Report: Fred dropping out; Update: Confirmed; Update: What went wrong? Update: The man who stopped Huckmentum
posted at 2:18 pm on January 22, 2008 by Allahpundit
Send to a Friend |
printer-friendly
Ambinder says so and Carl Cameron is reporting it on Fox now. Stand by for updates.
Update: Cameron says it could come tonight or tomorrow. He’s already informed his campaign headquarters, in person.
Update: The website hadn’t been updated in four days. The “Fred File feed” is already offline.
Update: Here’s the official statement via his web guy, Jon Henke:
McLean, VA - Senator Fred Thompson today issued the following statement about his campaign for President:
“Today I have withdrawn my candidacy for President of the United States. I hope that my country and my party have benefited from our having made this effort. Jeri and I will always be grateful for the encouragement and friendship of so many wonderful people.”
Update: The problem in one word: Not laziness but disorganization. Karl’s been doing yeoman’s work at Goldstein’s place lately tracking how Hillary managed to eke out wins against Obama despite the fact that he’s well-funded and light years more charismatic than she is. Read this post and follow the links to the Las Vegas Sun and, especially, to Zak Exley to see what it takes. The media likes sexy/dopey pop-psych narratives about election-eve crying and racial jabs, but organization matters — a lot, a rule Fred always seemed to believe he could ignore by counting on his True Conservative status to carry him through. Again I point you to this Mark Steyn post, or to MM’s tale of how his people couldn’t pull it together to get 500 signatures in Delaware. If the lesson (or one of the lessons) of Ron Paul’s newsletter fiasco was that you can’t trust a guy to manage a country if he can’t manage his own vanity publication, how can you trust a guy who can’t figure out how to get on the ballot in all 50 states?
So I’m chalking it up to disorganization. The alternative, that Bush killed the Reagan coalition dead and left Thompson types inviable no matter how efficiently their machines might run, is simply too terrible to contemplate.
Update: He served up the red meat, says Geraghty, but he didn’t char-grill it.
Update: I fear this news calls for anti-humpbot.
Update: Mitt’s race to lose now in Florida?
Update: I flagged these links after the South Carolina but we’re in obit mode here so let’s bring them back. What’s the legacy of Fred’s campaign? Disappointment and disorganization, yes, but something else too:
The reaction from Marvin Katzen, the McCain supporter who told us earlier in the evening that he was looking for vindication from the 2000 loss to tonight’s win: “Thank God for Fred Thompson.” Katzen credits McCain’s victory to the fact that Thompson split the conservative evangelical vote with Mike Huckabee in Upstate.
“While well behind and tied for third place with Romney, Thompson did make gains,” wrote Thomas Edsall, “and the data suggest that the 6 points Thompson picked up came out of Huckabee’s hide.” Huck’s own people admitted as much. It falls to Romney to finish McCain but Fred can claim a moral victory in having dispatched the demagogue.
Update: If you believe ARG, and you probably shouldn’t, McCain’s lead in Florida is now large enough that picking up Fred’s supporters won’t matter to Mitt.
Update: A wistful eulogy from Spruiell.
Update: Rich Galen, a now former Fred advisor, is pushing his man for veep.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 »
If I may be so bold…
MadisonConservative on January 22, 2008 at 4:11 PM
Okay, can we banninate this guy now?
Slublog on January 22, 2008 at 4:11 PM
bullpucky…guess what? Fred pandered to the Fredheads
He was rated a moderate conservative during his Senate career and moved further right for this campaign because he saw an opening. But keep rooting for McCain to get nomination and 8 years of Shillary, you don’t have a lot of company here.
windansea on January 22, 2008 at 4:12 PM
Congratulations. You are officially someone who gives Christians a bad name.
MadisonConservative on January 22, 2008 at 4:12 PM
It’s all very ouch for this Fredhead. I’ll definitely miss having as sharp and reliable of a conservative as Fred in this race.
I think I’ll be pulling for Romney now.
Beatnik Joe on January 22, 2008 at 4:12 PM
Update: Recent surge in alcohol consumption among conservatives eases evangelical fears of Romney nomination “legitimizing Mormon cult”.
Deety on January 22, 2008 at 4:13 PM
Fred was a waste of my time and money, no matter how much I wanted it to work he was never serious. SCREW HIM!
GO MITT GO!
HotAirExpert on January 22, 2008 at 4:13 PM
Mormonism is a cult. It is not recognized by the Christian church as a Christian denomination yet they claim to be.
In fact mormons believe that the entire Christian church is a cult.
HaraldHardrada on January 22, 2008 at 4:14 PM
One example: his plan to resist gay marriage. He wanted to pass an amendment to limit the full faith and credit clause, as well as to strip the power of judicial review in certain cases just to try to stop gay marriage. It’s better to ban the practice outright via a targeted Amendment than to mangle the rest of the Constitution in the process.
Big S on January 22, 2008 at 4:14 PM
You certainly may, any time - damned foreigners have the biggest challenge with words which are expressed the same, while being spelled differently. Though on this one it’s mute/moot, one could say :) Madison, you’re a good one,
Entelechy on January 22, 2008 at 4:14 PM
Yeah. Crazy. And the debate where Fred lied about supporting the surge and criticized Mitt for not.
MSNBC’s NORAH O’DONNELL: “We have a Rudy Giuliani, who supports the president’s plan on Iraq. We have Governor Mitt Romney, who also supports a troop surge. How are you different from any of those candidates.”
Answer: “Well, I’m not sure that I support the troop surge, if that surge has to come from our Guard and Reserve troops, which have really been overly stretched.”
Spirit of 1776 on January 22, 2008 at 4:15 PM
Wrong, wrong, wrong. Be not afraid. Mitt is it. He’s going to bring back all things conservative from the ’80s, including Members Only jackets!
Notice he’s been wearing one? Notice they just relaunched and will have a new line for Fall ‘08. Coincidence? I think not!
http://www.elle.com/fashionreport/12546/members-only-jackets-relaunch.html
Brat on January 22, 2008 at 4:16 PM
In fact I don’t support Huckabee because he was a minister.
I support him because he has the strongest energy independence plan and because I support the fair tax.
HaraldHardrada on January 22, 2008 at 4:16 PM
Disappointed FredHeads who are considering staying home, please take in this post by from a recent thread:
———————————————————-
Heres something to consider in November no matter WHO the nominees of each party are: if the Dems win and keep control of Congress, I bet you a donut that on January 22nd, the Dems recall Gen [Petraeus] and haul him in chains in front of Barbara Boxer, Dick Durbin, Maxine Waters and Jihad John Murtha,ably assisted by the ACLU, CAIR and countless NGOs, to face a hurricane of warcrime accusations…
Something to chew on if youre one of those thinking of staying home in November because the guy we nominate isn’t 1000% perfect on every issue,(and he wont be, whoever he is).
Mike D.
RushBaby on January 22, 2008 at 4:17 PM
Vote to ban.
Vizzini on January 22, 2008 at 4:17 PM
Man, with Russia heating up, it would have been great to have President Thompson repeat these famous words. “The Russians don’t take a dump, son, without a plan.”
IT could have been…
Dr. Gecko on January 22, 2008 at 4:18 PM
Well that’s too bad. Guess I’ll be voting
for Mittagainst the Dem nominee then.I won’t vote for McCain because of his involvement in the amnesty mess. I don’t believe him for a second when he says he “gets it” and has had a change of heart. With a Dem congress to back him, I’m sure he’d try it again should he get voted in.
I won’t vote for America’s Sanctuary City Mayor, either. Aside from his stances on guns and illegal immigration, I don’t appreciate his intellectually dishonest “my city was attacked on 9/11 = leadership” appeal. His personal baggage would make the General election pretty ugly… there’s no question Her Thighness will bring it up, seeing as how her campaign has treated The Messiah so far.
I won’t vote for Huck because, even though I’m a Christian, I find his blatant identity politics offensive. His positions on a number of issues concern me.
I’m not voting for the newsletter guy.
That leaves Mitt. I don’t have a problem with him being a Mormon because he’s just a layman. Sorry if that offended any Mormon readers here. I just hope there’s no “October Surprise” concerning him, and that he doesn’t get hammered in the General as a flip-flopper.
So here’s to another election cycle faced with crappy choices.
Dave Shay on January 22, 2008 at 4:19 PM
Finally, a voice of reason in this debate.
fred5678 on January 22, 2008 at 4:19 PM
Successful private sector business experience, for one.
Larger Delegate count, for another.
Rudy would make a pretty good Secretary of Homeland Security or even Attorney General. I like Hizzoner but given the poll numbers I’m seeing out of Florida…the state Rudy’s put the overwhelming majority of his campaign effort into…I’m wary of throwing support to another likely soon-to-be-ex-candidate.
I’d pick Mitt over Mack. I will vote against any ticket with Huckabee-nejad on it. Even if Huck’s only the veep.
Period.
Shirotayama on January 22, 2008 at 4:19 PM
members only coalition LOL
windansea on January 22, 2008 at 4:20 PM
Any one of them can get the “energy independence” going, and none will do a thing about the so-called “fair tax”. I explained this before.
Entelechy on January 22, 2008 at 4:20 PM
Fred was always rated conservative, but his ill advised support for McCain-Feingold cost him. In 2000 he finished with a conservative rating of 92. Other things were supposedly non-conservative was his strong support of the conservative principle of Federalism- something that Romney clearly does not understand or support.
Mitt was a RINO who completely reinvented himself and everything he stood for the moment he decided to run. He could’ve earned my unenthusiastic support, but his sleazy pandering that includes throwing taxpayer money at every perceived problem made him unacceptable to me.
You want to vote for a blatant phony who’ll say anything he thinks you want to hear up until he gets elected? Fine, that’s your choice. This election I choose to vote for someone I actually support rather than the “lesser of two evils”. And that would be “nobody”.
Hollowpoint on January 22, 2008 at 4:20 PM
*swiped*
RushBaby on January 22, 2008 at 4:20 PM
“The conservative movement is dead and to prove it, I’ll vote for Hillary…”
Go ahead, exercise your God-given right to be a moron.
Reading some of these comments, I think Libs may be on to something when they paint conservatives as “reactionary”.
I just hope this primary season is akin to a hangover which dissipates over time and leads to a clearer, less emotional thought process going in to November.
CliffHanger on January 22, 2008 at 4:20 PM
Mormons actually believe that the reason why people have dark skin is because they are cursed by God…
How is that going to fly in the general election??
Also they believe the entire Christian church is a cult.
Yeah harass me because I talk about the fact that mormonism is in fact deemed a cult by the Christian church.
Completely ignore the fact that mormons state that Christians are cult members openly.
HaraldHardrada on January 22, 2008 at 4:21 PM
smeg
LimeyGeek on January 22, 2008 at 4:21 PM
As are you, m’lady…
MadisonConservative on January 22, 2008 at 4:22 PM
against Hillary? heh…I’ll take Mitt in that debate
windansea on January 22, 2008 at 4:23 PM
You are a two-faced bigot.
Yesterday you said:
Then:
You know what? Just leave. You give not only Christians a bad name but Americans as well. You need to grow up.
CABE on January 22, 2008 at 4:23 PM
New definition: RINO == Someone who is willing to jump out of the party when the times get tough.
bnelson44 on January 22, 2008 at 4:23 PM
Please explain how his is any different from anyone else’s.
SouthernDem on January 22, 2008 at 4:23 PM
This time, I have to vote yes to a ban. He’s too stupid to indulge any further. I’m sick of him spouting outright bulls*** over and over that is patently false, and at the same time making Christians look as bad as the media portrays them.
Seriously, HH, f*** off.
MadisonConservative on January 22, 2008 at 4:23 PM
Good thing most of us atheist are smart enough to identify the mentally challenged cousin and make sure he only gets a rubber spoon and no steak knife.
peski on January 22, 2008 at 4:24 PM
Thank you so much for moronically confirming what so many of us suspected about Huckabee voters!!
P.S. please keep it up - one doesn’t need to be Hugh Hewitt to see how this could boomerang to help Mitt Romney.
thirteen28 on January 22, 2008 at 4:24 PM
RushBaby on January 22, 2008 at 4:17 PM
Not before we get rid of a few no-good ones
- Huckabee, out
- McCain, out
Then, we focus on what you quoted. Love,
Entelechy on January 22, 2008 at 4:24 PM
Motion seconded, another vote for ban…
…even though as frustrated as I am I’m probably going to end up banworthy myself.
Hollowpoint on January 22, 2008 at 4:24 PM
go away Huckatroll.
lan astaslem on January 22, 2008 at 4:24 PM
SouthernDem on January 22, 2008 at 4:23 PM
100% energy independent within 8 years!
HaraldHardrada on January 22, 2008 at 4:24 PM
People, calm down. Huck won’t be the nominee. He won’t get enough delegates. He won’t get FL and will be lucky to get a couple of the bible belt states.
bnelson44 on January 22, 2008 at 4:25 PM
How many times koolaid disciple of The High Reverend Huckster do you have to be told that there is no “The Christian Church”?
MB4 on January 22, 2008 at 4:25 PM
OK, how is that gonna happen?
SouthernDem on January 22, 2008 at 4:25 PM
Slubbo FTW!
doubleplusundead on January 22, 2008 at 4:26 PM
Mitt? Meh.
At this point, I’d relish the fight that four years of Clinton would bring. It’d beat fighting a Republican for four more years like I have this past four.
And with her in office, I might get more than a little bit of help from Congress. There’s no way in hell that the Democrats will keep both the House and the Senate in 2010 with her in the Oval Office. So I get rid of Speaker Pelosi or Senate Leader Reid (or both!) and have two elections to jam some good solid conservatives into Congress. I think I’d take that deal. That’s not reactionary. It’s rational.
Jimmie on January 22, 2008 at 4:26 PM
Again you’re saying I’m a bigot because I state the FACT that the Christian church considers mormonism is a cult.
Wow you are really some insane PC types!
I’m surprised you’re not voting dem…then again many of you openly state that you will!
HaraldHardrada on January 22, 2008 at 4:27 PM
Heh. Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for debate and exchange of ideas among conservatives, but HH’s constant Mormon-bashing is tiresome and irritating.
And no, I’m not a Mormon.
Slublog on January 22, 2008 at 4:27 PM
Thank you for finally showing your true colors.
Regarding voting in November, I’m going to make an exception and encourage you NOT to vote.
Thank you.
CliffHanger on January 22, 2008 at 4:28 PM
I would, too. The MSM will stack the deck against him, though. Not sure how that will play out.
Dave Shay on January 22, 2008 at 4:28 PM
You know, I bet Harald is Right2bright! They don’t seem to frequent the same threads, but both have incurable cases of Mormon derangement syndrome.
Lessee…. Harald, the biggest Huck supporter here, is revealed as an anti-mormon bigot. Is anyone surprised that he suddenly supports Huck? Has anyone met a Huck supporter yet that ISN’T anti-Mormon? I’m serious, I don’t think I’ve ever seen one. Has anyone else?
Vanceone on January 22, 2008 at 4:28 PM
My apologies ladies and gentlemen, I just couldn’t resist feeding an Alkaseltzer tab to the chihuahua.
It was childish. I’m sorry.
Deety on January 22, 2008 at 4:28 PM
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA the huckatroll is being picked on…
stlpatriot on January 22, 2008 at 4:28 PM
thats your choice and right
I hope you have a shitload of dough tucked away, cuz Hillary will surely try to take more of it from you than Romney.
What if Fred accepts VP with Romney? still gonna sit it out?
windansea on January 22, 2008 at 4:29 PM
Mine doesn’t. And since yuo claim there’s only one Christian church, I suppose I just proved your entire thesis wrong using your own *cough* logic.
Thanks for being so accomodating!
Jimmie on January 22, 2008 at 4:29 PM
I don’t know. I’ve never met a Huck supporter myself.
CliffHanger on January 22, 2008 at 4:29 PM
Still waiting to hear how Huck will make the US 100% energy independent in 8 years.
Harald?
SouthernDem on January 22, 2008 at 4:29 PM
Motion for banning this guy.
BlackCapitalist on January 22, 2008 at 4:30 PM
Shouldn’t you be over in Iraq helping them decide if Mohammed’s rightful successor was Umar or Ali?
MB4 on January 22, 2008 at 4:30 PM
Calling me as an individual a bigot doesn’t work.
I am simply stating the FACT that mormonism is not recognized as Christian. It’s a fact people not speculation or bigotry! Get a clue!
HaraldHardrada on January 22, 2008 at 4:31 PM
Mitt acually said that Fred! was the only candidate that stood up for the Reagan coalition before saying he’d be a wonderful running mate…
stlpatriot on January 22, 2008 at 4:31 PM
Still waiting to hear how Huck will make the US 100% energy independent in 8 years.Harald?
SouthernDem on January 22, 2008 at 4:29 PM
Let me help.
1) Claim energy independence in 8 years.
2) ????
3) Energy Independence!!
Jimmie on January 22, 2008 at 4:31 PM
I don’t think Christians are cultists.
I do believe, fervently, that you are a schmuck. Not for what church you go to, but on your own individual merits.
sulla on January 22, 2008 at 4:32 PM
And remember HaraldHardrada spelled backwards is adardraHdlaraH
Buttercup on January 22, 2008 at 4:32 PM
Can we ban this clown? He’s wasting space and the time of everyone who reads this blog. And no, stupid hararara, that won’t be a violation of your free speech, it’s only censorship if the gov’t orders it, so shut up and leave.]
JustTruth101 on January 22, 2008 at 4:32 PM
Strange…I count an average of about 15-20 churches in every town I pass through. Someone should tell them they’re not Christian, and refer to HolyHalfwit with any questions.
MadisonConservative on January 22, 2008 at 4:32 PM
ALLAH - BRYAN - MICHELLE - SOMEBODY PLEASE BAN HaraldHardrada
JustTruth101 on January 22, 2008 at 4:33 PM
Second.
fourstringfuror on January 22, 2008 at 4:33 PM
Ditto.
a capella on January 22, 2008 at 4:33 PM
Ah, yes, silly me. It was right in front of my eyes.
Don’t ban this guy, he’s a useful idiot.
SouthernDem on January 22, 2008 at 4:33 PM
No we do not.
I have been a Mormon for 16 years. We do not believe that, nor have we ever said that. Why are you a lying bigot?
Please ban this guy.
CABE on January 22, 2008 at 4:33 PM
Voting huckabee is just as good as voting democrat, so in reality, most of us are suprised that YOU are not voting democrat.
I am a Christian, I disagree with much of the teachings of Mormons, but this is America, we all share the right to choose our own religion.
Get over it
aclark on January 22, 2008 at 4:33 PM
+1 Ban
infidel on January 22, 2008 at 4:34 PM
Ok, now that my candidate has said he’s out, I will back Mitt. But if Juan or Rudy are nominated, I will vote for Obama, should he be the dhiminicrat nominee. If they nominate HER, I’ll vote libertarian.
Anyone care to start a “Draft Micael Steele” campaign?
Texas Nick 77 on January 22, 2008 at 4:34 PM
Most of the Muslims I’ve known have been more tolerant than you.
MadisonConservative on January 22, 2008 at 4:34 PM
HaraldHardrada on January 22, 2008 at 4:31 PM
we have a clue, you, on the other hand, don’t, and have never… give it up, upchuckabee is DONE..
You get that bigot?
stlpatriot on January 22, 2008 at 4:35 PM
There is no possible way you are a Huckabee supporter. You are very clever and talented.
JiangxiDad on January 22, 2008 at 4:35 PM
I don’t have a problem with mormon people. I’ve done business with mormons and they are very honest and stay true to their word in my experience.
But is mormonism a cult?? Yes. they have added to the scripture. Fact.
Is Willard Romney unelectable? Yes. 100% unelectable that is what scares me..running a unelectable candidate aginst the Hildebeast and guaranteeing her coronation!
HaraldHardrada on January 22, 2008 at 4:35 PM
Harald: Let’s make this short and sweet. What on God’s green earth does Mormonism and it’s merits have to do with this thread? This thread is about Thompson leaving the race. He’s not LDS.
It’s universally recognized that LDS people tend to be some of the most conservative there are. So why should Mormon beliefs matter one hill of beans?
The only reason it does is if you are a bigot, who thinks that “Oh NOES! They worship differently than me! BURN THEM ALL!”
I’ll ask you the same question I asked some others of your ilk on this website: do you agree with the idea of driving Mormons out of the United States at the point of a gun? Do you think that’s a good idea?
Oh, and btw–you have been revealed as a liar by another poster in this thread, who quoted your “I don’t care about Mormons” schtick from yesterday. You, sir, are a liar. No wonder you like Huckabee. Like calling to like.
Vanceone on January 22, 2008 at 4:36 PM
Romney on Hannity radio now.
Deety on January 22, 2008 at 4:37 PM
Halfwit is probably a liberal mole posing as a Huck supporter, just like 50% of the Paulbots
I thank him for driving more Fredheads into Mitts arms
that said, ban him
windansea on January 22, 2008 at 4:38 PM
The atheist crew does not support free speech.. when you can’t win a debate you want to shut your opponent up.
Why don’t you help your dem candidate pass the fairness doctrine…YOU BELONG WITH THE DEMS..
HaraldHardrada on January 22, 2008 at 4:38 PM
As a Florida voter, I’ve already voted early (on Monday). I know some people who were and did vote for Fred, and I tried to get them to reconsider for Romney.
Ugh. If McCain wins Florida, I’m going to vomit.
Enoxo on January 22, 2008 at 4:38 PM
Huh??? “Swiped”???
Meaning??
Did somebody famous already coin that phrase?
I thought that one up by meself. LITERALLY, I’M NOT LYIN’.
If somebody else coined it first, all I can say is “great minds think alike”.
PLEASE…CLUE ME IN.
Shirotayama on January 22, 2008 at 4:39 PM
Dab-burnit……
Well…it is on to someone else…….right now I’m leaning toward Allah, or maybe Kucinich.
Limerick on January 22, 2008 at 4:39 PM
I’m with you Jiangxi. Whether or not he’s sincere, the net impact is a clear illustration of the hypocrisy known as Rev. Shucknesty.
peski on January 22, 2008 at 4:40 PM
1. Take a deep breath
2. Switch to decaf
3. up the voltage
sulla on January 22, 2008 at 4:41 PM
Private site and server. You have no more right to free speech here than you do in a stranger’s home. They can call the police and have you removed if they want. So the same works here.
MadisonConservative on January 22, 2008 at 4:41 PM
I would. I like the guy, too bad he couldn’t get reelected in MD. Now I’m stuck with O’mally.
resqgal on January 22, 2008 at 4:41 PM
Before I state what I’m about to, I agree that this HaraldHardrada is at least guilty of “thread hijacking”…and I don’t particularly like his style of “discussion”…
That being said, he does have something correct: (and speaking soley from my Catholic viewpoint) Mormonism is considered a “cult of Christianity” by the Vatican, because it rests outside the orthodox Christian beliefs.
And a baptised Mormon convert to the Catholic church must be re-baptized (a requirement waived for baptized converts from other Christian religions). The biggest problem the Church has with the Mormon beliefs is the notion that God had physical relations with Mary to conceive Jesus.
But honestly, what a persons religion has to do with holding the Office of POTUS I don’t know…I’m not a Mitt fan, but it has nothing to do with any religion.
And this thread shouldn’t be about Mormonism anyway…this may be the last “Fred Thread” we get :-(
JetBoy on January 22, 2008 at 4:41 PM
Also, yes…
Thompson for VEEP!
Enoxo on January 22, 2008 at 4:42 PM
Don’t you believe it. ;)
MadisonConservative on January 22, 2008 at 4:42 PM
Go Rudy!
Chakra Hammer on January 22, 2008 at 4:42 PM
South Park
BohicaTwentyTwo on January 22, 2008 at 4:42 PM
You’re absolutely right. Mormons have every right to practice their beliefs they have freedom of religion and freedon of speech.
But if you listened you would know the question is…is Romney unelectable? I’m afraid so.
HaraldHardrada on January 22, 2008 at 4:43 PM
Advice to keep yourself from getting banned:
1. READ before you type.
2. THINK before you type.
3. Do not make uninformed, bigoted statements.
Opposing points of view are welcome and encouraged. Bigotry and ignorance are NOT.
JustTruth101 on January 22, 2008 at 4:43 PM
|Mormonism is a cult. It is not recognized by the Christian |church as a Christian denomination yet they claim to be.
|
|In fact mormons believe that the entire Christian church |is a cult.
|
|HaraldHardrada on January 22, 2008 at 4:14 PM
Why don’t you give it up already. No one is listening to your crap. Don’t you know who your audience is here? These are intelligent people.
cjs1943 on January 22, 2008 at 4:44 PM
So does the YMCA.
fourstringfuror on January 22, 2008 at 4:44 PM
Lim, lean on me instead - going Romney, if he makes it…if not, Rudy (no idea what he’s up to lately, though).
Maybe Fred having dropped out will give Romney his real voice, not the one which says anything anyone wants to hear. Haven’t heard it so far, though it must be there, ready to be unleashed. Hopefully waiting in anticipation,
Entelechy on January 22, 2008 at 4:45 PM
Well in looking at how our country votes, the current crop of GOP candidates and America’s overall swing to the Left, it would seem to me the Reagan Coalition, if not dead, is gravely ill.
mattyj86 on January 22, 2008 at 4:45 PM
omg heath ledger is dead, on focnews just a min ago
stlpatriot on January 22, 2008 at 4:45 PM
Comment pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 »