<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Mitt ad: Hillary = McCain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:21:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Snake307</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-2/#comment-932760</link>
		<dc:creator>Snake307</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-932760</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

Ha! I especially like the fake-Bill-Clinton voice at the end. Too too funny!

Tzetzes on February 4, 2008 at 11:37 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sorry, that&#039;s not a fake Clinton voice. It really was said by Bill Clinton. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/25/bill-clinton-hillarymcc_n_83339.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Huffington post article&lt;/a&gt; on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>Ha! I especially like the fake-Bill-Clinton voice at the end. Too too funny!</p>
<p>Tzetzes on February 4, 2008 at 11:37 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Sorry, that&#8217;s not a fake Clinton voice. It really was said by Bill Clinton. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/25/bill-clinton-hillarymcc_n_83339.html" rel="nofollow">Huffington post article</a> on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infidelpride</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-2/#comment-932664</link>
		<dc:creator>infidelpride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-932664</guid>
		<description>AP

Here in CA, I saw it air a few times today.  If only we had been bombarded with this over the last several weeks.

I&#039;m still hoping for a Mittacle tomorrow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AP</p>
<p>Here in CA, I saw it air a few times today.  If only we had been bombarded with this over the last several weeks.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still hoping for a Mittacle tomorrow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tzetzes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-2/#comment-932602</link>
		<dc:creator>Tzetzes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-932602</guid>
		<description>Ha!  I especially like the fake-Bill-Clinton voice at the end.  Too &lt;em&gt;too &lt;/em&gt;funny!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha!  I especially like the fake-Bill-Clinton voice at the end.  Too <em>too </em>funny!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Livefreeordie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-2/#comment-932585</link>
		<dc:creator>Livefreeordie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-932585</guid>
		<description>Awesome ad.....hope it gives him the boost he needs tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome ad&#8230;..hope it gives him the boost he needs tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustTruth101</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-2/#comment-932560</link>
		<dc:creator>JustTruth101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-932560</guid>
		<description>Great ad...he should be running this on tv.  I like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great ad&#8230;he should be running this on tv.  I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheSitRep</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-2/#comment-932520</link>
		<dc:creator>TheSitRep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-932520</guid>
		<description>It sucks when you are in a postition that when some one runs an ad that tells the truth it is a negative ad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sucks when you are in a postition that when some one runs an ad that tells the truth it is a negative ad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pax americana</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-2/#comment-932464</link>
		<dc:creator>Pax americana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-932464</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Mitthead Romnasshole, Mittlawnamnesty, Mitt for brains.

Oooh. Now I am arguing on your level. Exciting.

JayHaw Phrenzie on February 4, 2008 at 8:38 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Mitt Con-mey is my personal fav. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mittensromney.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mittens comes in not far behind.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Mitthead Romnasshole, Mittlawnamnesty, Mitt for brains.</p>
<p>Oooh. Now I am arguing on your level. Exciting.</p>
<p>JayHaw Phrenzie on February 4, 2008 at 8:38 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Mitt Con-mey is my personal fav. <a href="http://www.mittensromney.com/" rel="nofollow">Mittens comes in not far behind.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian G.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-2/#comment-932329</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-932329</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if anyone else corrected it, but the half-dollar gas tax is a distortion: http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/simi_valley_showdown.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if anyone else corrected it, but the half-dollar gas tax is a distortion: <a href="http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/simi_valley_showdown.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/simi_valley_showdown.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JayHaw Phrenzie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-2/#comment-932138</link>
		<dc:creator>JayHaw Phrenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-932138</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;csdeven on February 4, 2008 at 8:12 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So your argument boils down to making insults out of Macs name (McDouche, et al). 

Let me counter with:

Mitthead Romnasshole, Mittlawnamnesty, Mitt for brains.

Oooh.  Now I am arguing on your level.  Exciting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>csdeven on February 4, 2008 at 8:12 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>So your argument boils down to making insults out of Macs name (McDouche, et al). </p>
<p>Let me counter with:</p>
<p>Mitthead Romnasshole, Mittlawnamnesty, Mitt for brains.</p>
<p>Oooh.  Now I am arguing on your level.  Exciting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great new Romney ad</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-2/#comment-932104</link>
		<dc:creator>Great new Romney ad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-932104</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitting where it counts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitting where it counts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robsaye</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-2/#comment-932059</link>
		<dc:creator>robsaye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-932059</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So with minority status likely, and a strong possibility of a Democratic presidency only a few years away, Republican leadership was ready to jettison a key tactic of the minority party for blocking unacceptable nominees.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A key tactic of the Democrats. The Republican party had only &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/Filibuster_Derails_Supreme_Court_Appointment.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;filibustered &lt;/a&gt;1 candidate in it&#039;s history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So with minority status likely, and a strong possibility of a Democratic presidency only a few years away, Republican leadership was ready to jettison a key tactic of the minority party for blocking unacceptable nominees.</p></blockquote>
<p>A key tactic of the Democrats. The Republican party had only <a href="http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/Filibuster_Derails_Supreme_Court_Appointment.htm" rel="nofollow">filibustered </a>1 candidate in it&#8217;s history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csdeven</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-2/#comment-932051</link>
		<dc:creator>csdeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-932051</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This may not be your ideal tax policy, but it’s light years away from the Hillary and the vast majority of the Dems.

Big S on February 4, 2008 at 6:09 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why are you McLiar shills ignoring the fact that McShamnesty &lt;strong&gt;DOES NOT&lt;/strong&gt; work with conservatives on these issues?! If president he &lt;em&gt;will sign every POS legislation that the dem controlled congress sends to his desk&lt;/em&gt;. He has a hard-on for conservatives and he will oppose most conservative legislation just to poke us in the eye for opposing him for his liberal tendencies.

McDouche is all about McDouche validating his ego.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This may not be your ideal tax policy, but it’s light years away from the Hillary and the vast majority of the Dems.</p>
<p>Big S on February 4, 2008 at 6:09 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Why are you McLiar shills ignoring the fact that McShamnesty <strong>DOES NOT</strong> work with conservatives on these issues?! If president he <em>will sign every POS legislation that the dem controlled congress sends to his desk</em>. He has a hard-on for conservatives and he will oppose most conservative legislation just to poke us in the eye for opposing him for his liberal tendencies.</p>
<p>McDouche is all about McDouche validating his ego.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profitsbeard</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-2/#comment-932026</link>
		<dc:creator>profitsbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-932026</guid>
		<description>McCillary?

Cloning&#039;s worst premonition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCillary?</p>
<p>Cloning&#8217;s worst premonition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pax americana</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-2/#comment-931974</link>
		<dc:creator>Pax americana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-931974</guid>
		<description>The only people giving up are those who would sell all their principles down the river to defeat the Democrats. Party politics above all else for the pro-McCain “conservatives.” Shame on all of you.

2Brave2Bscared on February 4, 2008 at 7:26 PM

You&#039;ve sure lost the plot: I don&#039;t know what your principles are, but mine include being pro-life, pro-heterosexual marriage, pro investing in our military, anti-Islamist, against surrendering in Iraq, against socialised healthcare, against pork barrel spending, against tax hikes, pro free trade, against liberal appointees to the Supreme court etc etc. For as long as I&#039;ve been alive, these have been the views of the GOP.

On all these points McCain seems to share my view; the Democrats do not. He may not have been my first choice for nominee, but as a Republican I will be supporting him.

Shame on those imbeciles who will sell the GOP and Republican principles down the river just to serve their egos and their hatred of McCain. Contempt isn&#039;t the right word for such charlatans and P.O.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only people giving up are those who would sell all their principles down the river to defeat the Democrats. Party politics above all else for the pro-McCain “conservatives.” Shame on all of you.</p>
<p>2Brave2Bscared on February 4, 2008 at 7:26 PM</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve sure lost the plot: I don&#8217;t know what your principles are, but mine include being pro-life, pro-heterosexual marriage, pro investing in our military, anti-Islamist, against surrendering in Iraq, against socialised healthcare, against pork barrel spending, against tax hikes, pro free trade, against liberal appointees to the Supreme court etc etc. For as long as I&#8217;ve been alive, these have been the views of the GOP.</p>
<p>On all these points McCain seems to share my view; the Democrats do not. He may not have been my first choice for nominee, but as a Republican I will be supporting him.</p>
<p>Shame on those imbeciles who will sell the GOP and Republican principles down the river just to serve their egos and their hatred of McCain. Contempt isn&#8217;t the right word for such charlatans and P.O.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2Brave2Bscared</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-2/#comment-931909</link>
		<dc:creator>2Brave2Bscared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-931909</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Look we are at war. Thousands have already died. If Im going to ask US troops to go out and fight for my freedoms then I will NOT give any conservatives a few pass to sit on their asses at home while they bleed.

They are paying the price so it really urks me to see conservative say they will throw away their votes for president because they dislike the choices. If we have to ask them to risk it all I dont feel bad asking conservatives to get off their butts and support them.

You have a choice. You can make a difference. I hate the choices as well but damn it I will not surrender all just because we conservatives blew this election. My concern is for THEM I care not one whit about silly political stances in this country.

To quote a famous wise woman “suck it up” and start acting like true conservatives than sniving democrats.

If you want to vote for Mitt that is fine. He is a great candidate. At least you still would vote. Never ever give up.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The only people giving up are those who would sell all their principles down the river to defeat the Democrats. Party politics above all else for the pro-McCain &quot;conservatives.&quot; Shame on all of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Look we are at war. Thousands have already died. If Im going to ask US troops to go out and fight for my freedoms then I will NOT give any conservatives a few pass to sit on their asses at home while they bleed.</p>
<p>They are paying the price so it really urks me to see conservative say they will throw away their votes for president because they dislike the choices. If we have to ask them to risk it all I dont feel bad asking conservatives to get off their butts and support them.</p>
<p>You have a choice. You can make a difference. I hate the choices as well but damn it I will not surrender all just because we conservatives blew this election. My concern is for THEM I care not one whit about silly political stances in this country.</p>
<p>To quote a famous wise woman “suck it up” and start acting like true conservatives than sniving democrats.</p>
<p>If you want to vote for Mitt that is fine. He is a great candidate. At least you still would vote. Never ever give up.</p></blockquote>
<p>The only people giving up are those who would sell all their principles down the river to defeat the Democrats. Party politics above all else for the pro-McCain &#8220;conservatives.&#8221; Shame on all of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightOFLeft</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-2/#comment-931868</link>
		<dc:creator>RightOFLeft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-931868</guid>
		<description>A second thought on the gang of fourteen - how sound was the &quot;nuclear option?&quot; In 2005, the writing was on the wall for the Republican-controlled congress. They held a slim 5-vote majority, and the upcoming elections looked grim. Recall the scores of angst-ridden posts on this site concerning the impending Democratic majority. 

So with minority status likely, and a strong possibility of a Democratic presidency only a few years away, Republican leadership was ready to jettison a key tactic of the minority party for blocking unacceptable nominees. Again, does this really seem like a good idea? Republicans should thank McCain for opening a path to the confirmation of Bush&#039;s controversial appointments, not make dishonest attacks about McCain &quot;blocking judicial nominees.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A second thought on the gang of fourteen &#8211; how sound was the &#8220;nuclear option?&#8221; In 2005, the writing was on the wall for the Republican-controlled congress. They held a slim 5-vote majority, and the upcoming elections looked grim. Recall the scores of angst-ridden posts on this site concerning the impending Democratic majority. </p>
<p>So with minority status likely, and a strong possibility of a Democratic presidency only a few years away, Republican leadership was ready to jettison a key tactic of the minority party for blocking unacceptable nominees. Again, does this really seem like a good idea? Republicans should thank McCain for opening a path to the confirmation of Bush&#8217;s controversial appointments, not make dishonest attacks about McCain &#8220;blocking judicial nominees.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bnelson44</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-2/#comment-931867</link>
		<dc:creator>bnelson44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-931867</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MTI1NmU2OGRjZjFkZjZjYzZkMDgwOWFlOGUwMzNmOWE=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;There&#039;s Mistakes, And Then There&#039;s Pandering To Your Audience&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MTI1NmU2OGRjZjFkZjZjYzZkMDgwOWFlOGUwMzNmOWE=" rel="nofollow">There&#8217;s Mistakes, And Then There&#8217;s Pandering To Your Audience</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bnelson44</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-2/#comment-931861</link>
		<dc:creator>bnelson44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-931861</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_mccain_vs_clinton-224.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;General Election: McCain vs. Clinton&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_mccain_vs_obama-225.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;General Election: McCain vs. Obama&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_clinton-230.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;General Election: Romney vs. Clinton&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-231.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;General Election: Romney vs. Obama&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_mccain_vs_clinton-224.html" rel="nofollow">General Election: McCain vs. Clinton</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_mccain_vs_obama-225.html" rel="nofollow">General Election: McCain vs. Obama</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_clinton-230.html" rel="nofollow">General Election: Romney vs. Clinton</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-231.html" rel="nofollow">General Election: Romney vs. Obama</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SouthernDem</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-2/#comment-931849</link>
		<dc:creator>SouthernDem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-931849</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why do you think all the LibTurd Pundits are running around saying “OH…We Are Sooooo Scared Of A McCain Nomination?”…..
DUUUUHHHHHH………………….
awesum on February 4, 2008 at 6:20 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Show me one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why do you think all the LibTurd Pundits are running around saying “OH…We Are Sooooo Scared Of A McCain Nomination?”…..<br />
DUUUUHHHHHH………………….<br />
awesum on February 4, 2008 at 6:20 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Show me one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-931847</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-931847</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great ad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great ad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SouthernDem</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-931845</link>
		<dc:creator>SouthernDem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-931845</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m as disappointed as the next conservative around here at the apparent direction the GOP is going. But then, the Democrats don’t seem any surer of themselves.
JetBoy&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The big difference being there won&#039;t be a huge split depending on who the nominee is. They&#039;ll rally around the nominee whether it&#039;s Clinton or Obama. I don&#039;t see any such gelling for the GOP. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;emailnuevo on February 4, 2008 at 6:19 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Don&#039;t get me wrong, I understand the dilemma for conservatives here. How could I not? I&#039;m a Democrat that will, 99.99% chance (unless Obama gives up on Socialized care, amnesty and withdrawal from Iraq), be voting for a Republican in November.  
I have my own ideologies that I won&#039;t betray, but I also see where we are as a country and how important this next election is. So regardless of how much I dislike all 4 frontrunners, I&#039;ll pick the least of the evils for the good of our country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’m as disappointed as the next conservative around here at the apparent direction the GOP is going. But then, the Democrats don’t seem any surer of themselves.<br />
JetBoy</p></blockquote>
<p>The big difference being there won&#8217;t be a huge split depending on who the nominee is. They&#8217;ll rally around the nominee whether it&#8217;s Clinton or Obama. I don&#8217;t see any such gelling for the GOP. </p>
<blockquote><p>emailnuevo on February 4, 2008 at 6:19 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I understand the dilemma for conservatives here. How could I not? I&#8217;m a Democrat that will, 99.99% chance (unless Obama gives up on Socialized care, amnesty and withdrawal from Iraq), be voting for a Republican in November.<br />
I have my own ideologies that I won&#8217;t betray, but I also see where we are as a country and how important this next election is. So regardless of how much I dislike all 4 frontrunners, I&#8217;ll pick the least of the evils for the good of our country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightOFLeft</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-931829</link>
		<dc:creator>RightOFLeft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 23:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-931829</guid>
		<description>Alito doesn&#039;t get confirmed without McCain&#039;s gang of fourteen compromise. Possibly the most openly conservative supreme court justice ever to sit on the bench, and McCain played a pivotal role in putting him there. Yet he routinely gets excoriated for it by Republicans. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alito doesn&#8217;t get confirmed without McCain&#8217;s gang of fourteen compromise. Possibly the most openly conservative supreme court justice ever to sit on the bench, and McCain played a pivotal role in putting him there. Yet he routinely gets excoriated for it by Republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beatnik Joe</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-931823</link>
		<dc:creator>Beatnik Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 23:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-931823</guid>
		<description>Very nice ad!  I&#039;d like to see a nice, broad television ad buy for that one.  I think it&#039;s about as close as you can get to laying out the problems with McCain in a &quot;bumper sticker&quot; style that sticks in your head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice ad!  I&#8217;d like to see a nice, broad television ad buy for that one.  I think it&#8217;s about as close as you can get to laying out the problems with McCain in a &#8220;bumper sticker&#8221; style that sticks in your head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Voice</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-931822</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 23:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-931822</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;William Amos on February 4, 2008 at 6:05 PM&lt;/strong&gt;

You are right, we are at war, for the soul of the Republican party.  John McCain represents represents the pure essence of what a RINO is.  Only if he becomes the face of the republican party...it will be conservatives who would be RINOs, because the Republican Party would no longer be representative of conservatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>William Amos on February 4, 2008 at 6:05 PM</strong></p>
<p>You are right, we are at war, for the soul of the Republican party.  John McCain represents represents the pure essence of what a RINO is.  Only if he becomes the face of the republican party&#8230;it will be conservatives who would be RINOs, because the Republican Party would no longer be representative of conservatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mksmithwriter</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-931817</link>
		<dc:creator>mksmithwriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 23:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/04/new-mitt-ad-hillary-mccain/#comment-931817</guid>
		<description>Hey, why didn&#039;t Gush Goombagh put up a $100 mill or so for ads????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, why didn&#8217;t Gush Goombagh put up a $100 mill or so for ads????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
