I though he’d already slipped down the memory hole!

By the way, ‘76, I dare say Paul’s knowledge surpasses all who normally post here, though from what I’ve read of your posts, perhaps you’re not so far behind. I appreciate your level-headed answers and I clearly see your true conservatism shining thru. Who you supporting right now?

I’ve listened to a significant amount of Paul’s message. I think some of it is quite perceptive, but they are several aspects of his message that are either mis-representations of our history, or have been shown to be non-optimal in practice. I don’t desire to rail against him, but I see him more as a political pendulum swing then a stable long-term position. Even taken as the best translation – ie a Jeffersonian revival, Jeffersonian politics had some very negative ramifications. Paul never addresses those.

To answer your question I’m more of an issues voter, than a specific guy voter. But I clearly favor Mitt over McCain. I have no love lost with McCain. I do understand all the 2nd amendment concerns with Mitt, but I think he has tried to reassure voters he has no intent to interfere in that realm.

On the other hand, I have never met a Ron Paul supporter who does not fly their freak flag very high.

Ron Paul is to freedom what moonshine is to liquor. You’ll feel good when you’re on it, but you risk blinding yourself.

The Race Card on January 31, 2008 at 9:09 PM

Never? You don’t get out much do ya?

This (A Nazi on staff) doesn’t surprise me. Incompetent lunatic at work.

Yes, but can you actually prove it’s a Ron Paul supporter. I mean, how do we know this isn’t actually a Mitt Romney supporter, pretending to be a Ron Paul supporter to smear Dr. Paul’s good name?

amerpundit on January 31, 2008 at 6:53 PM

Troof!! (We all know Bush was behind it.) ;-)

One does not have to be a bigot to support RP. His platform appeals to a variety of free thinkers. On the other hand, I have never met a Ron Paul supporter who does not fly their freak flag very high.

Ron Paul is to freedom what moonshine is to liquor. You’ll feel good when you’re on it, but you risk blinding yourself.

By the way, ‘76, I dare say Paul’s knowledge surpasses all who normally post here, though from what I’ve read of your posts, perhaps you’re not so far behind.

Bwaaaaaahahahahaha. Awesome. Paulbots are hilarious when they try to defend their Chosen Leader. It’s like Yogi Bear trying to convince Ranger Smith that he has no idea where the pic-a-nic basket he’s eating from came from.

Hey, Boo Boo, I had nothing to do with the newsletters bearing my name.

I am regularly astounded by your ability to stand your ground against the RPDS here at the Air. Keep the faith! I, too, just want a real conservative.

By the way, ’76, I dare say Paul’s knowledge surpasses all who normally post here, though from what I’ve read of your posts, perhaps you’re not so far behind. I appreciate your level-headed answers and I clearly see your true conservatism shining thru. Who you supporting right now?

http://www.rightwingnews.com/mt331/2008/01/established_media_is_formally.php

LMAO

muyoso on January 31, 2008 at 7:25 PM

Thank you i thought it was something silly like
white = racist
brown =empowered

What do you base your contention that a majority of his supporters are conspiracy theorists and racists?

How about the fact that Ron Paul has been a regular guest on the Alex Jones radio show? How about the fact that wherever I see Ron Paul For President patrols — like the 3rd Street Promenade in Santa Monica, CA — more than 50% of the entourage has a “9/11 is an Inside Job” placard? And how about the fact that at stormfront.org 580,785 the Ron Paul Revolution thread has 580,785 views?

I must be imagining things.

What type of conservative are you, what issues are important to you, and who do you support?

The staunch variety. My top issues for a presidential candidate are illegal immigration, border security, and preemptive action against terror-supporting territories. I support no remaining GOP candidate as they are all phony-baloney jabronis.

muyoso on January 31, 2008 at 8:02 PM

I not sure that he intended to run again at the time of the newsletters. Either way I don’t know enough. So I’m not asserting it as fact, just my take. He certainly has done some things for political expedience.

Later.

There just isnt enough of those types to support a movement. Also, that type of support is way too risky to seek when running for public office.

What do you base your contention that a majority of his supporters are conspiracy theorists and racists? Do you have ANY proof for this, or is that you read a few stories online and didnt have either the honesty to compare those few to the vast majority of even those who donated to his campaign?

OK, so I got your type of conservative wrong, you seem to be much closer to where I am. What type of conservative are you, what issues are important to you, and who do you support?

He sure is. Smarter than everyone on this board, easily.

Heh. Let’s not go overboard, shall we.

I dont think so lowly of his intelligence, being a doctor, a veteran and a member of congress for 20 years, to think anyone could have a plan so stupid.

His plan (if true) would not have been stupid but unwise. Attracting new members to increase the weight of the political block is standard policy. Speak their language to get them in, then have them check that particular ideology at the door for a bigger one: libertarianism. Unfortunately, as you may note from some of his supporters, it seems that they are able to maintain both collectivism and non-collectivism at the same time. Cognitive dissonance doesn’t seem to be a problem for many of his supporters.