<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Veepstakes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:34:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: INC</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-3/#comment-949170</link>
		<dc:creator>INC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-949170</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Charlie Crist is likely as the popular governor of Florida&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This appears to be a statement that is frequently stated by people who are either not conservative or who do not live in Florida.  It&#039;s an MSM meme and I&#039;d love to know who first coined it.

One big problem with Charlie is that he is not married.  With McCain&#039;s marriage history he&#039;s really going to need a veep with a great family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Charlie Crist is likely as the popular governor of Florida</p></blockquote>
<p>This appears to be a statement that is frequently stated by people who are either not conservative or who do not live in Florida.  It&#8217;s an MSM meme and I&#8217;d love to know who first coined it.</p>
<p>One big problem with Charlie is that he is not married.  With McCain&#8217;s marriage history he&#8217;s really going to need a veep with a great family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dudley Smith</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-3/#comment-946674</link>
		<dc:creator>Dudley Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-946674</guid>
		<description>Just to follow up from Friday, Colin Powell was on with Wolf Blitzer today, and seemed to be right where I thought he was on Iraq.  They didn&#039;t discuss whether it was the right decision to invade, but he was very deferential to Gen. Petraeus about when troops should be drawn down and was fairly dismissive of both Clinton and Obama&#039;s arbitrary pull out talk.  He also didn&#039;t fall for the idea that McCain wants us in Iraq with the current troop levels for &quot;100 years&quot; but rightly recognized that a long term (but greatly reduced) presence like the ones in Germany and S. Korea might be needed.  He did say that the Iraqi govt. needs to get its act together, that we can&#039;t maintain current troop levels there indefinitely, and it will ultimately be the Iraqis who need to defend their country, but didn&#039;t engage in the antiwar canard that this will only happen after we pull everyone out. 

He thought we should be talking with Iran, but said at lower levels, and that he had done so with Syria when he was SOS (which actually undermines the argument that the Bush Administration doesn&#039;t talk to our enemies).  He was completely non-committal on the presidential candidates when asked point blank who he supported, and said he&#039;s evaluating all of them equally.  

Overall, I feel even better about the idea of him as a VP for McCain if he would do it.  He has walked the walk with his military background, and projects the kind of objectivity and restraint on military issues that I think the center of the electorate wants to see from its leaders.  I think we&#039;ve lost a little bit of our edge on national security because of Iraq, and have only been saved because the Dems have become so identified with a pacifistic, anti-war at all costs that repels the center even more.  Plus, with McCain/Powell, I wouldn&#039;t have to hear the word &quot;chickenhawk&quot; for at least 4 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to follow up from Friday, Colin Powell was on with Wolf Blitzer today, and seemed to be right where I thought he was on Iraq.  They didn&#8217;t discuss whether it was the right decision to invade, but he was very deferential to Gen. Petraeus about when troops should be drawn down and was fairly dismissive of both Clinton and Obama&#8217;s arbitrary pull out talk.  He also didn&#8217;t fall for the idea that McCain wants us in Iraq with the current troop levels for &#8220;100 years&#8221; but rightly recognized that a long term (but greatly reduced) presence like the ones in Germany and S. Korea might be needed.  He did say that the Iraqi govt. needs to get its act together, that we can&#8217;t maintain current troop levels there indefinitely, and it will ultimately be the Iraqis who need to defend their country, but didn&#8217;t engage in the antiwar canard that this will only happen after we pull everyone out. </p>
<p>He thought we should be talking with Iran, but said at lower levels, and that he had done so with Syria when he was SOS (which actually undermines the argument that the Bush Administration doesn&#8217;t talk to our enemies).  He was completely non-committal on the presidential candidates when asked point blank who he supported, and said he&#8217;s evaluating all of them equally.  </p>
<p>Overall, I feel even better about the idea of him as a VP for McCain if he would do it.  He has walked the walk with his military background, and projects the kind of objectivity and restraint on military issues that I think the center of the electorate wants to see from its leaders.  I think we&#8217;ve lost a little bit of our edge on national security because of Iraq, and have only been saved because the Dems have become so identified with a pacifistic, anti-war at all costs that repels the center even more.  Plus, with McCain/Powell, I wouldn&#8217;t have to hear the word &#8220;chickenhawk&#8221; for at least 4 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby04040</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-3/#comment-946314</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby04040</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 05:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-946314</guid>
		<description>susan collins, maine senator</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>susan collins, maine senator</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ITookTheRedPill</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-946027</link>
		<dc:creator>ITookTheRedPill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 23:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-946027</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hucksarmy.com/videos/HuckCPAC2008.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mike Huckabee Speaks to CPAC - 2/9/2008&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.hucksarmy.com/videos/HuckCPAC2008.html" rel="nofollow">Mike Huckabee Speaks to CPAC &#8211; 2/9/2008</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THE CHOSEN ONE</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-945409</link>
		<dc:creator>THE CHOSEN ONE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-945409</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s it. I GUARANTEE Lindsey Graham will be vp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s it. I GUARANTEE Lindsey Graham will be vp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bnelson44</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-945383</link>
		<dc:creator>bnelson44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-945383</guid>
		<description>I posted this on another thread, but it probably fits better here.  Yesterday, Real Clear Politics ran an Internet poll on who McCain should pick as a VP.  There were over 300 replies.  Here is the short list:

Condoleezza Rice (32)
JC Watts (23)
Sarah Palin (20)
Michael Steele (18)
Colin Powell (17)
Charlie Crist (12)
Bobby Jindal (12)
Mitt Romney (12)
Fred Thompson (12)
Rudy Giuliani (10)
Kay Bailey Hutchison (10)
John Kasich (9)
Newt Gingrich (8)
John Thune (8)
Mike Huckabee (7)
Joe Lieberman (7)
Tom Ridge (7)

For the rest of the best, &lt;a href=&quot;http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2008/02/veepstakes_the_results.html#more&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted this on another thread, but it probably fits better here.  Yesterday, Real Clear Politics ran an Internet poll on who McCain should pick as a VP.  There were over 300 replies.  Here is the short list:</p>
<p>Condoleezza Rice (32)<br />
JC Watts (23)<br />
Sarah Palin (20)<br />
Michael Steele (18)<br />
Colin Powell (17)<br />
Charlie Crist (12)<br />
Bobby Jindal (12)<br />
Mitt Romney (12)<br />
Fred Thompson (12)<br />
Rudy Giuliani (10)<br />
Kay Bailey Hutchison (10)<br />
John Kasich (9)<br />
Newt Gingrich (8)<br />
John Thune (8)<br />
Mike Huckabee (7)<br />
Joe Lieberman (7)<br />
Tom Ridge (7)</p>
<p>For the rest of the best, <a href="http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2008/02/veepstakes_the_results.html#more" rel="nofollow">click here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Nick 77</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-945294</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Nick 77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-945294</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Onager on February 8, 2008 at 7:19 PM

Hey, no fair! You already started learning, and we haven’t made him president YET!!! LOL

Califemme on February 8, 2008 at 7:39 PM
No sir I haven’t. I merely used a feature that google provides. Go to google.com once you get there, look for a menu item, “more”. Click on that and then on the drop down, click “even more”. That will take you to a google page with 2 columns of choices. In the right hand column, around half way down you’ll see “translate”. Click on that and it’ll take you to a page that will translate text you enter from your choice of languages. Pretty cool.

Onager on February 8, 2008 at 8:07 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Or just go direct to this page:

http://www.google.com/language_tools?hl=en</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Onager on February 8, 2008 at 7:19 PM</p>
<p>Hey, no fair! You already started learning, and we haven’t made him president YET!!! LOL</p>
<p>Califemme on February 8, 2008 at 7:39 PM<br />
No sir I haven’t. I merely used a feature that google provides. Go to google.com once you get there, look for a menu item, “more”. Click on that and then on the drop down, click “even more”. That will take you to a google page with 2 columns of choices. In the right hand column, around half way down you’ll see “translate”. Click on that and it’ll take you to a page that will translate text you enter from your choice of languages. Pretty cool.</p>
<p>Onager on February 8, 2008 at 8:07 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Or just go direct to this page:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/language_tools?hl=en" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/language_tools?hl=en</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwp1964</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-945188</link>
		<dc:creator>jwp1964</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 14:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-945188</guid>
		<description>In a real shocker FOX news is not showing Huckabees speech...had to go to MSNBC.  I&#039;m done with FOX...Fair and balanced my ass!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a real shocker FOX news is not showing Huckabees speech&#8230;had to go to MSNBC.  I&#8217;m done with FOX&#8230;Fair and balanced my ass!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THE CHOSEN ONE</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-945159</link>
		<dc:creator>THE CHOSEN ONE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 13:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-945159</guid>
		<description>How about Bill Frist?

SoulGlo on February 9, 2008 at 7:06 AM

The same guy who said it may be possible to contract HIV from a water fountain? Somebody tell me where he went to medical school because they are obviously giving away degrees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Bill Frist?</p>
<p>SoulGlo on February 9, 2008 at 7:06 AM</p>
<p>The same guy who said it may be possible to contract HIV from a water fountain? Somebody tell me where he went to medical school because they are obviously giving away degrees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoulGlo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-945137</link>
		<dc:creator>SoulGlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 12:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-945137</guid>
		<description>How about Bill Frist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Bill Frist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThackerAgency</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-945022</link>
		<dc:creator>ThackerAgency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 06:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-945022</guid>
		<description>I thought we went over this with the Obama issue being called &#039;articulate&#039;.  I hope to Hell that someone feels like they can call me articulate without having to worry about whether or not I get offended.

I&#039;m sorry to go off here, but this is what makes race relations strained.  If I can&#039;t say that a black guy is very impressive without sounding racist, then there will never be harmony between the races.  If I can&#039;t compliment someone without having to apologize, don&#039;t expect compliments.

It is assinine to assume that saying someone is articulate assumes that their race, background, or religion would preclude them from being so.  THIS is the problem with race relations in America.  THIS is what makes America weak.  With all the problems in the world, the black community takes issue with someone calling them &#039;articulate&#039; or &#039;the best choice&#039;.  THIS is what makes the black civil rights movement absurd.  THIS is what keeps blacks from succeeding. . . the continual victim culture.

Again, I am sorry, but out of everything I have said, to point this out to show me and everyone reading it some sort of protocol that needs to exist when discussing blacks is ridiculous AND harmful to the black cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought we went over this with the Obama issue being called &#8216;articulate&#8217;.  I hope to Hell that someone feels like they can call me articulate without having to worry about whether or not I get offended.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry to go off here, but this is what makes race relations strained.  If I can&#8217;t say that a black guy is very impressive without sounding racist, then there will never be harmony between the races.  If I can&#8217;t compliment someone without having to apologize, don&#8217;t expect compliments.</p>
<p>It is assinine to assume that saying someone is articulate assumes that their race, background, or religion would preclude them from being so.  THIS is the problem with race relations in America.  THIS is what makes America weak.  With all the problems in the world, the black community takes issue with someone calling them &#8216;articulate&#8217; or &#8216;the best choice&#8217;.  THIS is what makes the black civil rights movement absurd.  THIS is what keeps blacks from succeeding. . . the continual victim culture.</p>
<p>Again, I am sorry, but out of everything I have said, to point this out to show me and everyone reading it some sort of protocol that needs to exist when discussing blacks is ridiculous AND harmful to the black cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThackerAgency</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-945006</link>
		<dc:creator>ThackerAgency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 06:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-945006</guid>
		<description>And just before the &#039;offensive&#039; factual comment was this little insignificant issue that I brought up. . . 

&lt;blockquote&gt;I think he would really be the best choice.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

As you said, I&#039;m certain that these comments are

&lt;blockquote&gt;Not taken as a compliment by many.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But I&#039;ll make a deal with you. . . you characterize me as &#039;the best choice&#039; and I&#039;ll try just as hard as I can to take it as a compliment.  Even as a racist like myself, I hope I can try to avoid being offended at being branded &#039;the best choice&#039;.  I&#039;ll do the best I can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And just before the &#8216;offensive&#8217; factual comment was this little insignificant issue that I brought up. . . </p>
<blockquote><p>I think he would really be the best choice.</p></blockquote>
<p>As you said, I&#8217;m certain that these comments are</p>
<blockquote><p>Not taken as a compliment by many.</p></blockquote>
<p>But I&#8217;ll make a deal with you. . . you characterize me as &#8216;the best choice&#8217; and I&#8217;ll try just as hard as I can to take it as a compliment.  Even as a racist like myself, I hope I can try to avoid being offended at being branded &#8216;the best choice&#8217;.  I&#8217;ll do the best I can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThackerAgency</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-945002</link>
		<dc:creator>ThackerAgency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 06:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-945002</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Then why mention it?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

because it is a fact?!  I know quite a few black guys that I&#039;d prefer run things over white guys who are in power.  I&#039;d give specifics but I don&#039;t want to show anyone up.  How is it offensive to point out a fact?

It will actually work in his favor. . . I know it is hard to believe but there was a time in history when being black might work against him.
&lt;strong&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;He&#039;s a solid conservative family man. He knows how Washington works, but he’s not a Washington insider.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; 

That&#039;s the meat of the paragraph.  But thanks for being offended at the fact I presented.  I know the quote I used isn&#039;t as racially charged as the quote you used, but the quote I used was mostly what I was trying to say.  I&#039;ll try to avoid using FACTS to characterize someone and hold my tongue while people continue to characterize me any way they want. . . racist, bigot, evangelical, conservative (you choose because I&#039;m certain it won&#039;t offend anyone).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Then why mention it?</p></blockquote>
<p>because it is a fact?!  I know quite a few black guys that I&#8217;d prefer run things over white guys who are in power.  I&#8217;d give specifics but I don&#8217;t want to show anyone up.  How is it offensive to point out a fact?</p>
<p>It will actually work in his favor. . . I know it is hard to believe but there was a time in history when being black might work against him.<br />
<strong></p>
<blockquote><p>He&#8217;s a solid conservative family man. He knows how Washington works, but he’s not a Washington insider.</p></blockquote>
<p></strong> </p>
<p>That&#8217;s the meat of the paragraph.  But thanks for being offended at the fact I presented.  I know the quote I used isn&#8217;t as racially charged as the quote you used, but the quote I used was mostly what I was trying to say.  I&#8217;ll try to avoid using FACTS to characterize someone and hold my tongue while people continue to characterize me any way they want. . . racist, bigot, evangelical, conservative (you choose because I&#8217;m certain it won&#8217;t offend anyone).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradky</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-944958</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 05:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-944958</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why don’t you think JC would accept? I think he would really be the best choice. &lt;strong&gt;He’s a black guy&lt;/strong&gt;, but it’s not because he’s a black guy. Every time &lt;strong&gt;I’ve heard him speak, he’s very impressive&lt;/strong&gt;. He’s a solid conservative family man. He knows how Washington works, but he’s not a Washington insider.

I really hope that a guy like JC Watts gets a more prominent role in the R party. He took time off to be with his family. That means he’s available for the VP.

JC Watts for VP! That would be awesome!

ThackerAgency on February 8, 2008 at 6:39 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Then why mention it? It will be as ineffective as it is transparent. Your comment about his speaking is one of the more insulting things black citizens who &quot;talk like everyone else&quot; put up with. &quot;Why you are so articulate... sound very educated...&quot; 

Not taken as a compliment by many.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why don’t you think JC would accept? I think he would really be the best choice. <strong>He’s a black guy</strong>, but it’s not because he’s a black guy. Every time <strong>I’ve heard him speak, he’s very impressive</strong>. He’s a solid conservative family man. He knows how Washington works, but he’s not a Washington insider.</p>
<p>I really hope that a guy like JC Watts gets a more prominent role in the R party. He took time off to be with his family. That means he’s available for the VP.</p>
<p>JC Watts for VP! That would be awesome!</p>
<p>ThackerAgency on February 8, 2008 at 6:39 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Then why mention it? It will be as ineffective as it is transparent. Your comment about his speaking is one of the more insulting things black citizens who &#8220;talk like everyone else&#8221; put up with. &#8220;Why you are so articulate&#8230; sound very educated&#8230;&#8221; </p>
<p>Not taken as a compliment by many.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fires1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-944932</link>
		<dc:creator>Fires1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 05:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-944932</guid>
		<description>Trust me. You don’t want a 71 year old heart the only thing between crist and the presidency.
Not for me. I think this guy ran for state office three times and I refused to vote for him. I can’t be blamed for the dirtbag.
peacenprosperity on February 8, 2008 at 6:22 PM 
  All of us in Fla saw what great job he did with the homeowners insurance crisis when he was insurance commisioner. Just wait until his Ammendment 1 kicks in and we have less Police and Firefighters. No thanks to Charlie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trust me. You don’t want a 71 year old heart the only thing between crist and the presidency.<br />
Not for me. I think this guy ran for state office three times and I refused to vote for him. I can’t be blamed for the dirtbag.<br />
peacenprosperity on February 8, 2008 at 6:22 PM<br />
  All of us in Fla saw what great job he did with the homeowners insurance crisis when he was insurance commisioner. Just wait until his Ammendment 1 kicks in and we have less Police and Firefighters. No thanks to Charlie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funky chicken</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-944925</link>
		<dc:creator>funky chicken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 05:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-944925</guid>
		<description>Sanford!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sanford!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustTruth101</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-944877</link>
		<dc:creator>JustTruth101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 04:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-944877</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t think there’s any question that Rudy will be the VP pick. He’ll help with some of the blue northeast states including the biggest prize of New York…

Ballistic on February 8, 2008 at 4:22 PM &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I respectfully disagree.  Rudy is perfect for either AG or chief of Homeland Security, plus McCain needs to pick someone right of him and Rudy as they are both moderates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I don’t think there’s any question that Rudy will be the VP pick. He’ll help with some of the blue northeast states including the biggest prize of New York…</p>
<p>Ballistic on February 8, 2008 at 4:22 PM </p></blockquote>
<p>I respectfully disagree.  Rudy is perfect for either AG or chief of Homeland Security, plus McCain needs to pick someone right of him and Rudy as they are both moderates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chakra Hammer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-944876</link>
		<dc:creator>Chakra Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 04:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-944876</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Chakra Hammer on February 8, 2008 at 10:57 PM

Ends based philosophy is a progressive mentality. It has no respect for rule of law. This is the same reasoning that views the constitution as a “living” document. This philosophy is what is now infecting the Republican party. If you try and compete with the Dems to lead off on Entertainment Tonight, you’re going to lose your principled base. Foundation is the key. Fads come and go… if we trot out “fad” candidates over substantive candidates, we’ll consistently lose.

Cold Steel on February 8, 2008 at 11:04 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You are wrong. 

Is Rudy Giuliani someone that does not respect the Rule of Law?(One of the Most successful Prosecuting U.S. Attorney in History)

Does he believe in a living breathing Constitution? 
I don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Chakra Hammer on February 8, 2008 at 10:57 PM</p>
<p>Ends based philosophy is a progressive mentality. It has no respect for rule of law. This is the same reasoning that views the constitution as a “living” document. This philosophy is what is now infecting the Republican party. If you try and compete with the Dems to lead off on Entertainment Tonight, you’re going to lose your principled base. Foundation is the key. Fads come and go… if we trot out “fad” candidates over substantive candidates, we’ll consistently lose.</p>
<p>Cold Steel on February 8, 2008 at 11:04 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>You are wrong. </p>
<p>Is Rudy Giuliani someone that does not respect the Rule of Law?(One of the Most successful Prosecuting U.S. Attorney in History)</p>
<p>Does he believe in a living breathing Constitution?<br />
I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cold Steel</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-944850</link>
		<dc:creator>Cold Steel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 04:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-944850</guid>
		<description>Chakra Hammer on February 8, 2008 at 10:57 PM

Ends based philosophy is a progressive mentality.  It has no respect for rule of law.  This is the same reasoning that views the constitution as a &quot;living&quot; document.  This philosophy is what is now infecting the Republican party.  If you try and compete with the Dems to lead off on Entertainment Tonight, you&#039;re going to lose your principled base.  Foundation is the key.  Fads come and go... if we trot out &quot;fad&quot; candidates over substantive candidates, we&#039;ll consistently lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chakra Hammer on February 8, 2008 at 10:57 PM</p>
<p>Ends based philosophy is a progressive mentality.  It has no respect for rule of law.  This is the same reasoning that views the constitution as a &#8220;living&#8221; document.  This philosophy is what is now infecting the Republican party.  If you try and compete with the Dems to lead off on Entertainment Tonight, you&#8217;re going to lose your principled base.  Foundation is the key.  Fads come and go&#8230; if we trot out &#8220;fad&#8221; candidates over substantive candidates, we&#8217;ll consistently lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chakra Hammer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-944841</link>
		<dc:creator>Chakra Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 03:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-944841</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Principled Conservativism 101

Don’t water down the message.

Cold Steel on February 8, 2008 at 10:47 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Do not lower your standards nor do you set lower goals. 

Results are what matters, and what we are judged on.

Does it really matter how you arrive to a point&lt;em&gt;?&lt;/em&gt;, the question is what IF you never arrived at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Principled Conservativism 101</p>
<p>Don’t water down the message.</p>
<p>Cold Steel on February 8, 2008 at 10:47 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Do not lower your standards nor do you set lower goals. </p>
<p>Results are what matters, and what we are judged on.</p>
<p>Does it really matter how you arrive to a point<em>?</em>, the question is what IF you never arrived at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THE CHOSEN ONE</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-944838</link>
		<dc:creator>THE CHOSEN ONE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 03:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-944838</guid>
		<description>Principled Conservativism 101

Cold Steel on February 8, 2008 at 10:47 PM

We&#039;ve already crossed that bridge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Principled Conservativism 101</p>
<p>Cold Steel on February 8, 2008 at 10:47 PM</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve already crossed that bridge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cold Steel</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-944828</link>
		<dc:creator>Cold Steel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 03:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-944828</guid>
		<description>Politics 101

Own The Center

Chakra Hammer on February 8, 2008 at 10:04 PM

Principled Conservativism 101

Don&#039;t water down the message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politics 101</p>
<p>Own The Center</p>
<p>Chakra Hammer on February 8, 2008 at 10:04 PM</p>
<p>Principled Conservativism 101</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t water down the message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mojave Mark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-944766</link>
		<dc:creator>Mojave Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 03:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-944766</guid>
		<description>So who will be his young padawan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So who will be his young padawan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chakra Hammer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-944762</link>
		<dc:creator>Chakra Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 03:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-944762</guid>
		<description>Politics 101

Own The Center</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politics 101</p>
<p>Own The Center</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZCoyote</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/comment-page-2/#comment-944761</link>
		<dc:creator>AZCoyote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 03:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/08/veepstakes/#comment-944761</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;he said he fully expects that his grandchildren will be speaking Spanish as their native language. He’s perfectly okay with it, and so is McCain.

Si, si, peuede.

AZCoyote on February 8, 2008 at 4:57 PM
Much like Arizona?

myamphibian on February 8, 2008 at 5:37 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Si, &lt;em&gt;mis amigos&lt;/em&gt;, just like Arizona ... where McCain knows all about how to secure the border (he just doesn&#039;t want to do it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>he said he fully expects that his grandchildren will be speaking Spanish as their native language. He’s perfectly okay with it, and so is McCain.</p>
<p>Si, si, peuede.</p>
<p>AZCoyote on February 8, 2008 at 4:57 PM<br />
Much like Arizona?</p>
<p>myamphibian on February 8, 2008 at 5:37 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Si, <em>mis amigos</em>, just like Arizona &#8230; where McCain knows all about how to secure the border (he just doesn&#8217;t want to do it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
