Florida: Predictions

posted at 9:26 am on January 29, 2008 by Allahpundit

Get ‘em in now. How close is it? Dude. Mitt has the 10-to-1 ad advantage, Maverick has the endorsements. Verdict: Rudy, baby, in an upset! No, no, kidding. I’ll pick McCain, for no better reason than that the campaign has seemed to revolve entirely around him for the past week. Or, if that’s not good enough, try this:

[E]arly voting in Florida began January 14, and Thompson departed the race on January 22. There’s about a week’s worth of Thompson votes in there that might have gone for another GOP candidate.

“Another GOP candidate” being, of course, Mitt. As for the mayor, Riehl sends word that he’s already in parting gift mode vis-a-vis his staffers. Portrait of a man looking for the exit:

When Mr. Giuliani wandered back to take a few questions, some of them had a fairly bearish bent. Asked what he would do the day after the primary, Mr. Giuliani said: “When it’s Wednesday morning, we’ll make a decision. The reality is the voting hasn’t even started yet, at least the Jan. 29 voting hasn’t started yet. I believe we’re going to win.”

Money appears to be in short supply. The campaign tried to hoard its cash during the earlier contests, in the hope that it would be able to overwhelm its exhausted rivals once they arrived here with their coffers depleted. That does not seem to have worked out as planned. As loss after loss made fund-raising more challenging — Mr. Giuliani finished behind Representative Ron Paul of Texas in all of the early contests except New Hampshire — Mr. McCain, of Arizona, saw his fund-raising improve after he won in New Hampshire and South Carolina. And Mr. Romney started to invest heavily in Florida after his victory in Michigan; senior Giuliani campaign aides, meanwhile, have agreed to work without pay.

There’s a debate tomorrow night so he’s not kidding about having to decide tomorrow morning. Exit question: Can it really be true? “This is typical of the hard Right. It’s what they do. They don’t understand how to win elections, because Rush Limbaugh isn’t interested in electing a president. These people don’t care. They’re interested in listenership; it’s not the same thing.”

Update: Another reason for Rudy to get out quick rather than go to New York and be humiliated: He’s got the Giuliani brand to think about.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 3 4 5

Or are we just so corrupt and soulless ourselves that we no longer even expect better?

Murf76 on May 7, 2013 at 10:03 PM

.
Ditto that.
How does one embrace that which we have asked others to reject?

Today anyway,
Ich bin ein Democrat

What is that smell ?

FlaMurph on May 8, 2013 at 7:48 AM

Sanford is a flake for sure. And, there is no good explanation for his behavior, other than men (like me) are suckers for beautiful women.

But, at least we have another vote in the House for fiscal sanity. And, we beat back the progs.

That’s not nothing. If they can have JJ, Jr. and Charlie Rangel, we can have Sanford.

johnboy on May 8, 2013 at 7:59 AM

Well the Dems finalllyyyy have it right, “It really is Busch’s fault!”

el Vaquero on May 8, 2013 at 8:11 AM

Congratulations Mark Sanford!! Isn’t it strange how every Dem kept knocking Sanford’s personal life but not a word came out about Busch being a Jail Bird! That’s right! She was locked up in the 1980s for contempt of court in her divorce case. Isn’t it ironic that a person seeking to become a member of the ‘Ruling Authority’ gets locked up for showing contempt for the same Authority? Thanks to the Obama Media, this fact was not made known!

The only person I know of who made this fact public is radio talk show Host Mike Galagher! Thanks Mike!!

Jersey Dan on May 8, 2013 at 10:50 AM

jimgeraghty @jimgeraghty
$1.2 million in donations to Colbert Busch, $929,000 on independent expenditures against Sanford… FLUSH…

Yeah, except the execs and other employees at many media outlets who profit from those ad buys make the vast majority of their political donations right back to dems/libs/proggies.

So instead of FLUSH it’s more like LATHER – RINSE – REPEAT…

Marcola on May 8, 2013 at 11:57 AM

My opposition to Sanford from the get-go stems from my admiration for the man who held this seat before him.

alchemist19 on May 7, 2013 at 9:46 PM

You loved Arthur Ravenel? You’re a strange bird! Arthur was about as conservative as Sen. Lindsey Graham is–but as a House member, that’s not very strong.

//

I know you’re referring to 2014. But I’m referring to 1992, when a man like Tim Scott was still in his impressionable years, learning from the strongest conservative representative this district had ever had–Mark Sanford.

Y’sll young’uns that think “it’s all about today!” or “it’s all about the Founding Fathers!” fail to realize that there’s been some significant contributions made in the 230+ years since our nations’ founding.

Conservatism didn’t start out conservative. It came into existence as the only way to preserve our founding principles when the progressive engineers tried to run the national train off its tracks.

rwenger43 on May 9, 2013 at 11:03 AM

Not sure if this was already posted, Daily Caller:

People Elizabeth Colbert Busch may actually have a chance of beating

entagor on May 9, 2013 at 12:38 PM

Comment pages: 1 3 4 5