Video: Huckabee accuses Romney of buying Hannity’s endorsement
posted at 12:30 pm on February 2, 2008 by Allahpundit
Send to a Friend |
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Even more amazing than the accusation is the fact that the embed who recorded it buried it in a post about Huck’s dopey Romney/Hillary comparison. Skip ahead to 1:31; the beginning of the question is cut off but it’s clear enough that Hannity, who announced two days ago that he’ll vote for Mitt, is the subject. Huck himself refers to “Sean” in his answer. The background here is that Mitt’s firm, Bain Capital, owns Clear Channel Communications, which in turn owns all sorts of talent, Hannity included. Not until the last few weeks, though, when talk radio broke hard towards Romney to stop McCain (and, before him, Huck) was the Bain/CCC connection an issue. In fact, we’ve gotten several tips to the effect that Bain just recently bought CCC in a last-ditch effort to monopolize the media on Mitt’s behalf; for that lazy smear you can thank HuffPo, which duly repeated it on their site before googling for five seconds and discovering that Bain actually bought CCC back in November 2006. Which means that, per Huck’s theory, Hannity’s supposedly been in the tank for Romney for the past 14 months even while he was giving tons of airtime and admiring buzz to Rudy Giuliani and Fred Thompson.
And of course, true to Huckabee form, not only does this come in the context of a longer class-warfare harangue (per the emphasis on Mitt breaking up companies and laying people off) but he doesn’t have the balls to own the dirty trick he’s engaged in. He qualifies the accusation by stressing that “some suggest” Hannity might be in the tank, not necessarily our “Christian leader.” We’ll see if Hannity has more balls than he does by hammering him about this the next time he’s on H&C. I’m not optimistic. Click the image to watch.
Update: Not all talk radio stars are with Clear Channel either, needless to say. Ingraham is with Talk Radio Network.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
Huckabee is scum. He could care less about anything but himself and his lust for power. I am amazed that so many people continue to vote for such a blatant loser. He lies, he distorts, and all the while esposes his piety and “Christianity.” Just because he was a preacher does not make him worthy.
WAKE UP HUCKAMANIACS! Your candidate is bad for the country. As bad as Hillary or Obama. Not only is a vote for him a vote for the democrats, IT IS A VOTE FOR THE MEXICAN NATIONALIST MOVEMENT IN OUR COUNTRY.
America1st on February 2, 2008 at 6:04 PM
Bets please: Huck was offered Sec of State or VP by McCain for staying in to split conservatives?
TCJ on February 2, 2008 at 6:19 PM
What a prick. Easily the most odious figure to emerge from this campaign cycle.
Dudley Smith on February 2, 2008 at 6:24 PM
I donated the other day for the same reason. I don’t usually do that sort of thing but it had to be done.
I hope the news out of this great state of Maine is as positive as people are saying too.
drdroo on February 2, 2008 at 6:35 PM
All in all, you’re just another brick in the tie.
- The Cat
MirCat on February 2, 2008 at 7:21 PM
Sounds more like one of those strange conspiracies Paulites would come up with.
“Well, he used to be the CEO of a company which supplied to radio stations, which runs Sean Hannity’s program, which directly links them to the Clintons and Hitler!!!”
WHAT?!
NDConservative on February 2, 2008 at 7:26 PM
Sure but Hannity’s program is not run by Clearchannel. It’s run by ABC Radio. That’s the irony of it. Hannity is on Clearchannel stations, but his home station is 77 WABC. :)
Huck’s gotta learn how to do some research here.
drdroo on February 2, 2008 at 7:29 PM
Hmmmm another conservative pundit for Romney……go figure. The same people who went after Kerry as a flip flopper support a flip flopper. I do not agree with all that Huckabee supports, nor am I religious person. But the guy is honest and consistent in his views. Talk radio continues to bash Huckabee and McCain and yet in the SC primary conservative voters went to these two. Romney was a liberal Republican and should have run as what he really is as either Gov. back in Mass. or as President. Which is he? Please…with this guy!
arizonateacher on February 2, 2008 at 7:38 PM
Huck.
Didn’t they teach you “It’s a sin to tell a lie“?
Or -is he like George Costanza who believes that if you don’t think it’s a lie, it isn’t?
profitsbeard on February 2, 2008 at 7:47 PM
A vote for Mitt Romney may be a vote for Hillary Clinton.
Chakra Hammer on February 2, 2008 at 8:20 PM
Mitt Romney, Sellout.. LOL
Chakra Hammer on February 2, 2008 at 8:21 PM
Haha, thanks BD.. I was beginning to get worried about people around here if no one understood my deliberately over the top conspiracy theorizing to make a joke.
RightWinged on February 2, 2008 at 9:08 PM
Yeah? Well, I accuse Huckabee of being a stupid poopy dookie-head.
Tzetzes on February 2, 2008 at 10:13 PM
I accuse Huckabee of being a worthless, vicipus, hateful, bigoted, idiotic tool.
He is a small-minded little shitstain minister who should have retired to TV shystering long ago.
And those are the most polite words I can muster to describe him.
BKennedy on February 2, 2008 at 10:18 PM
A vote for McCain is a vote for Shamnesty.
Igor R. on February 2, 2008 at 10:23 PM
A vote for Huckabee isa vote for the Devil.
Igor R. on February 2, 2008 at 10:24 PM
McCain and Huckabee are the Beevis and Butthead of this campaign.
EJDolbow on February 2, 2008 at 10:28 PM
President H. Clinton = Liberal policies we can criticize and oppose.
President McCain = Liberal policies we’ll be expected to defend.
Tzetzes on February 2, 2008 at 10:30 PM
What a shameful duo to vie for the most powerful office in the world! A liar who likes to call his lies “straight talk” and “a man of God” with no conscience!
Igor R. on February 2, 2008 at 10:31 PM
Willard f’n Kerry.. opps… Romney.. we’ll be expected to explain away his memories, etc.
Chakra Hammer on February 2, 2008 at 10:33 PM
If and when either of them is elected, they will legalize the illegals at which point no Republican President will ever be elected due to the new 40 million strong illegals and their “unified” relatives permanent Democratic voting block. It won’t make any difference what policies anyone defends at that point. Just kiss your country good bye.
Igor R. on February 2, 2008 at 10:34 PM
Eh?
Tzetzes on February 2, 2008 at 10:35 PM
It’s better than explaining away Guiliani’s ex-wives, mistresses, and shady mob dealings.
BKennedy on February 2, 2008 at 10:36 PM
Who cares about meaningless crap. McCain’s main goal is to destroy this country by importing how of Mexico. Did you hear how he was encouraging La Raza to go an defend their (McCain’s and La Raza’s) common objective? He IS the Manchurian candidate!
Igor R. on February 2, 2008 at 10:36 PM
Chakra Hammer on February 2, 2008 at 10:33 PM
School yard logic in support of the tag-teaming duo of school yard haters, Huck and McCain. The super fighter jock and his wannabe water boy. Way to bring it to a higher plane Chakra.
Cold Steel on February 2, 2008 at 10:37 PM
Chakra has no rational explanation for his Rudy/McCain enthusiasm so asking to explain anything is like asking McCain and Huckabee to explain why they have no integrity. They just don’t, and it has worked for them so far.
Igor R. on February 2, 2008 at 10:41 PM
Who likes Romney?
Tommy Thompson Endorsed Rudy Giuliani
Sam Brownback Endorsed John McCain
Duncan Hunter Endorsed Mike Huckabee
Rudy Giuliani Endorsed John McCain
Huckabee says a vote for Mitt could be a vote for Hillary.
Chakra Hammer on February 2, 2008 at 10:49 PM
Boy…I didn’t think he could go any lower. I doubt it will come back to haunt him, but if there is any justice it will.
Dirthead on February 2, 2008 at 10:49 PM
Igor R. on February 2, 2008 at 10:52 PM
Chakra Hammer on February 2, 2008 at 10:49 PM
Hannity
Ingraham
Levin
McCarthy
Santorum
Bork
just to name a few
Cold Steel on February 2, 2008 at 10:54 PM
A vote for Huckabee is a vote for letting go over 1 million rapists and murders in federal prisons.
blahdy on February 2, 2008 at 10:56 PM
How it is nobody s going to be “happy” this year, unless we win.
McCain’s mom is right and we all need “our nose” and vote for her son.
Victory in Iraq and the WOT is the most important thing, we can keep the pressure up on him about the borders, IF he fails to deliver “measurable results”, it will be a “read my lips” moment.
Chakra Hammer on February 2, 2008 at 10:57 PM
I was going through the radio dial and came across a radical environmental show where they were trying to decide who is better, Hillary or Obama, and then some guy who had “tree hugger” in his title, really, said McCain shouldn’t be underestimated.
Igor R. on February 2, 2008 at 10:57 PM
I qualify this accusation by stressing that “some suggest” Huckabee may beat his wife and dog and stick pins in Voodoo dolls while baying at the moon, not necessarily am I suggesting that though.
MB4 on February 2, 2008 at 10:58 PM
I do.
Tzetzes on February 2, 2008 at 10:59 PM
Were these Presidential Candidates?
Also didn’t Santorum lose?
Chakra Hammer on February 2, 2008 at 10:59 PM
Conservatives who aren’t paid off don’t endorse McCain.
Igor R. on February 2, 2008 at 10:59 PM
What the point of winning in the war on terror only to lose the country to the massive horde from the south that shares none of the values that made this country great? Ever tried to talk to an illegal about the founding fathers and respect for the constitution?
Igor R. on February 2, 2008 at 11:02 PM
No one can hold his or her nose closed tight enough to not still smell McVain’s overpowering stench.
MB4 on February 2, 2008 at 11:02 PM
Americans love a winner and will not tolerate a loser. Americans play to win all the time. I wouldn’t give a hoot in hell for a man who lost and laughed. That’s why Americans have never lost, and will never lose a war… because the very thought of losing is hateful to Americans.
Chakra Hammer on February 2, 2008 at 11:04 PM
Ann Coulter, wanting to vote for hillary is hateful..to Americans, especially Americans that want to Win. The Americans that say, “LET US WIN!”
Chakra Hammer on February 2, 2008 at 11:07 PM
Corrupt (Keating Five), liar (why didn’t you vote for those tax cuts? never heard of what Juan Hernandez believes in? can’t understand what Romney was saying in that quote? so you want to secure the border “first”, really?), losing his mind (Putin is the President of Germany?), can’t control his temper. Yup, hold your nose and vote for this piece of crap.
Igor R. on February 2, 2008 at 11:07 PM
Quoting Patton to justify voting for McCain is like quoting “Mein Kampf” to justify supporting Israel.
Igor R. on February 2, 2008 at 11:09 PM
My pet name for Hillary is “the evil snake” which I delighted in using to taunt Lanny Davis on his blog. But I will vote for Hillary before voting for McCain.
Igor R. on February 2, 2008 at 11:10 PM
Huckabee needs to bow out.
ToddonCapeCod on February 2, 2008 at 11:16 PM
I wounder if Patton would consider men who were captured by the enemy and weren’t able to escape to be winners or losers.
I can sure guess.
MB4 on February 2, 2008 at 11:18 PM
Sis, boom, bah.
You sound silly.
MB4 on February 2, 2008 at 11:19 PM
The Americans that say “LET US WIN” don’t vote for the loser McCain.
Igor R. on February 2, 2008 at 11:26 PM
Huck is such a P.O.S.
stenwin77 on February 2, 2008 at 11:29 PM
If your going to quote Patton at least have the decency to credit Patton.
Besides, evoking Patton to justify a nine out of ten liberal is low by any standard.
Patton didn’t give a damn about Mexico.
Speakup on February 2, 2008 at 11:33 PM
He’s really lucky to be alive, after breaking both arms, his leg int he crash then having his shoulder shattered by the butt of a rifle and getting stuck with a bayonet in the ankle and groin, then tortured… after all that.. hmm..
Chakra Hammer on February 2, 2008 at 11:37 PM
…Tancredo?
But I guess that doesn’t mean anything…
/sarc
HYTEAndy on February 2, 2008 at 11:39 PM
Patton also said:
“Say what you mean and mean what you say.”
Which should be changed in McCain’s case to
“They say you’re mean, you don’t mean what you say, but you call it ’straight talk’”.
Igor R. on February 2, 2008 at 11:40 PM
Well how can that compare to McCain’s 12 million illegal fans?
Igor R. on February 2, 2008 at 11:41 PM
he needs to stop whining!
What a waste of time!
I would be embarrassed if I were a supporter of this guy!
Coming out and whining about a talk radio host not liking you!!
Doesn’t he have something better to do like,, uhh,, GETTING OUT OF THE FREAKIN RACE!!!
JellyToast on February 2, 2008 at 11:44 PM
Those fans are also fans of Democrats. There’s a reason why these people don’t like the idea of showing your ID to get a ballot in your hand.
drdroo on February 2, 2008 at 11:44 PM
I’m a lifelong hunter
I saw my father marching with Martin Luther King jr.
I cut taxes in Massachusetts
I had the endorsement of the NRA
Ted Kennedy didn’t read my mandated $50 co-pay adoption Healthcare package.
Chakra Hammer on February 2, 2008 at 11:44 PM
Latest Fox News Poll
.
Latest Gallup poll
Chakra Hammer on February 2, 2008 at 11:47 PM
Chakra Hammer on February 2, 2008 at 11:44 PM
Are you from Mass by any chance? I’m guessing not or you would be familiar with the legal struggle with the abortion issue and the fact that Mitt increased fees on specific items (similar to Tolls on toll roads), taxes are something everyone pays regardless of use.
The NRA endorsement thing wasn’t entirely false, but could’ve been portrayed better. If memory serves they made calls on his behalf but did not actually endorse him. Sean Hannity didn’t endorse Mitt either, he did say he was voting for him though. It depends on what one considers an endorsement.
Course I’m sure you’ll find some way to spin things to your purpose, but it would be nice if you tried to find venues in which you can work with like-minded individuals instead of against opposition.
drdroo on February 2, 2008 at 11:51 PM
I know, Mitt wasn’t my first choice. I would rather have someone who “embellishes” his record but has been endorsed by DeMint, Tancredo, and Sheriff Arpaio, than someone who outright lies about his intentions to legalize 12 million illegals at the first opportunity. Shamnesty is pretty much all I care about other than the WOT, and Mitt will handle that well enough. McCain may be better on WOT, but he is so much worse on the other thing I have to chose the best “package”. Plus Mitt clearly does have higher IQ.
Igor R. on February 2, 2008 at 11:52 PM
Latest Rassmussen poll: 30% each nationwide. Not that McCain isn’t the more likely winner, but we must fight the biggest threat to this country since the nuclear weapons were first tragetted at the United States until we can’t fight any more.
Igor R. on February 2, 2008 at 11:54 PM
Nope, i’m in a “Purple State”, that Reagan did not win.
Hopefully we can win it this time.
Chakra Hammer on February 2, 2008 at 11:54 PM
Coulter had a great zinger for Huckabee near the end of her rant on Cavuto’s show (generously provided by our wonderful hosts at Hot Air) in response to Neil implying that Huck’s attacks on Romney are not necessarily because he’s sucking up for a job in McCain’s administration … (Coulter, sarcastically): “Oh no, he (Huckabee) has a bright future if he doesn’t get a job in the next administration.” LOL!!!
D2Boston on February 2, 2008 at 11:56 PM
Ras polls are so lame, and have been so all year.
Chakra Hammer on February 2, 2008 at 11:57 PM
He does have a bright future endorsing the “Squirrel” brand pop-corn poppers.
Igor R. on February 2, 2008 at 11:58 PM
I have found their nationwide polls pretty good, not that only state-by-state polls matter at this point.
Igor R. on February 2, 2008 at 11:59 PM
What you mean “we” white man?
Igor R. on February 3, 2008 at 12:00 AM
I’m thinkin’ she’s a gurl. Her fellow McCain co-worker screwed up a bit the other day and left a clue. Freshman in college, maybe. Part time job. 10-12 bucks an hour, I suppose. Not even good drinking money, so she needs a lot of hours.
a capella on February 3, 2008 at 12:20 AM
Girls usually don’t quote Patton. Not unless they are Patton’s girls.
Igor R. on February 3, 2008 at 12:24 AM
Yeah, I could be wrong. It isn’t important, anyway.
a capella on February 3, 2008 at 12:45 AM
No, you got that a bit wrong . . .
A vote for Mitt in the Primary (if he wins the nomonation) == a vote for Mitt in the general
A vote for Mccain in the Primary (again, if he wins the nomination) == a vote for my pet goldfish in the general, because I’m not going to vote for Senator Looney Tunes
seanrobins on February 3, 2008 at 12:48 AM
Who you callin’ “white Man”?
I am part Lamanite..(However I do have Hazel-Blue eyes)
Chakra Hammer on February 3, 2008 at 12:52 AM
Oh, that was just the punchline of an old Lone Ranger/Tonto joke. I couldn’t presume that you’re white or a man.
Igor R. on February 3, 2008 at 12:59 AM
Does being like 10-15% American Indian disqualify me from the KKK?
If so, my feelings would be hurt.. :(
/mega sarcasm off
Chakra Hammer on February 3, 2008 at 1:03 AM
As a Russian immigrant I know little about the purity test applied to the KKK membership. I know your particular American Indian ancestry is very special in the book of Mormon, so you may reconsider supporting Mitt at this point.
Igor R. on February 3, 2008 at 1:08 AM
And I’m English-Scott-Irish.
You don’t even want to see the brawls that go on in my head.
Also, I am a native American. I was born here, my parents were born here, and darnit, my ancestors founded this great nation and the empire before it that gave it it’s principles.
Sorry if that offends anybody. If you’d like me to leave you to “your land” because my ancestors came here by sea instead of an ancient ice bridge, kindly stick it where the sun doesn’t shine :-D
BKennedy on February 3, 2008 at 1:20 AM
Why do you say, I’m English-Scottish-Irish
then… oh also, Part American Indian.. ?
—————————-
BTW, I’m English, German, Irish, Swedish, American Indian(Choctaw)
Chakra Hammer on February 3, 2008 at 1:26 AM
Above all, I’m an American..
By Birthright or by thanking oath, makes no difference.
I was born here, but that does not make me any MORE American, than someone that has earned their citizenship.
Chakra Hammer on February 3, 2008 at 1:31 AM
Ah, but what IS nativism?
Igor R. on February 3, 2008 at 1:33 AM
“What a shameful duo to vie for the most powerful office in the world! A liar who likes to call his lies “straight talk” and “a man of God” with no conscience!”
“If and when either of them is elected, they will legalize the illegals at which point no Republican President will ever be elected due to the new 40 million strong illegals and their “unified” relatives permanent Democratic voting block. It won’t make any difference what policies anyone defends at that point. Just kiss your country good bye.”
Igor R.
Absolute Genius. What else needs to be said. Now if only someone could make a commercial out of it and run with it.
America1st on February 3, 2008 at 1:35 AM
The joke goes like this:
The Lone Ranger and Tonto are riding home after a long day when they find the ridges around them lined with hostile Indians on horses.
The Lone Ranger says something like, “Well, we’ve been in a lot of hard scrapes, Tonto, but this looks like the worst.”
Tonto: Who you mean “we,” white man.
What Igor likely meant is he doesn’t consider you a fellow conservative Republican.
Weren’t you toting the herald for Rudy?
silverfox on February 3, 2008 at 1:37 AM
Huckabee = McCain’s sock puppet.
And a note to the McCainiacs, Huckabots, and dilusional tools that think all it takes is waving Hillary in our faces to get us to vote for the scumbags you’re pushing:
If the GOP ticket ends up McCain/Huckabee, it’s RIP, GOP. They’d be lucky to carry Idaho. There’s people out there that are willing to hold their nose and vote for McCain (with very little enthusiasm as it is) for whom adding Huckabee to the ticket will be an absolute deal breaker.
Put another way: McCain/Huckabee would be the GOP equivilant of Mondale/Ferarro.
Well, not exactly equal, as Mondale/Ferraro lost, and lost badly, to the most popular president of the 20th century. McCain/Huckabee would lose, and lose badly, to Hillary who isn’t just hated by the American people in general, but by large numbers within HER OWN PARTY!
SuperCool on February 3, 2008 at 1:41 AM
Thanks!
Igor R. on February 3, 2008 at 1:41 AM
Isn’t that what courts do every day, to people that break laws?
Rectify or to make legal, illegal actions?
It’s called Justice.
A fine or Legal Restitution, would be a guilty verdict on a very large scale, but paying the fine would not guarantee citizenship.
You still, have to go through that process..
Chakra Hammer on February 3, 2008 at 1:42 AM
You’re right! But somehow we got into racial purity of all things. Maybe I should use the whole joke instead of just the punchline next time! :)
Igor R. on February 3, 2008 at 1:43 AM
I know that people like to use and try and define the word “Conservative”
Heck I though Fred Thompson was the only “Conservative” in the Race.. hmmm
Yes, I Still do think everyone screwed up my placing the pro-choice litmus test on Rudy(even though he’s anti-abortion)
Rudy was the Best candidate in the race, by far.
Chakra Hammer on February 3, 2008 at 1:47 AM
Under “our friend” McCain’s bill, EVERY SINGLE ILLEGAL who cared to apply would get a Z visa entitling them to stay in the US permanently. You can write about all kinds of theories, but the consequence of that would be that EVERY SINGLE ILLEGAL that did not murder someone or whatever would stay. There would be no political will to go after them one by one, eventually that would HAVE to be made citizens. This is clear as day, forget redemption, forgiveness, and our shared humanity. And the consequences of that: loss of country as I keep writing ad infinitum.
Igor R. on February 3, 2008 at 1:50 AM
Besides his police chief’s legal trouble, what killed Rudy’s candidacy was HIS lack of repudiation of Amnesty. I hheard many of his supporters who were very dubious about his stance on the issue as time went on.
Igor R. on February 3, 2008 at 1:54 AM
The Bill Failed, he admitted that it failed, because the people want the borders secured first, then the other debate can start afterwards.
Lets get, The borders fixed, the VISA’s and verification systems up to par, then rehash.
Chakra Hammer on February 3, 2008 at 1:56 AM
Amnesty had nothing to do with Rudy, what happened there was sloppy reporting by Politico, and blogs like this running with it and not retracting it, because they hate him.
The NY Times buried the Retraction on Page 35, something that Fox News and the rest of the “Right-Wing Blogs” have in common, “Anyone-But-Rudy”
Now you have John McCain
Chakra Hammer on February 3, 2008 at 2:01 AM
McCain IMPLIED something like this by his rhetoric. Unfortunately (or fortuntately) I wasn’t born yesterday and he is doing an incredibly bad job of convincing any of his critics about his sincerity. In the court of law, when a witness gives contradictory statements on the evidence, has a history of dishonesty, and is shown to have maintained his connections with the criminal element, his credibility is low. Between McCains association and unconvincing denials having to do with Juan Hernandez, stressing the word “first” in “securing the borders first” as some sort of a mantra, statements to the effect that he WOULD sign the bill in some cases but not others, being strangely vague until pressed hard and then all of a sudden becoming clear, he shows all signs of a man who has a single purpose in mind: get through the primaries and then blossom into what he really always wanted to be: no-holds-barred advocate of legalization.
Igor R. on February 3, 2008 at 2:03 AM
Anyone-But-Rudy
As a Rudy Supporter I’m Loving this situation.
Payback’s a B***h.
Chakra Hammer on February 3, 2008 at 2:06 AM
Well that’s partially true, but you underestimate how much Amnesty mattered among his less ideological supporters. I read Free Republic daily so I know all about the “cross-dressing gun grabbing baby killer” stuff, but it fell on deaf ears of his supporters until something else started to happen.
Igor R. on February 3, 2008 at 2:08 AM
Have to go! Try not to take the attitude of “payback”, this is not about “you didn’t listen to me and now you’ll pay”. I was for Fred all along, for SO LONG, and I’m not bitter. Not that any of us can really affect the outcome, but we ought to dry and not out of revenge.
Igor R. on February 3, 2008 at 2:22 AM
I used to be a longtime daily reader and VERY ACTIVE FREEPER, before a huge swath of Rudy supporters got banned from that website over a year ago!
I haven’t gone back since.
Chakra Hammer on February 3, 2008 at 2:26 AM
As per thread title, Huck threw his claim at the wrong talk show host as Michael Savage’s campaign for donations to fund his legal defense provides a more reasonable target.
maverick muse on February 3, 2008 at 9:03 AM
You’re drinking your own Kool-aid now. The dems will have the inside track in the general because Bush is despised. If the electorate takes a chance on McLyingsackofcrap, we could run God himself in 2012 and a dem dog catcher would win. This country does not want shamnesty. 80% are opposed to it and McCain will sign the first piece of crap amnesty bill that comes down the pipe.
In the general, the dems will exploit all the issues that Romney is not. McCain will not beat either dem.
csdeven on February 3, 2008 at 9:26 AM
McDole 2008 - whose own multi-millionaire wife won’t give any of her liquor fortune to help his campaign.
I’ll bet his 95 year old mother at least sent half of her SS check.
profitsbeard on February 3, 2008 at 11:08 AM
So true about payback. Wait till you see what happens to McCain in the general, when he goes up against Obama and “change”, plus the millions who are disenchanted with McCain. I won’t enjoy it or the aftermath, but I’ll know who to fight.
a capella on February 3, 2008 at 11:46 AM
You can carry Hillary’s water, and the real risk of future American lives at home from a terrorist attack, I wont.
Chakra Hammer on February 3, 2008 at 12:15 PM
Comment pages: « 1 [2] 3 »