Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


ABC: Hillary Clinton kept mum while Wal-Mart fought unions

posted at 1:30 pm on January 31, 2008 by Bryan
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Hillary Clinton spent 6 years on the Wal-Mart board of directors yet did nothing during those years to advance the union cause. Wal-Mart continued to buy from overseas sweat shops and Hillary didn’t do anything to stop that either. She did try to advance the cause of women in the workplace, the one consistent theme of her entire political life. That’s the story ABC has. Obama may get a day or two of swings out of it from the left, but if Hillary makes the general election it won’t be an issue there. The unions back her now and will then, and she has spent the past few years distancing herself from her lucrative work at Wal-Mart. She has taken the money and run.

I doubt the main text of this story will hurt Hillary Clinton much except among the nutroots, who largely already hate her. That’s where the core of irrational Wal-Mart hate is, on the hard left. They spend more time demonizing Wal-Mart than al Qaeda, which tells you where they think the real threats to their way of life are. If Hillary’s the nominee, they’ll line up behind her whether she fought unions while she was on the Wal-Mart board or not.

There is a subtext, though, that ABC overlooks. Billary was governor of Arkansas at the time. Arkansas was a conservative, southern Democrat stronghold, so Billary had to retain certain vestiges of conservatism in order to remain in power. One of those concerned labor: Arkansas was a right-to-work state. It still is. Billary didn’t change that and they didn’t change Wal-Mart. Unions oppose the right-to-work ethic, as it threatens their power over the American work force. Wal-Mart was the most successful corporation to emerge from Arkansas. Billary had to remain relatively quiet on labor issues, or they would have drawn the full wrath of the state’s wealthiest man, Sam Walton. Bill Clinton was also publicly pro-life up until 1988 or 1989, for the same reason. Arkansas politics demanded it.

Hillary Clinton is a pragmatic political radical. She’s very capable of camouflaging her positions when the circumstances demand it, and ruling in Arkansas’ political and business elite demanded it. So she did it.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Why…who da thunk it?

kcd on January 31, 2008 at 1:33 PM

Hey, I worked at Wal-Mart back then.

I’ve been personally oppressed by Hillary!
.

.

.

No, I wouldn’t have really joined a union.

Slublog on January 31, 2008 at 1:38 PM

My God she was a looker.

Chuck Schick on January 31, 2008 at 1:38 PM

If the liberals think she’s a kinder, gentler Bill, wait till she files suit to have the MI and FLA delegates seated!

PattyJ on January 31, 2008 at 1:39 PM

Love the picture on the front. She looks so homey… like some woman who stays home standing by her man and cooking cookies.

AverageJoe on January 31, 2008 at 1:40 PM

Preaching drinking water, while drinking wine:

…murmurings of the little harp-girl’s song in Heinrich Heine’s 1844 poem “A Winter’s Tale”

I know the authors, I know the tune,
I know it line for line
In public, water is all they preach;
While in secret they guzzle wine.

The Clintons’ America, and yours…

The Edwards’ America…
The Kennedys’ America…
The Gore America…
The Streisand America…

…you know the tune.

Entelechy on January 31, 2008 at 1:42 PM

I’m going to Wal-Mart today. I take 5 prescription medications, 4 of which I buy at Wal-Mart for $4.00 each. I’m definitely oppressed and victimized by korporate Amerikkka.

Bugler on January 31, 2008 at 1:43 PM

Aren’t unions socialist?

Kini on January 31, 2008 at 1:45 PM

And the unions will back her 100% anyway. So what’s the difference?

libhater on January 31, 2008 at 1:48 PM

She has always been ugly.

Who’d have thunk it.

Utah Boy on January 31, 2008 at 1:50 PM

My God she was a looker.

Chuck Schick on January 31, 2008 at 1:38 PM

Cut that out! My keyboard isn’t waterproof, and now I have to clean up the screen…

Frozen Tex on January 31, 2008 at 1:51 PM

Aren’t unions socialist?

Kini on January 31, 2008 at 1:45 PM

Hmmm…

Union of Soviet Socialist’s Republic..

You may have a point, there…

Frozen Tex on January 31, 2008 at 1:53 PM

Of course Unions will back her because now she will crusade to destroy the evil Corporations. Its a lawyerly thing to do just ask silky

William Amos on January 31, 2008 at 1:53 PM

I guess the unions don’t care about all those corporate donations to Hillary’s campaign either.

Rick on January 31, 2008 at 1:54 PM

My God she was a looker.

Chuck Schick on January 31, 2008 at 1:38 PM

Blue dress…white spots. Seems familiar, somehow.

James on January 31, 2008 at 1:59 PM

James on January 31, 2008 at 1:59 PM
LOL!!

kcd on January 31, 2008 at 2:00 PM

James on January 31, 2008 at 1:59 PM

Excellent!

Bugler on January 31, 2008 at 2:02 PM

Her opinion was for sale.
Her opinion will always be for sale.

natesnake on January 31, 2008 at 2:03 PM

Second look at Hillary!

lorien1973 on January 31, 2008 at 2:03 PM

Bill and Hill were solidly Blue Dogs until they left Arkansas.

natesnake on January 31, 2008 at 2:05 PM

Second look at Hillary!

*sound of vomit hitting the floor*

natesnake on January 31, 2008 at 2:06 PM

Second look at Hillary!

lorien1973 on January 31, 2008 at 2:03 PM

Im leaving if anyone says second look at Janet Reno.

William Amos on January 31, 2008 at 2:06 PM

Im leaving if anyone says second look at Janet Reno.

William Amos on January 31, 2008 at 2:06 PM

SECOND LOOK AT JA*****&*UDG…..

Nope, my computer wouldn’t allow that one.

Frozen Tex on January 31, 2008 at 2:08 PM

William Amos on January 31, 2008 at 2:06 PM

She can only be better (and hotter) the second time around. You know you want it – or you wouldn’t have brought her name up without prodding. Admit your love.

lorien1973 on January 31, 2008 at 2:09 PM

After studied observation, I prefer Hill in pantsuits.

That dress looks like something my Aunt Ruby would wear.

natesnake on January 31, 2008 at 2:13 PM

She can only be better (and hotter) the second time around. You know you want it – or you wouldn’t have brought her name up without prodding. Admit your love.

lorien1973 on January 31, 2008 at 2:09 PM

There is seriously nothing funny about your comments on this thread. In fact, I think you are bordering on being banned.

Rick on January 31, 2008 at 2:16 PM

Did I ever tell you about the time I shaved Janet Reno’s legs?

minx

natesnake on January 31, 2008 at 2:18 PM

A politician who sat on the board of Wal-Mart, and later decries the fate of the worker? You know, that kind of oxymoronic crap sounds like a politician who is a Marxist, but is also rich.

Yup, the politician is Hillary Clinton. And oxymorons and hypocrisy matter little when you’re Clintoniavelli.

And, for the record, the only thing more vile than a Marxist, is a rich Marxist. I have such contempt for hypocrisy.

OhEssYouCowboys on January 31, 2008 at 2:22 PM

Did I ever tell you about the time I shaved Janet Reno’s legs?

minx

natesnake on January 31, 2008 at 2:18 PM

Half-eaten gummy bears everywhere, dude.

Best laugh of the day, so far.

Frozen Tex on January 31, 2008 at 2:22 PM

There is seriously nothing funny about your comments on this thread. In fact, I think you are bordering on being banned.

Rick on January 31, 2008 at 2:16 PM

Eh I laughed at it. At least it wasnt Helen Thomas

William Amos on January 31, 2008 at 2:28 PM

Helen is my feisty little wolverine.

natesnake on January 31, 2008 at 2:37 PM

Too Much Mickey Mousing Around…

Who’s the leader of the club,
That’s made for you and me?
B-A-R
A-C-K
O-B-A-M-A
Barack Obama! Hillary Clinton!
Barack Obama! Hillary Clinton!
Forever let us hold our banner high!

E L Frederick (Sniper One) on January 31, 2008 at 2:43 PM

The mug shot of Hillary for this article makes me think of Flowers In The Attic.

Montana on January 31, 2008 at 2:46 PM

I get why we don’t like the Clintons, but I’m continually confused by why the left likes them. How in any way have the Clintons helped Democrats or advanced Democrat principles (assuming that they have any)? I don’t get it.

TX Mom on January 31, 2008 at 2:50 PM

Blue dress…white spots. Seems familiar, somehow.

James on January 31, 2008 at 1:59 PM

You sunk my battleship!

Chuck Schick on January 31, 2008 at 2:51 PM

See there, it was under Hillary’s leadership that Wal-Mart raised the standard of living among the poor and middle income more than the War of Poverty ever hoped to do. Whatta gal.

petefrt on January 31, 2008 at 3:09 PM

It might take a village to rise a child but it takes a Clinton to triangulate a village.

snaggletoothie on January 31, 2008 at 3:12 PM

Helen is my feisty little wolverine.

natesnake on January 31, 2008 at 2:37 PM

Stop that, dammit! Fortunately, my mouth was empty this time…

Frozen Tex on January 31, 2008 at 3:26 PM

Pretty Woman.

bloggless on January 31, 2008 at 4:04 PM

Did I ever tell you about the time I shaved Janet Reno’s legs?

minx

natesnake on January 31, 2008 at 2:18 PM

That is sooo SICK

kcd on January 31, 2008 at 4:12 PM

I get why we don’t like the Clintons, but I’m continually confused by why the left likes them. How in any way have the Clintons helped Democrats or advanced Democrat principles (assuming that they have any)? I don’t get it.

TX Mom on January 31, 2008 at 2:50 PM

The left admire the Clintons! They could get away with murder (and they probably have if the truth were know) and the left think their s#$t don’t stink! Because the left have no morals, scruples, core pricipals, standards….they have so much in common! THAT is why they love them!

kcd on January 31, 2008 at 4:16 PM

Well, it is quite a relief to know that Hillary’s communistic (not merely socialistic) beliefs don’t extend to her own pocket.

Karl Marx would not be proud of her. Although Putin and Hugo Chavez probably approve.

LegendHasIt on January 31, 2008 at 4:42 PM

That picture really surprised me–I never knew that Hillary guest-starred on Little House on the Prairie.

ReubenJCogburn on January 31, 2008 at 4:45 PM

1) Hillary is clearly a fashion icon.

2)”pragmatic political radical” — this is the perfect way to describe her, Bryan! She is a bone-deep pragmatist, but her ideas are just as radical as they were in the 1960s when she did her thesis on Saul Alinsky. She never thought things could be changed through revolution, she always believed you had to use the system to change things, and that’s exactly what she has done. She’ll tow the line and put on whatever show circumstances or situations require, only to implement her radical policies and ideas the second she sees power.

mattyj86 on January 31, 2008 at 5:23 PM

That dress looks 80 years out of fashion.

allrsn on January 31, 2008 at 5:29 PM

Hillary Clinton is a pragmatic political radical. She’s very capable of camouflaging her positions when the circumstances demand it, and ruling in Arkansas’ political and business elite demanded it. So she did it.

Which means she has no soul; therefore, she cannot take a principled stand on anything. (But we all knew that already)

SouthernGent on January 31, 2008 at 6:16 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.