Huckabee: This is a two-man race — and Romney ain’t part of it
posted at 10:41 pm on February 5, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
He won West Virginia and Arkansas, surprised Maverick in Alabama, and is poised to steal Tennessee, Georgia, and winner-take-all Missouri. Romney’s got nothing yet but Utah, Massachusetts, and the North Dakota caucuses. If he can’t take California an hour from now, he’s a washout.
This is how the race is fated to end, isn’t it? RINO vs. RINO, with Biblical verses a-flyin’. SECOND LOOK AT McCAIN!
Update: Huck takes Tennessee and Georgia, says Fox.
Update: Heh. “What does it say that after conservative talk show hosts rail against McCain for a week, we do see a bunch of deep red states go for a candidate besides McCain… but it’s not Romney, but Huckabee?”
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
LMAO. This is a good night.
huckfan on February 5, 2008 at 11:28 PM
The same reason many thought Fred would win. They look around at their friends and say, “Well, they wouldn’t vote for McCain and neither would I!” Unfortunately, that sample is biased and time-varying.
Also, it helps justify a vote for Mitt. If you think “electability” is B.S., you can vote for who you want, regardless of the outcome in the general. I’m not saying they’re wrong to say that McCain could falter in the general, but, as J.P. Morgan once said, “A person usually has two reasons for doing a thing: one that sounds good and a real one.”
All I know is that I’ll never be able to think “Huckabee” without Dunlap’s response.
FYI, Berkeley’s county is staying open an extra hour (midnight EST, baby!) due to insufficient ballots.
calbear on February 5, 2008 at 11:28 PM
No, I’d trust Huckabee over McCain on judicial nominees. I know Huckabee is pro-life, pro-God, pro-gun…so I think he’d pick a conservative judge. I also think the base would be more able to hold him to it on that, where McCain could care less what the base has to say.
I think even McCain would be a better gamble than Hillary or Obama on the judicial picks though.
Jay on February 5, 2008 at 11:28 PM
Enjoy it while you can.
Slublog on February 5, 2008 at 11:29 PM
I think you are wrong about that where Huck is concerned. One thing we know for sure is that Huck is and always has been staunchly pro-life. I’m not a Huck guy, but I would trust him to select good justices if for no other reason than the life issue.
flyfisher on February 5, 2008 at 11:29 PM
I agree with you – there are lots of reasons to question how conservative Huckabee is, but he will hold the line on judges because he is so socially conservative.
Govgirl on February 5, 2008 at 11:31 PM
If Huck’s on the ticket, he loses Utah. Only the most conservative state in the Union. Huck’s getting 1%. If that.
Huck is slimy, a liar, and a man of no character. Rather, a man of bad character. He’s a televangelist in all the negative senses of the word.
I will not vote for Huckabee. Ever.
Vanceone on February 5, 2008 at 11:31 PM
I can’t believe how this political nightmare is going,how
is Romney getting getting the short end,here’s another strange twist,in Utah Obama beats Hillary,like I said in previous posts Utah is alright,but thank the media for
running all those religious hit pieces on Mitt,and Utah!
canopfor on February 5, 2008 at 11:31 PM
Huckabee did better than expected but Mitt is far from out of this. Mitt is wining in western states and Massachusetts. He is still set to take a large part of California too.
Tim Pancoast on February 5, 2008 at 11:33 PM
LOL, I am.
And no, I don’t think Huck is going to be the nominee. And I hope like heck he doesn’t take the VP slot. There’s more to be gained, later.
huckfan on February 5, 2008 at 11:33 PM
The conservatives spooked the evangelicals into votng for Huck out of fear of a Mitt presidency. It was ultimately a dumb play.
William Amos on February 5, 2008 at 11:34 PM
The way Huckabee’s campaigned?
I doubt it.
Slublog on February 5, 2008 at 11:34 PM
Dude, that reminds of a Fredhead.
huckfan on February 5, 2008 at 11:34 PM
The way you guys tried to stop him and failed?
huckfan on February 5, 2008 at 11:35 PM
It’s a freakin disaster from every aspect.
Big Orange on February 5, 2008 at 11:36 PM
The way Hucjis licking McCain’s . . . bu . . er . . feet by wheeling and dealing in W.Virginia.
geckomon on February 5, 2008 at 11:38 PM
No, it isn’t. Vote for Huck, get a brokered convention, then we’ll all be able to get a good ticket. And no, I wouldn’t include Huck in that, although I am a huge fan.
Let’s get a solid ticket – the only way is to stop McCain and Romney.
huckfan on February 5, 2008 at 11:38 PM
No. I’ve been disappointed by his campaign tactics, and I’m likely not the only one.
Slublog on February 5, 2008 at 11:38 PM
Yeah, that’ll change hearts and minds.
huckfan on February 5, 2008 at 11:39 PM
Mitts done, Huck is Jimmy Carter with an R next to his name and McCain is, well, McCain. God what a mess were in.
Big Orange on February 5, 2008 at 11:39 PM
Oh please. You guys didn’t like him from the start, nothing he could have done to please you.
But like I said, we need a brokered convention.
huckfan on February 5, 2008 at 11:40 PM
Assumptions, assumptions…
I was impressed by Huckabee’s performance in the debates. That led me to look at his record, and I was less than impressed by that. I was even more unimpressed by his attempts to spin that record, and by his Mormon-baiting and his class-warfare rhetoric.
In short, yes, he could have impressed me. He did not.
Slublog on February 5, 2008 at 11:43 PM
Not interested in changing your mind. Just telling it like it is. I am not even a Mitt shrill. Just telling like it is. McCain and Huck did a shameful thing with their venomous commentary afterwards as well.
geckomon on February 5, 2008 at 11:44 PM
Not promising, that is for sure. Well, we’ll see just how many right-leaning voters go along with the ‘new’ coalition.
I think Rush is right though, we are seeing the dismemberment of the Reagan coalition – seems many think the three-legged stool can stand just fine upon just two. Then again, Dems are facing a similar precipice – women or black?
IMHO, GOP gets crushed if Barak is the nominee – regardless. Hillary wins a squeaker over McCain because many of the base refuse to participate. Hillary wins over Romney similarly because too many of another part of the base are pissed off that he actually won in hyper-blue Massachusetts (and psst, he believes in that mormon cult), and Huckabee is slaughtered be cause he is the embodiment of all that is wrong with Christian conservatism.
Admitting my own petulance, I have to remind my fellow right-leaning voters. Romney, McCain, and Huckabee have all run blue, and all have flipped-flopped on key issues. In fact they all have flipped-flopped in much more accordance with the base lately.
Only one however was flipping against the prevailing sentiment of the body he was working within. alas…
you chose poorly.
bains on February 5, 2008 at 11:44 PM
Oh,this has to go to court for a recount!,hahahahahahahahahahaha,
okay,i just regained my faculty’s!
canopfor on February 5, 2008 at 11:44 PM
I enjoyed that; thanks.
RW Wacko on February 5, 2008 at 11:45 PM
C’mon, I’ve read your blog for some time. He didn’t have a chance with you.
But that is water under the bridge. I’m tellin’ you, a brokered convention is the way to go.
huckfan on February 5, 2008 at 11:48 PM
Huckabee must put his boxers on with Crisco he’s so slimy.
profitsbeard on February 5, 2008 at 11:51 PM
Well, I didn’t write about him until he annoyed me.
He had a chance, once.
Slublog on February 5, 2008 at 11:51 PM
No, you’re just telling it like you want it to be. Wanna lose to the Dems? You’re on the right track.
huckfan on February 5, 2008 at 11:52 PM
LOL, yeah, for about 30 seconds.
Brokered convention, the best hope for conservatives and Republicans.
huckfan on February 5, 2008 at 11:53 PM
I saw the whole speech (forced myself, yuk) and Huck is not a gracious winner, imo. And then, two seconds into it, he had to bring in the Bible metaphors *rolls eyes*. Bringing in David and Goliath and the widow’s mite. Very annoying (I am an Evangelical, btw).
-Aslan’s Girl
Aslans Girl on February 5, 2008 at 11:54 PM
Huh? Now you’re just making stuff up.
geckomon on February 5, 2008 at 11:54 PM
Exactly!
geckomon on February 5, 2008 at 11:56 PM
A rocket named Elmer approaches the Gantry.
And fizzles…
profitsbeard on February 5, 2008 at 11:56 PM
Again with the assumptions. Huckabee’s record kept me from supporting him.
And Huckabee wouldn’t do well at a brokered convention. At best, he’d be given a cabinet post. If Huckabee wants a future in the party, he’s going to have to prove his conservative bona fides on taxation, immigration and government spending.
Slublog on February 5, 2008 at 11:57 PM
The early debates, I liked Huck.
His first commercial, with Chuck Norris, I thought was great.
It’s the slimy way he’s acted since he leaped into the first tier that’s turned me away from Huck. My SECOND LOOK AT HUCK just made me warier.
Screw him and the Trojan Horse he rode in on.
sulla on February 5, 2008 at 11:59 PM
That’s it. I’m changing parties tomorrow and voting for Obama in the primary. I figure the best that we can we get out of this election is a black president so that the “anti-racist” whiners will look stupid continuing to harp on their dated monomania.
And anyway if comes right down to it and the only difference I see is picks for the SC, I’m socially moderate and will vote Democrat given the current far right bias of the SC. My goal is for David Souter to get to make up his random little mind just as Sandra Day did. I’d do just the opposite if it were a Ginsberg court.
The honest fact remains that I’m no more likely to vote Democratic for President in the general election than Ann Coulter is. We just have to have our little fits. The kind of temper tantrum does matter. Threats let you blow off steam, but staying at home is dangerous. We don’t want a Democratic President with a highly Democratic Congress. We want our checks and balances.
thuja on February 6, 2008 at 12:01 AM
The pro-Romney cabal on the website needs to wake up a bit. Look nationwide at how many REPUBLICANS voted for either McCain or Huckabee. How snobby of many of you to somehow think you are better conservatives than the rest of us.
arizonateacher on February 6, 2008 at 12:08 AM
Did Huckabee say “pundint” ? Around 1:11 in the clip. AP’s new nickname: Allahpundint.
Mark Jaquith on February 6, 2008 at 12:10 AM
Look nationwide at how many REPUBLICANS voted for Romney.
He’s trailing McCain, but he’s beating Huck. And outside of the South, where is Huck?
sulla on February 6, 2008 at 12:10 AM
It is painfully obvious that Mitt is not going to win this nomination.
McCain still has time to mend fences with the base (at least most of it), if he doesn’t wait too long. It would seem to be a no-brainer for him to do so….a promise to veto any amnesty bill would be a start. Many would not believe him, but most would, if he were clear and emphatic in his promise.
It is time for pragmatic conservatives to see what can be salvaged from the wreckage here, and the hope is that a president who at least pays lip service to Reagan will be better than one who wants to redistribute wealth. All the big talk about “standing on principle” and “not giving up my ideals” is going to sound pretty lame when we’ve got an anti-military, left wing president, a Dem majority in Congress, and 2-3 retiring SCOTUS justices.
Priscilla on February 6, 2008 at 12:11 AM
Romney is not a bad guy, but this whole idea that the pundits are somehow spinning that he is any more a real republican or a conservative than the others is crazy. No one candidate is going to be 100% of anything to everyone. Why do people on this board feel it is proper to diss and name call and degrade other fellow conservatives. If I am less conservative on one issue than someone else, am I suddenly liberal?
arizonateacher on February 6, 2008 at 12:19 AM
If Romney really wants to win the war, he’ll quit the race tomorrow and endorse McCain. There are four guys left, Romney ain’t one of them, and only one of the other four will not surrender to the terrorists.
Darin on February 6, 2008 at 12:19 AM
Not even against the evil Hillary?
Hypocrite.
2Brave2Bscared on February 6, 2008 at 12:20 AM
Hickabee’s supporters are like a little cult. Invisible on polls, function without money through churches, fanatical, one issue voters. I actually like most of the people I know who fit his profile.
I just don’t like him. He’s a bigot.
Jaibones on February 6, 2008 at 12:20 AM
Engage in ad hominem all you wish, but it’s not going to change my mind.
No to Huckabee. No matter what.
Slublog on February 6, 2008 at 12:21 AM
Ditto.
sulla on February 6, 2008 at 12:25 AM
I myself will do everything to elect whatever republican wins the nomination, to ensure either of those Dem-Socialists are not sitting in the oval office. I can deal with certain things but I cannot live with anyone from what I consider the communist in training party running this great country. I think most Republicans regardless of whatever Super Tuesday hangover they are feeling right now will wake up and smell the freakin coffee on this eventually.
gator70 on February 6, 2008 at 12:31 AM
Good for you. I won’t be voting for him either.
I only called you a hypocrite because it wasn’t all that long ago that you railed against me and a few others for refusing to vote for the RINO trash that the Republican party was (and still is) trying to throw at us, even against Hillary in the general election. You said a third party vote or a no vote was essentially a vote for Hillary, and that that was completely unacceptable to you — at the time. But now that YOU have found a candidate that YOU find unacceptable, that you refuse to compromise your principles for — now it’s OK to “take your ball home” and not vote for the lesser of two evils? Interesting.
Again, fine with me. Personally, I’m glad to see you grow some spine. And don’t worry; I won’t equate you with Hillary supporters for not wanting to vote against her no matter who the Republican Party nominee is like you did with me a couple of months ago. But just keep this in mind the next time you “mature,” anybody-but-the-Democrats people want to harass those of us who choose to stand on principle over party loyalty: everyone has a limit. Glad to see you finally found yours.
2Brave2Bscared on February 6, 2008 at 12:42 AM
Wow, McCain’s straw man may (or may not) have siphoned off some potential Romney votes, but a funny thing happened on the way out of Super Duper, Mega Deluxe, Front Loaded for Her Pleasure, Tuesday.
The straw man done sucked entire states away from the guy he was supposed to hand ultimate victory to.
Funny how these things break sometimes…
…and so very fortunate.
We’re looking at a three man race with plenty of states still on the table, BIG states, like Texas, Ohio, Pennsylvainia, North Carolina, Indiana.
We know Romney’s got the cash to stay in it. McCain’s up, so he’s in, question is, will McCain let Huckabee stay in it now that he’s not so much costing Romney votes, as he’s costing him states? Or will McCain torch his supposed straw man, the man who aced him out of more than a few states by such small margins, denying him his seemingly all but assured clincher tonight? Can Huckabee sustain and build on today, or was this just his finest hour before it’s over?
Do we get a brokered convention? If so, floor fight like ‘76 and a fractured party? Or sanity, reconciliation, and a unified front to rally the party to not only the White House, but perhaps a shot at recapturing The House?
Also, what’ll be the asking price, and more importantly the going rate, for delegates? How will it effect the platform? What about the ticket?
This has potential to become high powered crack for political junkies.
Things seem oddly brighter than they did 24 hours ago…
SuperCool on February 6, 2008 at 12:43 AM
When did Mike Huckabee marry Janet Reno??
The Hayekian on February 6, 2008 at 12:43 AM
Watching the outcomes are sickening, Huckabee and McCain are deplorable. The stunt they pulled in WV detestable.
I can’t stand this race, can you tell?
Conservatives R Us on February 6, 2008 at 12:44 AM
Unlike you, I’m well aware that my refusal to vote for Huckabee might mean a Clinton or Obama presidency. I’m willing to own it. If I remember correctly, the anti-Giulianites blamed others for their decision. I shoulder the responsibility for my vote, or lack thereof.
McCain is going to be the nominee, and I’ll vote for him unless he picks Huckabee as his running mate.
Slublog on February 6, 2008 at 12:46 AM
This November it will be the Marxists vs the socialists (lite). Yuck! When will we learn that government IS the problem?
Mojave Mark on February 6, 2008 at 12:48 AM
I’m not too proud of my Baptist brother right now. Huckabee is acting shamefully, un-Christlike.
Doug on February 6, 2008 at 12:51 AM
Well, seeing as how Hillary ranted throughout her speech tonight that Government is the solution to everything that ails ya, we’ll either learn it before November, or after January.
If the latter, heaven help us all.
sulla on February 6, 2008 at 12:53 AM
Huckabee isn’t running for President people. He is doing running for a job with McCain.
But McCain won’t win the general.
Tough luck Huck.
Montana on February 6, 2008 at 1:01 AM
Huck and McCain have burned a lot of bridges to get this far, I think the Huck/McCain supporters are gonna be in for a really rude awakening when the general election gets going…
doubleplusundead on February 6, 2008 at 1:06 AM
Romney,Pack it up, pack it in
Let me begin
I came to win
Chakra Hammer on February 6, 2008 at 1:12 AM
Fox News did a poll with just McCain and Romney and McCain won , HUGE.
Chakra Hammer on February 6, 2008 at 1:15 AM
Guilt by association? I’m Baptist too, put up your dukes!
>:}
Chakra Hammer on February 6, 2008 at 1:16 AM
Hey Hucklebee – eff you!, and your little followers, too.
I’m just glad I was alive to live in the Reagan years, because the GOP is dead now.
Says who?
We’re all f*ed. 2016 is a long way off people.
Once again, I must give an emphatic eff-you to Hucklebee and all the evangelical morons.
Well, I still have time to move my money off-shore…
reaganaut on February 6, 2008 at 1:40 AM
I wish the media would ask anti-evolutionist Huckleberry one question tomorrow:
“Governor, you say you don’t believe in Evolution? Then why do males have nipples?”
Just the look on his faux preacher’s puss would be worth it.
The schmucks who voted for this pontificating calamity, and for McDole, have done Obama and Hillary a great service.
The GOP, not so much.
profitsbeard on February 6, 2008 at 2:07 AM
I still can’t see why the people running Hotair think Romney isn’t a RINO. They all are at this point.
The only chance we had of a conservative was Thompson and he screwed up his run from the start when he made a joke of himself by pretending to announce 5000 times on various talk shows.
Benaiah on February 6, 2008 at 2:16 AM
I wish the media would ask anti-evolutionist Huckleberry one question tomorrow:
“Governor, you say you don’t believe in Evolution? Then why do males have nipples?”
Just the look on his faux preacher’s puss would be worth it.
The schmucks who voted for this pontificating calamity, and for McDole, have done Obama and Hillary a great service.
The GOP, not so much.
profitsbeard
That’s the extent of your argument that evolution is real? Males have nipples?
That’s…special.
Benaiah on February 6, 2008 at 2:19 AM
Benaiah-
Just answer the question.
Explain this biological anomaly.
What is their “purpose”?
Try especially hard.
profitsbeard on February 6, 2008 at 3:01 AM
Hi, profitsbeard. That question of yours seems to be a rhetorical device. But if you’re really interested, study embryology a bit.
Skidd on February 6, 2008 at 3:36 AM
Huckabee…the saviour of conservatism!
LOL!
Bye-bye, Flip Romney!
Al-Ozarka on February 6, 2008 at 3:40 AM
BTW, I’d have been here all night giving you Flip-Fans hell but our internet has been down because of a tornado strike just outside of town.
Al-Ozarka on February 6, 2008 at 3:41 AM
“Hey Hucklebee – eff you!, and your little followers, too.
I’m just glad I was alive to live in the Reagan years, because the GOP is dead now.”
Why?
If Allah, Michelle and Rush had been around in ‘80, Reagan would NEVER have even gotten the nomination given the idiotic litmus tests they have applied to today’s candidates.
Allah, Michelle…ready to admit that YOU guys are responsible for our predicament? Doubt it.
Well…maybe one day soon you’ll wake-up to reality but I still wonder if your foolish pride will allow you to admit your ignorance this election season.
Al-Ozarka on February 6, 2008 at 3:48 AM
Ah, we just figured you had a book burning to attend…
SuperCool on February 6, 2008 at 5:27 AM
Dittos, Slu. Don’t even have to think about it.
silverfox on February 6, 2008 at 5:34 AM
I do not see the spirit of Christ in Huckabee.
I see pride gussied up with a faux humility.
But not the real deal, not real humility.
You might say as much for others running, but they don’t quote the Bible and ascribe their successes to “supernatural” forces.
silverfox on February 6, 2008 at 5:44 AM
McPain/Schmuckabee 2008?
I don’t think so.
pilamaye on February 6, 2008 at 5:46 AM
Yeah..because of him the biggest RINO in the party will get the nomination…
EnochCain on February 6, 2008 at 6:08 AM
I am voting for president, not a church leader.
Its good to be devout. It is what shapes a persons views and beleifs. But, it is not good when that person comes across like a crooked baptist preacher, with one hand on the bible and the other in your wallet.
It appears to me that we have had a definate lack of god candidtes over the years. The 2 party system is a problem. No term limits is another. Everyone gets polerized into 2 camps, and damn the country, as long as they can hold on to their power they are happy. Manwhile the sheeple graze along on indiocy like Brittny or Paris while the world collapses around them.
Is this too bitter for this early?
Wyrd on February 6, 2008 at 7:11 AM
In my electoral universe, votes are earned, not expected. Where one votes for a candidate not just against another. McCain has not attempted to convince conservatives they have a reason to vote for him. His RINO credentials are still in evidence, his loathing of conservatives intact.
Huckabee won’t get the nomination and as far as being selected for Vice President, since McCain is counting on moderates and independents, that dog won’t hunt? Huckabee’s strategy of sucking up to Big John for the #2 spot will end up a loser.
Romney can’t win either, just too many bigots to overcome. And with Huckabee targeting him instead of McCain, Romney can’t get the one-on-one match-up he needs to accentuate the differences between himself and McCain.
So for me the selection in the voting booth in the general election will be easy. I’ll write in “None of the Above.”
Enigma on February 6, 2008 at 7:33 AM
If it’s true that McCain asked his voters to vote for Huckabee in order to keep Romney from winning the state – that is slime of the worst kind.
Take heed, voters, at the duplicity of McCain and Huckabee. Is it your intention to put Clinton-lite back into the White House?
pocomoco on February 6, 2008 at 7:45 AM
Because I am not going to vote for him. I am even thinking of going Ann Coulter on him and voting for the Dem. Momma McCain said I need to hold my nose and vote for him–sorry Momma!! It ain’t gonna happen.
USBB on February 6, 2008 at 7:52 AM
McCain doesn’t have to lose the general. Hillary and Obama are weak and inexperienced, and that is one of the reasons that Dem voters can’t decide who they want.
If the stupid party doesn’t go off and sulk in a corner, the leftist-socialists can again be denied the presidency. It is an opportunity not to be missed, because, if they win, they will begin structural and demographic changes that will institutionalize their power. That alone should motivate you to vote for Mac.
Priscilla on February 6, 2008 at 8:07 AM
I’m afraid not. By definition sheep are attracted to socialism, and feed at the communal trough. An immediate national emergency could rouse people from their stupor, but I have no real confidence in that. Hey, England and France are still there, they’re just not English and French anymore. There’ll still be a USA, it just won’t be American.
JiangxiDad on February 6, 2008 at 8:08 AM
“Yeah..because of him the biggest RINO in the party will get the nomination…”
Because of whom? Allah? Rush? Romney?
Maybe Romney will finally realize he is unwanted by the base (as proven in the south last night) and leave the heroics to the true conservative in the race, Huvckabee.
But I doubt it. It seems Romney’s stayed in the race with all of his money in order to insure a McCain nomination.
You Rom-Zombies MUST be startinto realize what IDIOTS you’ve been.
Thanks for McCAin, Romniacs!
Al-Ozarka on February 6, 2008 at 8:11 AM
If “today’s” GOP is the party of McCain and Huckabee, good grief. Whatdafuh? Uhhhh… second look at Bloomberg? Yeah, I know he’s not in yet and really a Dem… but he’s more honest about being a non-Republican than Mav and Goose (Huckabee.)
Wow. Clinton vs. McCain. Has there ever been two less popular, less likable candidates evah?
Sugar Land on February 6, 2008 at 8:25 AM
Ya’ll know what would be really funny? Since McCain is pretty much broke now — and the Huckster can’t win any non-Southern states and not even all of the Southern states at that — what if McCain sticks the knife in Hucklebee’s back and offers the VP slot to Romney in exchange for Romney putting up funding for the pair of them?
I don’t know if Romney would do it but — McCain is 71 years old — fair odds for dying in office and whomever is VP would then advance to the Presidency.
Just a thought…
SunSword on February 6, 2008 at 8:30 AM
I am from the South and I voted for Romney. Oh and is it really necessary to call people names?
EnochCain on February 6, 2008 at 8:50 AM
Huckabee is the Demoncrate plant on the Republican side of Hitlery’s campaign strutergy (ask the body language expert what that looks like so we will know what to look for).
MSGTAS on February 6, 2008 at 9:02 AM
I’m completely disheartened that Huckabee won even one more state. Not only do I think he’s not at all the “Christian Leader” he purports to be (not with the comments he makes, no way!), I can’t vote for someone who isn’t conservative.
Also, when he talks, sometimes it looks like he only has 2 teeth on the bottom. Looks creepy.
As for McCain, he’s not conservative either, so I’m hoping Romney will stay in until McCain blows a gasket.
serpentineshel on February 6, 2008 at 9:02 AM
Where Huckabee lost, he lost UGLY.
California– 12% (Half million votes behind Romney)
Colorado — 13%
Connecticut –7%
Maine –6%
Massachusetts –4%
Montana 15% — He finished BEHIND Ron Paul
Nevada 8% — Behind Ron Paul
New Hampshire — 11%
New Jersey –8%
New York — 11%
North Dakota — 20% Behind Ron Paul
Utah –2% Behind Ron Paul
Mike Huckabee finished behind Ron Paul in 4 states.
EJDolbow on February 6, 2008 at 9:06 AM
Cuz he’s a mormon which is alomst as bad as being a jew whereas I am a Southern Baptist minister ordained by God himself to lead the Deep South outta the GOP.
argos on February 6, 2008 at 9:13 AM
argos on February 6, 2008 at 9:17 AM
Remove Huckabees balls and you’ve got the perfect liberal.
What an a$$wipe!
leanright on February 6, 2008 at 9:20 AM
I MIGHT hold my nose and vote for Huck.
McCain? oh hell no.
Ex-tex on February 6, 2008 at 9:37 AM
Does anyone know what happens to Huckabee or Romney’s delegate votes if either of them drop out of the race?
orlandocajun on February 6, 2008 at 9:46 AM
I would never vote for Huckabee because he is not a man of character. Look at how quickly he abandoned his personal beliefs with regard to illegals and foriegn policy during this campaign when he realized his position were not popular.
EJDolbow on February 6, 2008 at 9:48 AM
They benefit the Democrats
EJDolbow on February 6, 2008 at 9:48 AM
I just heard the American Mongoloid Association endorsed Huckabee. The South is every bit as awful as California and New York have been telling us. I guess deep down we knew.
Yee-haw. Go team.
pc on February 6, 2008 at 1:16 PM
Did you watch the video? David & Goliath? Widow’s Mite?
Tzetzes on February 6, 2008 at 5:16 PM
Your mullet can’t bring him back.
Tzetzes on February 6, 2008 at 5:17 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »