3f9e567086c17d7e207e…

I’ll ignore the word “Iran” above as I assume it must be a typo.

Chuck Schick on February 1, 2008 at 4:53 PM

No typo. A million of them hit the streets of Tehran expressing sympathy for Americans after 9/11.

But lets go ahead and nuke em. What the f*ck.

Drum on February 1, 2008 at 5:00 PM

Odd, I don’t recall this. Perhaps I missed it through all the “Death to America” and “Death to the Great Satan” signs and shouts. Did they write “Sorry the Great Satan got Wacked” or “Our Condolences to the Evil Americans” on the back of their signs? Did they not burn a very poor rendition of our flag?

Saddam thought he could bluff us with NBC weapons programs. His bluff was called. Libya read the tea leaves and came clean and even “Mr. Ronley” up in North Korea may be coming clean about his nuclear projects. The mullahs in Iran would be wise to do the same. However, they, like liberals, are not known for acting logically.

About 2500 years ago the Greeks gave the Persians a bloody nose, twice no less, for attempting to subjugate them. The Persians learned their lesson and have not been back since.

Bubba Redneck on February 2, 2008 at 3:08 PM

OK, OK. It was a joke!

This will stop happening once we leave.

Chuck Schick on February 1, 2008 at 3:31 PM

No Chucky it won’t. It will stop when our boys place bullets in their heads or JDAMS between their legs. It started on our soil September 11, 2001, though most experts agree it really started earlier. This is a war of annihation between Western civilization and Islamofacism.
Now for all you moral-relitivism-can’t-we-all-just-get-along-we-must-be-to-blame-Bush-lied-we-need-to-talk-to-them Liberal cowards, do you think these “people” wish to talk? No, they want us and our way of life dead and will do anything to accomplish that.
There is evil in this universe, and these “people” are its disciples. You confront it and kill it or it devours you. We have done it before: Hitler, the Japanese, Commies…..we can and must do it again.

Oh, and Snake307: some gallows humor is funny but to make fun of mentally disabled women who were duped into having their lives ended shows your lack of intelligence as well as a lack of respect for them. Freedom of speech is wonderful because it reveals the intelligence, or lack thereof, of the speaker. Comments like yours lack substance or humor and as such deserve no place in this form. AP, Bryan, Malkin….ban the jerk!

I want John McCain and John McCain’s temper at the Oval Office. I would have no other person directing the global fight against these animals than him.

Baphomet on February 1, 2008 at 2:13 PM

We need to be willing to go ‘Jack Bauer’ on these monsters, and McCain’s afraid to waterboard them!

I’m truly sickened by this – Downs Syndrome women as targets? Man, there is a TRULY special place in hell (and Allah has nothing to do with it) for these sub-humans.

I also bring all of this up in the hope that liberal readers might finally extract their craniums from their backsides

Thanks for trying Bryan, but it’s hopeless. Have you ever met one of the A**holes? Weed, dude, and where is my latte?

I also bring all of this up in the hope that liberal readers might finally extract their craniums from their backsides and realize that whatever you think of Bush, he’s not the problem.

Thanks for trying Bryan, but it’s hopeless. Have you ever met one of the A**holes? Weed, dude, and where is my latte?

THANKS BRYAN and Hotair.com.

There’s nothing to talk over with people like that. They live in a state of violent depravity that puts them beyond reason barring some massive change in their own minds. We infidels aren’t going to make that chance by playing nice. We have to defeat them.

Well said, Bryan.

I don’t advocate “spreading democracy” in the middle east. That is pearls before swine. I advocate the undoing of the ideology called Islam. This means the repatriation of practicing Muslims in the west to Islamic countries in which they will feel more comfortable, if Muslims choose to sincerely leave Islam at this time, they should be welcomed to stay in the west. I advocate strict blockade of movement outside of Islamic lands for Muslims. I advocate overt kinetic pressure to deter Islamic aggression where ever it emerges. I don’t mind killing flies with sledge hammers.
I want Islam exposed to the sunshine and fresh air of wide spread understanding of what it is among non Muslims.

We do waste time, blood and treasure with Bushes naive approach of turning Muslims into voters.

What I want is not going to happen in the present atmosphere of the world. Things need to degrade at a steeper angle for such initiatives to be contemplated. But Islam works hard every day and they may turn us that way yet with their own outrageous acts.

Yeah, the people! What do you think this thread is about, Einstein? We go after the leaders and but end up opening the gates of hell only to witness the innocent suffer.

This is OK to you? I know it’s not our guys that are doing this, but it is OUR war. Fifteen years of innocent people dying because we want to help them by removing evil? This is the best America can offer?

See above. And thanks for the Einstein comparison.

Check the archives, dude. I’ve thrown that one out at least twenty times. I figure enough of you have heard it to not need to be reminded of it.

So basically, you’re willing to admit that we f*cked Iraq all through the Clinton years, but now what we’re dong is a good thing? That might make sense if what we’re doing now were premised on something different from what the Clinton sanctions were premised on. But there is no difference. The sanctions were geared toward the removal of Saddam and so was Gulf War II. Both are abject failures that have hurt those intended to have been helped.

But as for “less people having died,” I’m tempted to throw out some statistics about that, but I’ll spare myself the grief of seeing another Bush apologist who probably claims to be a conservative (conserving What? one wonders) ignore the facts, reclining upon “the surge is working.”

Facts would be a good evolution for you. All you’ve done so far is spew bilge.

Now they have a shot at not getting slaughtered by Saddam or by the failures of Oil for Food. That’s not a massive improvement for those people? What planet are you on?

The people, yes. Not the Iranian dictatorship,

Chuck Schick on February 1, 2008 at 5:11 PM

Yeah, the people! What do you think this thread is about, Einstein? We go after the leaders and but end up opening the gates of hell only to witness the innocent suffer.

This is OK to you? I know it’s not our guys that are doing this, but it is OUR war. Fifteen years of innocent people dying because we want to help them by removing evil? This is the best America can offer?

Less innocent people have died in 5 years of war than one year of sanctions under Bill Clinton. The sanctions continued right up until the war.

Where’s your outrage now?

Check the archives, dude. I’ve thrown that one out at least twenty times. I figure enough of you have heard it to not need to be reminded of it.

So basically, you’re willing to admit that we f*cked Iraq all through the Clinton years, but now what we’re dong is a good thing? That might make sense if what we’re doing now were premised on something different from what the Clinton sanctions were premised on. But there is no difference. The sanctions were geared toward the removal of Saddam and so was Gulf War II. Both are abject failures that have hurt those intended to have been helped.

But as for “less people having died,” I’m tempted to throw out some statistics about that, but I’ll spare myself the grief of seeing another Bush apologist who probably claims to be a conservative (conserving What? one wonders) ignore the facts, reclining upon “the surge is working.”

You know nothing about me, my academic credentials, or my professional reputation.

PimFortuynsGhost on February 1, 2008 at 5:14 PM

Indeed, and you didn’t balk to remind that you’re a professional! Wow! A professional! Sort of the like the professionals who teach in the public schools! Neat. What came to mind, actually, was Jim Carrey running off the edge of the terminal while screaming, “It’s OK, I’m a limo driver!”

If you’re going rely upon your position as a badge of authority and a reason to be taken seriously, you might want to back it up with a serious reply, instead of dismissing two scholars of impeccable credentials as liars.

BL@KBIRD on February 1, 2008 at 5:15 PM

Hate to break it to you, bud, but you “spread democracy throughout the Middle East” to defeat “terror” people aren’t a whole lot better than the blame America first Ron Paul folks. You’re both delusional.

Islam is the real issue here, not Islamofascism, radicalism, extremism, or terror. It’s not even about al Qaeda, the Taliban or Hezbollah, but rather the ideology of the religion they follow. Ron Paul certainly doesn’t understand this; unfortunately, neither do the Bushites.

Why I don’t support our democracy mission in Iraq and Afghanistan.

There is an onus on the ones that are liberated to participate in the process. They have been and are being given everthing at their disposal to be liberated from the yolks of radical Islam. Whether they choose to do so or not afterward is not our fault nor our responsibility. However, since we have provided them with the freedom to make this choice, we have once again show ourselves to be the most rightous nation on the planet.

Blowback? Your fault? You had it coming?

You feel bad on behalf of Islam? I nominate you to personally deliver your apologies to Osama.

You are an excellent agent of Islam Drum, whether you know it or not.

Oh, I’m sure you are and I’m sure you do and I’m sure it’s a pretty feeble product you peddle in light of your stupid reply.

Better to be called feeble and stupid by someone apologizing for scum and blaming America for all that is wrong.

You know nothing about me, my academic credentials, or my professional reputation.

You, on the other hand, obviously delight in attacking the civilized world and barbarians causing it ill.