Comments on: Video: Huckabee says the Constitution is a “living, breathing document” Update: Huck’s website disagrees

By: Furthermore…..

Furthermore….. — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:16:09 +0000

[...] (Source: Arkansas News Bureau, 11/21/03) • He referred to the Constitution in this video as a “living, breathing document” as liberals do. Then later, Huckabee’s websites stated: “I firmly believe that the Constitution [...]

By: Huckabee Caught on Tape - “Constitution is a Living Document”

Huckabee Caught on Tape - “Constitution is a Living Document” — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:41:33 +0000

[...] it seems that Huckabee is a bit of a flip-flopper on one of the most sacred of conservative (and GOP) issues. During an interview with CNN, Huckabee [...]

By: Entelechy

Entelechy — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:39:27 +0000

HE chose sides in this fight… and my side is the one who wants NO religion to CONTROL things…

Romeo13 on January 19, 2008 at 10:48 AM

Romeo13, +1

By: ‘A LIVING, BREATHING DOCUMENT’ « Texas Hold ‘Em Blogger

‘A LIVING, BREATHING DOCUMENT’ « Texas Hold ‘Em Blogger — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:55:23 +0000

[...] Huckster disagrees with his own website, which prompts Bryan Preston to ask: [W]ill his excuse be that he didn’t write that part of his own web site, or that he didn’t [...]

By: Hot Air » Blog Archive » Audio: Fred hammers Huckabee for his “living, breathing Constitution” remark

Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:40:39 +0000

[...] to Huckabee and gets at a problem with Huck’s much discussed remark that I didn’t hit yesterday — that if you’re in touch with the conservative movement, you know not to insert the [...]

By: right2bright

right2bright — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:35:08 +0000

I like him because of his strong sense of morality and the fact that he is a man of God who can clearly hear and follow the Word of God(an absolutely vital necessity in our next president)

I like the fact that he is the most elouquent speaker in both parties and writes all of his own speeches.

HaraldHardrada on January 18, 2008 at 11:39 PM

Too bad he couldn’t tell the truth here, he does not have a degree in theology…oh yeah, it’s okay for him to lie, he’s a “Christian”.

“I’m as strong on terror as anybody. In fact I think I’m stronger than most people because I truly understand the nature of the war that we are in with Islamofascism. These are people that want to kill us. It’s a theocratic war. And I don’t know if anybody fully understands that. I’m the only guy on that stage with a theology degree. I think I understand it really well.”

Well here is another problem, he not only lies, but lies about something that can be so easily tracked with timelines…but he can do this he is a “Christian”, so it just must have been another mistake.

Days later, Huckabee defended his gaffe by misrepresenting the timeline of his mistake, quipping that the “report was released at 10:00 in the morning, the president hadn’t seen it in four years and I’m supposed to see it four hours later.

Keep the faith you Hucksters, certainly his history and his actions do not support his words that he uses in his stump speeches…But hey, he has some funny quips, when he doesn’t know the answer.

By: Zorro

Zorro — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:31:31 +0000

Everyday he keeps proving that he is a featherweight politician. He is not worthy to lead us.

By: right2bright

right2bright — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:17:00 +0000

Skidd on January 18, 2008 at 10:13 PM

Okay bigshot. What do you believe in if you don’t God created it as the Bible teaches? You think evolution is true???

apacalyps on January 18, 2008 at 10:19 PM

Well, first of all you don’t know what I believe.
If you could read, you would have seen I was talking about Huck, and him not being a conservative. It shows that brains don’t play into it, the evang. that are supporting him are basing it on faith, and faith alone, not brains.
See, he is against many of the conservative planks:
He raises taxes
Wants more government
Open border advocate (oh wait, he is willing to concede to ship them back for 24 hrs., before allowing them to returen)
Believes in a “living” consitution, or not…he isn’t consistent, so he doesn’t have a postition.
More feds in the classroom
Want more? That should be enough “planks” removed to create an empty platform.
He is not a conservative, not by any standards, so I am saying his support is on the faith that he will, not that he has.
Get it? Now learn to be discerning, learn that attacking Huck is not attacking Christians…he does not represent me.
Here is one more little tidbit.
Does the New Testament teach that you can’t serve two masters?
You can’t be a political leader, and a religious leader…the two are independent. Otherwise instead of Jesus Christ our Lord, we would be saying President Jesus Christ.
Christ stayed away from politics, and a man that espouses religion, should do that same…why? Because you can’t serve two masters.
Now get off your Christian high horse, you won’t find me debating you on evolution, the fact the Christ is my saviour, that He sacrificed his life for your and me, but I will argue that saying Huck is a conservative is based purely on faith and not fact…look at his record, not his words…Christ warned you about those kind of guys also.
Now go practice what you preach.

By: JellyToast

JellyToast — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:56:43 +0000

Yeah,,, It doesn’t need interpretation, but I will interpret it further anyway,,,
“Every candidate should be able to say whatever they want without anyone correcting them, debating them, telling the other side or opposing them in anyway whatsoever. No person should be allowed to even utter the name of us candidates, because that is how high and holy we are! Our names are precious! We are holy! None should appose us!
Furthermore, I also would support a law banning direct eye contact with a candidate! Average or below average citizens have no business looking directly into the eyes of candidates! Average and below average citizens need to keep their eyes looking down and to the front of themselves at all times, especially when they are fortunate enough to be in the presence of a candidate!
This will also have a positive effect on the nations health care expenditures as fewer citizens will fall while walking.
Of course, it goes without saying, a citizen will always be expected to look into the eyes of a candidate, should that candidate instruct an officer of the law to bring the citizen before the candidate for questioning! We all know how dishonest the average citizen can be!

By: aero

aero — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:49:37 +0000

You Huckabee supporters really, really scare me. Notice I didn’t say “you evangelicals” or “you Christians” or “you social cons,” because I’m those things and I adamantly don’t agree with you. It is HUCKABEE SUPPORTERS who are scary and wrong, not all Christian Conservatives. Stop trying to create tribal warfare by lumping yourselves in with all evangelicals or all Christians. You are people who got scared and angry when you thought Giuliani was being forced on you. Huckabee is your revenge. Stop it. Seriously. You either have blinders on and can’t see Huckabee’s unviability, or you know full well how unacceptable he is and you’re supporting him for the express purpose of destroying the Reagan Coalition and exerting your power in a fractured and weakened party. Either way, you’re the problem, and it is immoral of you to try to take other Christians/Evangelicals with you when you leave.

By: Romeo13

Romeo13 — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:48:40 +0000

HaraldHardrada on January 19, 2008 at 4:07 AM

LOL… I’ll feed the troll one last time…

My arguement is fine… and I notice you don’t speak to the arguement, but just dismiss it as flawed, which it is not.

HE said he would bring the Constitution in line with God’s law… not me…

I would have no problem with him bringing up those Amendments at all… he can argue them all he wants… but as soon as he give his side the mandate of heaven? And uses that as an arguement to elect him???

Don’t you see? If he is on the side of the Lord, and you don’t agree with him, you are by definition on the side of the Devel… you are EVIL… just as YOUR rhetoric on this site has alluded too.

HE chose sides in this fight… and my side is the one who wants NO religion to CONTROL things… or be used as a whip to goad poeple into unthinking acceptance of someones opinion, because in that way lies Theocracys…

By: Buy Danish

Buy Danish — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:41:15 +0000

No wonder Huck’s air-kissing McCain. They’re like to peas in a pod when it comes to screwing around with the First Amendment.

Then you are voting to kill little babies. Fred is not against abortion. Abortion is murder and Thompson would allow people in each state to decide their own abortion laws. Duh!

apacalyps on January 18, 2008 at 10:23 PM

And that idiotic statement is an example of Irreducible Stupidity.

By: awesum

awesum — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:01:01 +0000

Gomer Huckabee……

http://www.flickr.com/photos/21615320@N06/2203797082/

By: csdeven

csdeven — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:03:21 +0000

evil?
divisive?
despicable?

Unbelievable.

apacalyps on January 19, 2008 at 1:49 AM

And he’s a religious gibot and I don’t care what faith he is. He is intolerant, a hypocrite, and he is a liar.

By: Entelechy

Entelechy — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:40:22 +0000

Untill we spring alive…and the dream of America preys on my bones.

By: MB4

MB4 — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:00:41 +0000

At some point MB4 will come by and say something similar to this “No, no, no, my little one, Hillary and Obama will not destroy the republic…and maybe, just maybe another Ronald Reagan will emerge…”

Entelechy on January 19, 2008 at 12:53 AM

No, no, no, my little one, Hillary and Obama will not destroy the republic…and maybe, just maybe another Ronald Reagan will emerge…

If we wait for the darkest hour.

By: HaraldHardrada

HaraldHardrada — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:07:15 +0000

thus the statement of bringing the Constitution in line with God’s Law (HIS INTERPRETATION OF IT!!!)… and thats my problem.

Romeo13 on January 19, 2008 at 2:00 AM

Proposing a constitutional amendment banning abortion and a constitutional amendment affirming marriage is only between a man and a woman is pretty specific.

Your argument is flawed.

By: Delmarva Dealings

Delmarva Dealings — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 08:41:17 +0000

Huckabee Caught on Tape – “Constitution is a Living Document”…

…

By: ComMITTed to Romney! » Huckabee: The Constitution is a “Living, breathing document”

Sat, 19 Jan 2008 07:18:37 +0000

[...] anybody in the MSM going to call Huckabee on this stuff? (H/T: [...]

By: Romeo13

Romeo13 — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 07:00:24 +0000

Skidd on January 19, 2008 at 1:25 AM

In case you see this tomorow… and to finish my point…

In your answer, you attempted to differentiate things as theological… and somthing other???

Key here is that at one time or another, slavery was legal… burning witches was legal… at times it was OK to pay an indulgance and literaly get away with murder… these were all both LEGAL and Theological positions…

Our founding fathers decided that NO man’s religious or philisophical beliefs should be manifest… its the Law, and Rights of the people which take priority…

But, Huck wants to bring the theological into the legal… thus the statement of bringing the Constitution in line with God’s Law (HIS INTERPRETATION OF IT!!!)… and thats my problem.

By: apacalyps

apacalyps — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:52:52 +0000

Seriously ArmageddonHuck, do you take us for fools?

BKennedy on January 19, 2008 at 12:13 AM

BKennedy, you keep putting forth that same old rhetoric spewed from the mouths of the GOP elite which is that Huckabee’s “too liberal” to make proper decisions, notably on the border, big vs. small gov’t, spending, entitlements and crime, blah blah, blah…”

By: HaraldHardrada

HaraldHardrada — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:52:34 +0000

Exactly

By: apacalyps

apacalyps — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:49:06 +0000

apacalyps,

I’m an evangelical. I have no hatred for evangelicals. I have some exasperation right now, and I think your statement, “I can smell your anti-Evangelical hate a mile away,” to be quitethe wrong thing to say, both in tone and in content.

INC on January 19, 2008 at 12:12 AM

I do not take that back one inch. I have no problem with a person disagreeing and not voting for Huckabee. Fine. I’m glad you don’t have EDS (Evangelical Derangement Syndrome) but some do, and I’m sorry, but those are just the facts.

I feel like I’m on the DailyKos. Just change Huckabee to Bush.

evil?
divisive?
despicable?

Unbelievable.

By: apacalyps

apacalyps — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:41:01 +0000

You’re a riot. Do you take your lines from Star Wars movies?

MadisonConservative on January 19, 2008 at 12:11 AM

No brother, but this is a battle between the light side and dark side. Apparently, you and some of the others here have been seduced by the dark side of the Force. This is no surprise because the Force can have a strong influence on the weak-minded.

There is nothing here for you anymore now MadisonConservative. Come join the Huckabee team and learn the ways of the Force and become a Jedi like the rest of us.

By: apacalyps

apacalyps — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:31:48 +0000

For the record, while I support Huckabee I’m not too thrilled with his comments about McCain. I have a feeling though this has more to do with McCain’s military service and the fact they are both running clean ad campaigns against one another.

I have nothing against McCain personally, but he would be a DISASTER for this country if elected. McCain is a liberal.