Video: Star Trek XI Teaser
posted at 7:23 pm on January 18, 2008 by Bryan
Some enterprising soul managed to capture this when it played in front of Cloverfield today. Bless ‘em. And for a Star Trek film it looks…cool.
I’m sure I’ll get over that once I see the actual film.
The grittiness in what little you can see suggests that the Trek producers may have learned a thing or two from Serenity/Firefly. That would be a good direction to go in.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
But I don’t wanna wait until Christmas!!!!!!!
Jim708 on January 18, 2008 at 7:26 PM
Another? Aren’t they played out by now? And when I watch the original series, no man that ever sat in the Captain’s chair was hotter than Kirk. IMHO
i actually got chills when the original them played.
CrimsonFisted on January 18, 2008 at 7:27 PM
them = theme Preview is my friend, preview is my friend.
CrimsonFisted on January 18, 2008 at 7:28 PM
“Christmas 2008″
Heh…I’ll go just to reward them for not saying “Winter Festival 2008″.
Jack M. on January 18, 2008 at 7:29 PM
at least we don’t have to worry about Joel Schumacher
tomas on January 18, 2008 at 7:30 PM
Eh not enough to tell. Trek started killing itself when it booted Ron Moore (Of Battlestar Galactica fame) and kept Brannan Braga. The plots were all retreads of each other.
Moore learned to tell a Sci Fi story as a novel rather an 20 short stories slapped together.
William Amos on January 18, 2008 at 7:30 PM
This is a “Prequel”. Kirk is back in the saddle of the original Enterprise assuming command from Captain Christopher Pike. They also show how Kirk beat the Kobiyashi Maru test.
Oh God! I’m sick! I actually know all that stuff!! :(
evilned on January 18, 2008 at 7:34 PM
What can one tell from THAT clip? NOTHING!
SouthernGent on January 18, 2008 at 7:34 PM
(Ach, ptui! John Glenn reference, blecch!)
Not much to go on, but if they don’t emulate the visual/design style of the original series, I’ll consider it a failure.
snickelfritz on January 18, 2008 at 7:34 PM
Thank god movies don’t hype and jive daily for 10 or 11 months before they come out.
BL@KBIRD on January 18, 2008 at 7:35 PM
A handful of shots of men welding, and what looked like the Enterprise-A from the 1980s movies. I wonder how much of that, if any, is from the actual movie?
But yes, they do get brownie points for being bold enough in Hollywood to actually say “mankind” (via Neil A.) and “Christmas” in the same ad!
Ed Driscoll on January 18, 2008 at 7:35 PM
Ummm….for some reason, while I love science fiction, I have never been a freak for either Star Trek or Star Wars. I enjoy both though. Oh, but for some reason, those freaks are attracted into becoming my friends. I was lucky enough to be one of the first to see Star Wars episode I. Not becuase I camped out for a ticket, but because some of the freaks that did had someone cancel and picked me to come along. Wow! Anyway, I’ll see this when I see it. I’m sure I haven’t seen all of the others yet. This gives me time to do so.
Jay on January 18, 2008 at 7:36 PM
Hmmm…. Bad Robot…. sound familiar? or are you LOST…..
or sitting in a Feild of Clover???
anything these guys get into gets a bit gritty… Hope for an ageing franchise…
Romeo13 on January 18, 2008 at 7:36 PM
You are not alone. That was not Klingo-speak to me, I GOT it. I am sick too. If they pick a crappy kid to play Kirk, I am writing it off.
CrimsonFisted on January 18, 2008 at 7:39 PM
I’ve got my fingers crossed…. If Burman and Braga have had hands in it though, it will probably suck on ice.
liquidflorian on January 18, 2008 at 7:40 PM
Kini on January 18, 2008 at 7:41 PM
As a lifelong Star Trek fan, all I can say at the moment is…
wood
JimRich on January 18, 2008 at 7:43 PM
oh, and…they better get it right. I would hate for this movie to sour me on “Lost.”
JimRich on January 18, 2008 at 7:44 PM
The first official pic of the Enterprise HERE
Trivia: Anyone know the origin of “NCC-1701″?
JetBoy on January 18, 2008 at 7:45 PM
I feel good all over.
Mojave Mark on January 18, 2008 at 7:45 PM
Forget Obama. Did Chris Matthews cry went he saw this trailer? If not, he’s not an American.
Spirit of 1776 on January 18, 2008 at 7:50 PM
I am sure it’s on oversight and the ACLU will be contacting them shortly to demand a correction.
azcop on January 18, 2008 at 7:50 PM
This has been around for some time now.
Cast
Story
I CAN’T WAIT!!!
Kini on January 18, 2008 at 7:52 PM
Cool picture. And I used to know the answer to that trivia. Funny. I think I lost that information and replaced it with something useful like how to properly poach an egg. :)
CrimsonFisted on January 18, 2008 at 7:53 PM
Oh yeah baby! Bring it on – Star Trek in any form, is better than no Star Trek at all. I remember all the originals – watched em as a family. Good stuff!!!
KrisinNE on January 18, 2008 at 7:53 PM
Is it a new script, or a movie version of the book “Enterprise”?
Didn’t care much for it even though it was accepted by Roddenberry.
I just hope it has lots of new nifty ships.
I am a little embarassed that i kow a bunch of this stuff.
cozmo on January 18, 2008 at 7:53 PM
Enterprise NCC-1701 was a Constitution-class starship, right?
Kini on January 18, 2008 at 7:55 PM
There is a character on imdb “George Kirk”. That was the brother of James T I think.
I am a geek.
CrimsonFisted on January 18, 2008 at 7:56 PM
Marking my calander already.
Rode Werk on January 18, 2008 at 7:59 PM
Exactly. Sorry, Bryan, but I’m a sucker for Star Trek flicks, and I hate Hollywood and nearly everything they do. Science fiction — even bad sci-fi — is the exception. And this looks really cool.
Jaibones on January 18, 2008 at 7:59 PM
Check out IMDB for the current cast list.
I am totally there for Simon Pegg, as Scotty. Flippin’ brilliant. Will there be ZOMBIES?? :)
SHAWN OF THE ENTERPRISE!
tickleddragon on January 18, 2008 at 8:01 PM
KIRK & SPOCK `08
Kini on January 18, 2008 at 8:02 PM
There’s nine zillion rumors, but the semi-official word was that 1, 7, and 0 were easy to recognize and 2, 3, 5, 6, and 8 were easily confused.
Matt Jeffries says he settled on it being the 17th design model, serial number 01, thus 1701.
NC was based on US naval designations, and they added a C to represent the future peace/alliance between the US and the USSR (CCCP).
Thus, the Enterprise was the first of the 17th class of ships built by the world alliance created by the peace betwen the US and USSR.
Which kind of doesn’t make sense because the Constitution should have been 01 of the Constitution class. It should have been “Enterprise Class.”
But it’s fiction, so why should it make sense?
Merovign on January 18, 2008 at 8:02 PM
And to peg myself as a hopeless geek, they’ve always shown starship construction in spacedocks by people in spacesuits, in a vacuum.
This one shows people welding in atmosphere.
But it looks cooler that way.
Also, I hope they don’t screw the pooch like they did with voyager, and it would be nice to see a new series, as long as no one from the old series was ALLOWED to work on it.
The old Star Trek blood is hopelessly inbred. Make your homages to Roddenberry if you must, but don’t try to recreate what he did, ’cause what he did was so 60s it hurts.
Merovign on January 18, 2008 at 8:06 PM
Spock is not Constituationally eligible.
azcop on January 18, 2008 at 8:07 PM
Geek alert:
I am pretty sure its the registration number on Gene Roddenberry’s plane.
Read it somewhere.
cozmo on January 18, 2008 at 8:07 PM
On the trivia “NCC-1701″….yeah, there’s all kinds of rumors and speculation…
What I heard since I was a kid was this: Gene Rodenberry lived in my hometown of New Canaan, CT (where the “NCC” comes from) and “1701″ was the year the town was founded. Only problem with that is it wasn’t 1701, but 1801.
Right on!
JetBoy on January 18, 2008 at 8:07 PM
Amendments baby, amendments!
Kini on January 18, 2008 at 8:09 PM
Star Trek is a heathen show and all of you should be ashamed for watching the commie propaganda. If you ever feel like watching something good, I advise Stargate and Stargate SG-1 .
Bryan should be especially ashamed for not showing Zoomies the luv.
TheEJS on January 18, 2008 at 8:11 PM
I’ll be in my bunk.
sulla on January 18, 2008 at 8:13 PM
Stargate shows are like Andromeda and the like.
The characters are all too pretty to be taken as entertainment.
Kini on January 18, 2008 at 8:13 PM
Darn, I was hoping they might have a movie centered around Archer and co., but what’cha gon’ do?
BKennedy on January 18, 2008 at 8:21 PM
Wait Kini, you’re saying Colonel Jack O’Neil (or with two Ls) is a petty and shallow character when he’s a stealth warrior of the finest quality, risking his life to advance the goals of the nation, putting his country before himself, and making sure his people are his top priorty, all while showing integrity excellence and service before self? A character and show that was indeed supported by the US Air Force? As opposed to Captain “let me sleep with a different Moon princess slave every week, even risking the Enterprise” Kirk?
Gotcha.
Oh and Stargate is a movie also, not just a syndicated TV show.
TheEJS on January 18, 2008 at 8:22 PM
Dude.
Sylar as Spock will be weird. Pegg as Scotty will be fun!
PolitiNOOB on January 18, 2008 at 8:26 PM
FWIW, I’ve heard the current script is… problematic.
I’m hoping for re-wrires/re-shoots.
Bad time for a writers’ strike.
Karl on January 18, 2008 at 8:30 PM
Via search:NCC-1701 was the FAA registry number of a Waco biplane owned by Matt Jefferies, the chief designer on Star Trek
home alone on a Friday night
cozmo on January 18, 2008 at 8:32 PM
Dude, Stargate is sooooo johnny-come-lately.
Star Trek is timeless.
Kini on January 18, 2008 at 8:35 PM
Winona Ryder???!!! I think I’ll pass on this movie. When is the next installment of Chronicles of Narnia coming out again?
kiakjones on January 18, 2008 at 8:35 PM
I am a bit shocked you’d put this on here, actually! That teaser is shown at the Cloverfield movie only and hasn’t had a wider release.
Warner Todd Huston on January 18, 2008 at 8:35 PM
I’ll see it. That’s all I gotta say about that.
Dude. You can get some mileage with a BSG preference, but Stargate? Dude.
Have no fear. You’re hardly alone. But if you start quoting from “The Trouble With Tribbles”, you’re on your own.
SouthernDem on January 18, 2008 at 8:38 PM
Anyone else notice that Enterprise‘s warp nacelles are fronted by what appear to be … turbines?
Anthony Perez-Miller on January 18, 2008 at 8:49 PM
Actually, the George Kirk in the new movie is supposed to be Captain Kirk’s father. Captain Kirk’s brother was named George Samuel Kirk but went by “Sam” and was also played by William Shatner, albeit as a corpse. (He was killed on the planet Deneba by amoeba-like aliens in the TOS episode, “Operation: Annihilate!”)
ConBlog_NH on January 18, 2008 at 8:50 PM
Forget Star Trek. Just go see Cloverfield. Friggin’ awesome!
William Teach on January 18, 2008 at 8:56 PM
And what, my dear friend, did Jack want to name EVERY ship they ever commandeered? “Enterprise”! But Sam Carter always said no.
BTW not to nitpick, but if you are welding in spacedock, why would the sparks be falling, instead of continuing in the same direction?
I have no life, and Battlestar Galactica sucks, but it started out great.
redshirt on January 18, 2008 at 8:59 PM
I always liked Star Trek until I went to a Star Trek
ConventionNerd Fest in college.The Ori of Star Gate are the Islamists.
dentalque on January 18, 2008 at 9:00 PM
When is the next installment of Chronicles of Narnia coming out again?
kiakjones on January 18, 2008 at 8:35 PM
Six days before Metamucil Jones and the Jeweled Whatchamacallit.
thirtypundit on January 18, 2008 at 9:07 PM
Surely you want some Antarean Glow Water….
ScottG on January 18, 2008 at 9:12 PM
you know, there are a couple things that have always bothered me:
why are they painting the name on the ship before construction is complete?
and what designer thought it’d be a good idea to put tonnes of windows on a spaceship?
Canadian Imperialist Running Dog on January 18, 2008 at 9:13 PM
The new pic of the Enterprise looks cool. I just wish my dad lived to see it, missed it by about 2 yrs.
ThePrez on January 18, 2008 at 9:14 PM
What where you watching in the 80’s? They are made of transparent aluminum.
dentalque on January 18, 2008 at 9:17 PM
i don’t care.
jummy on January 18, 2008 at 9:20 PM
Because it looks really neat onscreen.
See answer to above question.
At least they figured out that space was dark in the first Trek movie and lit the thing up…because it looks really neat onscreen.
Haven’t really cared for a Trek flick since Kahn, but I do love the pretty spaceships.
cozmo on January 18, 2008 at 9:27 PM
in who’s conception of the future will people still be
a) stick welding…
b) a spaceship made of steel.
oh, i forgot. a steel spaceship with windows of invisible aluminium.
jummy on January 18, 2008 at 9:32 PM
I’ve been in the “wait-and-see” camp ever since it was first announced. Doctor Who has been filing in the void for me in the meanwhile (along with Torchwood), and ever since NBC canceled Journeyman, I’ve been bumming out.
Thank goodness for the American Idolization of the 2008 Presidential elections, or I would have been totally bored. ;-)
itzWicks on January 18, 2008 at 9:33 PM
HA is infested with Trek geeks. Who knew? (Yeah, me too.)
baldilocks on January 18, 2008 at 9:39 PM
They are made of Titanium or Neutronium or something like that. Not that steel would not work. No rain in space means any rust
dentalque on January 18, 2008 at 9:39 PM
I always wondered: suppose you’re in the transporter room about to beam down to the planet below. Just at the moment you begin to dematerialize, you fart. Does the gas beam down to the planet with you, or does it remain in the transporter room?
radjah shelduck on January 18, 2008 at 9:39 PM
No rain in space means no rust.
dentalque on January 18, 2008 at 9:40 PM
if you say so. i’m basing this on the fact that the guy in the teaser is welding with a stick.
i’m not even going to touch the rust thing. i’m going back to my original position: i don’t care.
jummy on January 18, 2008 at 9:49 PM
it materializes at the rosemont convention center where several dozen sexless nerds tackle and scramble over one another for the opportunity to huff it deep into their lungs.
jummy on January 18, 2008 at 9:52 PM
I know what they are made of but I am just not that familiar with 23rd century assembly techniques.
dentalque on January 18, 2008 at 9:53 PM
Okie-dokie, just enjoy the pretty spaceships.
and tight mini-dresses
and dark stockings
and the boots
and the green chicks.
cozmo on January 18, 2008 at 9:54 PM
i wish it were possible to “go home again” like that, but you just cant. well never see new original footage of a swashbuckling kirk moving on a well-stacked neon-green go-go chick in a gold lame’ minidress.
i just checked out the cast they have signed up. did you see who they have playing kirk? he can’t play macho. he has a carreer doing chickflicks and gillmore girls episodes to protect.
it’s like how the metrosexual antihero of the last bond film is the most we’ll ever recover of the original after the regrettable timothy dalton appogee of the 90′s.
jummy on January 18, 2008 at 10:02 PM
I use that to polish the flame gems.
:D
I am interested and will definitely go see it.
knivek on January 18, 2008 at 10:05 PM
somebody should do a screen treatment of stranger in a strange land.
jummy on January 18, 2008 at 10:06 PM
Thanks Bryan! I’ve been a Trekkie since day one. When we’re in Las Vegas, the Hilton Star Trek Experience is always the first stop.
Zorro on January 18, 2008 at 10:09 PM
jummy
Heck no, ya can’t go home again.
Ain’t never gonna’ match the original magic.
We went and got too sophisticated.
That doesn’t mean ya’ can’t enjoy the eye candy that a new version of the original NCC-1701..no A, B, C, or whatever.
Did I mention I really like the spaceships.
spaceships
cozmo on January 18, 2008 at 10:13 PM
those yours? nice work.
jummy on January 18, 2008 at 10:23 PM
Bah…. yer all wrong…
Best Sci Fi series ever has not even been mentioned…
Babylon 5….
Shadows would OWN the Borg…. LOL…
Vere Kodo!!!… I need a drinkk……
Romeo13 on January 18, 2008 at 10:30 PM
Yep, thanks.
Thats why I’m looking forward to this. Lots of new pretty spaceships, hopefully.
cozmo on January 18, 2008 at 10:35 PM
B5 was an excellent story from beginning till end.
Kini on January 18, 2008 at 10:49 PM
Why do some of your pretty ships look like they would run on batteries?
Kini on January 18, 2008 at 10:51 PM
Yep… basic story line was set for the 5 year run…
things in the first year foreshadowed (pun intended) things that were not explained until year 5…. pretty neat…
But my favorite episode was the one about the Two Techs… who were going around fixing stuff while the main plot happened in the background… novel approach to storytelling…
Romeo13 on January 18, 2008 at 10:54 PM
Star Trek was basically Roddenberry’s view on technology and how it could positively effect human kind. Because of technology disease and hunger were wiped out and humanity found that if it banded together they could accomplish great things. Earth society became a weird mix between socialism and capitalism. I’m not sure where to find it but there is a document some where that details this society and how it might work. In spite of that however Star Trek is in no way socialist propaganda. Anyone one thinks otherwise is a commie; there I said it!
KHAN!!!!!!!!!!!!
Optimus Prime on January 18, 2008 at 11:28 PM
I just want Bruce Lee to come back and do a great sequel to “Enter the Dragon” in which he ends up in an all Islamic Jihad martial arts tournament, and beats the crap out of 110,000 Jihadis, beats the body guards of all the bad guy leaders, and beats their best champions, then, in the finally, takes on hundreds of attackers, beating the crap out of them, while Chuck Norris, Jet Lee, Steven Segal, Mark Dascascos, The Shaolin Monks, the Jeet Kune Do guys, the Wing Chun guys, the Brazilian Jiu Jiutsu guys, the UFC guys, and a few others, as well as the Navy Seals, the US Marines, the Army Rangers, tne Brits, the Aussies, the Brazilians, and the Japanese come and join him as they all open a giant can of whoop ass on al Qaeda, Taliban, and company – handing Jihadis their irreversible defeat – their Waterloo.
William2006 on January 18, 2008 at 11:30 PM
By the way, for those who care about my previous fantasy film and real life wish, Bruce Lee passed away in the 1970s.
I do not expect him to come back and make another “Enter the Dragon.”
William2006 on January 18, 2008 at 11:32 PM
I must chime in here, pointless as it is to do so.
Babylon 5 and the new Battlestar Galactica are far better than Star Trek and Star Wars.
The B5 episode “The Coming of Shadows” catapulted B5 well beyond anything Star Trek ever dreamed of. The closest the Federation ever got was when Deep Space 9 started to emulate B5 (in its own way) with the Dominion War.
That said, I have seen every ST and SW movie (including Phantom Menace-the horror!) and I am certain I will see this one as well.
Lancer on January 18, 2008 at 11:43 PM
Naval Construction Contract #1701
Frozen Tex on January 18, 2008 at 11:48 PM
Wallpaper anyone?
Kmarion on January 18, 2008 at 11:57 PM
I’m looking forward to this as well. As much as I enjoyed all of the shows, the series needs new blood and it needs to be grittier.
One of the most impressive aspects of Star Trek though has always been the passion of the fans. When you have groups of fans gathering together to make their own non-profit episodes based on Star Trek, that’s love.
I’ve seen more than a few of the fan films, and they are very well done. The quality of the special effects really impressed me. Links to episodes here.
Canadian Infidel on January 19, 2008 at 12:18 AM
I remember that episode, a day in the life of the two maintenance workers. I have many favorites, the final Vorlon and Shadow battle scenes were some of the best computer graphics yet. Sheridan final voyage to Coriana 6 where Shadow war ended and Lorien takes him to the galaxy’s rim. The decommissioning of B5 was sad. B4 going back in time…. so may good stories.
It was good story telling, and that’s why I liked Star Trek. Good story telling. Roddenberry had a good vision of technology and what the future could be. A wagon train to the stars.
I owe my direction in life to Star Trek and it’s vision.
Kini on January 19, 2008 at 12:51 AM
President Schwarzenegger took care of that back in 2017 (along with allowing the import of Cuban cigars).
The welding is a metaphor, people. The movie is under construction, not the Enterprise.
Did like the Nimoy voice-over.
Denny Crane!
B26354 on January 19, 2008 at 1:53 AM
That’s a ginormous can.
baldilocks on January 19, 2008 at 1:55 AM
I saw two movies tonight, (1/18/08) Cloverfield and 27 dresses. Guess which one was better.
Im afraid for this movie because it is NOT a movie adaption of the book “Enterprise”. I think this will be like star wars ep III. No matter how bad it is people will go see it. But I am hoping it will be good.
(Answer: 27 dresses was better. Cloverfield was simply a Godzilla version of the Blairwitch with an equally dissapointing ending.)
Bladerunner1701 on January 19, 2008 at 2:23 AM
Agreed. There were MANY pro-American thing in the original Star Trek. One of my favorites was the spread of Democracy throughout the world in the future such as the fact Uhura was born in the United States of Africa.
Bladerunner1701 on January 19, 2008 at 2:28 AM
DS9 was the best of the Star Trek series. There was a long story line, but they still put twists in every episode to make it very interesting. No real stars in the cast, just solid acting and writing.
Snidely Whiplash on January 19, 2008 at 2:41 AM
Star Trek the TV series was fun, the movies were overdone.
Star Wars was ‘cute’ but over hyped.
Babylon 5 was interesting, but the episodes were hard to find.
BattleStar Galactica started out great, then seemed to lose it’s magic. The character development seemed to get twisted.
The Star Trek imitators were just that; imitators.
Serenity was an interesting idea; couldn’t seem to get any traction.
Farscape was clue less. Claudia Black is .. uhm.. attractive.
StarGate the TV series was outstanding. It added SciFi window dressing to the ‘Perils of Pauline’ formula. Without Richard Dean Anderson, it is a different show. They developed several interesting story lines that have not been explored in any other TV SciFi that I’ve seen. The movie was good, also.
StarGate Atlantis, as a spin off, isn’t so bad. You just have to be willing to believe.
The 5th Element, just plain fun.
Pitch Black, and The Chronicles of Riddick have become my current favorite escapes from reality.
As though anyone cares about my opinion.
I just wish I could have kept my 30 year collection of Analog. The pain of discarding all those stories still haunts me. No storage room, you see. Unfortunately, Analog went leftist/socialist/fantasy in the ’70′s.
Oh, yea, Dune: the version by Laurentiis sucked, really.
The version by John Harrison was way off target. The Children of Dune by Greg Yaitanes was nearly perfect. But the Book was better.
Somebody should do Heinlein’s “Time enough for love” as a TV series, but leave the sex out of it.
If you have the time, watch the NASA channel for the real stuff.
rockhauler on January 19, 2008 at 3:00 AM
Sorry for the book but- saw it tonight (Cloverfield) and just had to sound off on what I thought.
Tell ya what- after getting back a while back from theater (saw it at Edgewater, across the Hudson from midtown itself which of crouse, kinda added something to things), and sipping “pleasantly nervously” (yet damn enjoyably) on a nice glass of 10 year Taylor tawny- if J.J. Abrams is involved with this new Star Trek, and I’m near certain he is, it is going to be different from any expectations you may have.
Cloverfield’s not going to be for everyone, but I have a sneaky suspicion that fans of the monster genre really should see it, as it provides the kind of experience we as fans of such tales wish we could always see things from.
It’s first person all the way, and I dug it sizeably. The effects were stunning, and very well timed, wrapping themselves into being part of the story rather than standing on their own- which they easily could have. The tantalizing bits in which you see the monster (and his, eh, little buddies?) look and feel real. The mayhem, and being right in the midst of it feels very realistic.
Telling you, and perhaps this is just the fanboy who has ALWAYS wanted to watch this type of thing with my own eyes, I mean this was a break-thru experience not only for this genre- but for film in general.
For the first time, really ever for me, this was the first, entirely first person perspective that I ever bought & enjoyed because of that perspective. Not just because it was “artsy” or clever- but because it made me feel part of a mind-numbing experience- and in a BIG BIG way- for the monster genre.
They NAILED the pacing of it which was absolutely crucial for an entire film presented by handheld camera and from first person perspective all the way through. Well paced = doesn’t drive ya nuts and gives you well-timed breathers between shaky chase scenes- in which the shake just makes ya feel you’re running for your life right with everyone else.
Abrams has the stones to take that different look. Maybe if anyone can bring back the Enterprise & her crew, Mr. Cloverfield would be that guy.
ChipDWood on January 19, 2008 at 3:13 AM
Forgive B5 God. Romeo13 has done my job. The borg would have no chance, their shields unable to modify to Shadow weaponry. And when they try to run, the Shadows would throw a couple mines in the way. It wouldn’t being OWNing, it would be PWNing.
The best cinematic piece, heck best piece period has and will be forever Peter Jurasik as Londo describing the Earth-Minbari War.
BTW is Vere Kodo suppose to be Vir Cotto?
Dude. That’s just not cool. Gotta show AF some love (even if they invite the “ghost hunters” to Wright-Pat).
TheEJS on January 19, 2008 at 5:34 AM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »