I’m not buying it.

I view the public agenda as renewing the true roles of government. Wherein the Federal government limits its specific responsibilities and grants to the States the largest level of protecting and providing for the basic needs (Maslow) needs for its population. When the states do not do their job properly, the population moves to another state or community that more closely share their personal values.

Therefore, we must remember what we are voting for in this election cycle. First, a President to lead this country among the other countries of the world and defend us against any enemy domestic or foreign,-not a person that will babysit us. Second, a President that supports the Constitution and finds ways “to promote the general welfare” which has a more ethereal meaning then the convoluted politicians have espoused “to provide for the general welfare”. Third, voting for representatives and senators at all levels of government who are mandated to knock down the roadblocks that do not allow us provide for our personal welfare.

Think carefully before you cast your ballot you may find on Nov 5 that the ‘Wicked Witch of West’ has arrive and we are not in Kansas anymore.

Mitt Romney will go into debates with Hillary or Barak at least as well or better than he has against Republicans. I think he will do better because he won’t feel the need to hold his punches as much against Democrats. He will also have a lot more time to tear appart their policies and arguments.

It is going to be awesome as long as Mitt is in it.

Tzetzes on February 3, 2008 at 11:28 PM

There’s also a woman fawning all over him who looks rather like the young Hilary Clinton.

I’m done praying to the porcelain alter.
I want this guy for President

Kini on February 3, 2008 at 3:50 PM

There’s a woman in that video holding a sign that says “boycott lettuce”. Does that mean she’s for or against McCain?

Your wallet may have a tough time telling the difference between Hillary care and carbon taxes.

What amazes me is not the fact that a lot of Republicans will be voting with their feet, but that the folks touting McCain’s electability have been so quick to abandon the wit and wisdom of the genius formerly known as Karl Rove.

First, my friend Danno, they must come home from shopping.
Second, they must have a clue about what goes on around them.

Entelechy on February 3, 2008 at 6:17 PM

Noted, and in turn I would have pointed you to my very insitefull piece, ‘Americans Are Lazy’ IF we had not lost that when the site crashed. I still have a copy here though.

Redundancy is always a good idea. Too bad that McAmnesty cannot fathom that simple truth. As a matter of fact, Juan has a poor conception of truth, eh?

I despise both of them. This election will suck.

tickleddragon on February 3, 2008 at 2:02 PM

Exactly!

America first, party second.

ThePrez on February 3, 2008 at 2:26 PM

Precisely WHY I will never vote for Shamnesty McLiar. If I wanted our country overrun with illegal aliens, our Constitutional rights destroyed in the name of some fuzzy-feel-good bumper sticker anc all my money taken in the name of “global warming” I would vote for the man. But since I do love my country, I won’t. Ever.

I despise both of them. This election will suck.

tickleddragon on February 3, 2008 at 2:02 PM

Tell us how you really feel.

Despierte, América! Hola!

DannoJyd on February 3, 2008 at 5:58 PM

First, my friend Danno, they must come home from shopping.
Second, they must have a clue about what goes on around them.

- The Cat

Despierte, América! Hola!

Ugh! What a bunch of cry babies. “I didn`t get what I wanted, so I`m going home!”

America first, party second.

ThePrez on February 3, 2008 at 2:26 PM

If McCain wins the nomination, it will continue the movement of the Republican party towards the Left. The coalition will be busted and will result in a very different dynamic.

I think some people would vote for Obama if he were running as a Republican and espousing the exact same positions he currently is. But he’d have an ‘R’ in front of his name, so it would be ok.

A Republican party that nominates an open border, class warfare, global warming, big government candidate isn’t appealing to principled Conservatives.

There likely isn’t going to be a Conservative in the race after the Primaries. So what’s the point?

America seems poorly served with two major parties that basically agree on most issues…mostly disagreeing on the timetables for implementation.

No thanks.

He had something like a 60% conservative voting record last year, compared with Hillary’s 8% (or thereabouts).

60% beats 8%. Do the math.

As for the crazies who call McCain a “Marxist-Leninist” or “America’s leading liberal” … get a grip on reality, please. He is a centrist Republican, and he’ll be going up against either Hillary or Obama (or Hillary-Obama) – two of the most liberal senators in the nation.

This whole election cycle has been set up/stolen/manipulated by the MSM, George Soros and the Clintons. How else can one explain McCain being the Republican nominee?

Oh, yes indeed: It’s a conspiracy! After all, it’s just not possible for a candidate that we disagree with to win an election. Ergo, the election must have been stolen.

Look, I can’t stand John McCain and will never vote for him. But let’s not permit the man’s nomination to psychologically destabilize us.

tickleddragon on February 3, 2008 at 3:58 PM

i would kneel gallantly and slip it over your slender foot, m’lady.

jummy on February 3, 2008 at 3:49 PM

You, Love, know precisely what you can do with that shoe. :)