to seize the moral high ground by suggesting supporters of Ensign’s amendment were trying to confiscate someone’s “nest egg.” “If this amendment is enacted,” he said in a floor speech, “the nest egg that these immigrants have worked hard for would be taken from them and their families.”

“I believe the amendment is wrong,” McCain said.

Ensign did not “calm down” and go away. “Is he aware that it is a felony to use someone else’s Social Security number?” Ensign asked of McCain.

“I am aware of that,” McCain said.

“Under this legislation, we forgive that felony,” said Ensign. “We grant amnesty for that felony.”

Now, the Straight Talker double-talked. “Under this legislation,” McCain responded, “we allow the illegal immigrants a path to citizenship which, if they are convicted of felonies or misdemeanors, according to an amendment, then they would be ineligible to embark on that path to earn citizenship”

Ensign neatly parsed this evasion. “Right,” said Ensign. “But … in Sections 601 and 614 of the legislation, it actually ensures that aliens who receive legal status cannot be prosecuted for document fraud, including the false use of Social Security numbers. Is the senator aware of that?”

At this point, McCain had no recourse but to admit he was proposing amnesty from document-fraud prosecution for illegal aliens whom he would put on the path to citizenship. “The senator is aware that when people come here illegally, obviously, they do not have citizenship, so, therefore, any Social Security number they use, whether it belongs to someone else or is entirely invented, is not valid,” McCain said.

Shortly, McCain also implicitly conceded that Ensign’s amendment would not deprive anybody of a “nest egg” they had saved-and explicitly stated that it was his intention to give illegal aliens Social Security benefits, which they had no reason to expect, for work they did here illegally.

“Of course they didn’t expect to receive benefits they had to pay here illegally,” said McCain. “The whole thrust of this legislation is to give them not only Social Security benefits but, as importantly, the protections under the law, as they now live in the shadows and are exploited and mistreated in many cases.”

Ensign, by contrast, was trying to protect U.S. citizens from paying taxes to provide retroactive Social Security benefits to illegal aliens who had exploited the government’s non-enforcement of both the immigration and document fraud laws.

Ensign’s amendment lost by one vote. Obama, Clinton and McCain voted against it.

On Jan. 5, one of the taxpayers Ensign was trying to protect asked McCain a question at a town hall meeting in Peterborough, N.H. He was a legal immigrant from India. “I’m a proud American, and I don’t understand, for the love of me, Republicans and Democrats calling illegal immigrants guest workers and providing for them and allowing them all kinds of services,” the man said, according to The Associated Press. “And I’m given to understand you endorse some of them.”

McCain was indignant. “I do not support, nor would I ever support, any services provided to someone who came to this country illegally, nor would I ever and have never supported Social Security benefits for people who are in this country illegally, that is absolutely false.”

Unfortunately, no one in Peterborough had the parliamentary privilege to ask the senator to yield.

(Terry Jeffrey is the editor in chief of CNSNews.com.)

Indy Conservative on February 13, 2008 at 8:36 AM

Wow… I guess I’m kinda rude…

But putting McCain in front of a jet to make this statement… after he managed to LOOSE FIVE during his flying days… does not add credibility to his statement.

Romeo13 on February 13, 2008 at 9:30 AM

I pretty much swore I wasn’t going to vote for McCain in the general election… and I’m still not a fan of his, especially considering how many times he has poked his finger in the eyes of conservatives… BUT, we absolutely can’t have Obama (or Hillary) in the White House.

We really do have to come together on the Republican side and hold our noses… and pull the lever for McCain.

Nineball on February 13, 2008 at 10:01 AM

He needs to keep saying this over and over.

The Dems want “Change”, while the rest of us want someone who is fired up and ready to go. We don;t need a warmed up ’60s social movement, we need someone who is going to fight Islam and protect our liberty and freedom.

Hening on February 13, 2008 at 10:01 AM

We really do have to come together on the Republican side and hold our noses… and pull the lever for McCain.

Nineball on February 13, 2008 at 10:01 AM

You’ve got that exactly backwards. If John McCain wants to be President, he needs to hold his nose and cross over and substantively address the issues where conservatives take exception to his record and positions.

John McCain thinks he can win this election without the conservative vote. That may or may not be true but he needs grassroots Republicans out there in conservative states knocking on doors, stuffing envelopes, and otherwise supporting his candidacy and he may be “fired up” but they sure as heck aren’t. It’s up to McCain to prove he is worthy of my vote instead of this demand that I vote for the vile RINO as a default candidate.

highhopes on February 13, 2008 at 10:26 AM

Ensign’s amendment lost by one vote. Obama, Clinton and McCain voted against it.

Indy Conservative on February 13, 2008 at 8:36 AM

Don’t you know he was a war hero. Yeah, and he was a POW. blah blah blah….

I’m so sick to my stomach with how stupid the Great Political Center is.

Saltysam on February 13, 2008 at 10:37 AM

Let’s play with a scenario for a moment.

POTUS proposes this:

I’ve talked to Barack a lot about his Patriot Corporation Act, which is not trade per se, but it’s certainly part of the economic package around globalization.
The Patriot Corporation Act has not gotten the attention that I would hope it would. But, basically it says that if you play by the rules, if you pay decent wages, health benefits, pension; do your production here; don’t resist unionization on neutral card check, then you will be designated a “Patriot Corporation” and you will get tax advantages and some [preference] on government contracts.
There is so much here that’s profoundly objectionable. On card check, it’s “patriotic” to support the elimination of the secret ballot in the workplace? It’s “patriotic” to pay an employee $14 an hour, but not $13.83? Play by the rules? What does that mean?

Conservative Republican congressmen mount a resistance. Unfortunately they are the minority party in congress, so they have to get votes from conservative and moderate democrats.

Will they be able to attract moderate democrats’ opposition to a Dem POTUS or a GOP POTUS more easily? Think about the pressure the dem caucus will exert on its members. Is the dem leadership going to permit their folks to join the GOP opposition if there is a dem POTUS?

Oh, and McCain ain’t gonna propose a “patriot company act” anyway, but Obama is a cosponsor on the one that is already there.

funky chicken on February 13, 2008 at 10:40 AM

Wonder if Hillary feels… marginalized…
elgeneralisimo on February 12, 2008 at 11:01 PM

EUTHANIZED

maverick muse on February 13, 2008 at 10:40 AM

“I’m fired up and ready to go”

Go back and you’ll find McCain and others said it long before Obamania was conceived.

maverick muse on February 13, 2008 at 10:43 AM

But putting McCain in front of a jet to make this statement… after he managed to LOOSE FIVE during his flying days… does not add credibility to his statement.

Romeo13 on February 13, 2008 at 9:30 AM

You do know that one of those five aircraft was one destroyed in the USS Forrestal fire that killed 134 sailors. You disgust me for using their deaths as a prop to smear McCain. FOAD.

BohicaTwentyTwo on February 13, 2008 at 12:03 PM

BohicaTwentyTwo on February 13, 2008 at 12:03 PM

Not taking sides here but how is that anymore disgusting than McCain’s use of his POW status throughout his political career?

Don’t get me wrong, I have nothing but the highest respect for McCain’s military service despite I find the man to be a worthless troll when it comes to politics. Nevertheless, doesn’t this constant self-generated hero talk by McCain dishonor the POWs and MIAs who didn’t make it home? There is something unseemly in the way McCain keeps pointing out that he was a POW. And, before you pig pile, I had the same complaint about John Kerry four years ago.

highhopes on February 13, 2008 at 1:13 PM

highhopes on February 13, 2008 at 1:13 PM

Because there is absolutely no reason to suggest John McCain was responsible for the USS Forrestal fire.

About 10:50, while preparations for a second strike were being made, a Zuni rocket was accidentally fired from an F-4 Phantom II by an electrical power surge during the switch from external power to internal power. It flew across the flight deck, striking a wing-mounted external fuel tank on an A-4 Skyhawk, either Aircraft No. 405 piloted by LCDR Fred D. White or No. 416 piloted by LCDR John McCain, which was waiting to launch.

This is not about attacking McCain’s military service or about McCain using his POW status as a campaign platform. This is about trying to place the blame of a tragic incident on someone for political reasons.

Regarding Kerry, I think it was less about his military service, but his actions upon arriving home that got him in the most hot water.

BohicaTwentyTwo on February 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.