Comments on: Video: BDS/CDS on the House floor

By: Reaps

Reaps — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:37:27 +0000

129,000? After, what, 3 weeks? Wow, that’s a lot!

..wait a minute.

By: Black Adam

Black Adam — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:35:44 +0000

Please impeach. Please. This would be great.

By: Captain America

Captain America — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:41:36 +0000

Snowball meet hell

By: jgapinoy

jgapinoy — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:15:20 +0000

Lesser-known Dems are acting like this to keep the nutroots happy & hopeful. They won’t really impeach because it would hurt them in Nov.

By: Highwayman

Highwayman — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:35:37 +0000

I can’t find the puking smiley.

By: Grayson

Grayson — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:08:09 +0000

As they say, sh*t or get off the pot. They’ve been threatening it for what seems like the entirety of his Presidency. Either do it, or be quiet.

By: Big John

Big John — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:58:39 +0000

In answer to Wexler’s opening questions…a resounding “No”. And as far as holding anyone in contempt, I hold you, Mr. Wexler, and your majority Congress in contempt. STFU you turd.

By: joeswampy

joeswampy — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:55:12 +0000

Would they just frickin stop talking about impeachment and do it already if they can. If there is no evidence then just STFU.

By: 4shoes

4shoes — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:06:53 +0000

Wexler is obviously bound up by the new items on the lunch room menu.

csdeven on January 17, 2008 at 12:24 PM

Heh, does seem that way.

By: Entelechy

Entelechy — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:46:02 +0000

Mr. Big Ego Wexler, and his, believe that more impeachments will dilute the most memorable one in history, the Cigarman’s.

You know, someone should volunteer to be Hot Air’s Official Quartermaster. You know, Lysol, bleach, censored internet links, Mohammed Bobbleheads, black market vomit buckets…

RushBaby on January 17, 2008 at 12:34 PM

RB, congratulations on your new HA assignment :)

By: oakpack

oakpack — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:27:18 +0000

I told ya……I told ya we had to stop this when they landed at Roswell. But no, we let it keep happening. We even let Ohio elect one of em to Congress. Now they’ve landed in Florida and are taking office.
I told ya………I told ya

By: SoulGlo

SoulGlo — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:34:14 +0000

That’s right Dems. Waste the country’s time with Impeachment talk. That way, more Republican voters will be emboldened and will vote in November.

By: ThePrez

ThePrez — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:13:41 +0000

I also hold myself in contempt of Congress!

IMPEACH ThePrez!

By: Brat

Brat — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:00:47 +0000

Smokescreen Alert!

So this is what Grandma Mimi, Dingy Harry and their Do-Nothing-Minions cooked up over the break so that they could have another Do-Nothing session, while eating their gourmet organic lunches paid for by us, in hopes of a Dem POTUS come next year.

By: sulla

sulla — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:56:28 +0000

I’ve loved to hate Wexler since the LAST impeachment spectacle.

What a piece of mental Jell-O this dolt is.

By: morganfrost

morganfrost — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:41:29 +0000

Hmmm… Most of what he seems to be saying is deranged lunatic babble (he even suggested that Code Pink is patriotic!).

I did notice that, at one semi-lucid moment, he was demanding that certain people be held “in contempt of Congress.” Is there a way that I could get in on that? I certainly have contempt for Congress.

By: Attila (Pillage Idiot)

Attila (Pillage Idiot) — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:32:10 +0000

Here it is in a nutshell: Guy’s on the Judiciary Committee. Coupla folks in the White House aren’t doing what the Committee wants. Basically telling the Committee to pound sand. He’s pissed.

By: peacenprosperity

peacenprosperity — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:29:36 +0000

They have to0 impeach Cheney, since if they do Bush first they will have their worse nightmare as president.

They have no intention of impeaching anyone. It’s all about perception just like all of the Bush “scandals”. They know they have no grounds. What they are aiming for is future use against republicans and conservatives. They can say “Remember all the talk about impeachment?” or “Bush was nearly impeached.” It is 1984 people and reality does not matter only perception and the control of the language. Control language and you control history.

By: Dr.Cwac.Cwac

Dr.Cwac.Cwac — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:19:45 +0000

History demands that we take action because the case against Vice President Cheney is far stronger than the illegalites surrounding Watergate when compared to the petty and partisan allegations made against President Clinton by Ken Starr and the GOP Congress.”

Translation: Republicans badddddd. Democrats goooddddd!!!!

We have a looming economic crisis and a war against radical jihadism (that started way before G-Dub was in office), and this liberal baggadouche wants to impeach Cheney? America, more specifically Florida, you get the kind of government you elect.

Maybe Cheney should reach to the fine Congressmen Wexler. Do you think he likes to hunt?

By: KBird

KBird — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:13:31 +0000

Code Pink(o) and After Downing Street cited as credible support?

Barkeep, I’ll have what he’s having!

JamesLee on January 17, 2008 at 12:10 PM

I love it, way to go.

By: TroubledMonkey

TroubledMonkey — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:06:38 +0000

Fla must love this guy.

By: scottm

scottm — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:04:20 +0000

“…And the evidence only will determine the outcome”
If that were the case, then the evidence should have already determined that there’s no reason to impeach. The Plame Affair showed pretty clearly that the claims against the VP were baseless. The idea of manipulating Iraq intel has been investigated several times and found nada. But…let’s just check that Sen Intel Com Phase II report to be sure-you know, the one that Sen Reid had the doors to the Sen closed to rant and rave that the Bush Admin was blocking. Yeah, well Dems have had the Sen for a year now. Where’s the report? Or how about the independent and bi-partisan WMD commission that investigated that aspect of the intel? No evidence of manipulation etc. What a friggin sham.

Oooooo 189,000 signatures. I wonder how many signatures there are demanding yet another investigation into the Roswell UFO crash?

Honestly, this is a big deal. Impeachment is a big deal, and by STILL ranting about it and pushing it irregardless of what it does to the nation, and despite being factually baseless those who advocate and demand it are clearly willing to go forth with it. They should not be dismissed exclusively as loons, but as people who are sorely misled, very upset, willfully ignorant, closed-minded liberals, and who are so politically alienated and frustrated that they will put the nation’s welfare at risk to satisfy a 10yr old frustration regarding a blue dress.

Very sad, very serious, not an accidental move on the Dems’ part.

By: Canadian Imperialist Running Dog

Canadian Imperialist Running Dog — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:03:00 +0000

For crying out loud, someone tell these idiots who were supposed to have been elected to Congress for a reason to knock off the impeachment talk and get down to the business they were put there in Congress to deal with by the voters in the first place. The economy would be a good start.

Why? the democrats got a clear mandate from their vocal supporters that they want impeachment, subsidies, pork, more pork, and even more pork. Anyway, it would be a good start if the government meddled in the economy less, not more.

By: Dusty

Dusty — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:59:09 +0000

I smell a 2009 “They would have been impeached if only we had had more time.”

All talk, no action. What a bunch of pansies.

By: swami

swami — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:58:40 +0000

189k signatures of 300m citizens equals less than 1% of the country. It sounds like the Paul and Kucinich for President supporters combined.

Note that he doesn’t say the 189k are registered voters too.

Congrats Wexler, you just made history for stupidity.