…

Like most conservatives, I spent Super Tuesday curled in a fetal position in my bunker. The idea that John McCain will get the Republican nomination is beginning to sink in and it is more than many of us can bear….

If it comes to deciding between Shrillary Klingon v McCain, and between His Holiness, the Savior of Mankind, the Messiah, Barak Obama v McCain, I will move to India, or maybe New Zealand!

I might stick around long enough to write-in any of the following persons:

Michelle Malkin. Next to my wife, and in a close tie perhaps with Dianne Irving, PhD who has written brilliant documents regarding Human Embryology, and Ethics related to abortion, Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Cloning, etc., debunking the false science, deception, etc. perpetrated by so many politicians and so-called “scientists” who are out of their fields in their promoting things they know little to nothing about, Michelle is among the most brilliant, most talented woman in regard to reasoning, clarity, journalism, communication skills, strong willed, level headed, and, although the left hates her, she is a most likable person.

Michelle has an air of warmth, congeniality, open-mindedness, balanced with a strong will, decisiveness, honesty, and ethics and values. She seems to care, and she seems to be quite reasonable. She stands her ground on that which she believes in, and, although she has occasionally become hot under the collar regarding some issues, and taken a lot of abuse from hate filled cooks of the left, she has always maintained dignity and civility.

Of course, she is well informed and has a penchant for getting to the bottom of a story, digging deep for the truth, and not being snowed by bogus, fabricated “stories.”

She has great qualities that would make her a great candidate for President.

Bruce Lee (Yes, he was born in the US, in San Francisco while his dad traveled with a Chinese Opera company), although he has passed away. Even dead he’ll make a better president than McCain, Shrillary, and The Savior of Mankind, Messiah, Bringer of Change, Obama. Snicker, snicker!

Kajol. I know, Bollywood-India actress, warm and charismatic and likable as she is, as talented as she is, she is not a US citizen that I know of, but she is among my favorite actresses in the world.

Marilyn vos Savant. I know that her world record IQ of 228 (100 is average) does not qualify her to be president, but if people falsely claim that Shrillary Klingon is the “Smartest Woman in the World” when it really is a toss up between My wife, smart enough to marry me, and lovable as all get out, humble as the day is long, but smart and sharp as can be, and Marilyn vos Savant, and perhaps a few other women who are truly smart like them, perhaps it makes sense to really get a legitimately smart woman, and not just s somewhat smart while also deceptive and soulless women in the White House.

Thomas Sowell. Wonderful author and thinker. Brilliant man.

I know, I know. Blacks will hate him because “his mind ain’t right” and “he doesn’t know what it is to be black” even though he has been black since birth. He is too smart, too bright, to well educated and reasonable for most lefties, liberals, Democrats, and race obsessed, race poisoned blacks, and Dr. Sowell is too uppity for any left leaning white racist Democrats.

He just doesn’t know his place.

He thinks for himself.

He’d be a great write-in vote candidate!

Professor Walter Williams. Again, too reasonable. Too brilliant. To uppity for white liberals – sneaky racists that they are, and black racist, race baiters, and race mongers. Good for the Conservative/Libertarian minded.

Larry Elder: Again. To uppity for leftist liberal whites who play the Race bean counting game. He doesn’t know his place in their eyes. And too “white” for racist blacks to support. Again, too bright, too accomplished, too vocal in speaking his mind, too strong willed, and thinks for himself.

Larry is a real go-getter. He cares! He used his own resources, not begging from the “Guvument” (spelling intentional) to start programs to help keep kids of the street, off drugs, out of violent gangs, and succeed in life, scholastically, achievment and goal oriented. Great guy who does not get enough praise or noteriety, and an entertaining author as well.

Yes, Larry Elder, Esquire, author, talk radio host.

Good guy, poison for leftists-liberals, but good for Conservatives/Libertarians.

Mike Adams, Professor of Criminology, UNC.

Way to smart and free spirited, fearless, and clever for the leftists-lilberals to understand, poison for Mind Police-Thought Police leftists, a bane on gun control freaks, deadly for Islamic Jihadis, and a crushing blow to male hating, hate filled, mentally deranged, divisive, up tight, thought police loving negative type “feminists.”

J. C. Watts, former Federal House of Representative member from Oklahoma.

Oh, the ACLU, atheists, and nasty racist would hate him! Too bad. He is a brilliant thinker, an excellent public servant, and a likable guy.

Again, an uppity black man who doesn’t know his place and whose mind ain’t right. He is patriotic, has conservative values, and does not seem to see a KKK mob hiding behind a tree holding a noose ready to make life a living hell for “minorities” but thinks things through for himself.

In other words, he ain’t no sheep!

Caution … he is an ordained minister. Oops! Can’t have not Bible believin’, Church goin’ Christian nut in the White House, unless that person is a Democrat!

J. C. Watts is an excellent speaker, gifted with a wonderful, melifluous voice.

I’ve admired J C Watts for years and I had hoped that he might have support and feel inspired to run and toss his hat into the ring. Alas, instead we have a nightmare about to unfold with McCain, Clinton, and Obama appearing to make this the most horrific, terrible election in baby boomer history!

Bobby Jindhal, newly elected Louisiana Governor. He IS a US citizen, born on Baton Rouge, LA, and a REAL so-called “minority” person of Asian Indian decent.

This man possesses a remarkable resume. Here is a brief sample:

1991 Graduates from Brown University with honors, in biology and public policy

1994 Graduates from Oxford University as Rhodes Scholar with a graduate degree

1994-1995 Advises Fortune 50 companies as a consultant for McKinsey and Company

1996 Appointed Secretary, Department of Health and Hospitals; rescues Louisiana’s Medicaid program from bankruptcy by turning a $400 million deficit into three years of surpluses totaling $220 million.

1998 Appointed Executive Director, National Bipartisan Commission on the Future of Medicare, a 17-member panel charged with devising plan to reform Medicare

1999 At the request of the Governor’s Office and the Legislature, volunteers his time to study how Louisiana might use its $4.4 billion tobacco settlement

Appointed President of the University of Louisiana System (16th largest in the U.S.)

2004 Elected to U.S. Congress, representing Louisiana’s first district

2006 Reelected to U.S. Congress

Current Lousiana governor.

(Info cited – bobbyjindal.com)

Here is a likable, warm, friendly, caring, intelligent, well educated fellow who has been a reliable individual in positions of responsibility, plus he cares and has shown it frequently.

He also lived through the racist attacks from phonies who cry “racism” every time they stub their toe, when all along they, themselves, are the real racists and haters!

Newt Gingrich. A briilliant man and innovative thinker with a wonderful attitude!

Those are just a few ideas.

Does anyone else have any write-in vote ideas?

William

To all of the “hold your nose and push the button” folks ….. does it really smell better if your hands are already stained with poop when you pinch your nose?

I’m NO FAN of McCain. This point in history is no time to shoot down a RINO when he’s not a truly committed communist like either Hitlery or B.O.

Shirotayama on January 31, 2008 at 4:49 AM

I’m not so sure that McCain is not a truly committed communist. He seems to support a “Dictatorship of the Proletariat” (where he plays Dictator and we’re the proletariat who should shut up and let him dictate), and he supports a collectivism which has us redistributing our money to illegal immigrants foreign invaders in the form of medical care, welfare, jobs, schooling, etc.

If this isn’t Communism, what do you call it???

No retractions… the party betrayed us.
I say again… only if BHO is a candidate will I vote.
Holding my nose and then… I’ll take a very long hot shower.

There has to be a limit SOMEWHERE, if principles are to mean anything.

I’m hoping Romney can stop McLame’s trash talk express.

Mojave Mark on January 31, 2008 at 1:56 AM

How ironic..

As you, this website and the rest of the Levin types name call..

And you call, him a trash talker.

Today we saw the unveiling of a new party, the McCain-Schwarzenegger-Giuliani party. It is using the name Republican, but millions of actual Republicans know better. This is not the Republican Party. The Republican Party does not support trashing the First Amendment, denigrating free enterprise, surrendering our sovereignty to Mexico, and giving terrorists rights under our Constitution. Republican leaders do not spend more time sponsoring bills with Democrats than with other Republicans, or more time trashing Republicans than confronting Democrats.

Actual Republicans feel no obligation to vote for the nominee of this strange new party. He will be no closer to an actual Republican if elected than will Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama. And it is not we who are naive or intransigent or selfish; we are simply acting on our principles — you know, those things that John McCain utterly lacks.

If a Democrat wins the White House, the Congress will move to the middle. Hillary/Obama will seem so left and the country simply isn’t that left. So I don’t believe that the sky will immediately fall. I’m almost certain that we’ll win seats in 2010.

Also, Obama and Clinton refused to promise that troops would be home by 2012. In one of the debates they were asked this and only Kucinich (I think) said they would be home by then/before then.

With the surge working and Congress unable to defund the war up to this point – even when things were going poorly and Code Pink was breathing down their neck – there’s no way HO (pun intended) will pull out straight away.

Those of you who think McCain is great on the GWOT why do you think this? Because he is strong on Iraq (and has tried to take credit for the surge?). If you go to his site (I went there the other day), there is no mention of how to fight the GWOT. He talks about Iraq but while Romney talks about the larger war, McCain doesn’t.

Not only that, he wants enemy combatants to be brought to the US and Gitmo closed; that means they’ll get the same protection you and I get and a flock of liberal lawyers (or public defenders paid with our tax dollars) will be suing the government for mistreatment, appealing their verdicts, demanding Halal meals and foot baths in Supermax… if you think this is positive for the GWOT and national security, you’re ‘batty’. I don’t think waterboarding compares to withholding medical treatment and tightly tying your hands behind your back for hours, so he’s wrong on that, but I’m willing to give him a pass because of his experiences as a POW.

So the one thing people claim he really has going for him he doesn’t have going for him. Add to that his support of cap and trade (and you think the American auto industry is bad), campaign finance (which helps incumbents… surprise there), his comments to Russert that he would have signed the amnesty bill “but it won’t cross my desk” while he tells entrepreneurs that “If they want their damn fence I’ll build their damn fence” and then hires Juan “no borders” Hernandez and fail to admit McCain-Kennedy wasn’t amnesty… his cursing at Cornyn, McCain-Feingold, his animosity towards Rumsfeld… on and on and on.

So you say he’s against earmarks and HO wouldn’t be; he was in Congress for 20 years and he didn’t reform earmarks. If he pushed for earmark reform with as much zeal as he tried to ram illegal immigration down our throats, we wouldn’t have the spending problem we have now. Instead, he just doesn’t really play the earmark game, and points to that as proof of his ‘conservatism’.

I’m sorry… but anyone who thinks that Congress has to tighten its belt before I get my money back is a crook. It’s my money, CONGRESS is being irresponsible. The burden of proof should be on them. Perhaps going to a revised pre-Cromwell type situation would be better. The monarch called the Parliament into session when he/she needed money to run the government. How about Congress stops its earmark busy work and only meets to discuss war or money to keep government running?

The thing is, as much as I admire anyone who serves, I don’t OWE McCain the nomination/Presidency as a result of it. Those of you who complain that people told you to vote for Bush are probably the same ones now telling you to vote for Romney, remember that McCain is LEFT of the President. McCain didn’t support the tax cuts and wants to confer Constitutional rights on enemy combatants (by closing Gitmo). Think about it.

Romney, despite some of his reversals, has actually showed to be a true conservative in some ways. He wouldn’t give bennies to illegals and if you’re a family values person, he forced all same sex couples to prove residency before they could marry. He is pro-capitalism and lowered taxes; on another thread a Massachusets poster explained Romney care and it isn’t government run care, but shifts funds already used to bail out hospitals out towards insurance.

McCain’s career is littered with examples of how he has rudely thumbed his nose at GOP principles except for one – earmarks. Taking into account both of their flip-flopping, Romney has walked the GOP walk more than McCain. When he’s flubbed or changed his mind, he’s owned up to it; McCain won’t even ADMIT it was amnesty, for example.

So my husband and I are voting Romney; if McCain gets the nomination we’ll write in Romney. If you think that’s throwing our votes away fine. I don’t think voting for a good candidate even if you think he’ll lose is throwing anything away; I think its called principle.

I’m not ready to vote for someone who I disagree with 90% of the time just because he has the “R” designation. I have as much in common with conservative Dems. The argument just isn’t compelling.

Sorry for the length.

I just wish the Huckabee supporters would give up their hopeless cause right now, because he’s taking votes and delegates from Romney, yet there’s no way Huck can get the nomination. The only way to deny McCain the nomination is for all who can’t stomach him to support Romney now.
So if you don’t want to face the choice of McCain vs some other Democrat, and you’re helping Huck help McCain, think it over.

Michelle, I love you like a sister, and I must tell you that sometimes family needs guidance from the older brother.

My sister thought that she was doing me a favor by protesting the Vietnam war. And then she thought she was doing me a favor by voting to cut off funding to the South. You see, I was over there covertly when funding was cut. It wasn’t pretty. But I never said much. I really can’t say much. Years passed and my sister was pushing anti war BS to pull out of Iraq and backing Hillary. I could not stay quite any longer and I pulled out the pictures I have had packed away since the ’70’s of the carnage that took place after our troops left and we cut off funding. I showed them to my sister a couple months back. She left the room in tears and a few days later told me she had no idea.

Michelle, don’t push for Clinton over McCain and think you are doing anyone any favors.

1. The primaries are not over yet.
2. No matter who is President, the best way to get thing done it through our representatives. That was shown with the stopping of the “Shamisty” bill. The whole bunch was for it, including W.
3. I am not a McCain backer, but Billary as president? Please.

Excuse me, but have you studied US history? Generally speaking, we civilians on the homefront have been allowed to shop and perform other day-to-day tasks, such as going to work, raising their children,etc., while the troops put their lives on the line to protect our ability to do those things.

Are you suggesting that we are NOT at war, because each and every one of us is not on a battlefield?

If so, then I can totally understand why you do not seem to comprehend the difference between McCain and Hillary as a potential Commander-in-Chief.