I had actually already seen this, but I suspected that NASA might say it was huge, rather than tiny… still not implying it was anything artificial, but I recall some Mars images in the past where I thought an object was only a fraction of how large it was reported to be.

That said, any numskull who actually thought that was “something” still has the excuse that they won’t just take NASA’s word for it on the size.

RightWinged on January 25, 2008 at 9:46 AM

BTW, even though I think most of what evolutionists say is silly… I have to point out one thing that really always gets me. I think it’s safe to say that most people who believe in aliens are evolutionists. That being the case, do these people ever stop and think how stupid it is to imagine that they would be humanoid in any way, based on their own line of thinking. I mean if everything on Earth was supposed to have evolved by random chance mutations, and that the same process is happening elsewhere… what the hell makes these morons think that “aliens” would evolve in to upright walking beings with heads, legs, and arms.

Whenever we watch something on the History channel about abductions or listen to stories on Coast to Coast AM, it’s always about the “grays” or the “white” who look remarkably human… but if evolution is true, then the odds that aliens would look anything like us are ridiculous. Are we to believe that after nothing exploded in to everything, the same type of rain came down on the same rocks, and the same life started from non-life, and just by chance it looks incredibly similar to what we look like, billions of years later? For f**k sake, what are the odds of an “alien” even evolving a brain? This is just like the “face” people claim is on Mars from some other photos. Why would one think that aliens that evolved on a totally separate line, with different origins, would even have the same concept of a “face” as we do?

RightWinged on January 25, 2008 at 10:14 AM