Huckabee ready to give up on Florida?
posted at 10:35 am on January 22, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
The Prowler says he’s broke, but then the Prowler says a lot of things. Even if he’s not broke, he’s not swimming in dough and ad buys don’t come cheap there. So he’s expanding his campaign throughout the south, with an eye to giving up on Florida in the next few days if his polls don’t start to move. What does that mean? It means Mitt catches a minor break in that a few (but not all) of Huck’s supporters in the state will peel off to him as the social con alternative. But it also means the already slim chances of Huck dropping out before Super Tuesday, when those southern states he’s been visiting finally vote, are down to near zero. That means it’ll almost certainly be a four-man race into February, with Romney hobbled by Huck and McCain hobbled by Giuliani (or vice versa, depending upon who finishes ahead).
While his opponents blanket Florida with ads and personal appearances, Huckabee is making a small step daily in Florida as well as states like Georgia to maximize his free news media coverage and keep expenses low.
And if Florida’s notoriously expensive media markets prove too costly and the polls show it’s pointless to hunt for the state’s winner-take-all votes, Huckabee acknowledged he’ll probably spend his cash — and time — elsewhere.
But not yet.
”Right now, our plan is to play ball in Florida. We think we can play here. Obviously, every single day is a new day in the campaign, especially when it’s as fluid as it is,” he told reporters. “I don’t want to abandon Florida yet because we have not come to the conclusion that Florida is out of play. We’ve had leads here when we didn’t have any reason to have leads here in Florida. So, I mean really, it was just astonishing to us. We were leading polls. We thought: We don’t have a single staff person, we don’t have a field operation here, we’re not running TV or radio and we’re leading polls.”…
Huckabee leads in Georgia, which will have more delegates than Florida when it votes Feb. 5.
His only realistic chance of winning Florida was for Mitt to get knocked out in Michigan and then for Huck to beat McCain in South Carolina. That would have left him as the sole social con alternative with Rudy and Maverick splitting the centrists. (Although maybe Mitt’s departure would have encouraged Fred to stay in?) As it is, he’s lost 5-7 points over the past week and is holding steady at a distant fourth; InTrade gives him a two percent chance of winning. Exit question: What can Romney offer him to drop out? Anything? Note the last two paragraphs of the Herald piece before answering.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Stick a fork in him.
Leonidas Hoplite on January 22, 2008 at 10:36 AM
I don’t think Romney can offer him anything to drop out. There seems to be genuine animosity between those two campaigns.
Slublog on January 22, 2008 at 10:43 AM
Exit question: What can Romney offer him to drop out? Anything?
Sorry, none of the answers I came up with are printable.
Jaibones on January 22, 2008 at 10:43 AM
He knows Rudy will win Florida. Endgame!
froghat on January 22, 2008 at 10:43 AM
Entelechy! Where are you?!
I want to say schadenfreud, but I cannot remember how to spell it.
csdeven on January 22, 2008 at 10:45 AM
windansea on January 22, 2008 at 10:46 AM
Huckster still has his eye on 2012. He’s looking ahead, and any exposure helps him. By then, most will have forgotten what he did in Arkansas as governor.
a capella on January 22, 2008 at 10:48 AM
I like Romney. I don’t think he should offer him even dog catcher
ConservativePartyNow on January 22, 2008 at 10:48 AM
Apparently, Florida media outlets don’t take linty mints from the bottom of Mrs. Huckabee’s purse as currency. Nor do they take fried squirrel in trade for airtime.
aero on January 22, 2008 at 10:51 AM
The Media has cut Huck loose – they had their fun building him up and strangling Fred
Now neither one has a shot
EricPWJohnson on January 22, 2008 at 10:51 AM
JiangxiDad on January 22, 2008 at 10:52 AM
From what I can tell, everyone in the GOP side is broke except Mitt (if you count his personal fortune).
I hear McCain is going to have a number of fund raisers in NYC.
bnelson44 on January 22, 2008 at 10:53 AM
Think you mean just freude this time.
JiangxiDad on January 22, 2008 at 10:53 AM
Now McCain Must Convince the Right – Fred Barnes, Wall Street Journal
bnelson44 on January 22, 2008 at 10:54 AM
Bye.
Mcguyver on January 22, 2008 at 10:54 AM
Sorry. Misstated my question. I don’t question the animosity. I wondered what you think truly generated it.
JiangxiDad on January 22, 2008 at 10:55 AM
You mean other than Huck attacking Mitt’s faith?
bnelson44 on January 22, 2008 at 10:56 AM
Excellent article. I think you all should probably read this:
Republican Voters vs. Establishment – David Brooks, New York Times
bnelson44 on January 22, 2008 at 11:00 AM
The Romney campaign is probably irritated at Huckabee’s Mormon-baiting and the Huckabee campaign is probably mad at Romney for the ads targeting Huckabee’s record.
Slublog on January 22, 2008 at 11:01 AM
Everyone said Giuliani was done when he skipped out on NH and SC. Now, everyone’s talking about him again. Who’s to say Huckabee isn’t doing the same thing? He’s playing to his strengths, and hedging his bets. I don’t see how this is the end of Huckabee.
fourstringfuror on January 22, 2008 at 11:08 AM
Never going to happen. John McCain has burned way too many bridges to convince the right that he is anything but a left-leaning career politician. The final straw for me was when McCain suggested I was unpatriotic because I was against the amnesty deal he hammered out with Teddy Kennedy.
I will stay home and let Clinton win before I cast a vote for John McCain because the nation would be screwed either way.
highhopes on January 22, 2008 at 11:10 AM
Breaking news: Fred Thompson pulls out of race!
froghat on January 22, 2008 at 11:11 AM
Breaking WHERE?
EJDolbow on January 22, 2008 at 11:14 AM
If Romney wants Huck out, he probably doesn’t want to ask him to do anything. (Given their animosity, it’d seem reasonable Huck would do the opposite, and I’m pretty sure Huck’s betting on being a VP with maverick and not mittverick.)
Vizzini on January 22, 2008 at 11:14 AM
In a world of pure imagination.
Slublog on January 22, 2008 at 11:15 AM
I should add, I think Thompson is going to drop out of the race. It’s hardly breaking news, though.
Slublog on January 22, 2008 at 11:16 AM
Romney/Thompson in ‘08!
highhopes on January 22, 2008 at 11:17 AM
May already be happening.
Vizzini on January 22, 2008 at 11:19 AM
Willard (Mitt) has plenty of dough. Looks like he’s the only one to give the RINO Cain any competition.
countywolf on January 22, 2008 at 11:20 AM
Romney need only get out the message that he is the one in Florida asking for their votes while Huck is in Georgia and Alabama telling yankess were to shove flagpoles and autographing bibles.
EJDolbow on January 22, 2008 at 11:21 AM
The religious divide was unexpected, and new, for me. Any sense of if/how this issue will be overcome in the future?
JiangxiDad on January 22, 2008 at 11:21 AM
just checked Fred’s website, no breaking news.
And I have a feeling Huckabee isn’t going anywhere.
conservativegrandma on January 22, 2008 at 11:22 AM
Note to Huck – you can’t win – please turn out the lights and go home.
I live in Little Rock (but am not an AR native), go to church most weeks, and can’t stand Huckabee. I support Giuliani and hope he kicks his campaign up a few notches.
I supported Fred before he officially entered the race but his lackadaisical attitude kept him from gaining traction and he’s since lost any real chance to win.
McCain will be a disaster on the scale of Obama or Clinton.
DerKrieger on January 22, 2008 at 11:27 AM
I think Mitt should offer him a nice big cup of STFU as a consolation prize.
Romney never did anything to warrant Huckabee resorting to the whole class-warfare deal. I would guess that the antimosity Huck has for Mitt is manufactured, an act meant to stir ‘his’ evangelicals against ‘the rich Mormon’.
As far as I can remember, I don’t think Mitt did anything but savage Hucks record (rightly so), and if Hucks animosity and class-warfare grew from that, then he’s a crybaby because that’s fair game. If you don’t want anyone attacking your record don’t dick up your record next time!
TheGoblinKing on January 22, 2008 at 11:34 AM
David Brooks isn’t a conservative. The toxic PC inanity prevalent at the NY Times has clearly infected him. Brooks persists in claiming Huckabee’s class warfare rhetoric has legs after we have had ample evidence that non-evangelicals voters have rejected it. Brooks has slandered Rush in almost all of his recent columns. I think the attacks on all the Republican candidates besides Fred has been counterproductive, but Brooks would have us abandon every tenent of conservativism in order to win the approval of his peers at the NY Times. That would be a disaster for all of us.
phronesis on January 22, 2008 at 11:51 AM
I hope he’s done.
roux on January 22, 2008 at 11:57 AM
Schadenfreude.
baldilocks on January 22, 2008 at 12:05 PM
I didn’t expect this level of religiosity to be part of the campaign, either. I’d like to say the way to prevent it in the future is to stop rewarding politicians like Huckabee with elected office. He’s run one of the most divisive political campaigns in recent memory, actively setting factions of the Republican coalition at one another. His popularity has been as surprising as it is disheartening. Up to this point, I had no idea identity politics and class warfare were so popular with GOP voters.
Slublog on January 22, 2008 at 12:31 PM
A nice, tasty plate of fried squirrel? With Krispy Kremes for dessert!
ErikTheRed on January 22, 2008 at 12:36 PM
This guy sends my creep-O-meter off the charts.
Buttercup on January 22, 2008 at 12:38 PM
Huckabee is finally telling the truth:
Zetterson on January 22, 2008 at 12:55 PM
Aren’t Huck and Romney brothers?
Seriously though, nothing.
Spirit of 1776 on January 22, 2008 at 1:18 PM
If hucks out it helps mccain. These Evangelcals wont back a mormon
William Amos on January 22, 2008 at 1:33 PM
I think that Mitt should offer Huck two things;
Jack and Squat.
lodestonejames on January 22, 2008 at 1:47 PM
Which Evangelicals you talking about? I’m an “Evangelical” in the sense that I utterly reject the secular humanist agenda that constitutes mainstream religion. My church considers the LDS to be cultists. Yet…… I’d vote for Romney and would never vote for a fraud like Huckabee.
I’d suggest that you be very careful with how you label people. Evangelical isn’t a dirty word and it doesn’t exclusively refer to the kind of Christian that would vote for the Huckster and would reject Romney because of his faith. That crowd is far smaller than the brand of Evangelical that cares about the social issues.
highhopes on January 22, 2008 at 1:47 PM
Allah, you bad boy you, stirring the pot….?
jerrytbg on January 22, 2008 at 1:56 PM
LOL, yep they’re all gonna switch to Rudy or McCain
you are clueless in your attempts at sabotage. Take a look at some exit poll data not that it will do any good. You might as well back McCain as you continue to post BS about Mitt and Rudy, the 2 remaining candidates that can beat him.
sour grapes made you whine?
windansea on January 22, 2008 at 2:30 PM
Just because Romney’s run is being financed by the church of mormon doesn’t meant that he has a chance at winning..
The American people will overwhelmingly reject him.
He is our John Kerry….the ultimate flip flopper and liar.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToQbeBC_fOI
HaraldHardrada on January 22, 2008 at 2:32 PM
I only missed the “e”? Cool. I might just remember it now. Thanks!
csdeven on January 22, 2008 at 2:34 PM
Again, you have no class.
Slublog on January 22, 2008 at 3:12 PM
Can`t he just pull a “Thompson” and just give up?
ThePrez on January 22, 2008 at 3:30 PM
“There seems to be genuine animosity between those two campaigns.”
What amazes me is the apparent animus McCain seems to harbour against Romney. His new improved “Honesty” campaign is just a refinement of the spitballs he’s been aiming at Romney in the debates, like his slimy, emblematic claim that he has spent decades serving this country for “patriotism not money.” McCain is just as bad as Bill Clinton when it comes to making everything personal.
JM Hanes on January 22, 2008 at 3:48 PM
He also has no clue.
As much as Huckabee has tried to exploit religious identity politics, he’s never managed to sway a majority of the evangelical vote in a primary. If he united anyone, it was the Mormons – against him.
sulla on January 22, 2008 at 4:22 PM
Go Rudy!!!!!!!1
Chakra Hammer on January 22, 2008 at 4:52 PM
If Huck drops out, it’s Mitt all the way, baby!
I’m with Mitt!
madmonkphotog on January 22, 2008 at 5:54 PM
It has an e at the end. An e that’s pronounced.
Tzetzes on January 23, 2008 at 4:01 AM
(As a schwa. Like “uh”.)
Tzetzes on January 23, 2008 at 4:03 AM
He could make him squirrel-catcher. Squirrel-catcher-and-fryer.
Tzetzes on January 23, 2008 at 4:05 AM
Comment pages: