Coulter: No, I’m not kidding about voting for Hillary over McCain
posted at 5:11 pm on February 1, 2008 by Allahpundit
Send to a Friend |
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
“He has no honor.” Quote:
In March 1968, McCain was put into solitary confinement, where he would be for two years. In July 1968, McCain’s father was named Commander-in-Chief, Pacific Command (CINCPAC), stationed in Honolulu and commander of all U.S. forces in the Vietnam theater. McCain was immediately offered a chance to return home early: the North Vietnamese wanted a mercy-showing propaganda coup for the outside world, and a message that only privilege mattered that they could use against the other POWs. McCain turned down the offer of repatriation due to the Code of Conduct of “first in, first out”: he would only accept the offer if every man taken in before him was released as well. McCain’s refusal to be released was even remarked upon by North Vietnamese officials to U.S. envoy Averell Harriman at the ongoing Paris Peace Talks.
And so it’s McCain, not Huckabee, who precipitates the long-awaited conservative crack-up. Man, did Patrick Ruffini pick the wrong year for this project.
Update: AC evidently prefers “a Presidency that would get rolled quicker than you can say Jimmy Carter.”
Update: McCain Derangement Syndrome?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 »
So what if he is if he’s shooting at the wrong target? He beats up on Conservatives more then his “friends” on the Dem side of the aisle. Straight talk means nothing if his policies are at odds with a conservative agenda.
DerKrieger on February 1, 2008 at 6:04 PM
THANK YOU!
malan89 on February 1, 2008 at 6:04 PM
I agree with Ann 100%
More importantly, she is HOT!
Roger Waters on February 1, 2008 at 6:04 PM
President Barack “Hussein” Obama…hmmm… can’t get used to it but I will if it means Maverick McVain retiring.
TOPV on February 1, 2008 at 6:05 PM
It really is disgusting when you think about it. Most of the people who are advocating we vote for this man, are the same people who have spent the last two years calling the man a traitor, and ranting that he’s the ultimate enemy.
Now you’re all ready and willing to reward him by making him President of the U.S.
Morons!
Gregor on February 1, 2008 at 6:06 PM
I don’t always agree with Ann, but she’s absolutely correct on this. Al Qaeda can’t destroy America. They can only launch terrorist attacks that we will always overcome. McCain sought amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants. His actions very well could destroy America. The only way America will ever cease being the most powerful nation on Earth and a fighter for personal liberty of every person on the planet is if it is destroyed from the inside. Likewise, the GOP is helping to kill conservatism. They supported Bush’s amnesty plan. Strike one. The are pushing a McCain nomination. Strike two. I predict that this year conservatives will leave the GOP in droves…and possible never come back. It amazes me how AP and others in the media think that conservatives will eventually come around. Many of us won’t. The best way in my opinion to get some attention is to take some drastic measures. If McCain is the nominee, I hope all conservatives will get behind the Dem nominee (but Republicans in Congress). I want the Republican elite who shoved McCain down our throats to have a very rude awakening. They cannot get away with spiting in our faces over and over again. I will laugh when million and millions of conservatives don’t get behind McCain and all the pundits wonder why their plan didn’t work. McCain is not a hero in any way. He is a disgrace to this nation! And before you fake conservatives get all worked up, I served in OIF. I say again, McCain is a disgrace to our nation!
davenp35 on February 1, 2008 at 6:06 PM
This is really smart of Ann. If the mainstream media picks this up (imagine the headlines) then everyone gets to hear her rant. Its a good way to get the word out to people NOT watching fox news or listening to talk radio.
Misty217 on February 1, 2008 at 6:06 PM
I really don’t understand why people such as Allahpundit and John Hawkins seem to think we’re all “just joking” when we say we’ll be voting for Hillary or sitting out.
I still can’t fathom this logic.
So, to be spiteful over the fact that you, and your fellow conservative voters, failed to do what was necessary to prevent McCain’s victory - and that is, to say, forming a consensus on a “true conservative” candidate and making sure HE got the nomination - you’re going to refuse to vote for a man who you disagree with on most issues (but do agree with him on some, such as abortion and the war), in favor of a man (Obama) or woman (Hillary) who’s basically diametrically opposed to your beliefs on ALL of the issues?
It strikes me as inherently foolish logic full of the same childish arrogance you attribute to McCain. I’d frankly request that should Hillary or Obama get elected, it is you and yours who refrain from complaining about whatever they do in office, because it will have been your contribution to their cause that made it happen.
Vyce on February 1, 2008 at 6:07 PM
Anyone else noticed the historical parallel this all has to the early 20th century civil war among Republican conservatives and progressives?
9 What has been will be again,
what has been done will be done again;
there is nothing new under the sun.
10 Is there anything of which one can say,
“Look! This is something new”?
It was here already, long ago;
it was here before our time.
(Ecclesiastes 1:9-10)
HYTEAndy on February 1, 2008 at 6:07 PM
Alright . . . somebody dig a big sawdust pit and post the address. We’ll all show up at an appointed time and then, the last one out of the pit wins.
rplat on February 1, 2008 at 6:07 PM
And frankly I’m sick of the term “maverick”. It ia almost a term of endearment. How about, in terms of the conservative agenda, we use traitor instead? His “maverickness” has caused the GOP more problems than many of the most Liberal Dems.
DerKrieger on February 1, 2008 at 6:07 PM
Sure thing. There’s a lot out there, but here’s an example.
Also, this site is just chock full of “good” stuff about “honorable” McCain.
Misha I on February 1, 2008 at 6:08 PM
Fixed.
calbear on February 1, 2008 at 6:09 PM
That is why the Huckster has been playing spoiler and is now humping John’s leg and wagging his tail. This is Huck’s big opportunity for exposure and to polish his resume. He’s a bigger danger lurking in the background than McCain.
a capella on February 1, 2008 at 6:09 PM
As someone who hopes to become a McCain convert, I wish you McCain supporters would start explaining this global warming thing that you want me to believe in. Is this the same thing as that Gore movie?
Convince me that we should legalize countless millions of poor illegal aliens and bring their poor families here while at the same time eliminating the kinds of jobs that these people would be employed in by cutting co2 emissions. The basic math for that seems to show we’ll have a big problem if we go through with this plan.
But I’m willing to listen to arguments in favor of McCain’s global warming amnesty plan for our economy, if his supporters are willing to enlighten me.
Buddahpundit on February 1, 2008 at 6:09 PM
See my post at 6:06pm. It would seem it’s directly attributed to your kind.
Gregor on February 1, 2008 at 6:09 PM
Bingo. If McCain used 1/2 the energy he uses attacking conservatives to stop Democrats/liberal policies, he would be the next Reagan.
HYTEAndy on February 1, 2008 at 6:09 PM
For a Conservative alternative to the GOP take a look at the America First Party. I’ve read over their positions and they wold be a better home for Conservatives than the GOP.
DerKrieger on February 1, 2008 at 6:10 PM
Since we are basing peoples ability to be president on combat experience I bet Audie Murphy would have made a seriously good president.
EnochCain on February 1, 2008 at 6:11 PM
Well now, you had your shot, and it was YOU all who failed to do so. You couldn’t decide, because you didn’t think any of the OTHER candidates lived up well enough to your idea of the “perfect” conservative.
So this is what you are left with. You only want Romney now because you’re desperate. Tough break for Mitt.
Vyce on February 1, 2008 at 6:11 PM
I’m so mad! I’m gonna vote for Obama or Hillary to teach my Party a lesson they’ll never forget! And after four years of a Liberal Dem ruining our economy, retreating from Iraq, appointing revisionist judges, and socializing healthcare, I’ll be able to say, “Don’t blame me, I voted for… uh… nevermind.”
CliffHanger on February 1, 2008 at 6:13 PM
I am a BIG fan of Ann’s and I understand why some of you guys don’t like her, but how is what she said any different than what Michelle said a day or so ago?
NDConservative on February 1, 2008 at 6:13 PM
The Supreme Court nominees that Hillary would put forth would make Ruth Bater Ginsberg look conservative. We need conservatives on the bench and who do you think will do that Hillary or McCain. Hillary and Bill and their minions must really be enjoying the divisions on the right, we are playing right into their hands. Um..oh wait McShamanisty blah, blah, blah. What do you think the Dems will do if they win, Hillary stated in the last debat that she does not want illegals to have drivers licenses because it will make it easier for them to get caught.
Tobias2012 on February 1, 2008 at 6:13 PM
Why do you think either one of them really cares.
Why would they NOT want Hillary elected? They stand to make a substantial amount of money doing what they’ve been doing for years now if she gets the win. It’s like a comic act - they’ll have 4 years, at least, of fresh material to feed to the rest of you.
Vyce on February 1, 2008 at 6:13 PM
You guys who support McCain seem to think he will actually stay conservative on the few things people do agree with him on…why should anyone believe that when he is after all a “maverick”?
EnochCain on February 1, 2008 at 6:15 PM
I agree with the other posters who said they weren’t kidding either… and the fact that we told you MONTHS ago that we wouldn’t support a RINO. Hillary, John, whateh. Go ahead and get freaked out now that a significant bloc of former Republican voters will either sit out, write in someone else, or - horrors - put a check by Hillary. And go ahead and wallow in your sanctimony and vitriol to try to sway us (yeah, that oughta work). See how much comfort that gives you in the next 4-8 years (I’m gonna go ahead and guess precious little).
fabrexe on February 1, 2008 at 6:15 PM
You can take this to the bank if we are going to have a open boarder, tax hiking, free speech stopping, gun banning, no oil drilling
postool in the white house better they have the {d}after their name then an {r} . this means there is no way in hell I will ever vote for McLair . Call it MDS all you wantbut it is what it is. You can only piss down my back so much and keep telling me it’s only rain before i tell you to go F yourself.
Mojack420 on February 1, 2008 at 6:17 PM
I’ve heard Ann dissed and vilified, but would someone argue against the points she made, please?
Personally, I agree with her.
Janna on February 1, 2008 at 6:17 PM
I’ve never called him a traitor. And I wouldn’t support him if there were any other choice. Any other GOP choice, I should say.
There isn’t. Mitt’s about done and you all know it. The air of inevitability is in the air.
Gauging from some of the comments in this thread, though, and based upon Ann’s remarks, I can just forsee it coming that, before long, there’ll be efforts to attack McCain’s military service, something which is admirable about him even if you loathe him for his politics. It’ll be interesting, and rather depressing, to see him get Swiftboated not by the other side, but by his own party.
Vyce on February 1, 2008 at 6:17 PM
What happens if McCain wins the Presidency and then decides he’s had enough of the GOP and leaves the Party? What happens if he pushes amnesty, effectively destroying America much faster than any terrorist group ever could?
davenp35 on February 1, 2008 at 6:17 PM
If you define “cognitive” as “foolishly and weakly willing to give up your principles and values to elect a liberal with an R after his name”… Then yeah, I’ll take “reactionary” because you seem to see that as the opposite.
I have very coherent thoughts on the subject of John McCain. I know his 25 year history in Congress, and I know how many times and to what degree he back-stabbed the R party. I’m not going to give up my Conservative principles to hand over the presidency to someone who would be no different on many liberal issues - including ones that are VERY important to me - to from the Democrats. If we’re going to have a Liberal, I’d rather it be a Dem. Then they will be blamed for the liberal crap that fails, and we will have a shot at the presidency in 4 years. If it’s McCain, it will be decades before we get it back because R’s will be blamed for the idiotic liberal policies.
But don’t you DARE for a minute tell me that my decisions are based on only emotions. They are well thought out, and are based on a much bigger picture than most of you are examining. You guys are about winning at all costs. I’m about winning the war of ideas, not just the piddly battle for the presidency. We lived through Clinton 1, we’ll live through Clinton 2 - if that is the course.
tickleddragon on February 1, 2008 at 6:17 PM
McCain will be a “conservative” right up to the day he’s sworn in. I wouldn’t put it past him to switch parties. He will do nothing he’s promised to do such as appoint conservative SCJ’s. Especially he is in this for only a single term like I think he is. If he isn’t interested in or up to two terms he doesn’t need Conservatives for anything after he wins the election.
DerKrieger on February 1, 2008 at 6:18 PM
re: “…the meaning of BDS”
——-
??boob deficiency syndrome?
number9 on February 1, 2008 at 6:19 PM
It’d be lovely, but it’s wholly irrelevant around here. Think of it as a rite of passage. You have to dis Ann to hang with the Kewl Kidz™ here, no actual argument necessary or even sought after.
I, too, agree with her.
Misha I on February 1, 2008 at 6:20 PM
Errr … “stay” conservative?
John McCain has NEVER been a conservative.
Gregor on February 1, 2008 at 6:20 PM
If I may make an imperfect analogy, traditional conservatives may feel the same about the GOP as black people should feel about the Democrats. Used. The vote, money, and volunteer work are welcome but the values aren’t. Going along just to get along hasn’t worked, and it’ll only get worse if lightning strikes twice and McCain wins the general, because he’ll control the party apparatus. Not a winning combination for conservative values ever carrying much weight in the GOP, IMO.
a capella on February 1, 2008 at 6:20 PM
That condition is no laughing matter.
EnochCain on February 1, 2008 at 6:20 PM
Whew…that’s one disease I don’t have to worry about. :)
But I think in that term, Bush is the boob.
tickleddragon on February 1, 2008 at 6:21 PM
Correction: I’ve been supporting Mitt for a looooong time.
It’s interesting, though, that like McCain, you’re willing to sneer at conservatives instead of working for conservative principles.
HYTEAndy on February 1, 2008 at 6:21 PM
I am mainly referring to the war.
EnochCain on February 1, 2008 at 6:21 PM
I agree - McCain supporters aren’t, in my opinion, long term strategic thinkers. Winning in ‘08 only to be set up for decades in the wilderness seems foolish. I honestly believe that losing with McCain as the nominee sets the GOP for another long period of domination while McCain winning does the opposite. Think beyond ‘08.
DerKrieger on February 1, 2008 at 6:21 PM
If you read further in the wikipedia entry, it does state that he eventually ended up being BROKEN and signing a false confession of war crimes. not exactly Stockdale.
plus, he finished 5th to last in his class at the Naval Acad. But dad and granddad were admirals so he got to fly anyway. And then he crashed four (or was it five, I forget?) jets in roughly 23 hours of flight time. big surprise he ended up a POW with flight skills like that.
I think AC had a point when she mentioned that at least HRC isn’t stupid enough to realize when she’s been caught in a lie. McCain might actually be in the Joe Biden territory of Senate Stupidity, which is saying something.
wordwarp on February 1, 2008 at 6:21 PM
Yeah. That’s how the actual Swift Boat Vets must have felt when Juanita McVain was giving them the finger while his other hand was fondling the balls of his pal, John “Genghis Khan” Kerry.
Misha I on February 1, 2008 at 6:22 PM
McCain/Specter!! Impossible? Birds of a Liberal feather.
DerKrieger on February 1, 2008 at 6:24 PM
Precisely. It’s like Global Warmers…they think they see the bigger picture because they look at 100 years worth of data for a trend. That is not the bigger picture, because the life cycle of the Earth is much much much longer than 100 years.
The bigger picture here, folks, is not the presidency in 08…it’s the continued march of Conservatism to the domination of American politics. The goal is much bigger than a 4 year presidency. If you can’t see beyond that, you’re useless to all of us.
tickleddragon on February 1, 2008 at 6:25 PM
McCain/Specter!! Impossible? Birds of a Liberal feather.
DerKrieger on February 1, 2008 at 6:24 PM
Sweet Jesus, spare us that imagery…
fabrexe on February 1, 2008 at 6:25 PM
For the sake of argument, let’s say McCain is a Liberal. Then, when you compare voting records, will we not concede that Hillary or Obama are then Ultra-Liberal, or perhaps even Socialist?
It’s astonishing how far left some of our commenters are willing to see this country go, just to make their point. It really is akin to Dems hoping for defeat in Iraq to drive home their point that we shouldn’t have gone there in the first place.
CliffHanger on February 1, 2008 at 6:27 PM
And what if McCain turns out to be the best, most conservative president this country has ever had?
myamphibian on February 1, 2008 at 6:28 PM
This is OT. Ecclesiastes is great literature and I as an atheist look to it for inspiration. But my answer to “Is there anything of which one can say, Look! This is something new?” is the Internet. or vaccines. or heart valve replacement. or …
thuja on February 1, 2008 at 6:29 PM
It’s astonishing how far left some of our commenters are willing to see this country go, just to make their point.
CliffHanger
+++++++++++++
To hoist you on your own petard, it’s astonishing to see how far left you’ll go to win one short election, only to lose the future.
fabrexe on February 1, 2008 at 6:29 PM
going off to work, folks, keep having fun
fabrexe on February 1, 2008 at 6:31 PM
Wrong. You’re missing the point. This isn’t about letting the Dems win to prove a point but rather to advance the conservative agenda. I have no point to make at all. McCain, through his policies, will damage the GOP and Conservative brands and keep us out of the Oval Office for a long time. However, if Hillary wins she will have the opposite effect and allow us to reclaim not only the WH but also Congress and the Senate.
DerKrieger on February 1, 2008 at 6:31 PM
I think she’s just saying that Hillary would be a tougher b*tch than McCain has proven himself to be.
But vote for her?
I’d rather vote for Ron Paul.
At least there’s a blimp.
profitsbeard on February 1, 2008 at 6:31 PM
Sorry tickleD - meant that for cliffhanger
DerKrieger on February 1, 2008 at 6:31 PM
Can’t. Stop. Laughing.
She did make one good point in all that, however: Republicans will rally against Clinton, but they won’t rally against McCain. This is exactly what I’ve been saying. Though I can’t in good conscience vote for any of the four frontrunners, at least with Clinton/Obama the opposition will be clear and well-marked. The tragedy of Bush’s legacy is that it split Republicans. Even now there are people standing behind him and approving of the job he’s doing.
Mark Jaquith on February 1, 2008 at 6:32 PM
No one can realistically say that is an emotional decision. I follow what you are saying. I would go so far as to say it’s one of life’s great questions. Which is better: to live on one’s knees, or to die on one’s feet? Which has more sting: to lose to one’s enemies or to be betrayed by one’s friends? In fact it leads to what I suspect is Shakespeare’s most famous quote. I follow your meaning.
Spirit of 1776 on February 1, 2008 at 6:33 PM
LOL!!!!!
davenp35 on February 1, 2008 at 6:33 PM
I was just listening to Sean Hannity’s radio show and he had on a conservative senator, I didn’t catch the guys name, but he said that right after the florida primary results came in, a senior guy on McCains staff pointed a finger at him and said, Ha! We beat you! This guy is not working on anyones campaigne so he asked, “Beat who?” and the McCain guy didn’t say but he realized who he was taking about, CONSERVATIVES! That’s who they beat and that’s who they are fighting against. The problem is there are a lot of people who call themselves conservatives who are too stupid to know that warm stream flowing down their leg isn’t rain.
Bikerken on February 1, 2008 at 6:33 PM
Cavuto’s show is so respectable he wouldn’t say “abortion clinic” if he had a mouth full. Even if Neil ignores them they’re a rock solid reality responsible for more death than Bush. Maybe Ann needs a hobby brcause her tolerance for crazy is low and she doesn’t seem to know how to disengage.
snaggletoothie on February 1, 2008 at 6:35 PM
confused for a min there. :)
tickleddragon on February 1, 2008 at 6:35 PM
Yes, you’re right. Call me crazy, but if I must, I will take an 80% conservative voting record over a candidate with the most liberal voting record.
CliffHanger on February 1, 2008 at 6:36 PM
Take a break for some inspiration. Click the little equalizer icon.
DerKrieger on February 1, 2008 at 6:37 PM
I didn’t hear Hannity, but that’s Santorum. He said that story yesterday to Laura as well I believe. It’s on the clip posted here.
Spirit of 1776 on February 1, 2008 at 6:38 PM
If we were talking about this man being liberal on one issue alone…I’d be thinking real hard about finding a way to support him. It is not about a single issue…it’s about dozens. I do have my limits.
tickleddragon on February 1, 2008 at 6:38 PM
Former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum.
HYTEAndy on February 1, 2008 at 6:38 PM
Michelle is much more purdy than Ann, the only way i’ll vote for Hillary is if she does!
myamphibian on February 1, 2008 at 6:39 PM
Can somebody give me a list of all the CONSERVATIVES endorsed by the NEw York Times in the past 30 years?
EJDolbow on February 1, 2008 at 6:40 PM
Cliffhanger
If his 80% ACU rating is based on his votes for some of the most unimportant issues while his missing 20% is based on his voting against the most important conservative issues of our time his rating is meaningless. Based on his immigration stance alone I can’t support him. I don’t care about his position on abortion. He can’t advance the ball on abortion no matter how hard he tries. He can however impact this country forever if he got his way om immigration.
DerKrieger on February 1, 2008 at 6:40 PM
As a poster said earlier on today on this site: You may have to start accepting the possibility that your conservative principles are no longer the majority viewpoints of the GOP.
Vyce on February 1, 2008 at 6:40 PM
The supreme court justices that Hillary will appoint will last for generations, the impact of her socialized programs on our health care could cost you or a loved one their life while waiting in some clinic for medical attention, her government induced economic programs will shut down business and increase taxes to the point of people losing their jobs and homes, her pandering to the left’s views on the war on terror will embolden the enemies of America. These are long term and short effects that we should be concerned about.
Tobias2012 on February 1, 2008 at 6:41 PM
And what a country it’ll be! With Dems in control of everything, it’ll be quite the reclamation effort. You guys are so patriotic, you’re willing to give us the toughest love of all - a country on the brink, whose people are crying and begging for true conservatives to right our course.
Hooray for us!
CliffHanger on February 1, 2008 at 6:41 PM
No president can write or pass legislation. We can work against McCain and simultaneously work to elect conservatives to the House and Senate and stop Hillary in her tracks. We accomplished a lot with Bill and Newt in their respective offices.
DerKrieger on February 1, 2008 at 6:43 PM
Dude! If you want to vote for McCain go ahead! I’m happy to sit back and wait for vindication. I’m patient.
DerKrieger on February 1, 2008 at 6:44 PM
Exactly!
davenp35 on February 1, 2008 at 6:44 PM
re: “…would someone argue against the points she made…”
——-
• ms. ann has secret lovin’ feelings for doc’s economic package
• but doc has a strong constitution, whereas ms. ann don’t
• ms. ann don’t cotton to amnesty advocates like mr. john
• mr. john likes amnesty ’cause his friends’ cotton needs a pickin’
• ms. ann abhors anyone with an astroturf-lined truckbed
• before she votes for mr. john, ms. ann will whor… well, you know…
number9 on February 1, 2008 at 6:46 PM
What if pigs could fly?
2Brave2Bscared on February 1, 2008 at 6:46 PM
DITTO DITTO DITTO DITTO DITTO DITTO DITTO DITTO
DITTO DITTO DITTO DITTO DITTO DITTO DITTO DITTO
DITTO DITTO DITTO DITTO DITTO DITTO DITTO DITTO
DITTO DITTO DITTO DITTO DITTO DITTO DITTO DITTO
mksmithwriter on February 1, 2008 at 6:47 PM
On immigration, we can and should fight whomever is in the White House if they think amnesty for illegals is a good idea. However, with Dems running everything, how successful do you think we’ll be? Don’t we stand a slightly better chance with enforcement first with McCain?
What about the concept of “one battle at a time”?
CliffHanger on February 1, 2008 at 6:48 PM
Book Sales more important than protecting the country..
Sorry Ann I will not buy any more books.
Chakra Hammer on February 1, 2008 at 6:48 PM
I’ll be voting for Hillary if McCain gets the nomination. It’s not only because of the sense Coulter made, but along with my own logic.
In order to save Conservatism and real Republicans, we must elect Hillary over McCain.
paultevis on February 1, 2008 at 6:48 PM
What if turns out that pigs really can fly?
2Brave2Bscared on February 1, 2008 at 6:49 PM
Well, first I need to cast my vote for Mitt here in Colorado. :)
CliffHanger on February 1, 2008 at 6:49 PM
Well in Nov. then.
DerKrieger on February 1, 2008 at 6:51 PM
Yes, that’s quite the impressive logic you have there, Mr. Opposite.
CliffHanger on February 1, 2008 at 6:51 PM
Well Ann, go out and do it. You won’t. All talk. Blah, blah, blah.
LtE126 on February 1, 2008 at 6:54 PM
You’re embarrassing. So are the rest of you mouth breathers who denigrate the man because he *gasp* works with democrats. OH NO! He’s a traitor to his country! What the hell have you ever done for this country you dolt.
Idiots.
Dash on February 1, 2008 at 6:56 PM
BTW…I will be voting for the guy with the “R” by his name. Agree 100% or not. Rudy’s out, I’m not a sore loser. But if it’s Romney, I’ll vote for him too. Team player, babe. It’s about judges.
LtE126 on February 1, 2008 at 6:57 PM
Heh.
He’s always saying he’d be sooo tough on terrorists, but he won’t put a little water up their nose!
She shoots, she scores!!!
I heart Ann.
Califemme on February 1, 2008 at 6:58 PM
I suggest a comfortable chair, 1 bottle of Jack Daniels and a tumbler full of ice, one sheet with McCain’s stance on the issues, and one sheet with Romney’s stance on the issues.
Drink … compare … decide.
darwin on February 1, 2008 at 6:59 PM
I’m looking forward to holding Ann to her word. If she backs out, she has no street cred.
THE CHOSEN ONE on February 1, 2008 at 6:59 PM
“I’m looking forward to holding Ann to her word. If she backs out, she has no street cred.
THE CHOSEN ONE on February 1, 2008 at 6:59 PM”
Totally agree. She gave Baldwin lots of guano about not moving to Canada after GWB was elected, didn’t she?
LtE126 on February 1, 2008 at 7:01 PM
If Romney is as smart as most assume he is, he should drop out now before he gets really embarassed super duper teusday. There might be another shot in 2016 and republicans ususally give it to the guy next in line.
THE CHOSEN ONE on February 1, 2008 at 7:02 PM
Everyone in congress has to work with the Democrats. McCain is the only one who favors them over his own party.
BKennedy on February 1, 2008 at 7:02 PM
You just don’t get it, do you. It’s your attitude that is causing the problem.
First: Those responsible for a Hillary presidency will be those propping up looney-tuney McCain, and accepting that his brand of non-conservatism is better than nothing. Well, we don’t agree with that logic. It will be those of you who are making his ill-gotten and really quite bizarre candidacy possible, who will be responsible for whatever Hillary or Barack end up doing . . . if YOU don’t come to your senses and jettison Mavijerk.
Second: Those of us who agree with Ann’s position, feel that there are more important things than simply accepting any old wretch who we’ve been fooled into thinking can beat Hillathing. If you or McCain think that he really does have some broad-based support, i.e., moderates (morons), centrists (morons), or democrats, … you are sooooo wrong.
seanrobins on February 1, 2008 at 7:03 PM
A smart, brash, confident conservative woman in a little black dress. Exactly what is it you people don’t get about this?
drunyan8315 on February 1, 2008 at 7:03 PM
man this sux so bad, i respect mccain for his service but he just feels icky.
i hope and pray mitt pulls out a comeback come tue.
trailortrash on February 1, 2008 at 7:03 PM
If people out there are willing to vote for mccain because of judges, what was the gang of 14 about? His best freind is warren rudman who gave the country david souter.
mccain is the manchurian candidate and the chinese and vietnamese are rolling on the floor laughing.
peacenprosperity on February 1, 2008 at 7:04 PM
drunyan8315 on February 1, 2008 at 7:03 PM
You have the worst taste in women in the history of western civilization. Put a bag on her head, turn off the lights, a bottle of Jack, being in prison for seven years, maybe.
THE CHOSEN ONE on February 1, 2008 at 7:07 PM
Comment pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 »