Sugar daddy scrapbooking kits. Rich sugar daddy. Meaning of sugar daddy. Sugar daddy cards. Be my sugar daddy. Agy sugar daddy. Sugar daddy. I need a sugar daddy….

How do you sqare this:

(the same goes for Huckabee, for that matter, whose social conservatism is solid while he lacks on the economic and national security fronts)

with Huckabee’s record on clemencies and pardons?
Isn’t “law and order” part of social con cred?

Gingrich behind the scenes, and Thompson and Romney front and center. Imagine the best of both worlds: We need to remake the GOP, getting rid of the Trent Lotts, the Mel Martinez’s and the John McCains from leadership positions. The only way that will happen is to lose the presidency.

However, the liberals could do so much damage in even two years, much less four, that we need to retake the legislature.

If McCain wins the presidency, his poll numbers will be about 10% good. The media will tell him it is because he isn’t liberal enough, and the GOP RINO old guard will believe it. It will pull the GOP so far left we will end up with a liberal party (GOP) and a socialist party (Dems), and they will “compromise” us right into Animal Farm.

So we need to lose the presidency, and win at least one house, if not now, then in two years at the latest. Yes, we may get some half-baked judges, but if the GOP in power in the senate has the cajones of Gingrich, we can block the real fruitcakes. Imperfect scenario, but we need to look ahead 50 years and decide what action or situation now would be best for then.

Chair of the GOP.

WH Chief of Staff.

Sec Treas.

THE CHOSEN ONE on February 8, 2008 at 11:18 PM

What do I have to be defensive about, pray tell? I’m not the one making idiotic comments about “my guy” giving info which to most of us is common knowledge, but to you is some kind of inside scoop.

Even if you didn’t read this blog, there are many stories out there for all the world to see about what Mitt’s future plans might be.

Call me unimpressed with your lunch partner.

/nitey nite.

I take a great amount of pride in watching people get defensive and fire insults.

That was called humor. My friend and him were classmates and mentioned to me TODAY that you couldn’t be more wrong. He reads these threads, and mentioned it over lunch. Just happenstance it seems that again you embarass yourself with continued circular logic.

THE CHOSEN ONE on February 8, 2008 at 8:18 PM

Circular logic is much more impressive than Kool-Aid logic. If Huckabee had Romney’s cash, he would blow it doubling down on lottery tickets. Huckabee self-promoted himself and morphed into the populist to get free air time. Pastor Huckabee also pandered and shook-down the mega churches. Absent the critical MSM eye, the knucklehead flew under the radar. If this furniture thieving genius gets out in front or gets the VP nod, the critical MSM eye is going to burn him in effigy. The Republican Establishment deserves this mess. You let ideological weeds like this grow…. this is the result. Pass the plate for Huckabee!!!!

THE CHOSEN ONE on February 8, 2008 at 8:18 PM

Your imaginary friend?

How is it “circular logic” to say that it is unlikely that prep school kids from Bloomfield Hills needed Mitt to give them cookies, as you claimed the other day?

By the way, I hope your friend got a scholarship to Cranbrook because if his command of the English language is as poor as yours they didn’t exactly get a bang for their buck.

I might add that you also don’t sound like someone who is in the 6th decade of your life as Mitt is; indeed, you sound sophomoric.

That was called humor. My friend and him were classmates and mentioned to me TODAY that you couldn’t be more wrong. He reads these threads, and mentioned it over lunch. Just happenstance it seems that again you embarass yourself with continued circular logic.

Is that the same guy you claim told you that Mitt bought the class presidency by giving out free cookies?

What an imbed you’ve got there!

Buy Danish on February 8, 2008 at 8:05 PM

LOL

My guy tells me he’s already started planning for next time.

THE CHOSEN ONE on February 8, 2008 at 8:00 PM

Another scoop? Is that the same guy you claim told you that Mitt bought the class presidency by giving out free cookies?

What an imbed you’ve got there!

I wish it were that easy. It took Mitt being embarssed by Huckmania to finally see the forest from the trees. My guy tells me he’s already started planning for next time. I haven’t enjoyed bashing a fellow republican since Gary Bauer.

THE CHOSEN ONE on February 8, 2008 at 7:06 PM

The horse is dead and at the glue factory.

Unless you just like trolling for the sake of it.

EJDolbow on February 8, 2008 at 2:16 PM

Hollowpoint on February 8, 2008 at 4:49 PM

Douches!

profitsbeard on February 8, 2008 at 6:38 PM

Ah, crap. Satan will probably bring Saddam back with him, too. Then we’ll be right back where we started!

Giuliani was far and away the front runner for almost an entire year.

Even though I disagreed with Giuliani on pretty much everything, I would have liked to see him as president based simply on what he did to NYC. The contrast between NY in the 70s and 80s with what it became in the 90s is staggering. I would never had taken my family (if I had a family back then) there in the 80s, but in the 90s I couldn’t wait for them to visit it.

Last summer I was certain he’d be the candidate. Oh well …

Drum on February 8, 2008 at 6:18 PM

Thompson is the Reason that we have McCain today.

Deny it all you want, it’s the truth.

I have studied the Averages all year, his campaign hurt Rudy the most and helped McCain the most, i always thought that McCain and Fred were running on the same ticket, just from looking at and analyzing the data.

McCain chooses Satan as running mate, news at 11.

“My friends, better the devil you know than the devil you don’t, right? And who among you doesn’t know Satan, Prince of darkness, erstwhile known as Beelzebub, Pazuzu, or Lucifer, the Morning Star? And I’m proud, my friends, to reach across the aisle to have him become my running mate. Because he has guaranteed me a win if I pass Amnesty as my first offical act, specifically because his little sister has been stuck in Tijuana since a bad contractual deal on a Girls Gone Wild shoot, and he wants her to join him in the good ole U.S. of A. All hail, the Lord of the Flies, and my partner in this enterprise to bring some fire back into the politics!”

Giuliani was far and away the front runner for almost an entire year.

Even though I disagreed with Giuliani on pretty much everything, I would have liked to see him as president based simply on what he did to NYC. The contrast between NY in the 70s and 80s with what it became in the 90s is staggering. I would never had taken my family (if I had a family back then) there in the 80s, but in the 90s I couldn’t wait for them to visit it.

Last summer I was certain he’d be the candidate. Oh well …

Thought I should mention it re: my earlier comment, Rush said in the 3rd hour that Bobby Jindal is/could be the next Ronald Reagan. How’s that for getting the name out?

hkenshin on February 8, 2008 at 3:31 PM

Cool. I listen to Rush’s podcast on my iPod but haven’t yet heard today’s.

Enough already.

Anyone who knows me, knows that I Ronald Wilson Reagan in high regard.

It has been discussed ad nauseum since Governor Romney’s galiant exit from this year Republican primaries that Romeny is the heir apparent to the Regan legac….

He [Thompson] got an F for effort, and that did not bode well ever for him being an effective executive.

Buy Danish on February 8, 2008 at 4:45 PM

Agreed. And I knew that when I chose him, though I hoped he’d pick up speed, enthusiasm, and effectiveness before it was too late. That’s why I’m not looking to Fred to run again in 2012 or to be the next Reagan or anything like that. Every candidate this time had a fatal flaw–some worse than others–and I think we need to toss them all out and start fresh for 2012. I knew this whole crop of candidates was crap and none of them was likely to be able to win the general election, so I chose the one who best matched my principles. I would have been pleasantly surprised if one of them had proven me wrong, but none did. Now I’ll go give my “duty vote” to McCain in the general–assuming he doesn’t choose Satan as his runningmate–and work for a better crop of candidates next time around.