Shut up.

No. Really.

Shut. Up.

Why doesn’t he just say “green collar jobs” and be just like Hillary?

I’m not the only one who noticed it and I hope it becomes something, but in the last debate, McCain let slip his mask more than a little and we got a peek at just how much this guy not only has no clue how markets work, but doesn’t have much respect for capitalism or the people who make it work at all.

“Green technology” will save us. The rallying cry of idiots who believe the government can decree a need for something and make it so.

I think this self-congratulatory little man may just be the biggest statist in the race on either said, and possiblt the biggest liar as well. I can see him, as President, thinking that if he believes a thing is good for us, well we’d just by-gawd better not complain and do what he says.

Y’know, FDR campaigned on the promise we’d stay out of Europe’s wars; LBJ campaigned on a pledge that “American boys shouldn’t be dying in place of Asian boys.” Democrats have a habit of being slapped in the face by reality (unless they’re Carter.)

So I don’t know. The sad thing is, if it weren’t for the war, I’d have McCain in a bag out on the curb and not even look back.

I do not like this guy at all.

Chuck Norris is correct…he’s too old an lifeless…..

Not to mention the FACT he is a LibTurd in RINO clothing…..

You’re welcome.

Here is the real sentiment that he had in 2004:

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/4/2/115508.shtml

I do not recall Mitt doing that…

Does McCain’s undeniable support for finishing Iraq with a win complicate things?

It is the one thing keeping me from staying home should he be the nominee.

nailinmyeye on February 1, 2008 at 9:50 AM

I will do everything in my power to prevent Obama or Hillary from being commander in chief. If it requires pulling the lever for McCain… so be it.

Staying home = vote for defeat in Iraq and GWOT
(Not by intent but by effect)

Actually, McCain has said that he was against the Swift Vets attacking Kerry’s military service. He added that Kerry’s actions after leaving the military are fair game.

Democrats are a much less conservative bunch in this way. They will readily dump the old guy (or gal) and pick the new guy. It works for them (JFK, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton). They went with the establishment guy the last two elections and they lost. They went with the establishment guy in 1968 and 1984 and he lost. That’s why I think they will pick Obama this time, and he will win. Republicans need to pay attention to what he is doing and forget all the Hillary-panic. He is a phenomenal candidate and he is generating gigantic turnouts in the Democratic primaries.

If Mitt Romney campaigns honorably and well from here on out, he will get his turn in 2012. He’ll have 4 years to put this party back together. If he’s as good at that as he was at putting Bain and the Olympics back together, we will have a hell of a nominee in 2012 and we will sweep back into office.

“Old, cranky, pasty, testy and tired Washington insider” will look unpalatable compared to “new, fresh, inspiring, hopeful, vibrant, and historical agent of change” .

It’s a Dole Redux being engineered by the left-learning media and their shills to bring the Dems the weaker candidate so they can then reveal all of McCain’s MANY flaws (of character and voting record) which they are strategically holding-back on noting, now.

McCain guarantees an Obama/Clinton.

As the Keating Five scandal shows, he’s corrupt enough to be a sitting duck for the MSM pundits and Dem political operatives slavering to skewer him with his “non-straight talk” and b.s. and tease out his rancid temper.

Guess I’ll have to start learning how you do a “write in” for November if Super Tuesday gives us this pre-lamed duck.

Complete7 on February 1, 2008 at 10:09 AM

Occupation is McCain’s word- not mine. We have bases in those countries. As long as Islam is in Iraq, we will be occupiers.

There are dozens of reasons to not vote for John McCain but dang, that DUDE IS SO FRACKING OLD!!

This reminds me – I can’t believe no one up to this point (First!) has made the Saul Tigh comparison. It’s quite apt, IMHO.

Mitt Romney knows what a commitment is … 1 marriage 1 wife.

burnitup on February 1, 2008 at 10:39 AM

Hey, relationships can get strained, especially after a person is away for a few years and can’t communicate. You can bash McCain on issues, but the guy is pretty committed to doing what he thinks is best for the USA.

…and, by golly, they are winning, my friend.

McCain

It should make it simple how to vote in November.

frankj on February 1, 2008 at 10:03 AM

This sucks.

Rotten prick has us by the short hairs…

Thank you. I made that point a few days ago. McCain didn’t only call out the Swifties, he backed KERRY’s position on this. The Swifties didn’t only complain about Kerry’s service, they yelled about his treason after he left Vietnam! What is McLiar’s position on Kerry’s actions AFTER Vietnam?

Res ipsa loquitur.

“McCain campaigned hard for Bush in 2004″

Tactical reasons, not principle. I never said that he was -utterly stupid- when it came to political necessity.

“and Bush himself kept his distance from those ads”

which is miles apart from calling the SwiftVets “dishonest” and “dishonorable.”

One wife here on Earth, yes. He can have multiple wives sealed to him in the temple for the afterlife.

I doubt if Romney has had that level of commitment to anything in his life except the Mormon church.

JayHaw Phrenzie on February 1, 2008 at 10:11 AM

Commitment? You mean like a marriage commitment?

John McCain dumps the woman who waited for him all those years he was a POW, and then pulls a John Kerry by marrying into money.

Mitt Romney knows what a commitment is … 1 marriage 1 wife.

How does his condemnation of the Swift Boat ads make him a backstabber? McCain campaigned hard for Bush in 2004…and Bush himself kept his distance from those ads.