Rush Limbaugh: I might have to fundraise for Hillary
posted at 3:05 pm on February 7, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
There’s no faulting his logic; I made the same point yesterday myself. If you can’t have a candidate Republicans love, make sure the left has a candidate Republicans hate. And needless to say, liberal Jesus isn’t a candidate Republicans hate.
So won’t you please give? This broke-ass loser’s in a hole that’s starting to look bottomless, so much so that not even her anti-semitic Islamic propagandist bundlers can pull her out. It’s up to us. Yes, we can.
Exit question reminder: Cross over. Cross over. Cross over.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Sweet.
You know, there’s probably no better way to throw a blanket on these idiotic stimulus packages than to spend them all on guns and ammo. Make the libs think twice about passing out checks. That said, I’m at a loss as to how to get the GOP to grow the spine it supposedly once had on matters fiscal…
TexasDan on February 7, 2008 at 6:40 PM
Vote for the lesser of the three weasels. Better to vote for the devil you know rather than the one you don’t know. Frankly, the GOP as a conservative force seems to be on its death bed. The GOP and the Demoturds have become one and the shame. Anyone want to start the ACP, American Conservative Party?
Zorg on February 7, 2008 at 6:54 PM
Don’t worry about Shrillary. Remember, she has those Michigan and Florida delegates waiting in the wings. Trust me, they WILL be allowed into the democrat convention, thus sealing her victory.
I can’t wait to see Michelle Obama’s reaction!
SouthernGent on February 7, 2008 at 7:02 PM
Yep.
davidk on February 7, 2008 at 7:26 PM
I wonder about something. What exactly does it mean when Rush uses the code-word “Conservative”? IMO it seems to mean:
1. Pro-Life. That is, no abortions allowed under the law.
2. Anti-Illegals. That is, no amnesty.
3. Pro-family. That is, as long as the “family” is 1 man, 1 woman, and children. This leads to:
4. Anti-homosexual. Not just in prejudice (perhaps bigotry) against homosexuals, but a desire to have the power of government bar such individuals from such advantageous benefits such as marriage and adoption.
5. Strong Military. Lots of spending, strong use of military overseas.
6. War on Terror. Win it by killing or otherwise neutralizing terrorists. Win the minds by improving material conditions in Islamic states.
7. Focus of life is on material wealth. This is evidenced by the continual reference to such possessions and the need to work hard to attain them. Basically, capitalism is the highest good as it leads to increased happiness through material gain. This leads to:
8. Large government in that it must provide security both at home and abroad for American interests. Morality must also be controlled via law as certain societal and personal choices (drugs, homosexuals, illegals, etc) must be controlled/banned by the power of the State. However, the government must accomplish these goals via the least onerous and most fair system of taxation possible so that the pursuit of wealth is unimpeded.
Did I miss anything or mis-characterize anything? I think Rush et al run into trouble with all of these to some extent among McCain and his ilk. Personally, I only agree with points 5 and 6. I hope I don’t sound Communist. At most I’m becoming slightly Socialist having been to various countries as well as having been exposed to a cross-section of economic classes here and abroad. The mad pursuit of wealth has given our country both great material gain and myriad problems. Blah, I have to cut this off now. It’s too long already.
Viscount_Bolingbroke on February 7, 2008 at 7:28 PM
Make it national.
Or there is always this option.
AprilOrit on February 7, 2008 at 7:49 PM
I hear you. They want to send out money foolishly instead of reducing spending I’ll encourage people to spend it on something legal that they’re not going to like. Guns.
That, and after the harridan or Hussein take office there’ll be a big move to either restrict guns or ban them all together. If they want to come get them fine. But there’s power in numbers. And there’s a lot more power in numbers if each number has a gun.
BowHuntingTexas on February 7, 2008 at 9:17 PM
-TexasDan
-BowHuntingTexas
Amen brothers! Viva la Revalucion!!!
labrat on February 8, 2008 at 1:26 AM
All this is leading to is a President Hillary Rodham Clinton and Vice President Barack Hussein Obama. Democrat rule for the next 16 years. After they get done there’ll be a hispanic president for America. We may never see a white man president again in our lifetimes. May never ever happen again. Get over yourselves and enjoy it. You’ve [I've] been beaten badly. I said it from the very beginning. The left’s plan all along was to cross-over and secure a nomination for a RINO they can beat badly. Landslides a comin’ baby. Wise the he11 up. It will be fun… that is, everything being their fault for a change.
Rush and Ann are just positioning themselves to capitalize upon the coming tide. They’ll be billionaires by the time it’s over. On satellite radio.
Griz on February 8, 2008 at 2:04 AM
It is time to hunker down because many of those who are thinking Hitlery or McCaniac are leaders of the Messes not the masses and are beginning to implode and I don’t want any of their debris on me.
The fund raisers should be for your representatives and senators at the local and national level that will override the effects of a mchiterly presidency.
Because all politics are really local, we must unite to protect ourselves and our backyard. Because, either of these two are going to do everything in their power to own your backyard (leaving us to living in little boxes).
MSGTAS on February 8, 2008 at 8:37 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2