First he brags about his political differences with the “liberal New Yorks Times”…

then he jumps in the same boat with them for the McCain endorsement?

What a fraud.

It’s like dodging a bullet and stepping directly on a landmine.

Nice trope.

I admire Romney’s “fire in the belly”, but he can’t win and can only derail the only chance we have to beat back Hobama in the general.

Let us be blunt here, McCain is 80% in line with my positions. I strongly oppose him on the other 20%, but I know he won’t flip flop. He is a man of convictions and he will stand up for what he believes in.

Between Mitt’s flip flopping and the way the Democrats would exploit the Mormon meme to death, we would only guarantee a blue state landslide that would leave America in a very bad place.

In a battle of Identity politics, either Black or Female trumps Mormon. John McCain is not about identity politics.

Stick a fork in Mitt, he is done.

America can’t wait till it is time to vote and expect to get a good President. We have to produce good Presidents. Very few of the candidates this year have even come close to that standard. We have forgotten the supply side. America has become such a consumption society that we aren’t producing enough goods, and that includes the production of good Presidents. We demand things that we aren’t willing to supply.

Mitt Romney is the best chance we have of returning to a productive society, and balancing out our excessive demand.

The endorsements are coming thick and fast because it is obvious which GOP candidate can best win the election for the party. The reactionary bigots who are still spitting poison at McCain don’t really matter so much – their votes are usually wasted in safe Red states anyhow.

Also, had my fill of Michael Medved this afternoon, and am disgusted by this neo-Marxist carrying the water for McClain.

it’s funny, when i used to watch aghast as democrats, greens, anarchists and reds go at one another, and i saw nonsense like the above, i was confused about it.

for instance, when a lefty would say of, say, nader, that he was a “reactionary” who “may as well go hang out with jerry fallwell”, i would actually look for sense in the statement.

but its clear to me that it was only nessesary that the words used sound insulting in intent. the idea is not to make an argument like a homo sapien, but to bark and present like a monkey; to screech “politically incorrect unperson!”

Just three months ago, Rudy was untouchable.

And now, here we are.

The early primary states can rest easy knowing that their importance will never again be questioned by any serious presidential candidate.

Amazing.

It’s like dodging a bullet and stepping directly on a landmine.

HAHA.

So cheer up, Republicans, you’ve got a good pair of candidates, either one of which stands a good chance to keep the status quo safe from the likes of Hillary Clinton. And keeping the status quo is the most conservative value of all.

RightOFLeft on January 30, 2008 at 6:33 PM

No it isn’t. Not if the status quo keeps incrementally shifting left mercilessly. It’s not enough to be right of left as your moniker suggests, standing athwart history yelling “Wait for me!” Conservative parties in any country only win when they stick steadfastly to their principles. Thermopylae and all that.

It’s like dodging a bullet and stepping directly on a landmine.

HAHA.

Vote Romney and lose.

Chakra Hammer on January 30, 2008 at 7:06 PM

If McCain wins we lose anyway … so what’s your point? He’s blue through and through.

don’t count on Rush endorsing McShamnesty

Nascar70 on January 30, 2008 at 6:16 PM

Can I now?

He is wiping the floor with endorsements and Mitt is still basically spinning his wheels.

Also, had my fill of Michael Medved this afternoon, and am disgusted by this neo-Marxist carrying the water for McClain. If McClain gets his way, I’m going to root for Obama, or stay neutral if it’s Clinton.

But I guess its all just kabuki theater by now.

Always Right on January 30, 2008 at 6:49 PM
Not for Mitt. I keep having the feeling that it is tonight or never for Mitt.

bnelson44 on January 30, 2008 at 6:52 PM

I agree about Mitt.

But for Mitt to make an impact he cannot just keep repeating the same lines he has already used a hundred times.

he has to try to confront McCain on his RINOism in a new and dramatic way.

Just repeating the old lines about Washington is broken, and rearranging the chairs and so on and so forth is, I belive, not gonna get it done. he needs to a NEW and yes a DESPERATE approach.

If he just goes with the same ol same ol, it is over for Mitt.

In the Romney pile, we’ll probably have about five to seven wins, and the delegates most of Massachusetts, all of Utah, all of Montana, most of Colorado, all of Missouri, and if that poll is correct, all of Delaware, and perhaps most of North Dakota’s. And he’ll get some of California’s.

I put him at about 200 to 250 delegates.

In the Huckabee pile, we’ll have Alabama, Arkansas, Tennessee, Georgia, and maybe he’ll get some of California’s.

I put him around 200.

In the McCain pile, we’ll have all of Arizona, all of New York, all of New Jersey, all of Connecticut, probably the largest chunk of California’s, probably most of Minnesota’s, probably majorities in Oklahoma and West Virginia.

I put him around somewhere north of 400 delegates.

Alaska may go for Ron Paul, and he may get a majority of their 29 delegates.

That would put things at about McCain at 500+ (needing 1,191 to be the nominee), Romney at 325, Huckabee at 230 or so.

http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MDkyN2RjZTVmMWE1MWQ0YzY5Y2I5MmM2NGUzZDY5OTI=

.

McCain vs Obama: McCain +1.5

.Romney has never shown that he could beat Hillary or Obama

Romney vs Clinton: Clinton +12.4

.

Romney vs Obama: Obama +17

Vote Romney and lose.

Take care, y’all, and good luck with the hate and vitriol!